re: http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technovel_teleport_041103.html
From Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" Ch 14. Note that Eric Davis's paper leans heavily on Matt Visser's book and that Matt Visser told me personally at GR 17 in Dublin July 2004 that he thought Hal Puthoff's PV theory was not a good strategy for anything important. Nevertheless, Eric Davis continues to promote Hal's discredited theory to USAF as a viable approach. What's wrong with this picture? Is this how to connect the dots?
The idea of "thin shell" is "for analyzing the gravitational field of a thin (delta-function) layer of matter" p. 153
Change "matter" to "exotic vacuum", i.e. /\zpf field and obviously a Dirac delta function is an idealization for mathematical convenience that is not physical in this case.
The idea of the thin shell star gate is literally a flat (in one dimension) wormhole portal "doorway" to walk through for instant teleportation, including time travel. The Star Gate SG1 set is close to The Truth Out There.
http://www.stargatesg1.com/home.html
A delta function source creates a kink in the "potential" and a discontinuity in the "force field". In this case the potential is the GCT (General Coordinate Transformation or Diff(4)) metric tensor field guv and the force field is the Levi-Civita "Christoffel" connection (^uvw) that is not a GCT tensor using only Einstein's 1916 theory for now. That may not be adequate. We may need torsion fields, nonmetricity fields from extra space dimensions, conformal boost and dilation fields. But for now, let's see how far we can get without that extra stuff.
Remember this is not mere theory. The UFO fact is that someone Out There is already doing it. We are now at the beginning, most likely, of runaway global warming followed by an ice age eco-catastrophe. Maybe we have 20 years if we are lucky. Hopefully that is all wrong, but it is a good idea to act now as if it is not wrong and get the real physics of metric engineering. That is why it is a fatal error for the USAF & USG Military Intelligence to rely on Hal Puthoff as their primary source of information in this fields. The CSICOPs are also a threat to survival of the planet with their mindless debunking.
So "the metric is continuous, but with a kink.
The connection (Christoffel symbol) has a step function discontinuity.
The Riemann tensor has a delta-function contribution."
Obviously a real star gate smoothes out the discontinuity and the delta-function.
"the Ricci tensor generated by the gravitational influence of a thin shell of stress-energy to the discontinuity of the second fundamental forms defined by considering the thin shell to be an immersed submanifold of the full spacetime." p. 154
We want a thin shell source of off-mass-shell virtual zero point dark stress-energy exotic vacuum /\zpf =/= 0, NOT Kip Thorne's on-mass-shell "exotic matter". No evidence for latter, good evidence for former.
"Loosely speaking, the second fundamental form is the normal derivative of the [three dimensional] metric." p. 12
Section 14.1: eq, (14.3) p. 154 is the equation for a generic metric created by a thin shell source.
Coordinate independent constraint is that the first fundamental forms on the two sides of the thin shell metric are equal.
eq. (14.5) defines the unit normal field to the thin shell exotic vacuum zero point dark stress-energy source (stargate portal or throat "like a thin film of soap stretched across a loop of wire" - Eric Davis p.11).
eq (14.6) are the two second fundamental forms one on each side of the thin shell of exotic vacuum dark energy.
Set up convenient Gaussian normal coordinates in a tiny boundary layer neighborhood of the thin shell.
See eqs (14.9) & (14.10) for the 3D space-like metric decomposition inside the thin shell and normal to it. p. 155
The second fundamental forms on both sides of the thin shell are then defined in eq. (14.13) p. 156. The Levi-Civita Christoffel non-tensor "g-force" connection field for this thin shell source is developed in section 14.2 in terms of the discontinuity of the second fundamental forms on the two sides of the thin shell star gate "doorway". See eq. (14.21) p. 157. There is a nonvanishing "g-force" ("weight") only on non-geodesic local noninertial frames (LNIF). The directly measurable local g-force is not a GCT tensor. That would violate the equivalence principle, i.e. WEP for the center of mass of an extended body.
Section 14.3 computes the 4th rank Riemann tidal acceleration curvature tensor that does not vanish in a local inertial frame on a timelike geodesic (LIF) in curved spacetime. See eq. (14.23)
Here the Bianchi identities work. We do not want that of course if we are to have practical metric engineering. Therefore, we may need an extended connection to spoil the antisymmetry of the covariant derivatives of the curvature tensor needed for the Bianchi identities to hold. The Bianchi identities prohibit the direct mingling of the zero point energy vacuum currents with the geometrodynamic currents. The Bianchi identites demand that /\zpf not be a local variable field but a true constant. That is no good for star gate construction.
