Memorandum for the Official Record

Subject: Metric Engineering of Weightless Warp Drive for USAF, RAF & IAF Fighters

From: Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D. (theoretical physics, UC degree)

To: MASINT, NID, DIA et-al

The Russians and Chinese are actively pursuing this line of inquiry as are the Indians allegedly at the Tata Institute primarily.

I am using the modern local frame-invariant Cartan forms math that is in Rovelli's "Quantum Gravity" book, in John Baez's "Gravity, Gauge, Knots" book, and in the appendices of Sean Carroll's new text book. Gennady is using the more cumbersome old-fashioned tensor indices method historically used by Einstein. The algebra is much simpler in the Cartan forms language but the results should be essentially the same.

I am also using the local gauge invariance principle that Gennady does not use explicitly. In addition to that I introduce spontaneous symmetry breakdown of the physical vacuum in which the Einstein-Cartan tetrad field is proportional to the "gradient" of the local macro-quantum coherent "supersolid" phase of the vacuum itself.

I smoothly join this to the standard model's Higgs field mechanism for the origin of the inertia of leptons and quarks via the Yukawa coupling. None of this "subspace" or "substratum" physics is in Gennady's low-energy semi-phenomenological effective c-number field theory approach historically used by Einstein 100 years ago before the modern physics was even developed.

On Sep 17, 2005, at 2:12 AM, Gennady Shipov wrote:

Dear Jack!

Let's made agreement about what torsion field is .

1. I work with the manifold of oriented points, instead of points manifold

of Riemann geometry.

My way of saying the above is locally gauge the 10-parameter Poincare group of global special relativity to get a 10-dimensional manifold for the configuration space of the "point" test particle. That is, we have 6 additional local scalar fields one for each element of the Lie algebra of the local Lorentz group O(1,3). These scalar fields form the elements of the antisymmetric Diff(4) tensor torsion 2-form

T(x) = T(x)uvdx^u/\dx^v = De(x) = de(x) + W(x)/\e(x)

D = d + W(x)/

is the Diff(4) covariant exterior derivative, /\ is Cartan's exterior product

Diff(4) is locally gauged T4

The Poincare group is T4*O(1,3)

Tuv(x) = (hG/c^3)arg(Vacuum ODLRO)[,u,v]

,u is ordinary partial derivative, [ ] is the antisymmetric commutator

Torsion means that the mixed 2nd-order partial derivatives of the mean Goldstone phase of the local physical vacuum (post-inflation) order parameter are not equal, e.g. Hagen Kleinert's "multi-valued gauge transformations", "Dirac strings", Michael Berry's "phase singularities", Abrikosov's "branch cut phase jumps" for lattices of magnetic vortices in Type II superconductors (ref. "Topological Quantum Mechanics" David Thouless).

e(x) = Einstein-Cartan 1-form tetrad field.

W(x) = Spin-connection equivalent to the Levi-Civita connection.

e(x)' = e(x) + S(x) = 1 + B(x) + S(x)

B(x) is the compensating 1-form tidal geodesic deviation curvature gauge potential from locally gauging T4 to Diff(4).

S(x) is the compensating 1-form torsion gauge potential from locally gauging O(1,3) to what for now I will call O*(1,3).

By DEFINITION

De(x) = de(x) + W(x)/\e(x) = 0

Therefore B(x) determines W(x).

T(x) = D'e'(x) = dS(x) + W(x)/\S(x) + S(x)/\(1 + B(x) + S(x))

Where D' = D + S(x)/

when S(x) = 0 then T(x) = 0

Therefore, the torsion 2-form T(x) depends on both the curvature W(x) spin connection and the torsion potential S(x).

The Einstein-Hilbert action density is the 4-form

R(x)/\e(x)/\e(x) + /\zpfe(x)/\e(x)/\e(x)/\e(x)

where the curvature 2-form is

R(x) = DW(x) = dW(x) + W(x)/\W(x)

Einstein's exotic vacuum field equation from the action principle is the 3-form equation

R(x)/\e(x) + /\zpfe(x)/\e(x)/\e(x) = 0

However, the Bianchi identities are

DR(x) = 0

But we also have

De(x) = 0

Therefore, obviously /\zpf must be a true constant when S(x) = 0.

This all changes when we have S(x) =/= 0

Define

R'(x) = D'(W(x) + S(x)) = dW(x) + dS(x) + (W(x) + S(x))/\(W(x) + S(x))

The new Bianchi identity is

D'R'(x) = 0

Note, that in ordinary 1915 GR where S(x) = 0

DR(x) = 0 (Diff(4) analog of Maxwell's U(1) dF = 0)

D*R(x) = *J(x) (Diff(4) analog of Maxwell's U(1) d*F = *J)

* = Hodge dual

Local conservation of stress-energy current densities is

D^2R(x) = D*J(x) = 0 (Diff(4) analog of Maxwell's U(1) d^2*F = d*J = 0)

Absolute parallelism means, obviously

R'(x) = 0

2. On the manifold of oriented points the geometry absolute parallelism ,

which possesses Ricci torsion Omega^i_jk (object anholomomity on Schouten)

is set.

I do not know that old cumbersome formalism. I prefer the above more elegant simpler more powerful formalism because I am definitely a "Lazy Dog" from the "Olympia Academy." ;-)

3. I name as a torsion field Ricci rotational coefficients T^i_jk, which

represent contorsion tensor of spaces of absolute parallelism.

In Cartan language

Tuv = Tuv^a&a

&a is a co-form vector field basis in the tangent space.

You can then write

Tuv^w = Tuv^ae'^wa

I use u,v,w for 0,1,2,3 in base space and i,j,l = 1,2,3 in a spacelike slice 3-geometry.

4. The geometry of absolute parallelism can be set by localization of

non-uniform Lorentz group (or Poincare's group).

I need to see your equations for that to understand your words.

5. Torsion field in my theory describes inertial properties of mass.

Operating by torsion fields, it is possible to change inertial mass of an

object.

Why change it? It's very dangerous to change inertial mass because then you change e/m ratios and as shown by Barrow & Tipler, by Paul Davies, by Martin Rees et-al, you destroy matter in a huge WMD explosion that can even destroy our entire universe. See, for example, "Our Final Hour" Chapter 11 by Sir Martin Rees. My idea is to leave m alone and simply change the shape of the local timelike geodesic glide path as I tried to explain to James Woodward in the previous message. Indeed you can change it by changing the intensity of the Higgs field on the scale of 1-fermi but we want to avoid doing so at all costs or else we will destroy the entire universe. That's a good enough reason for ET to be here to make sure we do not destroy them too!

6. Torsion fields create local Riemann curvature of space, therefore

operating by torsion fields, it is possible to operate by local Riemann

curvature and thus to carry out weightless or inertialess.

Jack, from my point of view you are right both as in my theory weightless

and inertialess is the same.

What I mean by "weightless" is simply (LC) ~ 0 for the occupants of the ship, i.e. no g-forces felt inside the ship in a dog fight. The UFO makes sharp turns at tremendous speeds that would rip a jet fighter apart from the g-force yet inside the crew is effectively "standing still" weightless in free float. It's the idea of the Alcubierre warp drive solution taken to the next step of finesse.

Shipov Gennady.

----- Original Message -----

From: "james f woodward"

To:

Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:59 PM

Subject: Re: Weightless Warp Drive

I said EFFECTIVELY inertialess. And that is correct. Weightless is not

correct.

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:41:59 -0700 Jack Sarfatti

writes:

means you can dogfight without a pressure suit. Stop talking about

it? Why? So that the USAF will lose the War in Space? Woodward here

confuses weight W with inertia m.

W = mg

only works for a non-geodesic.

"The distinctive thing about the metric(s) you're interested in

is that they render things/regions effectively inertialess. Yes,

inertialess. :-)" Woodward

On a geodesic g = 0 but m is still what it always is as in e/m for

example.

I ignore SR corrections for now.

Woodward above says m = 0 on the geodesic with g =/= 0 - that is

wrong physics.

In GR g ~ c^2(LC)^i00

i = 1,2,3

(LC) is the torsion-free Levi-Civita connection that is zero on a

timelike geodesic.

On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:40 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

On Sep 16, 2005, at 8:50 PM, james f woodward wrote:

"You've got to stop talking about "weightless warp drive". Everything in orbit is "weightless", but none of it can go cavorting around the cosmos."

I am talking about metric engineering, i.e. shaping the geodesic as desired for

flight.

ET to Professor Woodward:

The basic equation is

Guv + /\zpfguv = 0

By manipulating /\zpf with phase-locking to the vacuum phase,

/\zpf(x) ~ (Vacuum Coherence Length)^-1(Control Coherence Length)

^-1 cos(Vacuum Phase(x) - Control Phase(x))

Vacuum Phase(x) - Control Phase(x) = 2pi(Trapped flux at x/Quantum of flux)

you shape the local geodesic path of the ship as desired. That's what metric engineering means. I think even Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis understand that much? At least I hope so. To get more technical for everyone else. Woodward is stuck in the the test particle approximation in which the weightless geodesic motion of a ship cannot be changed by the ship itself. That is, the ship is a test particle that receives its marching orders from spacetime, but does not directly change the shape of space-time in its immediate vicinity. Warp drive changes all that!

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:36:25 -0700 Jack Sarfatti

writes:

Memorandum for the Record

Subject: The necessity of the Russian torsion fields for

weightless

warp drive of the UFOs.

On Sep 15, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:47 AM, a retired US Naval Intelligence

Officer wrote:

"Yes, and I applaud your efforts to extend GR to include torsion;

as you know, I too have always believed torsion is vital for

propellantless propulsion. Seems like some small scale

engineering experimental method is needed to test your math"

My math is quite solid. I mean my proof that you cannot have

weightless warp drive without the torsion field in the sense of

the Moscow physicist Gennady Shipov. That is, without Shipov's torsion, the residual zero point vacuum dark energy density field proportional to /\zpf cannot vary in space and time because of the 1915 GR Bianchi identities. Every physicist in the field will agree with that much. The good data on UFOs shows the reality of the torsion fields. No Paul Hill "acceleration field" without torsion fields.

The curved part of the tetrad field B ~ (hG/c^3)^1/2@(x)^a(Pa/ih)

where {Pa/ih} is the Lie algebra of T4 and @(x)^a are the 4 space-

time dependent phases from the local gauging of T4 -> Diff(4).

Similarly for the torsion 2-form T ~ (hG/c^3)@(x)^a^bSab where {Sab}

is the Lie algebra of O(1,3) and @(x)^a^b are the 6 space-time

dependent phases of the local gauging of O(1,3).

Also

B = Budx^u is a dimensionless 1-form for the curved part of the

Einstein-Cartan tetrad

Bu = Bu^a&a

T = Tuvdx^u/\dx^v

Tuv = Tuv^a&a

{&a} is the basis of 1-co-forms (tangent vectors) in the tangent space

{dx^u} is the basis of 1-forms in the base space

The Einstein-Cartan tetrad field is

e' = e + S

e = 1 + B

B = (hG/c^3)d(Goldstone Phase of Vacuum ODLRO Higgs Field)

S is the torsion 1-form and the problem is to find its relation to

the torsion 2-form

T = D'e' = de' + (W + S)/\e'

d1 = 0

W is the torsion-free spin connection of 1915 GR that is completely determined from B.

T = dB + dS + (W + S)/\(1 + B + S)

However by definition

dB + W/\(1 + B) = 0

Therefore, the basic curvature-torsion equation is

T = dS + W/\S + S/\(1 + B + S)

OK, I think I now have the correct formula.

Recall that 1915 GR is simply the EEP

guv(curved) = (Iu^a + B(x)u^a)nab(flat)(Iv^b + B(x)v^b)

"but Shipov's toy models don't appear to test your math."

I don't know.

From: Jack Sarfatti

Subject: Re: Exotic weapons torsion field R&D in Mainland China?

Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:16:47 -0700

Yes, but even more important I have the math down completely now

for all this stuff. The Chinese are BS'ing in that article. It's

flakey.

On Sep 13, 2005, at 12:49 PM, ... US Naval Intelligence, ret,wrote:

"Whether info or disfo, this is interesting and China is a

developing threat, much more so than many realize."

From: Jack Sarfatti

To: Kit Green ...

Subject: Exotic weapons torsion field R&D in Mainland China?

Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:18:33 -0700

Memorandum For The Record

Subject: Threat Assessment

http://www.halturnershow.com/ChineseDefenseMinisterTalksWarAgainstUS.html

The Chinese report below appears to be mostly disinformation &

misinformation for foreigners. That does not preclude real fire

covered by smoke and mirrors.

Important background information on the torsion physics

mentioned below is at

http://qedcorp.com/APS/zpf2005.pdf updated periodically

also Discussion Forum at http://stardrive.org

and in 3 books:

Destiny Matrix

Space-Time & Beyond II

Super Cosmos

http://amazon.com

On Sep 12, 2005, at 10:23 PM, Gennady Shipov wrote:

"Jack!

In China very quickly develop torsion technologies.

Look at the attachment."

Jack Sarfatti :

Of course, back then this was not understood. Bureaucrats like ... in DIA are holding USG back in this whole field in US Defense Effort. Meantime the Indians, Chinese, Iranians, Ukrainians and Russians are forging ahead. It's no accident that I was invited to publish in a book from the Ukranian Academy of Sciences in Kiev. Those guys are not stupid. The Chinese are really open to this stuff. Note the new Russian-Chinese

joint War Games. Gennady Shipov is attacked by some of his "KGB"

colleagues, but I now can prove that we do need his torsion field to make all of this advanced weaponry really work! We see the torsion weaponry out there in the UFO data of Bruce Maccabee, NIDS et-al. So someone knows how to do it and we don't.

Shipov Gennady:

"Jack!

In China very quickly develop torsion technologies.

Look the attachment."

My preliminary comments for the record, indeed my equations show the interplay of the Russian torsion fields with the zero point vacuum energy density that would probably explain the anomalous "cold fusion" data that in reality is release of dark energy if cold fusion exists.

"Xing•liu Jiang, Xiong•wei Wen, China Science School,

Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing

100083 and Li•jun Han, China Department of Materials Science

and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and

Astronautics, Beijing 100083

ABSTRACT

Highly localized nuclear activation in electrochemical

systems and other electrical discharge processes have been

observed by many laboratories in the world. This report is

an attempt to explain such anomalous phenomena by using

torsion field theory and axion model. Anisotopic behaviours

of radiation products, burst character, "heat after death"

of excess energy release in electrical discharge systems are

considered to be interpreted by the torsion coherence of

vortex dynamics with the zero point energy induced by

localized intense field emission of micro-protrusion ofthe

cathode, and the dynamic Casimir effect of transient

evolution of triple region of gas, liquid solution, and

electrode protrusion. Axion model and Primakoff's effect are

proposed for explanation of nuclear transmutation without

noticeable gamma radiation."

These allegations cannot be checked without the mathematics. Briefly here is the real story in terms of mainstream physics. We use the elegant local frame invariant Einstein-Cartan exterior differential forms mathematics for the tetrad gravity field that is the "square root" of Einstein's 1915

symmetric metric tensor field. The tetrad technique is analogous to the Dirac "square root" of the quantum Klein- Gordon equation. Note that the metric is the anti-commutator of the Dirac matrices and Einstein's curved space-time geometrodynamic field guv is a symmetric bilinear form in the Einstein-Cartan tetrad 1-form field e where

e = 1 + B

When B = 0 we have globally flat Minkowski space-time. According to the local equivalence principle there is no real gravity (i.e. geodesic deviation tidal curvature) in that limit. Technically B is the compensating gauge potential when global T4 of special relativity is replaced by local Diff(4). In addition using the charge neutral Vacuum ODLRO VEV Higgs-

Goldstone field for the spontaneous breakdown of SU(2)

hypercharge in the standard model we can write

B = (hG/c^3)^1/2d(Mean Goldstone Phase)

Goldstone Phase is a 0-form

No gravity & no inertia when h = 0 or 1/c = 0 even when G =/= 0.

Gravity and inertia are emergent "More is different" (P.W.

Anderson) properties of the spontaneous breakdown of SU(2)

hypercharge symmetry in the physical vacuum consistent with

the Standard Model explanation for inertia of quarks and leptons.

d is the Cartan exterior derivative, and we use the mean Goldstone Phase averaged over the internal indices of non- abelian SU(2).

The d^2 = 0 rule is suspended due to non-trivial multiply-

connected manifold cohomology in physical space and in VEV

local order parameter space. I call this "Flux without flux"

BTW like Wheeler's "Charge without charge". In Wheeler-

Feynman theory the gauge force connections are dynamically

redundant and are replaced by the source fields with advanced

light cone propagators. See Hoyle & Narlikar for1915 GR

version of Wheeler- Feynman elimination of the EM field for

the gravity case. Whether this 1940 classical idea survives

the transition to quantum field theory is an open question of

course.

Ref. John Baez, Gravity & Knots

Hagen Kleinert on "multi-valued gauge transformations"

Michael Berry "phase singularities"

Dirac Strings

Abrikosov phase jump branch cuts in physical space in Type II

superconducting magnetic vortex lattices

Therefore

F = dB =/= 0

If this were U(1) Maxwell EM field theory, the 4 Maxwell

equations would be in 2-lines

dF = 0 (metric independent - Faraday induction & no magnetic

monopoles laws)

d*F = *J (metric/constitutive material-dependent Ampere's & Gauss's laws)

* = Hodge dual p-form to N - p form in N-dim space-time.

hence

*d*F = J = current density 1-form

Local current density conservation is

d^2d*F = d*J = 0

Transition to gravity, i.e. General Relativity

W = spin connection

The Gennady Shipov torsion 2-form is

T = De = de + W/\e = dB + W/\(1 + B)

In 1915 GR

T = 0 , therefore W is determined completely by B.

In Gennady Shipov's theory O(1,3) is also locally gauged to give T =/ = 0, so now W depends on both B & T.

What is the torsion connection 1-form S?

If we use S = *dT we get

e' = e + S = 1 + B + S

Only use e to get EEP

guv = (1u^I + Bu^I)nIJ(1v^J + Bv^J) ?

If we use S = *DT we seem to get an infinite regress for W in terms of B & S.

Locally gauging entire Poincare group of 1905 SR gives Shipov's 10D "oriented point", which is essentially D3 BRANE theory BTW!

Finally the curvature 2-Form is

R = DW = dW + W/\W

Why the torsion field is needed.

In 1915 GR the Bianchi identities using the zero torsion tetrad

e = 1 + B

give

DR = 0

analogous to

d*J = 0 in EM

Einstein's exotic dark energy vacuum field equation is

R/\e + /\zpfe/\e/\e = 0 as a 3-form equation.

This implies that

D/\zpf = d/\zpf = 0

/\zpf is a 0-form

with

De = 0

i.e. /\zpf is a constant.

When we add torsion we get

D' = d + W/\ + S/

with

D'R = 0

Therefore

DR =/= 0

hence

d/\zpf =/= 0

in presence of a torsion field.

The zero point dark energy-stress tensor is

tuv(zpf) = (c^4/8piG*)/\zpfguv

/\zpf > 0 is repulsive dark energy of negative vacuum pressure (blue shift)

/\zpf < 0 is attractive dark matter (mis-named) of positive vacuum pressure (red shift)

/\zpf ~ (vacuum coherence length)^-1(anyon condensate

coherence length)^-1cos(Vacuum Phase - Anyon Phase)

This permits low power practical metric engineering of WEIGHTLESS Warp and Wormhole.

All the numerical PV estimates of Puthoff, Davis & Co are completely irrelevant. No USG money should be spent on high power laser bending of space-time - much too small. No Bang a mere Whimper for a Big Buck! Waste of tax money.

## No comments:

Post a Comment