Your comment below is inaccurate and misleading, and especially misleads those not in the know or who are otherwise not savvy enough to know better. I'm not sure who told you about the MITRE conference, but I was there as well in an official capacity. Hal's MITRE conference paper had nothing to do with the NASA BPP nor UFOs. His paper explored the generation and detection of gravitational radiation within the PV methodology. It discussed HFGWs, wave polarization modes, etc. His PV methodology was taken seriously for the conference because the mission of the conference was to embrace all physics approaches for generating, detecting and applying HFGWs. This included alternative physics approaches.
(HFGWs = High Frequency Gravity Waves)
Reply to Eric Davis
It doesn't matter much since all of his papers on PV are pretty much the same fundamentally wrong paper re-Haisched. :-) Also we all know the semi-black hidden agenda of the MITRE meeting since many of the same UFO & NASA BPP people were there. It was simply a cosmetic change for the uninitiated. Let's not get blogged down in superficial distinctions. We all know what is happening here. Hal uses "metric engineering" in his title. In case you forgot its real meaning you can refresh your memory by watching me lecture on it in Star Trek IV DVD.
Disc one contains the film and commentary, but on Disc 2 you will find a number of extras…
The “Time Travel: The Art of the Possible” featurette was very interesting, as three major scientists wrestle with the question of whether time travel could really happen.
James Woodward did raise an interesting issue. Hal has a kind of vacuum term in his eq. (3). How come you guys never try to use it?
Even apart from the fact that Hal does not understand the difference between the Schwarzschild radial coordinate and the isotropic radial coordinate and that his "Tables I and II" in earlier papers are in Pauli's words "not even wrong" based upon a confused measurement ontology IMHO, but taking what Hal writes on face value his Eq (5) will never get you any where of practical interest.
i.e. K^1/2 = e^GM/c^2r
Because G/c^4 = 10^-33 cm/per 10^19 Gev
So no way Jose on any practical large scale metric engineering application even if PV ala Hal were right, which it is not.
Playing Hal's game for the nonce
GM is replaced by ~ G(rho)R^3 and G(rho) by the exotic zero point vacuum equivalent c^2/\zpf
We then have, for a toy model of a uniform sphere region of exotic vacuum of radius R
K^1/2 = e^/\zpfR^3/r
This is a whole new ball game!
Looking at my paper http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc
soon to be published in Progress in Quantum Physics Research
/\zpf is controlled electromagnetically via a weak Josephson link to a real superconductor not unlike Ray Chiao's "gravity radio" but in the near EM field not the far field.
From: Jack Sarfatti
Subject: Refuting Haisch & Puthoff's Physics Blog
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:51:57 -0700
<< RefutingPuthoffBlog.pdf >>
It's amazing that Mitre takes Hal's PV stuff seriously for UFO BPP. Is everyone in UFO black ops really stupid or just pretending? ;-)