The idealized thin shell forms for the second rank GCT 4D Ricci tensor Ruv, the Ricci scalar R and the Einstein tensor Guv are given in eqs. (14.25 - 27) p. 158.
Second 14.4 deals with the stress-energy tensor
Tuv(matter) where Davis invokes Tuv(exotic matter). Our theory is very different, more restrictive, because
tuv(exotic ZPF vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv where the three-metric part of guv is in eq (14.9) that does not include any time-travel redshift function as yet in the goo term.
Eq. 14.28 has a thin shell surface strese-energy tensor Suv. Visser also invokes separate local conservation Tuv^;v = 0 which is NO GOOD AT ALL! It throws the practical metric engineering baby out with the bathwater. Eric Davis is blissfully ignorant of all this in his report to the USAF which misses entirely the essential clue in how the UFOs work. Remember that Davis worked for NIDS in Las Vegas whose sole purpose was UFOs. That Franklin Meade of USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion Group openly funded Eric's work here has the obvious implication for the reality of UFOs. You do not have to be a rocket scientist to figure that one out - but it helps! ;-)
So eq. (14.29) p. 158 MUST BE VIOLATED if you want to catch up with ET on warp, wormhole and weapon! Therefore Eric Davis discussion of the thin shell star gate in the USAF report is wrong and Visser's sections 14.4 and 14.5, 14.6 ... need to be reworked in this broader context. Therefore, you cannot conclude anything real about warp, wormhole and weapon from Eric Davis's report to USAF. It is at least a good start in the sense of
"The Question is: What is The Question?" John Archibald Wheeler
On Nov 3, 2004, at 6:57 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
From below
Therefore, the toy model static spherically symmetric stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy field /\zpf are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
The flat thin shell model in Eric Davis's USAF paper cited below does not work for zero point dark energy that is ~ 73% of the universe. Eric needs "exotic matter" that does not exist. Eric's invoking of the Casimir force to get such "exotic matter" will not work at all. However, there should be a way to work around this to get effective instant teleportation without tidal forces to distant parts of our universe and to parallel universes next door including time travel to past and future. Why? Because advanced intelligences are already doing it routinely so there must be a way. Heading towards that goal note that in the above model
/\zpf ~ 1/r*^2
r* is the radius of the spherical throat "portal" of this star gate toy model. For example, the "floating sphere" at Bigelow's Utah Ranch reported in a NIDS paper by Eric Davis would have radius r* ~ 1 meter. A creature resembling Big Foot was seen coming out of the sphere (by a paramilitary NIDS field unit in Bigelow's employ?) according to the NIDS report.
From the Josephson effect the induced /\zpf starting from a non-exotic vacuum is
/\zpf = (dimensionless coupling)(Mc/h)^2(Volume of Exotic Vacuum Region)(Density of Higgs Ocean)^1/2(Density of Control Condensate)^1/2Cos(Relative Phase of Higgs Ocean - Control Condensate)
M ~ 10^-5 gm is the usual assumption, but M may be a lot smaller. We do not know yet.
Therefore, very crudely:
b' = -(r/r*)^2e^2Z(r)
Z' = [b - r^3r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1]/2r^2(1 - b(r)/r)
(r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1)' = r*^-2(-e^2Z(r) - [1 - b(r)/r]^-1)Z' + [r*^-2(1 + sin^2theta)]/r
How to make the flat stargate in Eric Davis's USAF paper with dark energy is a problem that needs to be solved ASAP.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Orthodox 1916 GR is a local gauge force theory from only the 4-parameter translation subgroup of the 15 parameter conformal group. The compensating dynamical field is then guv(curved space-time)
If you also locally gauge the 6-parameter Lorentz group you get a new dynamical torsion field that is a 3rd rank tensor relative to the new expanded symmetry group that is larger than the 1916 Diff(4) group. This is basically what Gennady Shipov has proposed in Moscow.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
... I am making progress in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
Thursday, November 04, 2004
Gavin Newsome our idiot Mayor here in "Baghdad by the Bay" defeated Kerry. His Gay Marriage move galvanized the Jesus Freaks in Ohio et-al. The dope should have waited until after the election. The Marching Morons in Jesus Land care more about "values" than their own survival. The Lemmings march merrily off the cliff. The Pied Piper is off-tune but they don't care - The Deaf, The Dumb and The Blind!
Let us hope now that Bush Jr listens more to his own father not to "the higher father" and not only to the Red Revolutionary Trotskyites in Neocon disguise who are acting like the Judenrat to the Fanatic Christian Right hell-bent on making Saint John's Revelations real in Apocalypse Now! I see little difference between Al Qaeda, the Likud, and the fanatics on the American Christian Right and the Neocons. They are ALL equally crazy and dangerous. Also it seems that Usama is now bluffing. Let's hope so. They are all "Intellectual Morons" - see Finley's book http://www.thbookservice.com/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=c6562
Bush can go two directions now: Henry V or Mussolini?
Which will it be?
Is Kristol Nacht coming?
http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/coffee.html
See also Sir Martin Rees "Our Final Hour".
Sir Martin is Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, FRS, British Astronomer Royal and Hawking's boss.
He shows how the recent discovery of dark zero point energy as 73% of the universe makes possible the ultimate WMD that even Al Qaeda can develop: The Armageddon Bomb that literally destroys the Universe. Our entire universe is as fragile as our biosphere! This is just what the Christian Right Fanatics are looking for! Uh Oh! You better pray that the ETs will intervene to save us from ourselves!

On Nov 4, 2004, at 7:17 AM, JagdishM@aol.com wrote:
I was deeply disappointed by the Democratic loss. However, I cannot escape a certain perverse glee in the Bush victory. It bothered me that by losing, he was getting away scot-free from all his mistakes and the mess he had made of everything. Now that he has won, for the next four years, he has to deal with and shovel the increasingly larger quantities of guano all the chickens coming home to roost are starting to bring back with them. Believe me, there is going to be tons and tons of that stuff coming his way because facts are stubborn things and reality always trumps fantasy. I would not blame Senator Kerry if he feels some sense of relief in his defeat:-).
It is true that both Parties are controlled by 'win at any cost' type of thieves, but looking at the polling process around the country, it was evident that at the grass-root and precinct level, the voting public respects and expects fair elections. Carl Rove may have been successful to fool a large number of people by lying and inflaming their fears and prejudices, but he was unable to corrupt the process. Long live The Republic!
Let us hope now that Bush Jr listens more to his own father not to "the higher father" and not only to the Red Revolutionary Trotskyites in Neocon disguise who are acting like the Judenrat to the Fanatic Christian Right hell-bent on making Saint John's Revelations real in Apocalypse Now! I see little difference between Al Qaeda, the Likud, and the fanatics on the American Christian Right and the Neocons. They are ALL equally crazy and dangerous. Also it seems that Usama is now bluffing. Let's hope so. They are all "Intellectual Morons" - see Finley's book http://www.thbookservice.com/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=c6562
Bush can go two directions now: Henry V or Mussolini?
Which will it be?
Is Kristol Nacht coming?
http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/coffee.html
See also Sir Martin Rees "Our Final Hour".
Sir Martin is Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, FRS, British Astronomer Royal and Hawking's boss.
He shows how the recent discovery of dark zero point energy as 73% of the universe makes possible the ultimate WMD that even Al Qaeda can develop: The Armageddon Bomb that literally destroys the Universe. Our entire universe is as fragile as our biosphere! This is just what the Christian Right Fanatics are looking for! Uh Oh! You better pray that the ETs will intervene to save us from ourselves!

On Nov 4, 2004, at 7:17 AM, JagdishM@aol.com wrote:
I was deeply disappointed by the Democratic loss. However, I cannot escape a certain perverse glee in the Bush victory. It bothered me that by losing, he was getting away scot-free from all his mistakes and the mess he had made of everything. Now that he has won, for the next four years, he has to deal with and shovel the increasingly larger quantities of guano all the chickens coming home to roost are starting to bring back with them. Believe me, there is going to be tons and tons of that stuff coming his way because facts are stubborn things and reality always trumps fantasy. I would not blame Senator Kerry if he feels some sense of relief in his defeat:-).
It is true that both Parties are controlled by 'win at any cost' type of thieves, but looking at the polling process around the country, it was evident that at the grass-root and precinct level, the voting public respects and expects fair elections. Carl Rove may have been successful to fool a large number of people by lying and inflaming their fears and prejudices, but he was unable to corrupt the process. Long live The Republic!
