Berkant send to Greenglow, thanks.

Professor Kleinert is also a leading expert on general relativity and torsion fields at the Free University in Berlin. He worked with Feynman at Cal Tech,
On May 31, 2004, at 3:43 AM, Hagen Kleinert wrote:

Thanks for your mail Jack!
Have a look also at

H. Kleinert and J. Zaanen

World Nematic Crystal Model of Gravity
Explaining the Absence of Torsion
http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/346
FU-Berlin preprint 2003
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0307033

On May 31, 2004, at 3:38 AM, Alexander Konkretny wrote:

I guess what Gennady is saying is that Hammond does not make a
distinction between the Cartan torsion and "the Ricci torsion".
Funny, but of all theoreticians I know only Gennady Shipov
makes such a distinction. I wonder if Gennady could name just one
theoretician who would know what the hell is "the Ricci torsion"
he is talking about.

I am making an annotated pdf version of Hammond's review paper and will put it on line with key parts highlighted in yellow and pop-up annotations, so everyone can see for themselves. Hammond has a nice concise description of the essence of Gennady's particular version of torsion fields in Section 4 "Teleparallelism" eqs. 185-190.

"Teleparallelism" is a kind of absolute holonomy or integrability, i.e. path independence in parallel transport between two events (state functions - reversible process of constant entropy in the Catheodory (spelling?) formal thermodynamics analogy, e.g. R. Kiehn). This is like elementary Euclidean geometry. Of course the connection field is more than the symmetric Levi-Civita one from 1916 GR. The generalized curvature is zero, but this curvature is the Einstein curvature + torsion field contribution.

My theory of exotic vacuum from zero point energy has an equation

Guv(Einstein) + /\zpfguv(Einstein) = 0

which is a special case of Hammond's eq. 186. My quantum correction term /\zpfguv(Einstein) is independent of Hammond's (Shipov's?) classical torsion term tuv(torsion) spelled out in eq. (187). Therefore, in my theory with torsion, the exotic vacuum equation is

Guv(Einstein) + /\zpfguv(Einstein) + tuv(torsion) = 0

Let h = c = G = 1 for now for simplicity.

The vacuum propeller equation is simply the Einstein covariant divergence of this exotic vacuum local field equation. Metric engineering simply means shaping Guv(Einstein) on the world line of the Unconventional Flying Object (as defined by Paul Hill) from INSIDE the spacecraft using small amounts of power.

Hal Puthoff has never given a clear definition of what precisely he means by "metric engineering."

This is only possible if effective G, i.e. G* >> Newton's G on the scale of the propulsion device. Alleged observations by military intelligence sources of several nations of actual craft suggest this is true.

The Einstein covariant 4 divergences of the second and third terms in the exotic vacuum field equation are the zero point energy and the torsion field vacuum propeller terms respectively.

The /\zpfguv term includes both dark energy and dark matter as w = -1 exotic vacuum phases of negative and positive quantum pressure respectively which can, it appears, be controlled locally by a generalized Josephson effect (essence of Schauberger-Podkletnov-Ning Li effect)

/\zpf(induced) =
(volume of circulating supercurrent in a loop)^1/3(density of paired real electrons)^1/2(density of paired virtual electron-positron pairs)^1/2cos2pi[(magnetic flux trapped inside sc loop)/(magnetic flux quantum) - (mechanical circulation (vorticity) of single electron pair)/(vorticity quantum)]

This requires very delicate precise phase stability in the rotating superconductors almost impossible to achieve in the big rotating disks of Podkletnov and Ning Li which is why their effects are weak and hard to reproduce. They have the wrong idea in their heads. Modanese only had a small piece of the right idea. You have to go nano-tech! This is why the flying saucers are empty inside (Col. Phil Corso) it's all inside the thin strong smart nano-engineered skin of the alleged captured alien ET saucers that I am reverse engineering in the sense of Einstein's gedankenexperiment meditiation-visualization technique. In a sense I am remote-viewing them like any good psychic detective! :-) That is "detective" not "defective." :-)

See Berkant's latest on possible nano-tech mesh architectures for the smart skin of the zero point energy powered space-craft with zero g-force "G-Engine" (1956 George Trimble in Nick Cook's "The Hunt for Zero Point")

On May 31, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Gennady I Shipov wrote:

Hi, Jack!

I have closely studied R.Nammonda's work.
I think it is necessary to begin discussion on torsion with participation of Hammond. Once again I want to pay your attention to distinction between Cartan and Ricci torsions. Similar, that R.Hammond of this distinction does not make (see the formula (190) his article).

On May 31, 2004, at 8:11 AM, Berkant Goeksel wrote:

"Jack Sarfatti" schrieb:
Note one minor typo correction below. I would like to see entire paper
with math and pictures. You have a lot of ideas. :-)
Make sure you cite latest papers also the one with Ken Shoulders on
EVOs.

As usual in my papers.. I will quote the source and all relevant as much as possible.

This paper is for the...

It is not for ... dealing with warp drives. I think even your 1999 Heaviside force ideas are superior to what we have seen up-to-date from other sources which are quoted in the attached AIAA paper by Tony Robertson from 2001. Topic is "Exploration of anomalous gravity effects by magnetized high-Tx superconducting oxides.

You need to talk to James Woodward and Hal Puthoff BEFORE you give your paper. Even though Woodward and Puthoff disagree with each other on many things, they agree that Corum's Heaviside idea will not work. I am not sure if any of that will work. Ask Woodward, he may have something which might work? In any case, you should make the distinction that any kind of Heaviside force propulsion is NOT a warp drive. The problem is that the two guys running this part of STAIF i.e. Tony Robertson and Paul Murad simply do not understand what the problem is. They are not asking the right questions and have entirely confused not even wrong pictures in their minds. So does Marc Millis of NASA BPP, so does the entire Greenglow group. All these people are in the Dark Ages of blood letting and exorcism - it's all Cargo Cult Physics.

"The Question is: What is the Question?" John A. Wheeler

The STAIF split into FO5 and FO7 is confused. If Tony Robertson is interested in Podkletnov/Ning Li Modanese/Schauberger type physics that is WARP DRIVE, i.e. metric engineering Guv(Einstein) to make an Alcubierre type self-controlled timelike geodesic with the smart skin.
What Tony Robertson tried to duplicate would be a warp drive not a Heaviside force effect if he succeeded. He did not succeed and cannot succeed because you cannot do it with large rotating superconducting disks- there is too much phase noise that washes out the all important cosine control term in /\zpf(induced)! Any attempt to explain Podkletnov/Ning Li as an electromagnetic stress propulsion Heaviside force is completely confused! That's the point here. Of course, there is little hope that Robertson and Murad will understand what I am saying to you here. The STAIF 2005 meeting is essentially a waste of time and money for whoever is paying for it. It's the blind leading the blind in my opinion. They are not even close to understanding the real problem.
Yes, we played with Heaviside force at ISSO 1999-2000 and wasted one million dollars on a SARA contract because of Jim Corum's prestige and because we did not understand the nature of the problem. I was as much in the dark then as Jim Corum, Hal Puthoff, Bernie Haisch, Paul Murad, Tony Robertson, Marc Millis, Modanese, et-al still are today because they have closed their minds to what I have been saying since 2002. Dark energy was not understood in 1999-2000, I did not connect the dots between the dark energy of precision cosmology
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0308418
and the Bondi-Hill-Trimble acceleration field G-Engine (negative zero point quantum vacuum pressure) for UFOs until 2002!

*I would not spend any money on Heaviside force propulsion. It is the wrong way to go. Even if it worked it is too energy inefficient as a matter of principle.


You know that my vacuum propeller equation is from modified Bianchi
zero point energy identities in exotic vacuum

Guv;^v + /\zpf^,vguv = 0

This is for zero torsion fields and zero non-metricity fields that
would add still more "propulsion" terms as shown by Richard Hammond in
"Torsion Gravity" Vol 65 Rep. Prog. Phys. (2002).

It's the /\zpf,^v that does the vacuum propeller trick even without
torsion fields. Remember how I relate all that to the gravimagnetic
field

3D Divergence of Gravimagnetic Field = Alcubierre's "Tr(K)" ~ /\zpf

This needs G* >>> Newton's G at the nanometer scale

where

/\zpf(induced) ~ Lp*^-2 ~ (volume of vacuum- superconductor Weak
Link)^1/3(density of superconductor electron pairs)^1/2(density of
virtual electron-positron bound state pairs)^1/2cos2pi[(magnetic flux
through sc loop node of mesh)/(quantum of magnetic flux) - (mechanical
vorticity flux)/(quantum of vorticity)]

Lp*^2 = hG*/c^3

See my very recent papers at http://qedcorp.com/destiny/
Be sure to cite that directory and also
http://qedcorp.com/APS/
for details.

Okay. I will quote relevant papers. But please note this time we are talking about Heaviside forces. So your old ISSO papers are most relevant. But the outlook chapters could talk about the next steps towards zero-g drives.

It's like you are giving a paper on horse-driven carriages as the future of transportation when there is a Toyota Prius parked outside.
The organization of STAIF 2005 split into FO5 and FO7 is totally confused conceptually if they are linking Podkletnov/Ning Li with Heaviside force propulsion.

On my 1999-2000 Heaviside force confusions listen to

http://www.ladyofthecake.com/mel/frank/sounds/doodoo.wav

Been there, done that. Heaviside force is a false lead, wrong turn in the road, barking up the wrong tree, shining strong light in the wrong part of the dark Cave, touching the wrong part of the Elephant. As a Sufi you know what I mean, eh? ;-)

The Heaviside force is not a true vacuum propeller at all because the crew will feel g-forces! The crew is in a LNIF. Any vacuum propeller worthy of the name must keep the crew in a LIF at all times!

This is an important distinction.


This paper will also discuss the practical feasibility of a
Heaviside lifting vacuum propeller reaction force using state-of-
the-art nano-circuit design based on coaxial nanotube capacitors
wound into a torus loop with a toriodal solenoid made of
superconducting carbon nanotube quantum wires able to carry
supercurrents (Josephson currents).

I need to see a detailed picture of what you mean.

I confused here. It is real supercurrents as you already described.

Yes, there are real supercurrents in the little loops. The coherent phase of those real supercurrents must STABLY beat against the coherent phase of the virtual electron-positron vacuum currents, but there is no actual tunnelling current in this case. The real electron pairs of charge 2e do not transform into virtual electron-positron pairs of charge zero and vice versa! There is no physical quantum jumping between the superconductor nodal loop and the vacuum it occupies. Nevertheless their macro-quantum coherent phases can interfere with each other because they are collective emergent processes that do not remember their micro-dynamic origin but acquire a life of their own so to speak. P.W. Anderson talks about this as "generalized phase rigidity" in his "More is different" series of papers "A Career in Theoretical Physics" (World Scientific)

The fact that real electron pairs quantum jump across thin barriers in Josephson's junction is not essential to the more general effect of the beating of macro-coherent phases, which in that particular case is concommitant with actual quantum jumping of real pairs of charge 2e.

The wires are wrapped around the
capacitor whereby each end of the solenoid is connected to a
different plate of the coaxial carbon nano-tube metal-insulator-
semiconductor capacitor. It is envisioned that this set up can give
a rectified Heaviside force that gets larger as the LC circuit is
scaled down to nanometer size. Millions of such vacuum propeller
nano-modules could form an ultra-strong 3D-matrix smart skin carbon
nanotube composite material for use on transatmospheric flight
vehicles of future generations.

What do you mean "transatmospheric"? You mean "space"?

Transatmospheric is a term often used by aerospace engineers working on hypersonic applications. you enter space and re-enter atmosphere again.

Sort of like popping into and out of the vacuum in virtual processes.

Multi-wall carbon nanotubes consist of multiple shells, where the
tube is arranged in a coaxial fashion. Tubes with different atomic
and electronic structures can be fused together to create intra-
molecular metal-metal, metal-semiconductor, or semiconductor-
semiconductor junctions that are only a few atoms in cross section
and based entirely on carbon. Single-wall carbon nanotubes are
discussed for use as molecular superconducting quantum wires to
carry high supercurrents (Josephson currents).

Same mistake here. Of course, real currents.

Please note that we do not need any metals. You can mimic metal-like properties using carbon nanotubes. so the entire matrix could be made of carbon only.. this is what I understand.

Fine. I never said anything about that.


the question is how can we form the matrix??

In 1998, Bezryadin described an electrostatic self-assembly
technique which is used to arrange conducting nanoparticles into
long continous chains. The process takes place between a pair of
voltage biased micro-electrodes, immersed in a dielectric
(electrorheological) liquid with suspended graphitized carbon
nanoparticles.

I think this is a good approach.. yesterday I got it mind to use electrostatic (sound) waves to be used in the dielectric liquid with the suspended graphitized carbon nanoparticles..

Fine - I am not thinking on that level as yet.


the micro-electrodes could be used to generate electrostatic waves which could sound shape the nanoparticles into any shape we want.. but I am not sure how this could work..

To meet future environmental quality goals, the aeroengine company
Rolls-Royce Deutschland (RRD) recently announced the technology
tasks for air transportation in 2012 and after. The major technology
task for the time horizon after 2020 is the development of zero
emission propulsion systems: 1. Fuel cells driven conventional
mechanical propellers, 2. Fuel cells driven speculative electro-
magnetic vacuum propellers.

Probably tiny imbedded nano-fuel cells that get recharged from
/\zpf(induced).

yes, maybe. please note that carbon nanotubes are currently also discussed as hydrogen storage devices.. but I think you have something else in mind.. is it possible to generate hydrogen out of nothing?

No I don't mean that. I mean negative matter propulsion is a source of energy. Look at my EVO paper with Ken Shoulders for some possibly real data! Ken used to work with Puthoff, but obviously thinks my theory is better than Hal's to deal with the actual experimental data!


The smart skin is also a computer at three levels.

1. Classical with signal locality

2. Quantum with signal locality

3. Post-Quantum with "Conscious AI" (term I coined) with "signal
nonlocality"

Woow.

So the smart skin is a Command Control Communication zero g-force warp
drive "G-Engine" (George Trimble) with a controlled Paul Hill
"acceleration field" using Hermann Bondi's "negative matter propulsion"
with "negative matter" replaced by my original /\zpf field that depends
on vacuum coherence. Be sure to quote me exactly as these are all
original ideas of mine not found anywhere else. Also cite my book
"Super Cosmos" and Nick Cook's book "The Hunt for Zero Point."

Yes. It is all your and Creon's idea and this will be mentioned.
See my paper on the smart skin.. it is nearly all a paper of quotations.:-)
so it is nearly like a paper written in a popular scientific journal.
but please do not ask me to quote book which I have not read so far...

Cite ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf
Podkletnov.pdf

in http://qedcorp.com/destiny

that you have read


What's The Big Deal?


Origin of Arrow of Time simply explained below.

Nick Cook of Jane's Defence Weekly in "The Hunt for Zero Point"
mentions a torsion field as a possible explanation for the alleged Nazi
"Time Machine" experiment of Victor Schauberger in the final days of
WWII. This is of interest because Nick also says that Schauberger's
work influenced Podkletnov's work that was apparently also tested by
Tony Robertson of NASA/STAIF?
http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html

Hammond has a nice historical discussion of torsion fields as a gauge
force theory. The fact is that you get a theory of gravity as
space-time curvature from matter stress-energy density currents (4
translation parameters), and torsion from quantum spin and orbital
rotational currents (3 space rotations + 3 Lorentz boosts or space-time
rotations).
This excludes the 4 special conformal translations and the dilation
that will give more "force" fields in addition to curvature and
torsion. I use "force" loosely since the "geometrodynamic" view
eliminates force. We can use either depending on what level we are
talking. For example, the curvature field derives ultimately from the
Kleinert elastic world crystal lattice distortion field that comes from
the "More is different" (P.W. Anderson) macro-quantum coherent hologram
phase of the virtual electron-positron PV condensate. Einstein's metric
field is the "spin 2" elastic strain tensor of the Kleinert spin 1
compensating gauge force field from locally gauging the 4 space-time
translations infinitesimally generated by the total energy-momentum
4-vector Pu. The curvature field comes from 1-dim string topological
defects in the spin 0 scalar PV condensate corresponding to
disclination defects in the world crystal lattice spacing Lp* that is a
scale-dependent variable. Although the electron is a 4-component Dirac
spinor field, the PV condensate is a spin 0 scalar macro-quantum order
parameter from a BCS pairing of two spinor fields. A spin 1 vector
order parameter is also conceivable with new classes of topological
defects. The additional torsion field corresponds to dislocation
defects in the scalar order parameter. These defects are phase singular
strings on which the order parameter vanishes like in the core of a
vortex in a superfluid. Andrei Sakharov's "metric elasticity" for
emergent smooth c-number ODLRO Einstein gravity corresponds to P.W.
Anderson's "More is different" "generalized phase rigidity" (basis for
"world hologram" of Lenny Susskind), and to inverse of Ed Witten's
string tension alpha'^-1 and the "quantum of area" Lp*^2 of
non-perturbative Loop Gravity.

G*/c^4 ~ (G*h/c^3)(hc)^-1 = Lp*^2/hc = alpha'/hc = (String Tension)^-1
= (Phase Rigidity)^-1 = (Metric Elasticity)

The world hologram entropy of a 3D region of space with bounding area A
is S/k ~ A/4Lp*^2 (k = Boltzmann's constant)

For the expanding FRW universe with scale factor R(t) (in units of
length)

Lp* = Lp^2/3R(t)^1/3

The thermodynamic entropy of the Universe is therefore,

S(Universe)/k ~ R(t)^2 /4Lp^4/3R(t)^2/3 ~ R(t)^4/3

This explains the Arrow of Time of the Second Law of Thermodynamics in
terms of the spatial expansion of the Universe and it also explains why
the entropy of the Universe is zero at the Big Bang because R(0) = 0.
What's the Big Deal?

The effects of the extra dimensions of hyperspace is to promote
Newton's G from a constant to a renormalization group flow
scale-dependent running coupling parameter G*(s) at scale s in the
sense of the continuous wavelet transform generalization of Wigner's
phase space density and Green's function propagators based on the rigid
Fourier transform.

On May 29, 2004, at 12:43 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

A: No. So we eliminate that.

Equation (28) p. 604 of Richard Hammond's "Torsion Gravity" Rep Prog
Phys 65 (2002) is interesting. It is, for a metric theory with zero
non-metricity tensor, but with torsion S

R = Ro + 4(S^u;u - S^uSu) + SuvwS^u^v^w - 2SuvwS^v^w^u

Where ; is covariant derivative with respect to only the 1916
symmetric Levi-Civita connection for parallel transport of tensor
fields in the curved-torsioned space-time.

In the ordinary non-gravitating vacuum Ro i.e. the zero torsion Ricci
curvature scalar vanishes.

That leaves for the exotic vacuum field equation

Ruv + 4(S^u;u - S^uSu) + SuvwS^u^v^w - 2SuvwS^v^w^u = 0

Only if

4(S^u;u - S^uSu) + SuvwS^u^v^w - 2SuvwS^v^w^u = /\zpfguv

Could we interpret the torsion field as a cosmological field. This
does not seem like a good idea. Since the torsion field comes from
locally gauging the Lorentz group, it is a classical field with no
necessary connection to zero point energy density.

What's The Big Deal?

Origin of Arrow of Time simply explained below.

Nick Cook of Jane's Defence Weekly in "The Hunt for Zero Point" mentions a torsion field as a possible explanation for the alleged Nazi "Time Machine" experiment of Victor Schauberger in the final days of WWII. This is of interest because Nick also says that Schauberger's work influenced Podkletnov's work that was apparently also tested by Tony Robertson of NASA/STAIF?
http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html

Hammond has a nice historical discussion of torsion fields as a gauge force theory. The fact is that you get a theory of gravity as space-time curvature from matter stress-energy density currents (4 translation parameters), and torsion from quantum spin and orbital rotational currents (3 space rotations + 3 Lorentz boosts or space-time rotations).
This excludes the 4 special conformal translations and the dilation that will give more "force" fields in addition to curvature and torsion. I use "force" loosely since the "geometrodynamic" view eliminates force. We can use either depending on what level we are talking. For example, the curvature field derives ultimately from the Kleinert elastic world crystal lattice distortion field that comes from the "More is different" (P.W. Anderson) macro-quantum coherent hologram phase of the virtual electron-positron PV condensate. Einstein's metric field is the "spin 2" elastic strain tensor of the Kleinert spin 1 compensating gauge force field from locally gauging the 4 space-time translations infinitesimally generated by the total energy-momentum 4-vector Pu. The curvature field comes from 1-dim string topological defects in the spin 0 scalar PV condensate corresponding to disclination defects in the world crystal lattice spacing Lp* that is a scale-dependent variable. Although the electron is a 4-component Dirac spinor field, the PV condensate is a spin 0 scalar macro-quantum order parameter from a BCS pairing of two spinor fields. A spin 1 vector order parameter is also conceivable with new classes of topological defects. The additional torsion field corresponds to dislocation defects in the scalar order parameter. These defects are phase singular strings on which the order parameter vanishes like in the core of a vortex in a superfluid. Andrei Sakharov's "metric elasticity" for emergent smooth c-number ODLRO Einstein gravity corresponds to P.W. Anderson's "More is different" "generalized phase rigidity" (basis for "world hologram" of Lenny Susskind), and to inverse of Ed Witten's string tension alpha'^-1 and the "quantum of area" Lp*^2 of non-perturbative Loop Gravity.

G*/c^4 ~ (G*h/c^3)(hc)^-1 = Lp*^2/hc = alpha'/hc = (String Tension)^-1 = (Phase Rigidity)^-1 = (Metric Elasticity)

The world hologram entropy of a 3D region of space with bounding area A is S/k ~ A/4Lp*^2 (k = Boltzmann's constant)

For the expanding FRW universe with scale factor R(t) (in units of length)

Lp* = Lp^2/3R(t)^1/3

The thermodynamic entropy of the Universe is therefore,

S(Universe)/k ~ R(t)^2 /4Lp^4/3R(t)^2/3 ~ R(t)^4/3

This explains the Arrow of Time of the Second Law of Thermodynamics in terms of the spatial expansion of the Universe and it also explains why the entropy of the Universe is zero at the Big Bang because R(0) = 0. What's the Big Deal?

The effects of the extra dimensions of hyperspace is to promote Newton's G from a constant to a renormalization group flow scale-dependent running coupling parameter G*(s) at scale s in the sense of the continuous wavelet transform generalization of Wigner's phase space density and Green's function propagators based on the rigid Fourier transform.

On May 29, 2004, at 12:43 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

A: No. So we eliminate that.

Equation (28) p. 604 of Richard Hammond's "Torsion Gravity" Rep Prog Phys 65 (2002) is interesting. It is, for a metric theory with zero non-metricity tensor, but with torsion S

R = Ro + 4(S^u;u - S^uSu) + SuvwS^u^v^w - 2SuvwS^v^w^u

Where ; is covariant derivative with respect to only the 1916 symmetric Levi-Civita connection for parallel transport of tensor fields in the curved-torsioned space-time.

In the ordinary non-gravitating vacuum Ro i.e. the zero torsion Ricci curvature scalar vanishes.

That leaves for the exotic vacuum field equation

Ruv + 4(S^u;u - S^uSu) + SuvwS^u^v^w - 2SuvwS^v^w^u = 0

Only if

4(S^u;u - S^uSu) + SuvwS^u^v^w - 2SuvwS^v^w^u = /\zpfguv

Could we interpret the torsion field as a cosmological field. This does not seem like a good idea. Since the torsion field comes from locally gauging the Lorentz group, it is a classical field with no necessary connection to zero point energy density.

On May 28, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Hermann and Christine Bondi wrote:

It would be nice to hear from you after all these years. Hermann Bondi

Dear Professor Bondi

It's too bad I missed you when I visited Trinity College last September.

I remember fondly your wonderful performances with Ivor Robinson on third floor of Newman Laboratory at Cornell with Hans Bethe, Phil Morrison, Tommy Gold, Ed Salpeter in his kakhi shorts looking like Indiana Jones, Kinoshita, Robert Wilson, Robert Woodward, Jay Orear, Ronnie Peierls et-al lecturing on general relativity. You had us all in stitches with your wonderful Lewis Carrollian/Monty Python/Gilbert & Sullivan sense of British humor, whilst teaching Einstein's ideas in a most entertaining and inspiring way. Is Ivor still among us?

One of your talks which stuck in my mind for more than 40 years now was on "negative matter" and how that could cause propulsion in combination with ordinary matter. Robert Forward of course wrote about that years later citing your work. I did not know until looking at Forward's paper that Yakov Terletskii, Stalin's nuclear spymaster, also was interested in that idea.

I am working with some far out scientists in USG Military/Intelligence circles and also with Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly, Simon Daniel, a Cambridge physics grad in London, and other eccentric Brits who "go out in the noonday sun" on the idea of "dark energy," which has the properties of "negative matter" and whether or not it can be "bottled" for practical "negative matter propulsion" of "Unconventional Flying Objects."

Now I see you have signed that letter in May 22, 2004 on the alternative cosmology dating back to Tommy Gold's and Fred Hoyle's ideas. That is how I realized you were still at Cambridge. Perhaps we can discuss that next time I am in UK. I do have an idea that both dark energy and dark matter are real enough as w = -1 zero point energy density of negative and positive pressure respectively. The sign of the zero point pressure depends on something I call "vacuum coherence," that you can picture as a vacuum condensate of virtual electron-positron pairs something like a BCS superconductor inside the vacuum, which is also the inflation field. This vacuum coherence also explains why Einstein's cosmological constant /\ ~ (Hubble radius)^-2 rather than ~ (hG/c^3)^-1.

Therefore, I have natural dynamical explanations for dark energy, dark matter and the inflation field in terms of rather elementary battle-tested ideas of Einstein's 1916 version of GR, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and the spontaneous broken ground state symmetry of condensed matter physics that P.W. Anderson has generalized to "More is different" in accord with Andrei Sakharov's idea of emergent gravity.
In the Cornell tradition of more with less, string theory and loop quantum gravity do not seem to be needed. Also this new picture, in which the effective gravity coupling seems to be strong on short scales, has consequences for particle physics like the old problem of the stability of the classical electron as a spatially extended charge distribution as well as the universal slope of the Regge trajectories of the hadronic resonances. The invisible sphere of the galactic halo that prevents our solar system from escaping into outer space may be the same zero point energy density of positive pressure that prevents the charge on the electron from exploding where the electron is Wheeler's geon of "Mass without mass" and "Charge without charge" but now the effective G* >> G on the scale of a fermi.

I will be in London at Thistle Hotel 104 Bayswater Rd July 13-17 and then at Herbert Park Hotel in Dublin July 18 - 25 for GR 17? Will you be at GR 17? I will also come back to London later in the fall of 2004.

Live Long and Prosper :-)

One of your admirers

Jack Sarfatti

My rebuttal to New Scientist May 22, 2004 Open Letter: http://www.cosmologystatement.org/

and Commentary on:
The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity
Authors: Miguel Alcubierre
Comments: 10 pages, 1 figure. Not previously available in gr-qc
Journal-ref: Class.Quant.Grav. 11 (1994) L73-L77

It is shown how, within the framework of general relativity and without the introduction of wormholes, it is possible to modify a spacetime in a way that allows a spaceship to travel with an arbitrarily large speed. By a purely local expansion of spacetime behind the spaceship and an opposite contraction in front of it, motion faster than the speed of light as seen by observers outside the disturbed region is possible. The resulting distortion is reminiscent of the ``warp drive'' of science fiction. However, just as it happens with wormholes, exotic matter will be needed in order to generate a distortion of spacetime like the one discussed here.

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009013

My comments on this paper:

The metric squared interval in Einstein's GR os

ds^2 = guvdx^udx^v

Use the ADM 3+1 canonical decomposition

ds^2 = -(a^2 - b^2)(cdt)^2 + 2bidx^i(cdt) + gijdx^idx^j

u,v = 0,1,2,3
i,j = 1,2,3

a = lapse function

b = (b1,b2,b3) = shift 3-vector = gravimagnetic field of frame drag Lense-Thirring effect to be tested in EINSTEIN NASA space probe.
b also plays key role in Ray Chiao's "gravity radio" superconducting transducer to convert far field gravity waves to electro-magnetic waves and vice versa via the b.A coupling Hamiltonian, where A is the EM vector potential. We need the near-field "induction" case for metric engineering the fabric of space-time (AKA the geometrodynamic field).

Note that Hal Puthoff's PV challenge to Einstein's GR is not able to describe the gravimagnetic field at all so far. We will see that the gravimagnetic field is essential to practical metric engineering on small scales where G* >> G. Therefore, PV as formulated up to present time in publications by Puthoff is irrelevant to the metric engineering of weightless warp drive and traversable wormhole star gate time travel portals.

Alcubierre's lapse function a = 1, which is a sufficient condition for weightlessness, i.e. the timelike world lines normal to the spacelike slices of space-time in the ADM 3+1 decomposition are free float geodesics for the Eulerian observers inside the "flying saucer" who are able to shape their own flight geodesic - to steer it at will including hair-pin 180 degree turns with zero g-force inside the saucer because the spacelike 3D metric gij inside the saucer is flat Euclidean.

Since the interior of the alleged alien ET flying saucer is spatially flat all of the curvature is extrinsic given by the second fundamental form

Kij = (1/2)(bj,i + bi,j)

where ,j denotes ordinary partial derivative in the usual notation.

A key parameter is the expansion of volume elements for the Eulerian observers inside the flat 3D geometry of the saucer's interior, which turns out to be simply the negative divergence of the gravimagnetic field! This is what is plotted in Alcubierre's picture in his paper.

Therefore, in terms of my theory of metric engineering controlled saucer flight

Div.b ~ /\zpf

That is, the exotic vacuum zero point energy density is a source for the gravimagnetic 3-vector field of the engineered warp drive/star gate metric field!

In the electromagnetic analogy, the zero point energy density is a gravimagnetic monopole density!

We will also need, in the special case of Alcubierre's toy model

1 - b^2 ~ /\zpf

with the critical exotic vacuum phase transition from universally repulsive dark energy density to universally attractive dark matter density at |b| = 1.

The recent letter in New Scientist (May 22, 2004) signed by 33 dissident cosmologists that

"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. ... The successes claimed by the theory's supporters consist of its ability to retrospectively fit observations with a steadily increasing array of adjustable parameters, just as the old Earth-centred cosmology of Ptolemy needed layer upon layer of epicycles."
http://www.cosmologystatement.org/

is very wrong-headed in my opinion.

Note that Alcubierre's eq. (19) for Goo ~ -|/\zpf|^2 because goo ~ /\zpf and Einstein's exotic vacuum field equation is simply

Guv + /\zpfguv = 0

The statements by the 33 dissident cosmologists that dark energy, dark matter and the inflation field are epicyclic fudge factors are false.

Dark energy is /\zpf > 0/

Dark matter is /\zpf < 0

The inflation field is the vacuum coherence in the large scale sense of a wavelet transform where the vacuum coherence local field is dominated by the physical vacuum ODLRO order parameter

Vacuum Coherence = <0|e+e-|0>

for a macro-quantum condensate of virtual electron-positron bound states.

http://www.ladyofthecake.com/mel/main.htm
Jack, you said
"... if you locally gauge the space-time translation
group you get Einstein's 1916 theory of General Relativity ...
... you get a torsion force field if you also
locally gauge the Lorentz group.
You get even more force fields if you locally gauge the special
conformal transformations and the dilation transformation. ...".

You also, in another message, atttached an image (attached here)
from the History of the World, Part I, quoting Moses as saying
"..these fifteen...Oy!!...these ten commandments! ...".
Was that a reference to the 15-parameter conformal group
being reduced to the 10-parameter Poincare/antideSitter group
due to the action of Earth's gravitational field ?

Tony

re: http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf

These mesoscopic EVOs are tiny "flying saucers" with warp drive in some cases, i.e. observed anomalous self-acceleration.

A typical EVO charge cluster is 10^-4 cm across with a total charge of Ne where N ~ 10^11.

Exactly how the vacuum coherence ~ Tr(K) is tweaked is not clear yet in this phenomenon, but that it is so tweaked is the only plausible explanation for the observed facts.

One way to test this EVO hypothesis is to look for an anti-gravity blue shift of a sharp spectral line of a quantum jump in the interior of the EVO if the zero point pressure is negative or a gravity red shift if the zero point pressure is positive since the effective short-range G* >> G here.

Ken

I am adding a section:

A typical EVO has r ~ 10^-4 cm, N = 10^11. Use the hydrogen atom as the basis of comparison where r ~ 10^-8 cm and N = 1 with self-electrical force ~ 10^+16 compared to the EVO self-electrical force 10^22x10^8 = 10^30 in these relative dimensionless units. That is, the self-electrical force at the surface of the typical EVO assumed to be in a spherical thin shell is ~ 10^14 stronger than the electrical force on the atomic electron in the ground state of the hydrogen atom. Next consider a single electron as a shell of charge e at the classical electron radius 10^-13cm. The relative self-electric force is then 10^+26. Therefore, the electrical force of the typical mid-range EVO is only about 10^4 larger than that on a single electron. The effective G* induced by the zero point energy core needed to stabilize a single spatially extended electron is ~ 10^40G. That is the effective Planck length Lp* in the interior of a single electron is ~ 10^-13 cm. The effective Planck length in the interior of a typical EVO is therefore ~ 10^-11 cm ~ h/mc (a curious coincidence) since G* ~ Lp^*2. That is the “Eddington number” G*/G ~ 10^44 to stabilize the typical EVO. Note in this thin shell model the uniform zero point energy density core actually has negative pressure to give a springy positive potential self-energy that scales as r^5 whose force slope is opposite to the positive Coulomb potential self-energy that scales as 1/r.



On May 23, 2004, at 9:49 AM, Ken Shoulders wrote:

Jack
A middle point for size is the 1 micrometer diameter EV. It has about 10^11 electrons in it. Measurements made on larger EVs are usually groups of 1 micrometer beads stuck together in various ways. It is not a good idea to give diameter measurements here. The smallest EVs I have directly measured are about 0.2 micrometers in diameter but there are no valid measurements for the number of electrons in these. From indirect observation, it appears that the cluster size extends down to single electron structures.

Ken

Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Ken give me some experimental numbers for observed EVOs

i.e. size "r" of the EVO

estimated number of electron charges N


On May 23, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Ken Shoulders wrote:

Jack

I have installed my FTP software and uploaded the EVO final in PDF format. I am sure it is not perfect, but it will do for now. It is located at:

http://www.svn.net/krscfs/

On May 23, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Tony Smith wrote:

Jack, you say that Dark Energy can be produced

Both Dark Energy and Dark Matter.

by using a real phased-array set of current loops

Superconducting current loops, maybe they also wil bel mechanically rotating, i.e. little rotating superconducting nano washer nuts ~ 10^-7 cm or superconducting nano-spinning tops with holes in them to trap magnetic flux - an array of nano-gyros imbedded in a mesh inside covering the entire saucer smart thin material fuselage skin that is essentially empty inside - no need for large macro-engine assemblies at all! "There's plenty of room at the bottom."

to induce order in the virtual Dirac sea,

Not quite. There is lots of order there already!

/\zpf = 0 means NON-EXOTIC |VACUUM COHERENCE| = Lp*^-3/2 is already there, otherwise NO SMOOTH CURVED SPACE-TIME is possible! We want to tweak the vacuum coherence with phase modulation!

thus increasing the relative density in the Dirac sea
of the coherent condensate of bound virtual e-p pairs,

in some regions and decreasing it in other regions to get the Tr(K) field distribution needed for warp drive for example.

and
that the "... phased array creates any /\zpf(P,s) ~ Tr(K)
FIELD CONFIGURATION needed for any self-propelled UFO
creating its own local metric field guv(P,s) according
to the Einstein field equation Guv + /\zpfguv ~ 0 ...".

--------------------------------------------------------

Then, the question arises,
how do you build a real phased-array set of current loops ?

That's like asking Einstein in 1905 after he first writes down

E = mc^2

for a detailed blue print of the reactor for a nuclear submarine.

http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html

Ask those little guys whizzing around Out There!


Do you build small loops of conventional superconductors
a la Carver Mead
or
negative permittivity structures such as those
of http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9804195 ?

You tell me. What's the Carver Mead reference BTW.
We obviously need a Task Force to work on this problem, but DIA's "UFOGuy" is too dense to get the point it appears.

How will negative electrical permittivity help?

Main thing is to get a coherent field that will beat against the vacuum coherent field on a desired scale in a desired bandwidth set of temporal frequencies and spatial wave numbers in a given region of space at a given moment - i.e. wavelet transforms.

Do you build stiff diamondoid structures
a la Eric Drexler or the doped diamonds of http://physicsweb.org/article/news/7/4/5 ?

Sounds like you are off to a good start. Send me your reports.

Do you build less-stiff organic-type structures
a la Eric Drexler ?

Do you work with crystal structures such as YBCO superconductors
a la Ning Li
or
non-YBCO materials as discussed by Ray Chaio
or
barium titanate, as to which Constantin Ivanenko said
"... importance of barium titanate - key component
of "psi-genome weapons" -
was intuitively foreseen by SF author H. Kuttner;
- who wrote in his '54 novel "Mutants" that "destiny of
Humankind is contained in the chip of barium titanate crystal". ...".
Barium titanate, like some high-temperature superconductors,
has a perovskite-type crystal structure. With some such things,
such a YBCO, you get superconductivity. With barium titanate,
you get interesting dielectric and pizeoelectric properties. ?


We need really high Tc not the puny things they have now. NO CRYOGENICS at all. It must stay SC even in high T of re-entry should that become necessary if there is some breakdown on board.

Or maybe there is some kind of pumped non-equilibrium Frohlich mode we can use and avoid superconductivity altogether?


---------------------------------------------------------

As to some geopolitical matters:

What about Lev Navrozov's statement at
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/25/210250.shtml
"... In contrast to Hitler,
who stupidly grabbed the rump of Czechoslovakia in 1939,
China has been very cautious in its territorial claims,
since the position of China now is the best for the development
of "Superweapon No. 3," such as the nano superweapon. ..."

Yeah the Chinese are likely to beat us to the punch because they are less uptight about being "respectable" immersed in the hashish dreams of M string theory, spin networks, foams and weaves - pretty math to be sure, but as physics????

These mathematicians in physicist's clothing do not have any really good physical ideas and they hope that arcane math will provide the magic they seek like Faustus in his study at Wittenburg! Pun definitely intended! :-)

A mathematical physicist is a mathematician who has given up trying to do really important mathematics.


What about Herman Wouk's new book "A Hole in Texas",
which deals with a Chinese "Boson Bomb" related to
the vacuum-mass-Higgs system?

News to me. Tell us more.

On May 23, 2004, at 7:32 AM, Ken Shoulders, the key experimental physicist who has worked with Hal Puthoff, inside USG and for Jupiter Technologies wrote:

A new paper on "Energy Conversion From The Exotic Vacuum" is available. This paper can be downloaded from:

http://www.svn.net/krscfs/

A synopsis follows:


Energy Conversion From The Exotic Vacuum

by

Ken Shoulders1 and Dr. Jack Sarfatti2

 

Abstract

A connection is shown between electron clusters, or EVs, and energy conversion processes yielding thermal energy in excess of the input energy used to form the electron cluster. This energy conversion process is traced to all known forms of cold fusion claims for over-unity or excess energy production. A theory of like charge binding as well as highly effective nuclear acceleration using the charge cluster is presented based on local gravity coupling arising from manipulation of the Exotic Vacuum.

Prologue

In earlier papers by Shoulders (3,4,5,6,7,8)
, it was shown that electrons could be clustered far beyond the densities normally allowed by classical considerations of charge repulsion. This dense state of charge clustering has produced a range of electronic devices with properties surpassing those of any other known technology. In addition, many new manifestations of anomalous energy production were shown on a laboratory scale. Although these energy gain measurements satisfied the numerous tests applied to them, they were unsupported by any theory due to their extreme divergence from classical considerations.

During the search for a highly advanced space propulsion system, Sarfatti (2) originated a theory covering many aspects of a new physics based on manipulation of the exotic vacuum that appeared relevant to the measured energy gain arising from charge clusters, or EVs, herein called Exotic Vacuum Objects, or EVOs. This writing is the first attempt to combine theory with practice on this new frontier of both physics and engineering as applied to new energy production methods. From present observations, it appears likely that future considerations will cover not only energy production processes but totally new experimental propulsion methods as well.


On May 22, 2004, at 9:51 PM, Tony Smith wrote:

Jack, you say
"... There is the "equilibrium virtual pair condensate density"
defined by

(Volume Factor)|Vacuum Coherence|^2 = 1

/\ < 0 when vacuum condensate density falls below that.

/\ > 0 when vacuum condensate density rises above that.

/\ ~ "normal fluid density" i.e.
incoherent broken virtual electron-positron pairs
NOT inside
the coherent virtual condensate of bound virtual pairs! ...".

---------------

So,
do you have in the virtual Dirac electron-positron sea
two components:
1 - bound virtual pairs in a coherent condensate
and
2 - unbound incoherent broken virtual pairs

Yes, this is what I have been saying since Day 1. It's in my book "Destiny Matrix" 2002. I keep saying "two fluid model", but in this case both nonrandom coherent MACRO-quantum superfluid vacuum condensate a random incoherent micro-quantum exotic vacuum net zero point energy density are virtual off-mass shell INSIDE the vacuum.
/\zpf (P,s) the "curvature" measure of the exotic vacuum zero point energy density at a given point P at a given scale s in the sense of continuous wavelet transforms.


such that

when the coherent condensate has relatively high density
you have /\ > 0 Dark Energy
and
when the coherent condensate has relatively low density
you have /\ < 0 Dark Matter ?

Yes


Does that mean that you can produce Dark Energy
by using a real phased-array set of current loops
to
induce order in the virtual Dirac sea,
thus increasing the relative density in the Dirac sea
of the coherent condensate of bound virtual e-p pairs ?

Not only dark energy. The phased array creates any /\zpf(P,s) ~ Tr(K)
FIELD CONFIGURATION needed for any self-propelled UFO creating its own local metric field guv(P,s) according to the Einstein field equation

Guv + /\zpfguv ~ 0


BTW dark energy is "springy vacuum" i.e. you need to do work to dilate a spherical lump of radius r of exotic vacuum with a uniform negative pressure interior whose self energy is

U(spherical EVO of uniform negative pressure) ~+ (/\zpf)^2r^5/G*(s)

as opposed to compressing a real gas of positive pressure with a piston in a cylinder.

This feature of positive potential energy with a positive power law is "quark confinement"! Quarks may be confined by negative pressure!
This is counter-intuitive. It is not generic but model-dependent.

A uniform distribution of electric charge needs a uniform distribution of positive pressure exotic vacuum to stabilize it.

U(uniform charge) + U(uniform positive pressure EV) ~ 0


However, counterintuitively a thin outer shell of electric charge like Ken Shoulders' EVOs needs a uniform EV core of negative pressure to stabilize it.

http://www.ladyofthecake.com/mel/world/hwimages.htm

On May 22, 2004, at 10:51 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

"Elegance is for tailors." I. Rabi - The Groucho Marx of Physics

Is the string-loop membrane bubble about to burst like Internet Vaporware stocks in 2000, like Enron, Tyco, Global Crossing, Martha Stewart, WMD in Iraq et-al? Have we all been had? Dumb dee dumb
dumb! Listen to this as you read on:
http://www.tv-timewarp.co.uk/midi_files/Dragnet.mid

My new book "Super Cosmos" explains the observational mystery of dark energy that Brian Greene's & Co M string theory and John Baez's & Co spin-weave loop theory are powerless to deal with. Both strings and loops are fine conceptual art but have little to do with the real physics problems of the day. Strings and loops are dangerously close to W. Pauli's "not even wrong." They have too many leaps of faith, too many epicyclic fudge factors that I. Rabi would say "Who ordered that?" and too little contact with the amazing observations of dark energy and dark matter as well as unsolved problems of high energy particle physics. Ed Witten has already seen the handwriting on the wall.
How can the cosmological constant be so close to zero but not zero?
"I really don't know. It's very perplexing that astronomical observations seem to show that there is a cosmological constant. It's definitely the most troublesome, for my interests, definitely the most troublesome, observation in physics in my lifetime. In my career that is." Ed Witten
http://superstringtheory.com/people/witten.html

"Super Cosmos" will be on Amazon et-al by Fall 2004
Free online copy 5 megs at
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/SUPERCOSMOS.doc
This is 3rd book in Space-Time and Beyond Series
The 4th book "Hidden Variable" now in production.

The Russian skeptics should turn their attention to strings and loops. They can start with
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0405107
and then compare with Richard Feynman's
http://www.physics.brocku.ca/etc/cargo_cult_science.html

On May 21, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:

FYI good non-technical story reviews mainstream position re: dark
energy/matter
for your non-physicist list

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040522/bob9.asp


Dark Doings

Searching for signs of a force that may be everywhere . . . or nowhere

Ron Cowen

Ever since 1998, Robert Caldwell has been obsessed with something dark and repulsive. He spends nearly every waking moment trying to comprehend a mysterious entity that may be undermining gravity and pulling everything apart, making the universe expand at a faster and faster rate. This presumed force, sometimes called dark energy, might ultimately rip apart every object in the cosmos, from the tiniest of atoms to gargantuan clusters of galaxies
(SN: 2/28/04, p. 132: Available to subscribers at
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040228/fob3.asp). "It's both
fascinating and terrifying," says Caldwell, a cosmologist at Dartmouth
College in Hanover, N.H.

RADIO PROBES. This group of radio telescopes, known as the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Array, is one of several new efforts designed to figure out what's revving up the expansion of the universe.
E. Leitch

Caldwell has partners in his obsession, among them other theorists and the astronomers who dropped the bombshell about cosmic acceleration onto the scientific community 6 years ago. That's when two studies of distant exploding stars first revealed that the universe is accelerating its rate of expansion-exactly the opposite of what had been expected. The mutual gravity of all the matter in the cosmos ought to be slowing down the expansion that began with the Big Bang. The new observations led the teams to propose that there was something previously unimagined pushing everything away from
everything else. "It's kind of amazing that it's only been 6 years" since those findings, says observer John Tonry of the University of Hawaii in Honolulu, "because it now seems so much a part of the canonical lore that we believe about the universe." Now, several teams of researchers are conducting experiments and planning ambitious new ones to investigate this suspected force. On the cosmic scale, astronomers are developing new sky surveys in search of supernovas while also studying the shapes of galaxies and the evolution of galaxy clusters. On a small scale, particle physicists are turning to atom-smashing experiments that may reveal whether the mystery lies in hidden spatial dimensions or in as-yet-undiscovered fundamental particles.

"When you have a big problem, you throw everything you can at it," says Joseph Lykken of Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill.

Cosmic acceleration is "not just another mystery," says Lykken. "It's
getting at something fundamental in our understanding of gravity, energy, and quantum theory. It may take us 20 years to [figure it out], but it will open a whole new chapter in physics, a revolution in our understanding of the world."

Seeking supernovas

In trying to identify the origin of this cosmic push, researchers are
simultaneously considering two divergent and equally bizarre scenarios. In one approach, researchers embrace the concept of dark energy and look for the fingerprints of this unseen entity, which may spread uniformly through the cosmos and be an intrinsic property of empty space. The other strategy denies dark energy's existence and instead seeks to explain cosmic acceleration by modifying the laws of gravity. According to this perspective, the wildly successful theory of gravity developed by Albert Einstein needs revision, especially as it describes gravity over large distances."

This second alternative is wrong. The proof will be in bottling dark energy http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf Heads up! look to the skies. The Truth really is Out There.
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12778_weapons.html

"If dark energy is real, a special type of supernova may shine a light on its properties. Known as type 1a supernovas, these stellar explosions all have about the same intrinsic brightness, like light bulbs of similar wattage. A comparison of that fixed brightness to the brightness with which each supernova appears on the sky enables astronomers to measure the distance to each of these stellar explosions. By recording the spectrum of light emitted by a type 1a supernova, astronomers learn how fast its host galaxy was
receding at the time the supernova erupted. With the information on the distance and recession velocities from many supernovas, astronomers can reconstruct how fast the universe was expanding at different times during its history.

From the 200 or so type 1a supernovas that astronomers have now studied, they've deduced that galaxies today are flying apart faster than they did 5 billion years ago-prima facie evidence for runaway expansion. Now, researchers want to learn whether the presumed dark energy has had the same density throughout cosmic history.
If its density is constant, then dark energy may resemble what Einstein called the cosmological constant-an unchanging property of empty space that imbues the universe with a constant acceleration. If dark energy's density varies, it could either increase in strength and rip the universe apart, or it could fade away. In the latter case, the gravitational tug of all the matter in the universe would eventually cause the cosmos to collapse."

This is a scale-dependent phenomenon in the sense of wavelet-transforms. What is true for the scales of these cosmology observations greater than 100 megaparsecs may not be true on scale of flying saucers ~ 1 - 10,000 meters using dark energy powered weightless zero g-force warp drive showing a "reverse Doppler effect."

SUPER TELESCOPE. A proposed design for the Supernova Acceleration Probe.

R. Lafever, LBNL

By the end of the decade, astronomers hope to have a telescope that will find thousands of type 1a supernovas and produce enough data to reveal whether or not dark energy has varied. For example, the Supernova Acceleration Probe, an orbiting satellite bearing a 1.8-meter telescope and the largest solid-state camera ever constructed, would image and take spectra of some 6,000 supernovas. If it gets funded by NASA and the Department of Energy, the 3-year mission could be launched by 2010. However, the project's funding has been delayed by NASA's recent presidential mandate to focus on human exploration of the moon and Mars.

Cluster connection

In addition to studying explosions inside individual galaxies, astronomers are also trying to glimpse dark energy's effects by determining when and how clusters of galaxies coalesced.

The evolution of clusters-or any massive cosmic structure whose formation depends on gravitational attraction-is closely tied to the strength of dark energy. Early in the universe, when the density of matter was high, gravitational attraction would have handily won the tug-of-war with dark energy's repulsive force. Later, as the universe expanded more and more, matter became more dilute, permitting dark energy's push to overpower it. So, in a universe brimming with dark energy, clusters must form early or they won't form at all.

The earlier the galaxy clusters formed, the stronger dark energy must be. To determine how far back in time most clusters coalesced, astronomers must find the most distant ones. One technique is to look for signs of the hot, X-ray-emitting gas that bathes clusters. The proposed Dark Universe Observatory, a suite of seven Earth-orbiting telescopes, would scan a large chunk of the sky in search of the X rays. Astronomers will then combine the X-ray data with information already in hand from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, which has recorded the distances to several hundred thousand galaxies. The results are expected to indicate when galaxy clusters formed.

Other cluster watchers examine the cosmic microwave background, the radiation left over from the Big Bang. When photons from that background strike the hot gas surrounding a cluster, they gain energy. It's this shift in photon energy, known as the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, that John E. Carlstrom of the University of Chicago and his colleagues will be examining in unprecedented detail beginning late this summer.

Using their new Sunyaev-Zeldovich Array of six 3.5-m radio receivers at the Owens Valley Radio Observatory near Big Pine, Calif.(pictured on this week's cover, above), Carlstrom and his collaborators expect to find thousands of new clusters. Several other teams are building similar radio telescopes. And in 2007, Carlstrom expects to have finished building an even more sensitive detector of clusters, a radio telescope at the South Pole.

Another search strategy for signs of dark energy takes advantage of a cosmic distortion known as gravitational lensing. Because any massive object causes space-time to curve, it can bend the path of a light ray emitted by a body, such as a galaxy, that lies behind it. The shape of that body appears distorted, as if the light had passed through a thick glass lens. In so-called weak lensing, light emitted by the outer parts of distant galaxies is distorted by the gravity of all the individual galaxies that lie in front of it.

Weak lensing relates to dark energy because the expansion rate of the universe determines how much volume lies between distant galaxies and Earth. Dark energy's push would increase the volume of space, making it more likely that light traveling to Earth from a distant galaxy would pass near other bodies and exhibit weak lensing. Dark energy would also require clumps of matter to begin coalescing into galaxies earlier in the history of the universe, also increasing the chances for lensing to occur. To perceive the small effect of weak lensing, astronomers will have to study millions of galaxies distributed across the sky. The proposed Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, an 8-m ground-based instrument, could open for business in 2011. The orbiting Supernova Acceleration Probe could also lend a hand in
weak-lensing studies.

Getting particular

Dark energy may also reveal itself on the subatomic scale. Particle
physicists at Fermilab and other high-energy physics laboratories are paying close attention to the neutrino, an elementary particle known to come in three flavors-tau, muon, and electron. A decade ago, scientists discovered that each type of neutrino could transform into the others. These so-called oscillations indicate that neutrinos, which for decades were thought to be massless, actually have some weight.
Theorists have homed in on what may be a deep connection between dark energy and particle physics. Mass and energy are equivalent, according to Einstein, and scientists have noticed that the energy scale associated with dark energy, about one-thousandth of an electronvolt, is approximately the same as the masses associated with the three known types of neutrinos. Assuming that this isn't a coincidence, scientists have been trying to identify a single quantum mechanical description that applies to both dark energy and neutrinos."

How to compute the dark energy scale: Energy density scales as E^4 in natural units h = c = G = 1. The random ZPE theory-observational discrepancy in dark energy density is ~ 10^122. 120/4 ~ 31. Planck energy scale is ~ 10^28 ev, 28 - 31 = -3, hence dark energy scale is ~ 10^-31x10^28 ev ~ 10^-3 ev ~ 10^12 Hertz, i.e. 1 gigahertz.
Note that random ZPE theory has zero vacuum coherence. That's the problem Ed Witten et-al does not understand in his M-Theory which is an answer without a question!
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0405107

"The Question is: What is The Question?" John A. Wheeler

"They've found that neutrino oscillations can be described by a time-varying field that resembles the time-varying dark energy described in some models. However, these models also predict a fourth type of neutrino for which there is yet no experimental evidence.

In a series of ongoing experiments at Fermilab, scientists are searching for that missing neutrino. In these studies, a beam of muon neutrinos crosses a 30-foot tank of mineral oil. Some 520 light detectors lining the tank record the flashes that occur when neutrinos strike carbon nuclei in the tank. An analysis of those flashes has yet to reveal evidence of a fourth neutrino, but the experiment is set to continue for another 2 years.

Gravity on the fly

Despite the interest in time-varying dark energy, an unchanging energy density akin to the cosmological constant now appears to be the more accurate model for the brand of dark energy that might exist in our universe, says cosmologist Sean Carroll of the University of Chicago. Yet for Carroll and other theorists, the notion of a cosmological constant is downright distasteful."

Only because they do not understand "vacuum coherence." This is what "Super Cosmos" is about.

"For starters, the only source that scientists have come up with for an
unvarying dark-energy density is the energy associated with the vacuum of space. As described by quantum theory, the vacuum seethes with the relentless creation and annihilation of subatomic particles and their antiparticles. But calculations show that the density of this vacuum energy is a whopping 10120 times as big as that of dark energy. Such a glaring discrepancy makes it hard for Carroll and others to fully embrace the cosmological-constant model."

Sean needs to read "Super Cosmos."

"Then there's the cosmic-coincidence scandal. The density of matter in the universe has steadily declined since the Big Bang, and measurements show that today it's about the same as the density of dark energy predicted by the cosmological-constant models. There's only a 1 percent chance, Carroll calculates, that observers would be living at a time when the density of dark energy and matter were comparable. For some physicists, this match is too unlikely to be true.
Instead of accepting dark energy, these scientists would rather try to
account for the acceleration of the universe's expansion by tinkering with Einstein's general theory of relativity."


"O Brane New Worlds!"


"OUTER LIMITS. Illustration of how gravity might leak out of our
four-dimensional world into hidden dimensions, thus explaining why the cosmos is revving up its expansion.

Fermilab

Gia Dvali of New York University and his colleagues propose that gravity parts company with Einstein's theory because some of it leaks away into extra, hidden dimensions. They suggest that the universe as we know it-galaxies, stars, and familiar elementary particles-is confined to a four-dimensional space-time, called a brane, that's embedded in a higher-dimensional world.

Because gravity is an intrinsic property of all of space-time, however, it
may be the only component of the cosmos that isn't trapped on this
four-dimensional brane, Dvali suggests. He compares the scenario to what happens when a metal plate submerged in water is struck with a hammer. As the plate-representing the brane-vibrates, some of the sound waves escape into the surrounding water-representing higher dimensions.

When gravitons, the particles that mediate gravitation attraction, escape the local brane, the gravitational force that remains within the brane diminishes. The weakening of gravity shows up as an increase in the rate of cosmic expansion. In this way, leaky gravity looks and behaves much like dark energy.

Dvali and his collaborators are still fleshing out their model, but it
already has some concrete predictions measurable within our own solar system. Leaky gravity, it turns out, should cause the moon to tilt ever so slightly in its orbit about Earth. New measurements are looking for such a precession by using ground-based lasers that bounce off mirrors that the Apollo 11 astronauts left on the moon 3 decades ago."

I have nothing against extra dimensions, but it is not the only way to have strong short-range gravity.

"Hidden dimensions and leaky gravity may also reveal themselves in
experiments at Fermilab (SN: 2/19/00, p. 122:
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20000219/bob9.asp). At extremely high energies, collisions between two particles, such as a proton and an antiproton, should produce a graviton, along with a spray of other particles. Those other particles will remain trapped on a four-dimensional brane, but the graviton can escape. If it does so, then there ought to be a noticeable deficit in the amount of energy recorded. Such missing energy would serve as a signpost of the universe's higher dimensions and a gravitational theory that goes beyond that of Einstein."

A strong short-range Einstein gravity field in 4D is an off-mass-shell vacuum sink and source of either "missing" or its inverse "anomalous" energy for on-mass-shell quanta by tweaking the local vacuum coherence field. On alleged actual measurements of anomalous energy of mesoscopic EVOs by Ken Shoulders see
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf

"No such missing energy has yet been detected,"

But anomalous energy production in mesoscopic EVO "charge clusters" allegedly have.

"but physicists continue to search. "We had the capability to look for this before, but people didn't' think [the notion of higher dimensions] was a reasonable idea. Now, people have started to take this seriously," says Lykken.

Whether it's dark energy that rules the universe or a kind of gravity that goes beyond what Einstein had imagined remains to be seen. Whatever the answer is, Caldwell notes, it's bound "to answer some deep questions about the universe."

E = mc^2 from Einstein's special relativity of 1905 gave us the WMD of nuclear fission and fusion bombs.

What makes you think that

Ruv ---> Grho(1 + 3w) in weak curvature Newtonian limit and

Ruv + /\zpfguv = 0

in exotic vacuum from Einstein's general relativity of 1916 and Heisenberg's quantum uncertainty principle of 1925 with "More is different" (P.W. Anderson 1967) "vacuum coherence" as the macro-quantum origin of gravity and inertia (J.A. Wheeler 1956 & Andrei Sakharov 1967) will not bring us new WMD as well as peaceful applications? Indeed we already see them in the skies above our nuclear weapons bases. Heads up!
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/dan.html
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12778_weapons.html


"Dark Musings

A springboard to space?

The notion that gravity can be repulsive instead of attractive may sound bizarre, but it has its roots in Einstein's general theory of relativity. The theory states that mass isn't the only source of gravity. Pressure also exerts a gravitational force. There's a further complication because pressure can be positive or negative. And if pressure happens to be negative, gravity pushes rather than pulls."

Say the Magick without magic word and win a trillion smackeroos.
"You bet your life" and everyone else's the day after tomorrow.
http://www.tvparty.com/moviemarx.html

"Positive pressure is the familiar type, like that exerted by an inflated
balloon. You have to expend energy in order to compress it. Something with negative pressure acts like a spring-you have to expend energy to stretch it. That's why theorists say that dark energy imbues space with a springiness, notes David H. Weinberg of Ohio State University, Columbus."

See Appendix 1 in http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf i.e., eq. 1.6 Uzpf(self energy) ~ r^5

Taking the spring analogy further, he says that the question of whether the density of dark energy varies over time is equivalent to asking how hard it is to compress the springiness of space. If the density of dark energy is constant, as in the cosmological-constant model, then dark energy is difficult to compress, as if you're dealing with an especially stiff spring. Models in which dark energy varies with time are akin to imbuing space with a more flexible spring. Observers are now trying to determine the compressibility.

If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered for publication in Science News, send it to editors@sciencenews.org. Please include your name and location.

To subscribe to Science News (print), go to https://www.kable.com/pub/scnw/
subServices.asp.
To sign up for the free weekly e-LETTER from Science News, go to
http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/subscribe_form.asp.
Further Readings:
Caldwell, R.R., M. Kamionkowski, and N.N. Weinberg. 2003. Phantom energy and
cosmic doomsday. Physical Review Letters 91(Aug. 15):071301. Available at
http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0302/0302506.pdf.
Carroll, S.M., and M.M. Guica. Preprint. Sidestepping the cosmological
constant with football-shaped extra dimensions. Available at
http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0302/0302067.pdf.
Cowen, R. 2004. Wrenching findings: Homing in on dark energy. Science News
165(Feb. 28):132. Available to subscribers at
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040228/fob3.asp.
______. 2000. Hunting for higher dimensions. Science News 157(Feb.
19):122-124. Available at
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20000219/bob9.asp.
Deffayet, C., G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze. 2002. Accelerated universe from
gravity leaking to extra dimensions. Physical Review D 65(Feb. 15):044023.
Available at http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0105/0105068.pdf.
Sources:
Robert R. Caldwell
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Dartmouth College
6127 Wilder Laboratory
Hanover, NH 03755
Claude Carlstrom
University of Chicago
Department of Astrophysics
5640 South Ellis Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
Sean M. Carroll
Enrico Fermi Institute
Department of Physics
Center for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
5640 South Ellis Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
Gia Dvali
Department of Physics
New York University
New York, NY 10003
Joe Lykken
Fermilab
P.O. box 500
Mailstop 106
Batavia, IL 60510
John L. Tonry
University of Hawaii, Honolulu
Institute for Astronomy
2680 Woodlawn Drive
Honolulu, HI 96822
David H. Weinberg
Ohio State University
Department of Astronomy
140 West 18th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210


http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040522/bob9.asp
From Science News, Vol. 165, No. 21, May 22, 2004, p. 330.
Copyright (c) 2004 Science Service. All rights reserved.

BTW New version of
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf
online (with Hal Puthoff's old partner Ken Shoulders from Jupiter Tech)
also see
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/Podkletnov.pdf

On May 22, 2004, at 7:09 AM, main_engineering wrote:

The Josephson effect is a tunneling current that flows "Between two
Superconductors" separated by an insulating layer. The dc current depends on
the phase difference between the two wave functions and the density of
electron pairs in each superconductor.

The tunneling current interpretation is NOT FUNDAMENTAL. What is fundamental is the wave interference of TWO macro-quantum coherent order parameters. In the case of the Josephson junction with identical superconductors on both sides of the weak link, yes you have an actual supercurrent across the weak link. NOT so in the vacuum-superconductor link. All you have is a real circulating supercurrent in each nano-ring node of the phase coherent array mesh imbedded in the fuselage of the "saucer". The local PHASE of that real circulating loop of supercurrent INTERFERES with the local PHASE of the vacuum coherence to generate the local value of Alcubierre's key control source parameter Tr(K)

Tr(K) ~ cosine[relative LOCAL phase of loop of real supercurrent minus local phase of virtual electron-positron pairs inside vacuum occupying same space-time region as the real supercurrent. The real electron Cooper pairs are swimming in the virtual sea of coherent electron-positron pairs! Their relative local coherent phases BEAT at a single node of the nanomesh network to form Tr(K) at that node provided the inherent phase noise in the real supercurrent closed loop can be filtered out! You do not want to quiet the phase noise of the real supercurrent nano-loops too much because the effect is intrinsically huge, much larger than nuclear fusion energy density release. This phase coherence is a cosmic trigger to the enormous energy density of the vacuum. This is not a Casimir force effect - completely different laws of physics!

You're saying that there is only 1 superconductor and "the interpenetrating
vacuum coherence in the common support" and that the Josephson effect takes
place between the superconductor and the vacuum. To me, this is the most
important point in your theory. It represents your method of coupling to the
vacuum to control space-time curvature. Now I see that you are saying that
this all happens "inside" the superconductor.

YES! There is no actual tunneling current between real control superconductor and the vacuum in this case. That is not fundamental here. The virtual electron-positron pairs stay virtual. You do not want to hit them with 2mc^2 energy transfers to make them real. That destroys the delicate coherent local phase matching between COINCIDENT real supercurrents and virtual supercurrents that together generate the weightless warp drive.

You say "The vacuum is
everywhere the superconductor is". My question is if it happens inside, then
why not at the surface? If not at the surface, then why would it happen
inside? If it is happening inside, then why are currents persistent for eons
inside a superconductor?

Again you are barking up the wrong tree. Wherever there is a real electron-pair supercurrent there is also the virtual electron-positron pair "aether" it is swimming through. Each real Cooper pair is immersed inside the virtual electron-positron pair vacuum condensate. They each have coherent macro-quantum phases that coherently interfere with each other. What Hal Puthoff and everyone else miss is the coherent local phase of the virtual electron-positron sea. They mistakenly believe the "PV" virtual spin 1/2 electron-positron sea is completely 100% incoherent and uncontrollably random! For example, in SED for EM field it's uncontrollably random for the spin 1 virtual photons in that case. Furthermore, you need smooth ODLRO coherence of the virtual electron-positron pairs in order to generate Einstein's guv(x) field of locally curved smooth space-time with gravity.

Read Ray Chiao's background paper
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0211078
and his more extensive 80 page paper linked from there.

Current cannot be flowing in or out of the
supercouductor, so therefore there is no Josephson effect.

Wrong as I explained above. The flow of actual particles is not fundamental to the basic wave interference essence of the Josephson effect. It is incidental. You have misperceived the physical essence of the macro-quantum effect! You have only seen the shadow not the light. Call this a generalized Josephson-Bohm-Aharonov effect.


I don't see anyone else challenging your ideas where I can learn from their
experience, and I'm not saying that you're wrong.

That's obviously because no one else on this planet at this time has thought of this precise idea-conceptual. I am the first one to have conceived it. It is uniquely original here and now. There is only one Mona Lisa painting by Leonardo Da Vinci, there is only one Ninth Symphony by Beethoven etc. None of the others, Volovik, Modanese et-al have seen precisely what I have seen and am bringing down from the Magick Mountain's Burning Bush. :-)



..these fifteen...Oy!!...these ten commandments!

http://www.ladyofthecake.com/mel/world/hwimages.htm

Plugging in numbers for metric engineering is of course very important.

BTW this stuff is much closer to observations than is both string theory of Brian Greene/Ed Witten & Co (hyped on NOVA cannot explain standard model in detail) and loop gravity of Ashetkar/Baez (spin networks -> spin foam weaves - cannot really get Einstein's GR)
Both strings and loops are almost pseudo-science because
i. too may fudge factors
ii. no conceptual and math consistency
iii. hardly any contact with experiment and observation.
see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0405107
for evidence that what I say about strings and loops as Cargo-Cult is not really exaggerated.

1. Cosmology e.g. type 1a Supernovae, CHANDRA, CDMSII, gravity lensing.

2. Stability of spatially electron -> possible tight atomic states (J.P. Vigier, Maric & Dragic in Beograd "plasma pinch" (new form of non-nuclear atomic power) http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12778_weapons.html Note that exotic vacuum zpe induced strong short range gravity inside core of single spatially extended electron counteracts both Coulomb repulsive self-energy and repulsive QED Casimir force as well as rotational centrifugal barrier as model for "spin."

3. Universality of Regge slope of hadronic resonances.

4. Charge cluster EVOs
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf

5. UFOs, e.g. most recently Mexico - this is data!
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/Podkletnov.pdf


On May 21, 2004, at 6:05 PM, main_engineering wrote:

That helps, Thank you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack



On May 21, 2004, at 9:13 AM, main_engineering wrote:


In any case, okay I see.

2mv is the momentum of the Cooper pairs in the superconductor,

Yes

A_u is the EM Gauge field, probably understood as the superposition of the applied EM field from Podkletnov's inductor coils and the EM field of the superconductor's 4-current density. There is more than 1 source of A_u in Podkletnov's experiment and their relative contributions differ.

Yes, Au is the potential not the field Fuv


Your coherent vacuum field is the /\zpf,

NO. Coherent vacuum field is PSI

/\zpf(induced) ~ Tr(K) (Alcubierre warp drive paper)

where starting from non-exotic vacuum = 0

Locally at a point P, for each NODE in the nano-mesh imbedded in the
flying saucer fuselage (a phased array)

Tr(K) ~ (hG*/c^3)^-1[(Volume of tiny superconducting loop where real
electron pairs flow)(density of condensate of virtual electron-positron
pairs inside vacuum)^1/2(density of condensate of real electron pairs
of tiny superconducting loop)cos2pi[(rotational flux of single real
electron pair in loop)/h - (magnetic flux through superconducting
loop)/(quantum of magnetic flux)]

where mechanical vorticity vector of nanosupercurrent is opposite to
external magnetic field through tiny control superconducting loop (a
node) in the nano-mesh.

G* is effective gravity coupling on scale s of the tiny superconducting
ring.

Magnetic flux = Closed loop line integral of A.dl Stoke's theorem!

Local Phase Difference = (Mechanical Vorticity Flux of single sc
electron pair)/hbar - 2pi(Magnetic Flux through tiny sc loop
node)/(Quantum of Magnetic Flux)

Local Tr(K) that controls WARP FIELD ~ cosine(Local Phase Difference)

This is the Josephson effect where the weak link is between the vacuum coherence and the superconductor "control knob" coherence in their common overlap region of space for each tiny sc loop node of the mesh.

In /\zpf you have sqrt(Cooper pair density}*sqrt(electron-positron)
pair density. What is your estimate of the actual numerical value for these terms and for this product?

~ 10^29 electrons per cubic meter ~ 10^23 per cc.
~ 10^-4 of those form Cooper pairs so that's 10^19 pairs per cc

So roughly (sc density)^1/2 ~ 10^9 per cm^-3/2

What is quantum of area?

Suppose it's a Planck area.

How big is effective volume of SC nano ring? Say 10^-21 cc

/\zpf ~ 10^+66 cm^-2 (10^-21 cc)(10^33)(10^9)cos(Theta)

This is too strong an effect!

Suppose instead, quantum of area is 1 fermi^2

/\zpf ~ 10^+26cm^-2 10^-21 cc 10^42 cos(Theta)

Still very strong compared to curvature of space at surface of Earth which is only ~ 10^-26 cm^-2

Remember, generally the Theta phase noise will wash out the effect, fortunately! We are playing with a very large effect here if we quiet down the Theta phase noise. In general the statistical average

-> zero

The hugeness of the effect is similar to the 122 Powers of Ten random estimate of the Cosmological Constant.

It's only because rotating superconductors, and currents in superconducting coils have large phase noise that we do not see these "anti-gravity" controlled or "bottled dark energy" effects easily. This is a good thing in a way because this is potentially a huge effect - i.e. dangerous if we do not know what we are doing. Sorceror's Apprentice Effect. I mean if any of this is correct.

In other words what Ning Li and Podkletnov are attempting could be dangerous - an inadvertent WMD - maybe. I mean if I am in right ball park here.

If the flying saucers are real and are alien ET then we know already such supertechnology is Out There Here-Now.

There is also the volume factor and the quantum of area.

The point is that if real saucers fly with zero g-force warp drive (G. Trimble "G-Engine") they must obey my equations and that gives estimates of the parameters in my equations. What they are precisely depends on the state of the advanced ET alien supertechnology. There is a manifold of these control parameters that we need to estimate from the observed flight of the saucers and the "fact" they are "empty" inside (Col. Phil Corso). That is a big job of gedanken reverse engineering, but it is doable by a team of visonary metric
engineers here in North Beach not in Austin, Texas.

The scale of curvature at surface of Earth is of order

GM/c^2r^3

M = mass of Earth, r = radius of Earth

So we need

/\zpf ~ Tr(K) ~ GM/c^2r^3 for observed flights

GM/c^2r^3 ~ (hG*/c^3)^-1(Volume of Tiny SC Loop))(Vacuum Condensate Density)^1/2(SuperConducting Density)^1/2

That is if we want to metric engineer at the scale of the local
curvature tensor field at the surface of the Earth to shape the
timelike geodesic path of the saucer from the saucer itself, i.e. to
nullify the external curvature tensor field from M!

If hG*/c^3 ~ 1 fermi^2

Then non-exotic vacuum condensate density ~ (1 fermi)^-3

Work in progress with Ken Shoulders who worked with Hal Puthoff I think at NSA and later at Bill Church's Jupiter Technologies and in Austin.

http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf

Some think that Ken's "charge clusters" that I rename EVO's are merely charged mercury droplets. Ken says he can disprove that. What do I know? I am merely a simple-minded theorist. In any case I make a model of what Ken may be seeing.

One curious counterintuitive feature

Einstein's GR in weak field limit is Newton's gravity with a correction term

Grad^2(Gravity Potential) ~ G(mass density)(1 + 3w)

For exotic vacuum, Type 1a supernovae + CHANDRA et-al show
w ~ -1

The rule of thumb is G(mass density)(1 + 3w) is replaced by c^2/\zpf when w = -1. /\zpf can have either sign depending on intensity of local vacuum coherence field PSI.

Consider a thin shell of N electrons at radius r. The repulsive Coulomb self-energy is

~ (Ne)^2/r

Imagine a homogeneous sphere of uniform /\zpf field up to radius r as the inner core of the thin shell of N electrons.

The gravity potential self energy is then of the form (c^2/\zpf)^2r^6/G*r
where G* >> G on a short scale.

The total self-potential energy is then of the form

U = a(Ne)^2/r + b(c^2/\zpf)^2r^5/G* > 0

Note that both energy terms must be positive to have a possibility of metastability of the charge cluster. This BTW applies to a single spatially extended electron as in J.P. Vigier's "tight atomic states" theory for "cold fusion" or the "sub-atomic bomb."
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12778_weapons.html

The positive Coulomb repulsive barrier self-energy decreases with increasing radius of the thin shell. In contrast the positive exotic vacuum core zero point energy induced strong short-range effective gravity potential self-energy increases with increasing radius of the thin shell of electric charge. Together they form a potential well of oppositely directed force gradients allowing for the possibility of metastable equilibrium in this toy static spherically symmetric model where

Total Force on Thin Shell of Electric Charge

= -GradU = +a(Ne)^2/r^2 - 5b(c^2/\zpf)^2r^4/G*

With the metastable equilibrium point of the EVO charge cluster at the critical point:

GradU = 0

Of course in real EVOs this toy model is too simple.

/\zpf = (hG*/c^3)^-1[(hG*/c^3)^3/2|PSI|^2 - 1]

and PSI obeys a nonlinear dynamical Landau-Ginzburg type nonlinear nonunitary local partial differential equation with the Mexican Sombrero potential coupled to Einstein's exotic vacuum field equation

Guv + /\zpfguv = 0

And we have the complex dynamical behavior you see in Ken Shoulders' photographs in

http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf

re: http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12778_weapons.html

Message: 19
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 19:59:06 -0700
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: Re: New data on dark energy Chandra: Thumbs up for w = -1.

Excellent news. They are saying w = -1 as I have said. This and CDMSII
refuting Italian false positives is thumbs up for my theory in "Super
Cosmos" thumbs down for phantom energy w < -1 and thumbs down for
quintessence -1 < w < -1/3. Also thumbs down for dark matter as
supersymmetry partners.

Let's see if the experiments continue to confirm this in next few years.

This is all explained in my book Super Cosmos soon out as well as in my
two previous books Destiny Matrix and Space-Time and Beyond II from
late 2002.


Memorandum for the Record

Cargo cult pseudo-physics or important breakthroughs?

Paul Murad, allegedly from DIA who runs STAIF 'out of the box' meetings sponsored by AIP, worked with Dyatlov.
Murad allegedly wrote about flying saucers:

The mis-spellings are in the original.


From:

"Because of attitudes, mentioning UFOs per se will detract from the credibility of the paper. There is nothing wrong with discussing a hypothetical ship that was saucer shape.... This looks quite interesting. From my limited knowledge about UFO wreakage, the vehicles are made with a top half of pure magnesium and bottom half with aluminum. Magesium cannot sustain a magenetic field but is a great conductor. The sphere constellation uses nickel for magnetic properties. Basically, you have a rotating magnetic field trapped inside of an electric field."

Note Uri Geller warns of "11-11" note "11" in Murad's e-mail address and use of "UFO" - curious coincidence. Murad admits "knowledge about UFO wreakage" (sic)



On May 19, 2004, at 6:52 AM, Doc Savage wrote:


On May 19, 2004, at 3:09 AM, SarfattiScienceSeminars@yahoogroups.com wrote:

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/CBirlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

There are 19 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. Re: Man-Made Flying Saucers?
From: Jack Sarfatti
2. Re: Reply to Jack Sarfatti's Comments in PRAVDA
From: Jack Sarfatti
3. Re: And what about Dyatlov???
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
4. Re: And what about Dyatlov???
From: "Berkant"
5. Searl Replication in the USA???
From: "Berkant"
6. Re: Searl Replication in the USA???
From: "Berkant"
7. PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons
From: Jack Sarfatti
8. Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons
From: "Berkant"
9. P. Murad and V. I Dyatlov
From: "Berkant"
10. Classical electromagnetic devices to generate macroscopic Kerr-Newman singularit
From: "Berkant"
11. Re: Classical electromagnetic devices to generate macroscopic Kerr-Newman singularit
From: "Berkant"
12. Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
13. Father of Jet Engine Von Ohain - Expert in Electrofluidsystems
From: "Berkant"
14. Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
15. Heim
From: Jack Sarfatti
16. Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons
From: Jack Sarfatti
17. Richard Feynman on Cargo Cult Science Re: Rabbi Sarfatti introduces "Torsion Field Invocation"
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
18. Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
19. Re: New data on dark energy Chandra: Thumbs up for w = -1.
From: Jack Sarfatti


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 06:50:52 -0700
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: Re: Man-Made Flying Saucers?


On May 17, 2004, at 9:47 PM, Tim Ventura wrote:

Interesting -- it also contains WW2 era photos with ground crews:
http://www.buforadio.com/ufofilespennsylvania/id22.html

I am skeptical. Nick is in a better position to judge.
No known propulsion system back in 20's & 30's not to mention dubious
aerodynamics.


[This message contained attachments]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 07:00:19 -0700
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: Re: Reply to Jack Sarfatti's Comments in PRAVDA

Gary let me know if they publish this.

On May 17, 2004, at 9:24 PM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:

Dear Inna Novikova,

Thank you for having the foresight to run my story and Dr. Sarfatti's
comments in PRAVDA.

I offer a few additional remarks, in response to Sarfatti's comments:

Sarfatti writes:

As far as I know I am the only physicist so far to claim: " that the
invisible gravitating dark matter could be the other side of the
invisible
dark energy coin..."

Sarfatti's ideas are unique, however at least one other physicist,
Gonzalez-Diaz in Madrid has suggested a related idea based on a
sub-quantum
potential: "dark matter and dark energy are both unitarily described
by just
the scalar field..."

http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0311244

Yes, but I had not read that by Diaz when I made that remark. Also Diaz does not derive the Einstein GR gravity field equations from the phase of the scalar field the way I claim to do. Diaz assumes GR as a given, so does Modanese. Further he does not make the explicit prediction that dark matter detectors should give null results in principle like Michelson-Morley experiments for ether drift.

Regarding "Some French, Serbian and Ukrainian physicists have been working on new theories of extended electrons and solitons, so perhaps a sub-quantum bomb is not entirely out of the question."

Sarfatti writes:

"Bekkum fails to acknowledge J.P. Vigier as the leader of this
project."

Although I neglected to mention Vigier, Jack also fails to mention the
influence of George Lochak and the The Foundation Louis de Broglie.

I don't know if Lochak and Vigier collaborated on this. I do not see
any work by Lochak on "tight atomic states" as a mechanism for "cold
fusion" energy production.

As an example, here is a Russian paper:

---

http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-26j/aflb26jp381.pdf

Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 26 n± special, 2001
381

Soliton Model of Extended Quantum Particles

Yu.P. Rybakova and Bijan Sahab
Department of Theoretical Physics, Peoples' Friendship University of
Russia
Laboratory of Information Technologies,
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

ABSTRACT. Some first principles that, we believe, could serve as
foundation for quantum theory of extended particles are formulated.
It is also shown that in the point-like particles limit the
non-relativistic
quantum mechanics can be restored. Bohm problem of nonlinear resonance
has been considered and its possible solution has been given.
Within the frame-work of the Einstein-de Broglie soliton model a
hydrogen
atom has been simulated.

I never read this paper.

----

As for the "Podkletnov effect" and the theory of Ning Li:

American Military Investigated Anti-gravity Weapons

Government Budget Document evidence that the United States Department
of
Defense actively pursued reports of anti-gravity effects

The United States Government Official Website, http://www.firstgov.gov/
allows a rapid search of official government documents available over
the
internet.

A quick search for Dr. Ning Li, the physicist that predicted an
anti-gravity
effect from her theory, and the key word "contract" leads to an
official US
Government Department of Defense budget document:

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/Docs/FY01RPT.doc

The document describes contract number DAAH01-01-9-R001, titled
"Gravito-Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment", awarded by
the US
Army Aviation and Missile Command, to Dr. Ning Li's company AC
Gravity, LLD

New means of propulsion, ways of controlling missiles and gun launched
munitions, lowering of the effective weight of tanks and heavy
vehicles,
deflecting incoming missiles, including ICBM's, are listed as among the
military applications for this technology.

This document supports Jane's Defence Weekly contributor Nick Cook's
exposure of a similar project at the American aerospace contractor
Boeing.
Previously Nick Cook showed the BBC and Jane's documents as proof that
Boeings' Phantom Works facility were investigating the Russian
scientist
Evgeny Podkletnov's reports of repulsive antigravity from spinning
superconducting disks.

Thank you again.

Sincerely,

Gary S. Bekkum
Starstream Research
USA




__________________________________________

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 18:18:13 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
Subject: Re: And what about Dyatlov???

Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 23:43:44 -0000 From: "Berkant"
Subject: And what about Dyatlov???

What is the opinion of the Russian Academy
of Science regarding the
person and work of Prof. V. L. Dyatlov??

RAS Academicians Edward Kruglyakov and Valery
Rubakov published their review on
books by V.L.Dyatlov, A.N.Dmitriev, and
V.I.Merkulov in Physics-Uspekhi
1999, v. 169, #5.
The review is highly negative.
http://ufn.ru/abstracts/con1999.html
(subscription to Physics-Uspekhi required)

Please summarize content of critical review as none of us subscribe to Uspekhi.


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 16:42:38 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: Re: And what about Dyatlov???

Paul Murad claims to have worked with Dyatlov on exotic propulsion - a euphemism for flying saucers obviously.


Alexander, thanks for the info..

http://www.ufn.ru:/Index99.html#99_1

Please can you provide me with a PDF copy of the following articles:

On "What is happening to us?" by E.P. Kruglyakov (V.L. Ginzburg)
Download .pdf file (ufn993p.pdf, 65Kb)

and

On the "Problems of non-uniform physical vacuum" book series (Ê.P.
Kruglyakov, V.A. Rubakov)
Download .pdf file (ufn995g.pdf, 93Kb)

--

Sergej Godin told us at the greenglow list that he is applying the
work of Dyatlov.. he didn't want to tell us more.. but he also added
that in his view those triangled crafts were using generators
similar to Searl generators on the three corners of the craft..
he even added that he observed such a craft over Shukovsky test area
in Moscow.. of course, we were not able to check his claims.. and I
assume Marc Millis as list member of greenglow was curious and
accepted his abstract... at the time I was co-moderator at
greenglow..

maybe you know about those dubious experiments claiming to have
replicated the so-called Searl-effect..

http://users.erols.com/iri/JPCReport.htm

An Experimental Investigation of the Physical Effects in a Dynamic
Magnetic System V. Roschin, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow,
Russia; S. Godin, Inst. for High Temperatures, Russian Academy of
Science, Moscow, Russia


Sergey was never able to show us photos of the build-up..
only some photos of small scale rotors of magnets...
we thought he would show them at the NASA conference...

please note that Evgeny Podkletnov also claims to have worked for
the Institute for High Temperatures of the RAS...

Nick Cook says Podkletnov's father had Victor Schauberger's papers on the Nazi "Bell" machine that seems to have influenced Podkletnov's current anti-gravity work.


Are Roschin and Godin really RAS Academicians???

if yes, please can you provide me with the contact addresses..
I assume you are an RAS Academician...

Thank you in advance.

Berkant

--- In SarfattiScienceSeminars@yahoogroups.com, "Alexander
Konkretny" wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 23:43:44 -0000 From: "Berkant"

Subject: And what about Dyatlov???

What is the opinion of the Russian Academy
of Science regarding the
person and work of Prof. V. L. Dyatlov??

RAS Academicians Edward Kruglyakov and Valery
Rubakov published their review on
books by V.L.Dyatlov, A.N.Dmitriev, and
V.I.Merkulov in Physics-Uspekhi
1999, v. 169, #5.
The review is highly negative.
http://ufn.ru/abstracts/con1999.html
(subscription to Physics-Uspekhi required)



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 19:21:31 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: Searl Replication in the USA???


Several years ago I was also in touch with Searl... is he alive???

in the past he was regularly invited to the meetings of the German
Association of Vacuum Field Energy... this was the time when Dr.
Hans A. Nieper was head of this German group.. Uri Geller may
remember him.. Nieper made several photos with him...

in Nieper's final years he was in touch with Bernie Haisch.. he was
proud telling us about his Lockheed contacts.. this was the time
when this German group began to promote the work of Hal Puthoff..

then I left this group and entered MUFON-CES...

anyway, Tim Ventura has recently uploaded some papers dealing with the Searl generator...

http://www.americanantigravity.com/paul-brown-seg.shtml


In this letter, dated December 5th, 1986, Paul Brown details the
results of his amazing SEG replication.

Brown claims that the SEG generated enough power to actually melt
the Neodymium Magnets, and estimated that the output was measured
in 'kilowatts or megawatts'.


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 19:47:26 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: Re: Searl Replication in the USA???


PS: Now I am no ufo study group...

Just a brave scientist working on bionics at TU Berlin:-)



-________________________________________________________________________

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:14:22 -0700
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons

Memorandum for the Record

Military Intelligence information/disinformation/misinformation I am
receiving in the wake of the article in PRAVDA
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12778_weapons.html

On May 18, 2004, at 6:50 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:


On May 17, 2004, at 9:47 PM, Tim Ventura wrote:

Interesting -- it also contains WW2 era photos with ground crews:
http://www.buforadio.com/ufofilespennsylvania/id22.html

I am skeptical. Nick is in a better position to judge.
No known propulsion system back in 20's & 30's not to mention dubious
aerodynamics.

STAIF leader Paul Murad has written that he too thinks the saucers are
real and he works for DIA in the Pentagon. In that regard Murad agrees
with the French chap below.

I received this. I have deleted many detailed images and designs from
the original document of more than 2 megs. My comments are sparse and
incomplete as I have not digested it nor really checked its
authenticity as yet. Caveat, this document is probably disinformation.
I am not endorsing it. Intelligent feedback welcome.

The document is mostly about MHD with copious images. There is some
wrong physics about anti-gravity that I excerpt here at beginning

" About anti-gravitation.
Research in theoretical cosmology which we have published, inspired by
information received through alien contacts, has led us to build a
cosmological model based on two universes,"

This model was discussed by Phillipe Gaugain in our recent Ideas of
March London Meeting March 17, 2004 described in my book "Super Cosmos"
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/SUPERCOSMOS.doc 5 meg file FREE ONLINE COPY
Now in production in hard copy and soon to be available from
http://amazon.com et-al

On May 18, 2004, at 7:38 PM, Berkant Goeksel wrote:

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/docs/Stargate-en.pdf

Unified Dirac-Maxwell field as space-time portal
Philippe-Alexandre GAUGAIN
mirror@europeanufosurvey.com


On May 18, 2004, at 7:08 PM, Berkant Goeksel wrote:


okay... now I have it... after looking at the homepage of the
European Ufo Survey... interesting.. shall I contact them??!

are you member of this group??

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/english.html

Mission Statement

We are an independant European team of about 28 scientists (
Physicists, Mathematicians, Astronomers, Biologists, Computering ,
Optics engineers, Free Energy researchers, Linguists,
Archeologists...) and free Ufo researchers who have been silently
involved in Ufological investigations for more than 20 years .

EUS is a diverse team from over 10 different European nationalities.
We share professional, respect and friendship links for a very long
time.
Each one of us have is accurate research field and skills and
individually deal with, and share his results when, and in the way
they wish with the rest of the team.

The most important thing for EUS:

Is to work and continue the research without any waste of time.
As many of us are in university careers, or the like, for the moment
we have decided to protect the private datas of the associate members
of the team, and publish our statements, and conclusions as a joint
voice of one accord, and thus the group EUS.



" ... which develops ideas put forward by Andrei Sakharov in 1976 : the
twin universe cosmology. We believe the latter also to have been in
contact with aliens. Just read the strange end terms of his speech,
which was read by his lady friend Helena Bonaire in Sweden on receiving
the Nobel Prize. This model consists of a two-fold universe or
double-universe. Australian researchers Foot and Volkas today follow a
similar path, calling it "mirror-universes" (papers published in
Physics Review). We have shown that the "apparent mass" of the "twin
universe" was negative, i.e. twin matter repels ours while two
particles of twin matter attract each other, in accordance with
Newton's law. This repulsion explains the re-acceleration of the
expansion of our universe, while it slows down the expansion of the
twin."

I am skeptical of this particular model. It is not needed. See my book
for details.

"When interstellar vessels cruise over huge distances, they use the
twin as a sort of "express subway". In this universe, which is
extremely rarefied in regions adjacent to ours, distances are shortened
and the speed of light is high. This makes space travel possible,
subject to the principle : "it is illegal to exceed the speed of light
of the universe in which one is travelling."

The Alcubierre "FTL without ftl" weightless warp drive solution solves
this problem without needing a huge Kerr-Newman black hole and with my
/\zpf field for the exotic vacuum w = -1 zero point dark energy/matter
we can implement that solution in principle.

"One American research team is working on an idea based on attempting
locally to modify the value of the speed of light; the "warp driving
concept"."

He probably means Hal Puthoff. I refute Hal's "PV" dielectric program
in my book "Super Cosmos." It has no chance of working in my opinion.
It has already been contradicted by experiment in the case of the
pulsar data as shown by Michael Ibison who works with Hal. I call this
NASA BPP where "BPP" means "Broken Propulsion Program." ;-)

Note "with the help of aliens"
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/spectra.html :-)

"Our approach is different and far more advanced. With the help of
aliens, it has taken us years just to begin understanding how it works
and it would require pages to describe. In principle, the vehicle's
mass must be transferred to the twin universe."

This whole idea of changing mass m is wrong-headed and muddled. Hal
Puthoff has a version of it, and it is in Nick Cook's book "The Hunt
for Zero Point."

Standard physics for rest mass of lepto-quarks is the "Higgs mechanism"

m ~ (coupling)(vacuum coherence) at scale ~ 10^-16 cm

You do not want to change e/m ratios and e^2/hc even if you could
because that will blow up the matter so modified!

What you have on timelike worldlines that are NOT free float geodesic

W = mg

and it is the g you control with metric engineering! You leave m alone!
Change it at your peril! Changing m is Mickey Mouse in Sorceror's
Apprentice in Walt Disney's "Fantasia."

"When this operation takes place near the Earth, the latter becomes
invisible to the craft but acts on it as a negative, repulsive mass. If
the stations in our universe and in the adjacent region if the twin are
rapidly alternated, this is not detected by an observer, however in one
phase the vessel drops under the Earth's attraction, while in the other
it rises under the Earth's repulsion. Globally this amounts to an
apparent cancellation of the vessel's weight, whichever it's mass may
be. This is our interpretation of what people call anti-gravitation. We
do not know whether aliens have given earthlings the tip about those
techniques."

The "French' are wrong here. One can cancel weight W, but that is a
primitive way to put it. The idea is that the flying saucer can steer
its only local timelike geodesic in which it is weightless! W = 0, m
stays the same! You do this with a nano-mesh phase array of devices
embedded in the fuselage of the saucers that controls the /\zpf field
configuration in Einstein's exotic vacuum equation

Guv + /\zpfguv = 0

With stress-energy density current flow conserved according to

Guv^;v + /\zpf^,vguv = 0

/\zpf is the source pump to metric engineer Guv as desired with small
amounts of on-board power using delicate phase matching as in the
Josephson effect. The weak link is between the control high Tc
superconductor coherence in each node of the mesh and the vacuum
coherence as shown in math detail in my book "Super Cosmos."

Obviously the French "CNRS" do not understand how anti-gravity zero
point energy metric engineering works any better than Hal Puthoff,
STAIF and NASA BPP. I show above how it really works.

The MHD stuff has nothing to do with anti-gravity and my remarks do not
apply to the MHD information in this document.


"Open Letter from a group of French scientists to the Initiator of the
Disclosure Project.

Introduction.
We are a group of French scientists. We have read Dr. Greer's text on
the Disclosure Web site and have been impressed by his remarks. We are
convinced, as he is, that certain nations, and chiefly the US, have
been able to derive from the UFO files, from crashed UFO retrievals and
from possible contacts with aliens, information which has led to
entirely new scientific knowledge. We shall farther discuss the
assessment of developments achieved on the basis of these information.
The question is : "how far have they reached ?". We hold accurate
information about the American black programs linked with hypersonic
planes, be it the satellisable Aurora spy craft or a hypersonic long
range bomber for which the B2 is but a cover-up. Technical data in our
possession allow us, in this particular case, to sustain our
assertions. These technologies were directly derived from the analysis
of the wreck retrieved at Roswell, which was a hypersonic space shuttle
and not an interstellar vehicle. We deplore the fact that this reverse
engineering has only been applied to military ends, since these
techniques could have found better use, the one as a completely
re-reusable space launcher - much more efficient and cheaper than the
customary rockets - the other as a hypersonic commercial plane.

Possible antimatter synthesis.
Besides the above, it is highly presumable that the Americans have
mastered a massive antimatter production technique, this - and not the
"void energy" - being the near magic, inexhaustible future energy
coming out of nowhere; unless one considers the transformation of
matter into antimatter by thermonuclear compression as a means of
"extracting energy from the void". I shall add that once antimatter has
been produced in this way, it can farther be used to produce more. No
nuclear explosion is needed at every start. However this technology
lays in the hands of humanity incredibly more destructive bombs than
the most powerful thermonuclear weapons presently available. It also
generates a potential straightforward war hazard through the fact that
very small quantities of antimatter can be stocked in crystals under
very stable electrostatic confinement; this allows the production of
tiny bombs - "bucky balls" - , the size of an egg, thermal shield
included, of 40 ton TNT power. Thanks to their relatively limited power
and the fact that no waste is produced, these bombs could readily be
used. Instead of dropping high power bombs on isolated targets, which
would throw up great quantities of pulverulent matter into the high
atmosphere and generate nuclear winter effects, it would be possible to
scatter a great number of these mini antimatter bombs and cause equal
damage, whilst avoiding that the dust should rise at high altitudes and
generate a nuclear winter. We believe that the US already possess a
considerable number of such weapons with which they would be capable of
reducing whole countries to ashes, and we fear that these devices will
soon be discreetly brought into action on more restricted scales. This
takes us far out of sight of the positive applications of which
Humanity could benefit from such a technology and thus produce, as Dr.
Greer rightly puts it, "flowering deserts".

The raw material and waste problem.
We believe that the ET vehicles visiting us use antimatter, stocked on
board or synthesised, as primary source of energy. This basic energy
could be put to a wide range of uses. One of the most useful is to
master the transmutation of materials and be thus able to synthesise at
will any type of atom. Coupled with a very advanced nano-technology,
this would allow the most complex systems to be synthesised without
human intervention, i.e. without "work". Inversely, any system composed
of atoms could be converted into neutral waste such as helium, the
typically ideal waste. If we survive the next century, this is the
picture of our future technology. If such a set of techniques were
completed with a more comprehensive approach of biology then that which
is practised on Earth today, the Human being would have the keys of a
Golden Age within arm's reach.

Present state of technology on Earth.
We do not know how far these technologies may have been developed on
Earth. To this date we may only strongly suspect that antimatter
synthesis through thermonuclear compression has been obtained in the US
towards the end of the sixties; we shall farther come back to this.
Another problem raised by Dr. Greer is machine weight reduction,
suppression or even inversion (anti-gravity). We consider this as
feasible. This is the technique used by UFO's when they hover without
any air displacement. In our opinion this can only be understood via an
important paradigm shift, a different way of comprehending space and
matter. But this is still speculative and we suggest also coming back
to it farther on. Anti-gravity control could obviously be applied to
civilian transportation, but far beyond this, we think it would open
the way to outer space travel. Here again, we shall postpone the
subject to the end of this paper.

Our comments on the Space Energy Access Systems.
However commendable the feeling from which this project arises, we are
doubtful as to its chances of success. We think that its applications
(unlimited energy production, anti-gravity), even though physically
conceivable, would call for very expensive advanced technologies. By
comparison one could imagine the Foundation offering men of the
Antiquity a full purse of gold to whomever would fly a plane with three
passengers over more than six miles. We are sceptical as to the
compatibility of such techniques with soft technologies within reach of
amateurs and moderately sized laboratories. Such developments may, to
our mind, only be envisaged by large scale laboratories with
considerable funds for which a million dollar prize would seem but a
derisory sum compared with the cost of such research. Consequently,
laboratories of that size would inevitably be part of the
military-industrial lobbies. At best would the supporters of such a
project be rewarded with interesting theoretical ideas, but no
exploitable practical results. Such is our opinion, but of course we
may be mistaken.

Our answer to the Disclosure Manifest.
Whilst we are not in a state to submit to Dr. Greer plans for an
unlimited energy producing machine or one that could suppress the force
of gravity, we are, on the other hand, able to present strong arguments
in support of his campaign against the diversion of technologies by
military-industrial complexes elusive to American political power and
dedicated to serve a few who seek world domination by force. The
elements we are in a state to produce are related to underwater high
velocity propulsion and construction of very long range hypersonic
planes, both these techniques being based on what is called
magneto-hydro-dynamics, or MHD.

deleted

above from a "Dr Petit" allegedly of CNRS in Paris?


Message: 8
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:37:55 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons


Mama mia... I have not read the Petit text.. maybe I should do now..

please note that I was introduced to Paul Murad by Gary Stephenson
from Boeing.. Gary was fascinated from the MHD Braking idea which is
not mine.. I only revived the idea of Prof. Ali Bülent Cambel and
also the work of Prof. Arthur Kantrowitz..

it seems that aerospace companies are highly interested in MHD
Braking... I did not know.. the French MHD text forwarded by Jack
was sent to me by an Italian aerospace engineer from Alenia.. like
Gary from Boeing he was interested in MHD Braking and papers of
Cambel who by the way was also science advisor to the White House
when Kennedy was president..

The MHD stuff may be very important to conventional machines, but is not directly important for anti-gravity warp drive.


and several days ago I was also contacted by a German Aerospace
company.. they will come with a delegation soon.. mama mia..
I did not know that MHD is so interesting...

there are virtual and real plasmons.. I think Jack is talking about
virtual plasmsons whereby me and other talk about real plasmons..

The only link I can see for what I need would be a macro-quantum condensate of plasmons (real or virtual) in a pumped open system far from thermodynamic equilibrium (Prigogine dissipative structure & Frohlich pumped non-equilibrium macro-condensates) whose giant coherent wave can interfere with the giant physical vacuum wave it shares same space with to form a Josephson weak link. Changing the relative phase between control condensate and vacuum condensate in a given volume element changes the Tr(K) Alcubierre warp drive field configuration of the self-controlled free float timelike geodesic path of the ship. The coherent phase nano-array imbedded all over the ship's outer hull enables it to execute hairpin turns instantly without any g-forces on the ship and crew.


the second may be more of a secondary effect.. so I doubt that ufos
have only MHD propulsion which would only work in atmosphere..

it is a nice synchronicity here that trixcleverspace mentioned the
old message

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SarfattiScienceSeminars/message/3171

I will come back to plasmons.. this is a key item..
and I agree with Jack that the key people at DoD, NASA etc. have no
idea about this.. so I also won't go to STAIF2005..


_________________________________________________________________________________

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:57:14 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: P. Murad and V. I Dyatlov


Alexander may know understand why I am interested in the review of
the Dyatlov book.. I hope he is able to send us PDF copies of the
review papers from Academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences..

BTW, the following informations have nothing to do with Gary's
article to PRAVDA.. it only come out as a result of reviewing papers
on MHD!!!


Here we go with a paper from Paul about celestial mechanics and the
works of Jefimenko and Dyatlov.. anyone interested can email me for
a Winword DOC copy

Yes, send me one. Thanks.


--

ROTATION EFFECTS OF BODIES IN CELESTIAL MECHANICS

Lavrentiev M.M., Dyatlov V.L., Fadeev S.I., Murad P.A.*, Kostsova
N.E.

Russia, Novosibirsk, Institute of Mathematics SB RAN
*USA, Vienna, Virginia

The gravitational equations of Heaviside are used to derive the
momentum equations of celestial mechanics. The derivation includes
a gravity potential that has additional terms that account for the
spin (torsion) field of the sun and the galaxy which are ignored in
both Newtonian theory as well as Einstein's Theory of Relativity.
These 'spin' terms account for rotation of the sun, planetary
bodies, and other space objects as well as the contraction of the
elliptical orbits of the planets moving around the sun. The
consequences of the gravity theory of Heaviside are numerically
verifiable and represent a modern approach to better understand
Astronautics.

---

A UNIFIED MACROSCOPIC MODEL OF MATTER AND THE PHYSICAL VACUUM
Dyatlov V.L., Murad P.A.*, Kostsova N.E.

Russia, Novosibirsk, Institute of Mathematics SB RAN
*USA, Vienna, Virginia.

Matter consists of elementary particles with both a positive rest
mass and energy. The physical vacuum is a heterogeneous medium that
possess a neutral charge, polarization, electrical, magnetic,
gravitational, and spin fields. To understand each, a unified
macroscopic model is created based upon the foundations of four
different but interconnected theories. These are electrodynamics
from Maxwell; gravidynamics from Heaviside; the special theory of
relativity; and mechanics. This union creates a more complete
description to describe macroscopic physical processes exhibited in
both matter and the physical vacuum.
The introduction of the Heaviside theory into the model of the
physical vacuum allows an extension that includes explaining the
rotation effects of planetary bodies in celestial mechanics which
are ignored by Newtonian and special relativity theory as well as
the physical behavior of self-luminous bodies of natural anomalous
phenomena capable of penetrating through solid substance, emitting
radiation of electromagnetic waves, initiating electrical and
magnetic field, levitation, rotation, explosions, and the
modification of matter.

---


I. INTRODUCTION

There is always a requirement to examine the gravity
potential in problems involving orbital mechanics. Obviously with
the success of current models, changes in the gravity gradient are
included to the point that oceans, mountain peaks, and ore deposits
are adequately described and the orbital prediction and tracking of
a satellite is well-known beyond needed accuracies. Why look at a
new potential?
The Newtonian approach suggests that gravity can be
represented as a LaPlacian function. Einstein did not feel that
gravity could be felt instantaneously and looked at a model which
could support wave phenomenon. He extended this into a model which
used space-curvature to predict orbital motion of a body where the
curve was a consequence of the gravity environment. His initial
approach of developing an equation capable of supporting waves was a
far better representation that would be easier to implement in lieu
of looking at soliton solutions.
The problem with relativistic speeds is that the relativity factor
now becomes a parameter where a singularity occurs when an object
reaches the speed of light. Mass becomes infinite as well as
certain magnetic and electric field components, electric and
magnetic charges also become infinite. Based upon previous efforts,
the point was raised that a space propulsor that incorporates these
electromagnetic effects is an ideal approach to treat the infinite
increase in mass that is a consequence at light speed.
These issues are complex by themselves. The issue remains regarding
the environment and what occurs to gravity at these conditions?
Newtonian potentials imply that there is no effect whatsoever and
one wonders why light is bent when it travels near a star.
Newtonian gravity offers no explanation. On this basis, the
Jefimenko gravity model offers a different approach. This model
based upon ideas from Heaviside, treats gravity as a function of
both position and velocity. Moreover, the relativity factor is
directly incorporated into this model and does not need to be
treated as a separate factor for relativistic conditions. The
interesting issue with Jefimenko's model is that as velocity
increases, the gravitational attraction also increases. For a
particle moving at the speed of light, the attraction becomes
infinite.
A useful test of the accuracy of a model is to extend the model over
different conditions of interest. For example, the model may appear
reasonable at relativistic conditions but is it suitable at other
conditions? This is the crux of this analysis. The problem will be
to investigate Jefimenko's gravity model to examine its effects upon
the classical two-body and restricted three-body problem of
celestial mechanics. This will be at nominal satellite conditions.
Moreover, the analysis will be extended to see if any dispersion can
occur to treat other problems such as the perihelion of Mercury.
After these results are created and assessed, problems involving sub-
and faster than light speed trajectories will also be treated? In
these last situations, the trajectories will look at an accelerating
spacecraft under electromagnetic power to reach these speeds as well
as a spacecraft having an initial light-speed velocity decelerating
by approaching either a single or two-body system.
One needs to ask the question about what is to be gained by
such an approach. Obviously, a more accurate model would be able
to better predict satellite trajectories but at what additional
expense in computational time or accuracy? From viewing Newtonian
gravitational theory, sufficient terms are included to account for
gravitational perturbations due to mountain ranges and the oceans.
Such a model could be expanded by hundreds of terms to account for
these effects which can hardly be viewed as Newtonian or an inverse
function of distance, but now such a gravity model is really in a
class all by itself. This particular effort is not to raise
questions about such an extension of the Newtonian model but to
address first-order questions. This includes looking toward a model
that could, for example, address the perihelion of Mercury problem
which was used to substantiate Einstein's Theory of Relativity as
well as provide a means for estimating the speed of gravitational
waves.

II. DISCUSSION

This section will present the Jefimenko model and the conventional
wisdom regarding some approaches for examining solutions to Kepler's
two-body problem and the restricted three-body problem of celestial
mechanics.

A. The Jefimenko Gravitation Model

Jefimenko20,21 provides some other very interesting insights
into this problem. He introduces a gravitation field as well as a
cogravitation field defined by the equation:

...

This equation resembles the Lorentz force acting on an
electromagnetic particle. This is a crucial analytical finding
based upon Heaviside's 1893 paper where equations are shown similar
to Maxwell's equations, to describe gravity. Jefimenko also
introduces cogravity to account for relativistic effects acting upon
a rest mass.

...

The propagation velocity, per Jefimenko, is less than light speed;
we shall modify this approach by assuming this velocity is actually
greater than light speed. Moreover, these expressions for steady-
state revert to Newtonian gravity. Interestingly these equations
include all pseudo-analytical or pseudo-wave relations necessary to
define unique vectors.

...

To decrease gravitational force acting on our light-speed
spacecraft, we should select a path that reduces the radius-velocity
and radius-acceleration vector cross-products. A test of this
gravity model would be to examine a photon passing a large body.
With Jefimenko's cross-product term, each photon's trajectory
depends upon grazing angle and closeness to the large body. Our
light-speed vehicle acts like a photon!

This includes an acceleration term. Gravity is a function of the
radius vector emanating from the larger body and as in previous
Jefimenko models, includes a term that accounts for relativistic
effects operating on a rest mass.
There is another point worth mentioning. With the gravity
gradient as an inverse function of distance, gravity acts as a
singularity at the origin. With the addition of radial terms, other
more pronounced effects take place. For example, a value of 1/r2
provides what Popescu calls a gravitovortex wave. Popescu also
indicates that such gravitational waves could cause spiral
trajectories. Dyatlov also calls this a gravispin wave. The reason
is that such a function admits the existences of vortices as
solutions to Laplace's equation. For the Jefimenko model, such terms
can be considered as a gravitational torque that force planets to
alter their spin motion about the rotation axis. For this reason
due to its attraction from the Earth, we see the same side of the
moon.
There is another point of interest. What physical evidence
is there that such a gravitational field may exist? How does one
measure the magnitude of the vortex strength or gravitational
circulation in a gravispin wave? One physical artifact of such an
effect is the arms that extend outward from a spiral galaxy. These
could be due to sudden rotational motion of the galactic mass which
is the approach outlined by the conventional wisdom. Such a vortex
induced gravity field would produce similar effects and induce the
rotation as well.
It is clear that the adequacy of these models requires
examining the uncertainty where gravity strongly depends upon a
light-speed vehicle's trajectory to define velocity, acceleration,
vector cross- and dot products as the vehicle approaches or egresses
near a larger body.

...

Also, travelling at the speed of light may blur the distinction
whether the satellite orbit is elliptical or hyperbolic because of
the large speeds involved. The major factor that is off concern is
that the gravity of the planet using Jefimenko's gravity model will
increase drastically as we approach the light speed singularity.

...

B. The Three-Body Problem

The question is how to implement Jefimenko's gravity model
in these equations. The issue is that the three-body problem at the
speed of light may become meaningless as both bodies may act as a
singular mass. If the gravitational forces become infinite and our
trajectory goes, say, in the middle of the two bodies, we may then
argue that the bodies act as a 'light' trap and a stable trajectory
may result where the vehicle decelerates under tremendous stress to
the point that with reduced velocity and the sudden decay in
gravitational attraction, the problem again becomes meaningful. A
consequence of such an analysis would be to use two nearby planets
as a means for decelerating or 'braking' the vehicle in lieu of
expending energy.

...

C. Mathematical Solution Behavior

Let us expand this point further to consider changes in the
solution where we operate on either side of the light speed
singularity.
It is not nature's fault a singularity occurs at the speed
of light, the fault is our inability to correctly model nature's
behavior. Moreover, what type of singularity should be expected?
Will this help explain the pseudo-transition that occurs with
changes in the canonical form? We do not want to gradually approach
the singularity and reside there before passing through but wish to
pursue passing through the singularity as rapidly as possible to
minimize residing at the speed of light as a segment of a light wave.
The problem posed by the light speed singularity was
previously discussed3-5. Recall our earlier statement about
punching through the singularity as being comparable to the problem
of an airplane passing through the singularity at transonic speed
from a physical context; it should be no different here. You have
similar singular behavior. In Asaro18 the problem was reduced to
complex variables with the definition of a complex velocity. The
singularity is treated in a similar fashion as passing through a
singularity in the complex plane. Although having mathematical
significance, there is no physical significance unless there is a
finite meaning to the term complex velocity. Thus there is no
magical tree but only a mathematical artifact. Moreover, the
singularity could be removed by multiplying by a factor moving the
term from the denominator to the numerator.
With these thoughts, one wonders what a crew would see inside of a
hyper-light spaceship. This is one reason to be concerned with the
speed of light in a coordinate system moving faster than light
speed. Either he sees no change if light moves at velocity c within
the ship or it will look as if water was poured over an object where
the water flows down distorting visible features. Light emitted
from an object in the spacecraft will appear as sheets formed by the
object and the angle they form with the body depends upon the
vehicle's velocity. If you look forward, you will only see objects
within the light cone that includes the observer. Likewise, if you
look rearward, you only see those objects within your own light cone.



References

1. I. N. Popescu: Gravitation, Pleading for a New Unified Theory of
Motion and Fields, Editrice Nagard, Foro Triano 1/A, Roma, Italia,
1988.
2. P.A. Murad: "Tsien's Method for Generating Non-Keplerian
Trajectories", AIAA Paper No. 91-0678 presented at the AIAA 29th
Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada 7-10 Jan 1991.

3. P.A. Murad: "Tsien's Method for Generating Non-Keplerian
Trajectories, Part II- The Question of Thrust to Orbit a Sphere and
the Restricted Three-Body Problem", NASA Conference Publication
3186, Flight Mechanics/Estimation Theory Symposium 1992.
4. P.A. Murad: "A Mathematical Treatise on the Restricted Three-Body
Problem of Celestial Mechanics", AIAA Paper No. 75-8, presented at
the AIAA 13th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 1975.
5. P.A. Murad: "Hyper-Light Dynamics and the Effects of Relativity,
Gravity, Electricity and Magnetism", IAF Paper No. 99-S.6.02
presented at the 50th International Astronautical Congress in
Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Oct. 4-8, 1999.

6. P.A. Murad: "Hyper-Light Dynamics, Relativity, Gravity,
Electricity, and Magnetism", AIAA Paper No. 99-2696, to be presented
at the 35th AIAA/ASME/ SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference in Los
Angeles, Calif. 20-23 June 1997.

7. P.A. Murad: "An Extended Navier-Stokes Algorithm and The
Challenges of Relativistic Fluid Dynamics", AIAA Paper No. 99-0562,
presented at the 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Jan 11-14, 1999,
Reno, Nevada.

8. P.A. Murad: "Challenges Posed By Hyper-Light Trajectories", AAS
Paper No. 98-138 presented at the AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics
Meeting in Monterey, Calif. 9-11 February 1998.

9. P.A. Murad: "An Ansatz On Hyper-Light Travel", AIAA Paper No.
97-3213 presented at the 33rd AIAA/ASME/ SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion
Conference in Seattle, Wa., 6-9 July 1997.

10. P.A. Murad: "An Electromagnetic Rocket Hyper-Light Stellar
Drive", IAF Paper No. IAA-96-IAA.4.1.07 in the Proceedings of the
47th IAF Congress in Beijing, China 7-11 Oct. 1996.

11. P.A. Murad: "An Electromagnetic Rocket Stellar Drive....Myth or
Reality? Part I- Electromagnetic and Relativistic Phenomenon", AIAA
Paper No. 95-2602 presented at the 31st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ ASEE Joint
Propulsion Conference in San Diego, 8 July 1995.

12. P.A. Murad: "An Electromagnetic Rocket Stellar Drive....Myth or
Reality? Part II- Fluid Dynamic Interactions and an Engine Concept",
AIAA Paper No. 95-2894 presented at the 31st AIAA/ ASME/SAE/ASEE
Joint Propulsion Conference in San Diego, 10 July 1995.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 10
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 23:02:56 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: Classical electromagnetic devices to generate macroscopic Kerr-Newman singularit


The following paper seems at first view close to the work of Hans-
Georg Kuessner (book published after WWII in 1946 and 1976) from
Germany:


Unified Dirac-Maxwell field as space-time portal
Philippe-Alexandre GAUGAIN

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/docs/Stargate-en.pdf




________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 23:24:31 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: Re: Classical electromagnetic devices to generate macroscopic Kerr-Newman singularit


Now I find the time to read the "Open Letter from a group of French
scientists to the Initiator of the Disclosure Project."

Before we go into details.. please let me note the following..
several months ago I purchased two interesting books:

1. Luftwaffe - Secret Projects - Strategic Bombers 1935-1945
by Dieter Herwig and Heinz Rode

2. Luftwaffe - Secret Projects - Fighter 1939 - 1945
by Walter Schick and Ingolf Meyer

Look for those books at www.amazon.com

Now let me add that Prof. Kuessner was involved in many of those
projects.. he was the leading expert in aeroelasticity and unsteady
aerodynamics.. after WWII he was head of DLR (German NASA)
Aeroelasticity Section in Gottingen.. the same place where you can
find the Max-Planck-Institute for Fluiddynamics...

But Kuessner also worked on quaternion and Clifford algebra Maxwell
equations.. furthermore, please note that with Prof. Winfried-Otto
Schumann the Germans had a leading expert in EM-Plasma-
Interactions.. after WWII Prof. Schumann could keep his chair at TU
Munich and was member of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences.. years
later the earth resonance frequency was named after Schumann who
might be aware of Tesla's interesting ideas...

I do not want to speculate but I find it curious that the French
group writes:

"These technologies were directly derived from the analysis of the
wreck retrieved at Roswell, which was a hypersonic space shuttle and
not an interstellar vehicle. We deplore the fact that this reverse
engineering has only been applied to military ends, since these
techniques could have found better use, the one as a completely re-
reusable space launcher - much more efficient and cheaper than the
customary rockets - the other as a hypersonic commercial plane."

