At this point in time I see no problem in theoretical physics in

2007, including both dark energy and dark matter, that cannot be

solved satisfactorily in terms of the two great already battle-tested

organizing ideas:

1. The gauge principle, i.e. Einstein's relativity principle

expressed in its deepest form.

2. "More is different" (PW Anderson) emergence of new orders i.e.

effective low/high energy theories including renormalization group

flows to fixed points, ODLRO, "hidden symmetry", Goldstone-Higgs

mechanism, spontaneous ground state symmetry breakdown leaving action

invariant.

If anyone has a counter example - let's see it.

String theory and loop quantum gravity are over-mathematized clearly

failed programs. The only surviving parts are already in 1 & 2 above.

On Jun 3, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

> PS To be more precise: Let Psi be the matter source fields forming

> a basis for an irreducible representation R of the rigid global Lie

> group G where the action field density L invariant under G. We need

> a new larger action density L' invariant under the larger locally

> gauged G(x) where the parameters of G are no longer constants but

> are arbitrary functions of the overlapping local coordinate charts.

> L(Psi, Psi,u) -> L(Psi, R(DuPsi), Au) where Au is the spin 1

> compensating gauge field "connection".

> GR is less direct than Yang-Mills because of the equivalence

> between local g-forces and stationary non-geodesic observers

> outside of event horizons. Not all GeoMetroDynamic fields are

> stationary of course - but the non-stationary corrections (gravity

> waves) are usually pretty small - definitely small Earthside. In GR

> the passive no gravity arena for Yang-Mills fields becomes at

> active player. A^a is the warped tetrad connection. It is spin 1

> as a quantum field. The GMD affine connection is secondary

> essentially (,u is ordinary partial derivative):

>

> GMD connection of Einstein-Cartan theory ~ e^ae^b,u = (I^a + @A^a)

> (I^b + @A^b),u

>

> this includes possible torsion fields, but not a non-metricity Weyl

> conformal boost field in which the inner products are anholonomic

> (path dependent) - the non-metricity 4-potential has no relation to

> the EM potential which was Weyl's error of 1918. The curl of this

> conformal boost 4-potential vanishes in a simply connected way for

> phenomena observed so far.

>

Jack Sarfatti

sarfatti@pacbell.net

"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called

research, would it?"

- Albert Einstein

http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999

http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.jack.sarfatti

http://qedcorp.com/APS/Dec122006.ppt

http://video.google.com/videoplay?

docid=-1310681739984181006&q=Sarfatti+Causation&hl=en

> http://www.flickr.com/photos/lub/sets/72157594439814784

>

## Saturday, June 09, 2007

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

## No comments:

Post a Comment