Thursday, November 04, 2004


From Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" Ch 14. Note that Eric Davis's paper leans heavily on Matt Visser's book and that Matt Visser told me personally at GR 17 in Dublin July 2004 that he thought Hal Puthoff's PV theory was not a good strategy for anything important. Nevertheless, Eric Davis continues to promote Hal's discredited theory to USAF as a viable approach. What's wrong with this picture? Is this how to connect the dots?

The idea of "thin shell" is "for analyzing the gravitational field of a thin (delta-function) layer of matter" p. 153

Change "matter" to "exotic vacuum", i.e. /\zpf field and obviously a Dirac delta function is an idealization for mathematical convenience that is not physical in this case.

The idea of the thin shell star gate is literally a flat (in one dimension) wormhole portal "doorway" to walk through for instant teleportation, including time travel. The Star Gate SG1 set is close to The Truth Out There.

A delta function source creates a kink in the "potential" and a discontinuity in the "force field". In this case the potential is the GCT (General Coordinate Transformation or Diff(4)) metric tensor field guv and the force field is the Levi-Civita "Christoffel" connection (^uvw) that is not a GCT tensor using only Einstein's 1916 theory for now. That may not be adequate. We may need torsion fields, nonmetricity fields from extra space dimensions, conformal boost and dilation fields. But for now, let's see how far we can get without that extra stuff.

Remember this is not mere theory. The UFO fact is that someone Out There is already doing it. We are now at the beginning, most likely, of runaway global warming followed by an ice age eco-catastrophe. Maybe we have 20 years if we are lucky. Hopefully that is all wrong, but it is a good idea to act now as if it is not wrong and get the real physics of metric engineering. That is why it is a fatal error for the USAF & USG Military Intelligence to rely on Hal Puthoff as their primary source of information in this fields. The CSICOPs are also a threat to survival of the planet with their mindless debunking.

So "the metric is continuous, but with a kink.

The connection (Christoffel symbol) has a step function discontinuity.

The Riemann tensor has a delta-function contribution."

Obviously a real star gate smoothes out the discontinuity and the delta-function.

"the Ricci tensor generated by the gravitational influence of a thin shell of stress-energy to the discontinuity of the second fundamental forms defined by considering the thin shell to be an immersed submanifold of the full spacetime." p. 154

We want a thin shell source of off-mass-shell virtual zero point dark stress-energy exotic vacuum /\zpf =/= 0, NOT Kip Thorne's on-mass-shell "exotic matter". No evidence for latter, good evidence for former.

"Loosely speaking, the second fundamental form is the normal derivative of the [three dimensional] metric." p. 12

Section 14.1: eq, (14.3) p. 154 is the equation for a generic metric created by a thin shell source.

Coordinate independent constraint is that the first fundamental forms on the two sides of the thin shell metric are equal.

eq. (14.5) defines the unit normal field to the thin shell exotic vacuum zero point dark stress-energy source (stargate portal or throat "like a thin film of soap stretched across a loop of wire" - Eric Davis p.11).

eq (14.6) are the two second fundamental forms one on each side of the thin shell of exotic vacuum dark energy.

Set up convenient Gaussian normal coordinates in a tiny boundary layer neighborhood of the thin shell.

See eqs (14.9) & (14.10) for the 3D space-like metric decomposition inside the thin shell and normal to it. p. 155

The second fundamental forms on both sides of the thin shell are then defined in eq. (14.13) p. 156. The Levi-Civita Christoffel non-tensor "g-force" connection field for this thin shell source is developed in section 14.2 in terms of the discontinuity of the second fundamental forms on the two sides of the thin shell star gate "doorway". See eq. (14.21) p. 157. There is a nonvanishing "g-force" ("weight") only on non-geodesic local noninertial frames (LNIF). The directly measurable local g-force is not a GCT tensor. That would violate the equivalence principle, i.e. WEP for the center of mass of an extended body.

Section 14.3 computes the 4th rank Riemann tidal acceleration curvature tensor that does not vanish in a local inertial frame on a timelike geodesic (LIF) in curved spacetime. See eq. (14.23)

Here the Bianchi identities work. We do not want that of course if we are to have practical metric engineering. Therefore, we may need an extended connection to spoil the antisymmetry of the covariant derivatives of the curvature tensor needed for the Bianchi identities to hold. The Bianchi identities prohibit the direct mingling of the zero point energy vacuum currents with the geometrodynamic currents. The Bianchi identites demand that /\zpf not be a local variable field but a true constant. That is no good for star gate construction.

The idealized thin shell forms for the second rank GCT 4D Ricci tensor Ruv, the Ricci scalar R and the Einstein tensor Guv are given in eqs. (14.25 - 27) p. 158.

