Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Dear Carlos
What is new about my proposal is that curved spacetime is a macro-quantum "supersolid" effect in which the 4D world crystal lattice (or "simplex") distortion field, i.e. tetrad is precisely akin to the superflow field of He4 below Lambda. The nodes of the 4D world crystal lattice generally covariant "aether" are precisely the nodes of the post-inflation Higgs-Goldstone coherent vacuum fields where the huge random zero point energies of the pre-inflation false vacuum are converted to the smooth c-number "ODLRO" fabric of space-time. Hence an intuitive explanation for why the cosmological constant is small and positive, albeit in the context of Linde's eternal chaotic inflation on a populated cosmic landscape as Lenny Susskind suggests even though Lee Smolin does not like it. However, Smolin's objection is overcome because in my theory, beyond Lenny's, the other worlds are directly observable, hence Popper falsifiable, via two distinct mechanisms
1) dark-energy supported traversable wormhole "star gates"
2) Antony Valentini's "signal nonlocality" because macro-quantum effects violate "sub-quantal heat death."
Evidence for this is precisely the UFO data that mainstream physics mistakenly rejects. From my numerous contacts inside USG Intelligence I know the UFO evidence is real.

On Nov 7, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Carlos Castro wrote:

Dear Jack :

Yes, this is an active topic of research nowadays.

Shalom

Carlos

1 comment:

Tony Smith said...

Jack, you say "... that curved spacetime is a macro-quantum "supersolid" effect in which the 4D world crystal lattice (or "simplex") distortion field, i.e. tetrad is precisely akin to the superflow field of He4 below Lambda ...".

Have you seen the paper by Hamilton and Lisle at gr-qc/0411060 ?

Its title is "The river model of black holes" and it says in part:
"... In the river model, space itself flows like a river through a flat background, while objects move through the river according to the rules of special relativity ...".

It seems to me that their paper is a nice way to visualize what you are doing.

As you know, I like your model and have a hard time understanding why there is not a Manhattan project based on it.

Maybe the answer is related to people like Lubos Motl, who in his blog on 7 Nov 2007 attacked a paper by Garrett Lisi that was put on the Cornell arXiv at 0711.0770 Lubos said in part:
"... A few years ago, such a paper would almost surely be filtered out from hep-th. ... the recent fashionable trend is to accept an ever broader set of crackpots into the physics circles ... maybe A. Garrett Lisi will become an endorser himself. Really entertaining times will start afterwards: the hep-th era of Jack Sarfatti, Tony Smith, Peter Woit, and their friends. ...".

Maybe based on Lubos's attack on Garrett (and you and me), Lubos was able to update his blog post, saying that Garrett's "... paper was re-classified from hep-th to gen-ph, general physics. Thanks God. ...".

Tony Smith