On May 15, 2004, at 9:17 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:

American Military Investigated Anti-gravity Weapons

“Government Budget Document evidence that the United States Department of Defense actively pursued reports of anti-gravity effects The United States Government Official Website, http://www.firstgov.gov/ allows a rapid search of official government documents available over the internet. A quick search for Dr. Ning Li, the physicist that predicted an anti-gravity effect from her theory, and the key word "contract" leads to an official US Government Department of Defense budget document:

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/Docs/FY01RPT.doc

The document describes contract number DAAH01-01-9-R001, titled "Gravito-Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment", awarded by the US Army Aviation and Missile Command, to Dr. Ning Li's company AC Gravity, LLD”

My theory of this is at http://qedcorp.com/destiny/Podkletnov.pdf

“New means of propulsion, ways of controlling missiles and gun launched munitions, lowering of the effective weight of tanks and heavy vehicles, deflecting incoming missiles, including ICBM's, are listed as among the military applications for this technology. This document supports Jane's Defence Weekly contributor Nick Cook's exposure of a similar project at the American aerospace contractor Boeing. Previously Nick Cook showed the BBC and Jane's documents as proof that Boeings' Phantom Works facility were investigating the Russian scientist Evgeny Podkletnov's reports of repulsive antigravity from spinning superconducting disks.”

Gary S. Bekkum
Starstream Research
USA


On May 15, 2004, at 9:32 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

PS

re:http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/377/12778_weapons.html

Good point Gary. One way to make a "sub-quantum bomb" is to change m, i.e. change e/m as Hal Puthoff proposes not realizing the implications! The rest mass m is a function of vacuum coherence. However, one must consider a "power spectrum" of the local macro-quantum vacuum coherence field that depends on the scale s in the sense of a conformal group continuous wavelet transform generalization of the rigid Fourier transform with zoom-in/zoom-out adaptive windowing. Einstein's gravity guv field of smooth curved space-time is essentially a holographic image of the coherent phase information in the vacuum coherence field left over from the Big Bang, i.e. the vacuum coherence field on large scales s > 102 megaparsecs is simply the post-inflation field in the FRW metric of "precision cosmology" models of the accelerating universe based on WMAP, Type 1a supernovae, gravity lensing and other data.

Changing vacuum coherence on nano-scale ~ 10-7 cm should not change m on the fermi scale 10-13 cm - otherwise the saucers we are allegedly seeing now over Mexico, Iran et-al could not fly. The saucer data is very important in seeing how to formulate the theory in the "reverse gendanken-engineering" sense, which is what I am doing. A phased array of tiny high Tc superconducting mesh of identical nanodevices, perhaps rotating nano-high Tc rings whose axis of rotation is the symmetry axis of nano-solenoids, imbedded in the thin saucer smart skin fuselage is how they fly I suspect -educated guess. The relative phase between the superconducting control solenoid coherence and the vacuum coherence controls Alcubierre's Tr(K) for the weightless warp drive field configuration.


http://www.astro.cf.ac.uk/groups/relativity/papers/abstracts/miguel94a.html
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/polyvalens/clemens/wavelets/wavelets.html
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/polyvalens/clemens/wavelets/wavelets.html#section2



My /\zpf ~ Tr(K)

Note the "reverse Doppler shift" (Bruce Cornet) positive ZPE pressure in nose of UFO makes a gravity redshift, negative ZPE pressure in the tail makes a gravity blueshift. The effective G is G* >> G(Newton) on relevant scale s ~ 10^-6 cm probably.

Once that general idea is put into the mix, other people who are engineers will come up with details. Or I will after I have had enough time to focus on that detail. The idea here is the control the relative phase "Theta" between a "control knob" superconductor coherence and the vacuum coherence in the common element of space that they share. Alcubierre's Tr(K) is then proportional to the cosine of Theta and from there using Einstein's general relativity we can have the warp drive as shown by Alcubierre in his toy model by shaping the Tr(K) field configuration in accord with Einstein's exotic vacuum field equation

Guv + /\zpfguv = 0

Where essentially

/\zpf ~ Tr(K)

I mean some yet-to-be-designed "superconducting nano-circuit" as the identical nodes in the mesh to control the local phase field of the vacuum coherence. The existence of the saucers is a "dot" a "data point" an "iron post of observation" (J.A. Wheeler) in our reverse gedanken-engineering telling us that such nano-circuit elements of the control mesh imbedded in the thin smart skin fuselage is not only thinkable and possible in principle, but has actually been built by a superior technological intelligence and is currently in control of our airspace. When Alan Turing, John Von Neumann and Eugene Wigner were inventing the concept of the universal programmable computer and the self-reproducing automaton they did not have every engineering detail at the beginning. They did not have Intel designs of the Pentium or Motorola G5 back then. Right now my only purpose is to get everyone into the right ball park away from the Puthoff PV/ZPE way of thinking into something that is closer to what will actually work. First one needs to formulate the Question.

"The Question is: What is The Question?" J.A. Wheeler

I am still working on formulating "The Question." Like those statues of Michelangelo only partly out of the marble.