Second 14.4 deals with the stress-energy tensor

Tuv(matter) where Davis invokes Tuv(exotic matter). Our theory is very different, more restrictive, because

tuv(exotic ZPF vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv where the three-metric part of guv is in eq (14.9) that does not include any time-travel redshift function as yet in the goo term.

Eq. 14.28 has a thin shell surface strese-energy tensor Suv. Visser also invokes separate local conservation Tuv^;v = 0 which is NO GOOD AT ALL! It throws the practical metric engineering baby out with the bathwater. Eric Davis is blissfully ignorant of all this in his report to the USAF which misses entirely the essential clue in how the UFOs work. Remember that Davis worked for NIDS in Las Vegas whose sole purpose was UFOs. That Franklin Meade of USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion Group openly funded Eric's work here has the obvious implication for the reality of UFOs. You do not have to be a rocket scientist to figure that one out - but it helps! ;-)

So eq. (14.29) p. 158 MUST BE VIOLATED if you want to catch up with ET on warp, wormhole and weapon! Therefore Eric Davis discussion of the thin shell star gate in the USAF report is wrong and Visser's sections 14.4 and 14.5, 14.6 ... need to be reworked in this broader context. Therefore, you cannot conclude anything real about warp, wormhole and weapon from Eric Davis's report to USAF. It is at least a good start in the sense of

"The Question is: What is The Question?" John Archibald Wheeler

On Nov 3, 2004, at 6:57 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

From below

Therefore, the toy model static spherically symmetric stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy field /\zpf are:

b' = r^2/\zpfg00

Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)

(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r

Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation

g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)

grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)

gtheta,theta = 1

gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)

The guv must be dimensionless.

The flat thin shell model in Eric Davis's USAF paper cited below does not work for zero point dark energy that is ~ 73% of the universe. Eric needs "exotic matter" that does not exist. Eric's invoking of the Casimir force to get such "exotic matter" will not work at all. However, there should be a way to work around this to get effective instant teleportation without tidal forces to distant parts of our universe and to parallel universes next door including time travel to past and future. Why? Because advanced intelligences are already doing it routinely so there must be a way. Heading towards that goal note that in the above model

/\zpf ~ 1/r*^2

r* is the radius of the spherical throat "portal" of this star gate toy model. For example, the "floating sphere" at Bigelow's Utah Ranch reported in a NIDS paper by Eric Davis would have radius r* ~ 1 meter. A creature resembling Big Foot was seen coming out of the sphere (by a paramilitary NIDS field unit in Bigelow's employ?) according to the NIDS report.

From the Josephson effect the induced /\zpf starting from a non-exotic vacuum is

/\zpf = (dimensionless coupling)(Mc/h)^2(Volume of Exotic Vacuum Region)(Density of Higgs Ocean)^1/2(Density of Control Condensate)^1/2Cos(Relative Phase of Higgs Ocean - Control Condensate)

M ~ 10^-5 gm is the usual assumption, but M may be a lot smaller. We do not know yet.

Therefore, very crudely:

b' = -(r/r*)^2e^2Z(r)

Z' = [b - r^3r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1]/2r^2(1 - b(r)/r)

(r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1)' = r*^-2(-e^2Z(r) - [1 - b(r)/r]^-1)Z' + [r*^-2(1 + sin^2theta)]/r

How to make the flat stargate in Eric Davis's USAF paper with dark energy is a problem that needs to be solved ASAP.

On Nov 2, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Orthodox 1916 GR is a local gauge force theory from only the 4-parameter translation subgroup of the 15 parameter conformal group. The compensating dynamical field is then guv(curved space-time)

If you also locally gauge the 6-parameter Lorentz group you get a new dynamical torsion field that is a 3rd rank tensor relative to the new expanded symmetry group that is larger than the 1916 Diff(4) group. This is basically what Gennady Shipov has proposed in Moscow.

On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

... I am making progress in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...

See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):

On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):

Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004

In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, writes:

Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.

"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."

Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)

I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.

Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)

"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability.  And there it does very well."

Not good enough.

"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be.  What they're saying is true.  What you're saying is false."

Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.

The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".

Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.

Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)

Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.

Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.

Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).

b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.

T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.

Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)

For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)

For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.

The Einstein field equations, reduce to

b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number

Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)

Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r

In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy

Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv

Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:

b' = r^2/\zpfg00

Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)

(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r

Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation

g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)

grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)

gtheta,theta = 1

gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)

The guv must be dimensionless.

On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.

There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.

Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:

a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.

Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr

H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt

R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor

t = cosmic time

Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is

V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly

v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.

Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center

V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo

v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy

/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2

The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula

S/kB = A/4Lp^2

in my theory is exactly

S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS

R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61

The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.

The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.

No comments: