Saturday, August 06, 2005

Cosmic Coincidence a false alarm for Intelligent Design of the Universe?

On Aug 6, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Memorandum for the Record
Subject: Are we alone, or are the Little Green UFO Buggers here already screwing things up - as if we needed help?
From: The MASINT Irregulars

On Aug 6, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Dan Smith wrote:

"To Whom It May Concern:

We all have our jobs to do. I am trying to do the eschaton job."

For a moment, from the way Rocky Kolb joked around yesterday in the Panofsky Auditorium (Panofsky was there, Secretary of DOE was there the day before) it looked like Dan had a killer piece of evidence in Rocky's "Cosmic Coincidence Slide"

Rocky joked about this slide as "Intelligent Design" and also compared it to Martha Stewart's sale of her ImClone stock on the downhill slide of its price. The point of the coincidence is that right now we are only a bit to the right of the crossing point of the red and blue curves. That is the vertical dotted green line for NOW AKA "0" should be a little to the right of where it is crossing the solid red line at 0.3 and, therefore, the solid blue line at 0.7. The Cosmic Coincidence is: WHY ARE WE SO CLOSE TO THE CROSSING POINT at 0.5? Is this Weak Anthropic Principle in action WITHOUT GOD? Or, is it a COSMIC COINCIDENCE "WOW" SIGNAL from GOD? Or from "Q" some Great Architect of the Frame of the World (Free Masons, Society of Cincinnatus), some Mighty Metric Engineer of Super Cosmos? Some Gulliver to us Lilliputans? ;-)

On further reflection, this may only be Weak Anthropic Principle leaving no Room in The Inn for God? But I am not sure right now.

"I have always said that I would have to learn on the job. I will always make more wrong moves than correct moves, just by standard statistics. There is one best possible way to evangelize the eschaton and there are an infinity of
other ways to do it. Those stats are not in my favor. I am happy to learn that Kit is neither disturbed nor conflicted."

Kit's ignorance is bliss? :-)

"I can only wish that I could be so fortunate. I will always be disturbed and
conflicted in a potentially infinite number of ways, so long as I remain
human. Eventually, according to Apokatastasis, we will all become God. At that point we will be conflicted in a transcendental number of ways. We may as well get used to it. My privately placed question to Kit was for his educated guess concerning the purpose of the alleged visitation. Is this asking too much? Is there a more important question we need to ask?"

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Sarfatti []
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 6:00 PM
To: Ron Pandolfi
Subject: Re: Please provide broad distribution to this Information


I. On Aug 6, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Ron Pandolfi, Ph.D. wrote:

"It has come to my attention that Dan Smith has been distributing e-mails indicating I had suggested that Dr. Green was "disturbed or conflicted." I
may have been on distribution for some of these e-mails. I wanted to
clarify that I do not often read these e-mails, so I was unaware of
their existence or of their interpretation. Please let me correct that I
had only stated to Mr. Smith that Dr. Green seemed "disturbed" with Mr. Smith's insistence that he provide evidence for ET visitations--what Mr. Smith
refers to as the "core story." Dr. Green has clearly stated his position
on these issues on multiple occasions and in multiple venues. My understanding was that he was "conflicted" in terms of his desire to address Mr. Smith's questions and his need to attend to more pressing issues."

For the record, Christopher "Kit" Green, former CIA "Weird Desk" Keeper
is "Kennett" in Jim Schnabel's
"Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies"
In Ch 11 of Schnabel's book, "Kit" has the same kind of "metallic
voice" contact as I had in 1953 approximately "twenty years" later as I
did and as was predicted in

Other incidents with the "metallic voice" exist.

reported by Rocky Kolb yesterday at SLAC? Kolb "joked" about it as
"Intelligent Design". Is it a Joke? If not, it would support President
Bush on "Intelligent Design." Probably7 not.

No comments: