Thanks. I have been saying that for at least ten years since reading
his first book.
On Apr 5, 2007, at 11:30 AM, art wagner wrote:

> (um, .... it's a book title) http://www.perseusbookspromos.com/
> docs/PBG-StrangeLoopPostcard.pdf
>

My macro post-quantum theory with signal nonlocality has the strange
loop built in beyond the no-cloning signal locality of micro-quantum
theory. The adaptive self-organizing strange loop is a no-brainer in
the Bohmian ontological interpretation (e.g. A. Valentini's violation
of sub-quantal equilibrium
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0203049),
but is inconceivable in Asher Peres's interpretation. Orthodox
quantum physicists like Satinover (Yale) have cognitive dissonance
over "post-quantum theory" because they implicitly accept the Peres
type interpretation where the wave function is a purely cognitive
tool for making statistical predictions and is not an objective
physical field as it is in the Bohmian picture.
>

Jack Sarfatti
sarfatti@pacbell.net
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999
http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.jack.sarfatti
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Dec122006.ppt
http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=-1310681739984181006&q=Sarfatti+Causation&hl=en
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/lub/sets/72157594439814784
>