Monday, August 08, 2005

Final Chapter of Super Cosmos & SLAC SSI 2005

On Aug 8, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

I got permission from Rocky Kolb (et-al) to use some of the SLAC SSI 2005 slides in Super Cosmos and got the file size down to under 2 megs. Also I mention Hagen Kleinert's latest on "multi-valued gauge transformations"

The very end of Super Cosmos is at 1.78 megs

Includes also latest on God, George Chapline, Susskind, Ken Shoulders EVOs, Puthoff, Shipov, Burinskii & good last line for the book.

Saturday, August 06, 2005

Cosmic Coincidence a false alarm for Intelligent Design of the Universe?

On Aug 6, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Memorandum for the Record
Subject: Are we alone, or are the Little Green UFO Buggers here already screwing things up - as if we needed help?
From: The MASINT Irregulars

On Aug 6, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Dan Smith wrote:

"To Whom It May Concern:

We all have our jobs to do. I am trying to do the eschaton job."

For a moment, from the way Rocky Kolb joked around yesterday in the Panofsky Auditorium (Panofsky was there, Secretary of DOE was there the day before) it looked like Dan had a killer piece of evidence in Rocky's "Cosmic Coincidence Slide"

Rocky joked about this slide as "Intelligent Design" and also compared it to Martha Stewart's sale of her ImClone stock on the downhill slide of its price. The point of the coincidence is that right now we are only a bit to the right of the crossing point of the red and blue curves. That is the vertical dotted green line for NOW AKA "0" should be a little to the right of where it is crossing the solid red line at 0.3 and, therefore, the solid blue line at 0.7. The Cosmic Coincidence is: WHY ARE WE SO CLOSE TO THE CROSSING POINT at 0.5? Is this Weak Anthropic Principle in action WITHOUT GOD? Or, is it a COSMIC COINCIDENCE "WOW" SIGNAL from GOD? Or from "Q" some Great Architect of the Frame of the World (Free Masons, Society of Cincinnatus), some Mighty Metric Engineer of Super Cosmos? Some Gulliver to us Lilliputans? ;-)

On further reflection, this may only be Weak Anthropic Principle leaving no Room in The Inn for God? But I am not sure right now.

"I have always said that I would have to learn on the job. I will always make more wrong moves than correct moves, just by standard statistics. There is one best possible way to evangelize the eschaton and there are an infinity of
other ways to do it. Those stats are not in my favor. I am happy to learn that Kit is neither disturbed nor conflicted."

Kit's ignorance is bliss? :-)

"I can only wish that I could be so fortunate. I will always be disturbed and
conflicted in a potentially infinite number of ways, so long as I remain
human. Eventually, according to Apokatastasis, we will all become God. At that point we will be conflicted in a transcendental number of ways. We may as well get used to it. My privately placed question to Kit was for his educated guess concerning the purpose of the alleged visitation. Is this asking too much? Is there a more important question we need to ask?"

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Sarfatti []
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 6:00 PM
To: Ron Pandolfi
Subject: Re: Please provide broad distribution to this Information


I. On Aug 6, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Ron Pandolfi, Ph.D. wrote:

"It has come to my attention that Dan Smith has been distributing e-mails indicating I had suggested that Dr. Green was "disturbed or conflicted." I
may have been on distribution for some of these e-mails. I wanted to
clarify that I do not often read these e-mails, so I was unaware of
their existence or of their interpretation. Please let me correct that I
had only stated to Mr. Smith that Dr. Green seemed "disturbed" with Mr. Smith's insistence that he provide evidence for ET visitations--what Mr. Smith
refers to as the "core story." Dr. Green has clearly stated his position
on these issues on multiple occasions and in multiple venues. My understanding was that he was "conflicted" in terms of his desire to address Mr. Smith's questions and his need to attend to more pressing issues."

For the record, Christopher "Kit" Green, former CIA "Weird Desk" Keeper
is "Kennett" in Jim Schnabel's
"Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies"
In Ch 11 of Schnabel's book, "Kit" has the same kind of "metallic
voice" contact as I had in 1953 approximately "twenty years" later as I
did and as was predicted in

Other incidents with the "metallic voice" exist.

reported by Rocky Kolb yesterday at SLAC? Kolb "joked" about it as
"Intelligent Design". Is it a Joke? If not, it would support President
Bush on "Intelligent Design." Probably7 not.

Friday, August 05, 2005

New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design

AI = Advanced Intelligence
This is too coincidental to be a random coincidence. Is it the COSMIC WOW SIGNAL for CONTACT with ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE?
Look here are the simple basic equations for precision cosmology
Note that for "vacuum", i.e. zero point energy there can be an independent INTRINSIC cosmic time dependence for the zero point energy density not tied to a(t). Indeed, in my metric engineering theory the equation for this on a smaller scale is something like the "Flying Saucer Warp Drive Equation" of Dan Smith's alleged "Visitors" who seem to prefer "metallic voices" if we are to believe Jim Schnabel about CIA's Kit Green's experience during the Uri Geller experiments? ;-) As this message is being sent I am advised that Dan Smith is a "DIA Contractor" who has just been in a "car accident" in Washington DC/Baltimore area? There are no coincidences - cosmic or otherwise in this weird business. Note President Bush recently commented on "Intelligent Design" and so did a Pennsylvania Senator. It seems to be a hot topic.

/\(t) = (1/Lp*)(ODLRO Surface Density of Control Thin Film)Cos(VacuumODLRO Phase - Thin Film Phase)


G*/G = (R/Lp)^n


Lp*/Lp = (R/Lp)^n/2

for n extra space-dimensions of scale R.

OK we know k = 0 (Space is flat) from WMAP. This fits inflation. Therefore the total

Omega = (total density)/(critical density) = 1

trivially because

critical density(t) = 3H(t)^2/8piG

As t increases all densities decrease except for the zero point dark energy with w = -1.

This means the total critical density itself becomes dominated by the zero point dark energy.

i.e. H(t)^2 ---> c^2/\(t) as t increases.

Since there is no theory for /\ (other than mine) there can be an arbitrary t-dependence /\(t) that is independent of the scale factor a(t) for the expansion of space. Indeed this /\(t) can be from "The Architect" of Freemasonry, from Michio Kaku's "Masters of Hyperspace", from Star Trek's "Q", from Dan Smith's "Visitors", from the "Metric Engineers", from "Darth Vader", from "Gulliver", from "The Matrix", from "God" - take your pick.

Note that if the dark matter is really negative zero point energy with w = -1 and positive pressure that cannot be distinguished from w = 0 Cold Dark Matter (CDM) then NOW ~ 96% of our universe is zero point energy (73% positive and 23% negative). Only 4% is the stuff we are made from.

On Aug 5, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Desperate Cosmologists How far will they go?

Saul Perlmutter just happens to observe the Type1a supernovae just at the crossing point NOW 13.7 billion years since the BIG BANG where Dark Energy is shooting up and everything else is falling down.

Is this Dan Smith's ESCHATON? :-)

Kolb's final lecture at SSI 2005 is VERY FUNNY! (No, he did not mention Dan).

He compares Saul Perlmutter to Martha Stewart and sudden drop of IMCLONE when she sold. He uses Creation of Adam with God as Ed Witten and Adam as Peskin - who is here (the physicist not the politician).