A hypersonic space shuttle?? Let's assume it was a secret German
spyplane.. maybe?? maybe not?? if not.. what else could it be? a
craft from old cilizations?? maybe?? maybe not??
maybe there was even nothing but only myths.. I do not know..

but after WWII the USA have got all those scientists via Paperclip..
also the now famous fusion expert Friedwart Winterberg... so I find
the French group's conclusions irritating..

Paul Murad sent the following abstract which is very interesting..
maybe he wanted to interest me.. Jack obviously overread this part..

please note that the idea of Inertial Electrostatic Confinement
(IEC) is decades old.. and it is said that it is a fusion technique
which really works..

---

Combining MHD Airbreathing and Fusion Rocket Propulsion
for Single Stage-to-Orbit Flight
Principal Author H.D. Froning, Jr. 1
Co-authors: G.H. Miley,2 J. Nadler, Y. Shaban, H. Momota,3 E. Burton4

1Flight Unlimited, 5450 Country Club Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86004, USA
2 Fusion Studies Lab, University of Illinois, 103 S. Goodwin Ave.,
Urbana, IL 61801, USA
3 NPL Associates, 912 W. Armory, Champaign, IL 61821, USA
4 Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Illinois
206b Talbot Lab, 104 S. Wright, Urbana, IL 51801, USA

ABSTRACT

Studies in Russia, Europe, and the US have shown that Magneto-Hydro-
Dynamic (MHD) processes can extract electricity for vehicle and
propulsion power from slowed airflow within airbreathing engines,
while reducing propulsive losses and propellant consumption during
high-speed atmospheric flight. And the study reported in this paper
shows that: (1) further reduction in airbreathing propellant
consumption is possible by use of energies from aneutronic fusion
processes, that emit no harmful radiation; and (2) the aneutronic
fusion processes can also enable subsequent fusion rocket propulsion
to achieve, with minimal propellant expenditure, much higher speeds
in space.

For this Study, the aneutronic Inertial Electrostatic Confinement
(IEC) propulsion system design by Dr. Robert Bussard was used
because of its potential for high thrust-to-weight. Hydrogen
propellant is used as fuel in the MHD airbreathing system and as
working fluid in the fusion rocket system, and Boron 11 and protons
would be the aneutronic nuclear fuels used to accomplish fusion.
Both MHD airbreathing and aneutronic fusion propulsion systems share
common subsystems: flow channels, superconducting magnets, electron
beams (for flow ionization and flow heating), and power conditioning
to minimize total propulsion system mass. And use of electric power,
generated by MHD airbreathing, enables in-flight ignition of the
fusion system, while fusion system energy deposition into engine
airflow enables additional airbreathing thrust with no additional
propellant consumption.

The paper also describes some of the most critical issues associated
with accomplishment of aneutronic IEC fusion, together with critical
issues associated with integration of a fusion propulsion and power
system with MHD airbreathing propulsion and power. Some subsystem
performance and design requirements for the most critical elements
of the MHD and fusion systems are also identified.

Although accomplished work is not yet sufficient for confirming the
feasibility of MHD airbreathing and aneutronic fusion for future
flight, use of combining such propulsion was explored for single-
stage-to-orbit flight to low earth orbit. It was found that SSTO
vehicle takeoff and propellant mass for MHD airbreathing and IEC
fusion could be as much as 25 and 40 percent respectively less than
that of a SSTO vehicle with ordinary airbreathing and IEC fusion.
And SSTO vehicle takeoff and propellant mass for MHD airbreathing
and fusion rocket propulsion would be as much as 50 and 70 percent
respectively less that of a SSTO vehicle with MHD airbreathing and
chemical rocket propulsion.



--- In SarfattiScienceSeminars@yahoogroups.com, "Berkant"
wrote:

The following paper seems at first view close to the work of Hans-
Georg Kuessner (book published after WWII in 1946 and 1976) from
Germany:


Unified Dirac-Maxwell field as space-time portal
Philippe-Alexandre GAUGAIN

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/docs/Stargate-en.pdf



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 12
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 03:36:35 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
Subject: Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/english.html
...
" ... which develops ideas put forward by Andrei Sakharov in 1976 : the
twin universe cosmology. We believe the latter also to have been in
contact with aliens. Just read the strange end terms of his speech,
which was read by his lady friend Helena Bonaire in Sweden on receiving
the Nobel Prize.

[Konkretny]
See "the strange end terms" of Sakharov's speech read by
his wife Elena Bonner-Sakharova:
http://www.nobel.se/peace/laureates/1975/sakharov-acceptance.html
Quote:
"...I would like to end my speech expressing the hope
in a final victory of the principles of peace and
human rights. The best sign that such hope can come
true would be a general political amnesty in all
the world, liberation of all prisoners of conscience
everywhere. The struggle for a general political
amnesty is the struggle for the future of mankind.

I am deeply grateful to the Nobel Committee for awarding
me the Nobel Peace Prize for 1975, and I beg you
to remember that the honour which was thus granted
to me is shared by all prisoners of conscience in
the Soviet Union and in other Eastern European countries
as well as by all those who fight for their liberation."

SFW? What is so "strange" about Sakharov's words and what
do they have to do with UFOs?


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 13
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 23:38:14 -0000
From: "Berkant"
Subject: Father of Jet Engine Von Ohain - Expert in Electrofluidsystems


PS:

It is not widely known that the father of the jet engine Von Ohain
who after WWII worked for Wright-Patterson AFB was also an expert in
electrofluiddynamic generators..

this is something which should be considered..

with such a EFD generator you are able to generate high voltage
energy from your jet engine.. you need some modifications between
the combustion chamber and the turbine..

you may know those rumours regarding the B2-Bomber.. there are
claims that this craft also uses a EFD generator.. why not?? it is
nothing which could not be engineered.. furthermore a charged
exhaust doesn't generate contrails as it affects the vapor
condensation.. did you know that this was already shown by Helmholtz
in the end of the 19th century.. Helmholtz made experiments with hot
water vapor and used high voltage discharges and also sulfid acid
(again a stealthy mixture often mentioned to be used to remove
contrails).. you see it is nothing new.. and all mentioned in my
thesis works for years...

Furthermore, before Guenther Kappler founded BMW-Rolls-Royce
Deutschland he was aeronautics professor at TU Munich.. at his
institute he also had a section Electrofluiddynamics headed by Dr.
Wolfgang Dittrich.. a student of Prof. Schumann.. if I recall
correctly.. Dittrich published several reports in Germany..
but up-to-date I do not know who is applying those techniques.





________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 14
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 03:47:07 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
Subject: Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons

OK, I got it; they should have been more specific. What they
meant was obviously Sakharov's Nobel Lecture:
http://www.nobel.se/peace/laureates/1975/sakharov-lecture.html

"...Thousands of years ago tribes of human beings suffered great privations in the struggle to survive. In this struggle it was important not only to be able to handle a club, but also to possess the ability to think reasonably, to take care of the knowledge and experience garnered by the tribe, and to develop the links that would provide cooperation with other tribes. Today the entire human race is faced with a similar test. In infinite space many civilizations are bound to exist, among them civilizations that are also wiser and more "successful" than ours. I support the cosmological hypothesis which states that the development of the universe is repeated in its basic features an infinite number of times. In accordance with this, other civilizations, including more "successful" ones, should exist an infinite number of times on the "preceding" and the "following" pages of the Book of the Universe. Yet this should not minimize our sacred endeavors in this world of ours, where, like faint glimmers of light in the dark, we have emerged for a moment from the nothingness of dark unconsciousness of material existence. We must make good the demands of reason and create a life worthy of ourselves and of the goals we only dimly perceive."

Anyway I fail to see in these words any indication of Sakharov's
being an alien contactee.

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/english.html
...
" ... which develops ideas put forward by Andrei Sakharov in 1976 : the
twin universe cosmology. We believe the latter also to have been in
contact with aliens. Just read the strange end terms of his speech,
which was read by his lady friend Helena Bonaire in Sweden on receiving
the Nobel Prize.

[Konkretny]
See "the strange end terms" of Sakharov's speech read by
his wife Elena Bonner-Sakharova:
http://www.nobel.se/peace/laureates/1975/sakharov-acceptance.html
Quote:
"...I would like to end my speech expressing the hope
in a final victory of the principles of peace and
human rights. The best sign that such hope can come
true would be a general political amnesty in all
the world, liberation of all prisoners of conscience
everywhere. The struggle for a general political
amnesty is the struggle for the future of mankind.

I am deeply grateful to the Nobel Committee for awarding
me the Nobel Peace Prize for 1975, and I beg you
to remember that the honour which was thus granted
to me is shared by all prisoners of conscience in
the Soviet Union and in other Eastern European countries
as well as by all those who fight for their liberation."

SFW? What is so "strange" about Sakharov's words and what
do they have to do with UFOs?


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 15
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:05:48 -0700
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: Heim

I got one of the Heim papers.
It is too complicated. I get a lot more with a lot less.
However Heim cites Saul-Paul Sirag and Blackett Effect so I sent the
paper to Saul-Paul. Maybe he will have patience to wade through it.
Heim claims to compute particle masses.



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 16
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 20:04:22 -0700
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons

I did not write that. The French guy Peit from CNRS allegedly wrote it.
On May 18, 2004, at 4:36 PM, Alexander Konkretny wrote:

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/english.html
...


Message: 17
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 07:51:13 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
Subject: Richard Feynman on Cargo Cult Science Re: Rabbi Sarfatti introduces "Torsion Field Invocation"

http://www.leninism.org/stream/96/cargo_cult_science.htm

From Cargo Cult Science by Richard Feynman:

"That's just an example of the kind of things that overwhelm me. I also looked into extrasensory perception, and PSI phenomena, and the latest craze there was Uri Geller, a man who is supposed to be able to bend keys by rubbing them with his finger. So I went to his hotel room, on his invitation, to see a demonstration of both mindreading and bending keys. He didn't do any mindreading that succeeded... And my boy held a key and Geller rubbed it, and nothing happened. Then he told us it works better under water, and so you can picture all of us standing in the bathroom with the water turned on and the key under it, and him rubbing the key with his finger. Nothing happened...

But then I began to think, what else is there that we believe? (And I thought then about the witch doctors, and how easy it would have been to check on them by noticing that nothing really worked.) So I found things that even more people believe, such as that we have some knowledge of how to educate. There are big schools of reading methods and mathematics methods, and so forth, but if you notice, you'll see the reading scores keep going down -- or hardly going up -- in spite of the fact that we continually use these same people to improve the methods. There's a witch doctor remedy that doesn't work. It ought to be looked into; how do they know that their method should work? Another example is how to treat criminals. We obviously have made no progress -- lots of theory, but no progress -- in decreasing the amount of crime by the method that we use to handle criminals...

So we really ought to look into theories that don't work, and science that isn't science...

Another example is the ESP experiments of Mr. Rhine, and other people. As various people have made criticisms -- and they themselves have made criticisms of their own experiments -- they improve the techniques so that the effects are smaller, and smaller, and smaller until they gradually disappear. All the para-psychologists are looking for some experiment that can be repeated -- that you can do again and get the same effect -- statistically, even. They run a million rats -- no, it's people this time -- they do a lot of things are get a certain statistical effect. Next time they try it they don't get it any more. And now you find a man saying that is is an irrelevant demand to expect a repeatable experiment. This is science?"

Gennady I Shipov wrote:

The psychophysical phenomena constitute a part of reality, a part of the Nature. If traditional physics cannot explain them, it follows only that it is incomplete and that a new physical paradigm is required. The theories of Physical Vacuum and of the Ricci torsion fields, which are being actively developed today in Russia, provide precisely this new paradigm as a natural and logical continuation of the present science. They explain the Nature in its entirety and do not overlook the "inconvenient" phenomena.


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 18
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 07:55:46 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alexander Konkretny"
Subject: Re: PRAVDA & French "CNRS" on exotic "UFO" weapons

Sure, Jack, I did not write that you had written it. I was just
commenting on what the French guy had written.

I did not write that. The French guy Peit from CNRS allegedly wrote it.
On May 18, 2004, at 4:36 PM, Alexander Konkretny wrote:

http://www.europeanufosurvey.com/english.html
...
" ... which develops ideas put forward by Andrei Sakharov in 1976 :
the
twin universe cosmology. We believe the latter also to have been in
contact with aliens. Just read the strange end terms of his speech,
which was read by his lady friend Helena Bonaire in Sweden on
receiving
the Nobel Prize.

_____________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 19
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 19:59:06 -0700
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: Re: New data on dark energy Chandra: Thumbs up for w = -1.

Excellent news. They are saying w = -1 as I have said. This and CDMSII
refuting Italian false positives is thumbs up for my theory in "Super
Cosmos" thumbs down for phantom energy w < -1 and thumbs down for
quintessence -1 < w < -1/3. Also thumbs down for dark matter as
supersymmetry partners.

Let's see if the experiments continue to confirm this in next few years.

This is all explained in my book Super Cosmos soon out as well as in my
two previous books Destiny Matrix and Space-Time and Beyond II from
late 2002.

On May 18, 2004, at 5:25 PM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:


NASA NEWS RELEASE:


http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2004/darkenergy/


Chandra Discovery Sheds Light on Dark Energy
05.18.04

New data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory is changing the way we
view the universe.

Astronomers using information from the orbiting observatory are
discovering the universe's expansion has been picking up speed. The
finding sheds light on a force known as "dark energy," which experts
believe will shape the fate of the universe.

Dark energy, which fills the space between galaxies and drives them
apart, is "perhaps the biggest mystery in physics," said Steve Allen
of the Institute of Astronomy (IoA) in Cambridge, England.

Image to left: In this still image from an animation, the universe has
just begun to expand after the Big Bang. Click image for animation.
Credit: NASA/Space Telescope Science Institute

Scientists have long wondered if the universe will collapse in on
itself billions of years from now in what many call the "Big Crunch."
Another theory states it will expand so rapidly that everything is
torn apart in the "Big Rip."

Fortunately, the Chandra findings indicate that these catastrophes
might be ruled out. The density of dark energy appears to be fairly
constant, or at least increasing slowly enough that the universe will
simply continue to expand forever. If this is the case, many billions
of years from now, only a few of the known galaxies we can see today
will be visible.

According to Chandra data, the expansion of the universe was gradually
slowing down until about 6 billion years ago, when it started to
accelerate, presumably because of the repulsive effect of dark energy.

Now, thanks to Chandra's unique capabilities, astronomers are
beginning to chip away at the wall of mystique surrounding dark
energy.

Image to right: This optical and X-ray composite image shows Abell
2029, one of 26 galaxy clusters studied by Chandra, located one
billion light years away. Click image for full size version. Credit:
Optical: National Optical Astronomy Observatory/Kitt Peak, X-ray:
NASA/Chandra X-ray Center/IoA

Allen and his colleagues at the IoA used Chandra to study 26 galaxy
clusters between 1 billion and 8 billion light years away.

Chandra's probe of dark energy relies on the unique ability of X-ray
observations to study the hot gas in galaxy clusters. By using Chandra
data to figure out the ratio of hot gas to dark matter, astronomers
determined how far away the clusters were and at what point in time
they were viewing them. They found the clusters were farther away than
expected, indicating an accelerated expansion.

Image to left: In this still image from an animation, a galaxy cluster
consists of galaxies (shown in white and yellow) and intergalactic gas
(shown in red). Click image for animation. Credit: NASA/Chandra X-ray
Center

Because galaxy clusters are the largest bound structures in the
universe, scientists consider them as scale models of the universe in
terms of matter content.

Einstein first proposed the concept of dark energy, calling it a
"cosmological constant" in his General Theory of Relativity. He
suggested that a repulsive force must be counteracting the pull of
gravity, creating a sort of equilibrium to maintain a static universe
that doesn't change in size. He later abandoned the idea, calling it
the biggest blunder of his life, when Edwin Hubble's observations
indicated the universe was expanding.

But it appears Einstein's idea had much more merit than he thought.

For now, astronomers still have many questions and dark energy is
keeping most of its secrets to itself. But more detailed studies with
NASA's Chandra, Hubble Space Telescope, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy
Probe and future missions such as Constellation X should continue
providing answers.

To view the press release, related images and animations, visit:

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2004/darkenergy

Anna Heiney, KSC Staff Writer
Chandra X-ray Center and NASA's John F. Kennedy Space Center




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________


** Slight name change, added another little 's'

** Patronize any Yahoo! Group Sponsor at your own risk.

- - - - - - Message From Starfleet - - - (Read below) - - - - - - - - - - -
To change any characteristic of your online membership access, visit via web:
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/SarfattiScienceSeminars

Join in our ongoing discussions and theoretical science writings:
http://groups.yahoo.com/messages/SarfattiScienceSeminars

Dr. Sarfatti may be reached at his e-mail or using Internet site:
http://stardrive.org
http://www.1st-books.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To respond or comment directly to the group's archive, reply via e-mail:

SarfattiScienceSeminars@YahooGroups.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------