Wednesday, November 03, 2004
From below
Therefore, the toy model static spherically symmetric stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy field /\zpf are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
The flat thin shell model in Eric Davis's USAF paper cited below does not work for zero point dark energy that is ~ 73% of the universe. Eric needs "exotic matter" that does not exist. Eric's invoking of the Casimir force to get such "exotic matter" will not work at all. However, there should be a way to work around this to get effective instant teleportation without tidal forces to distant parts of our universe and to parallel universes next door including time travel to past and future. Why? Because advanced intelligences are already doing it routinely so there must be a way. Heading towards that goal note that in the above model
/\zpf ~ 1/r*^2
r* is the radius of the spherical throat "portal" of this star gate toy model. For example, the "floating sphere" at Bigelow's Utah Ranch reported in a NIDS paper by Eric Davis would have radius r* ~ 1 meter. A creature resembling Big Foot was seen coming out of the sphere (by a paramilitary NIDS field unit in Bigelow's employ?) according to the NIDS report.
From the Josephson effect the induced /\zpf starting from a non-exotic vacuum is
/\zpf = (dimensionless coupling)(Mc/h)^2(Volume of Exotic Vacuum Region)(Density of Higgs Ocean)^1/2(Density of Control Condensate)^1/2Cos(Relative Phase of Higgs Ocean - Control Condensate)
M ~ 10^-5 gm is the usual assumption, but M may be a lot smaller. We do not know yet.
Therefore, very crudely:
b' = -(r/r*)^2e^2Z(r)
Z' = [b - r^3r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1]/2r^2(1 - b(r)/r)
(r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1)' = r*^-2(-e^2Z(r) - [1 - b(r)/r]^-1)Z' + [r*^-2(1 + sin^2theta)]/r
How to make the flat stargate in Eric Davis's USAF paper with dark energy is a problem that needs to be solved ASAP.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Orthodox 1916 GR is a local gauge force theory from only the 4-parameter translation subgroup of the 15 parameter conformal group. The compensating dynamical field is then guv(curved space-time)
If you also locally gauge the 6-parameter Lorentz group you get a new dynamical torsion field that is a 3rd rank tensor relative to the new expanded symmetry group that is larger than the 1916 Diff(4) group. This is basically what Gennady Shipov has proposed in Moscow.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
... I am making progress in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
Therefore, the toy model static spherically symmetric stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy field /\zpf are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
The flat thin shell model in Eric Davis's USAF paper cited below does not work for zero point dark energy that is ~ 73% of the universe. Eric needs "exotic matter" that does not exist. Eric's invoking of the Casimir force to get such "exotic matter" will not work at all. However, there should be a way to work around this to get effective instant teleportation without tidal forces to distant parts of our universe and to parallel universes next door including time travel to past and future. Why? Because advanced intelligences are already doing it routinely so there must be a way. Heading towards that goal note that in the above model
/\zpf ~ 1/r*^2
r* is the radius of the spherical throat "portal" of this star gate toy model. For example, the "floating sphere" at Bigelow's Utah Ranch reported in a NIDS paper by Eric Davis would have radius r* ~ 1 meter. A creature resembling Big Foot was seen coming out of the sphere (by a paramilitary NIDS field unit in Bigelow's employ?) according to the NIDS report.
From the Josephson effect the induced /\zpf starting from a non-exotic vacuum is
/\zpf = (dimensionless coupling)(Mc/h)^2(Volume of Exotic Vacuum Region)(Density of Higgs Ocean)^1/2(Density of Control Condensate)^1/2Cos(Relative Phase of Higgs Ocean - Control Condensate)
M ~ 10^-5 gm is the usual assumption, but M may be a lot smaller. We do not know yet.
Therefore, very crudely:
b' = -(r/r*)^2e^2Z(r)
Z' = [b - r^3r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1]/2r^2(1 - b(r)/r)
(r*^-2[1 - b(r)/r]^-1)' = r*^-2(-e^2Z(r) - [1 - b(r)/r]^-1)Z' + [r*^-2(1 + sin^2theta)]/r
How to make the flat stargate in Eric Davis's USAF paper with dark energy is a problem that needs to be solved ASAP.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Orthodox 1916 GR is a local gauge force theory from only the 4-parameter translation subgroup of the 15 parameter conformal group. The compensating dynamical field is then guv(curved space-time)
If you also locally gauge the 6-parameter Lorentz group you get a new dynamical torsion field that is a 3rd rank tensor relative to the new expanded symmetry group that is larger than the 1916 Diff(4) group. This is basically what Gennady Shipov has proposed in Moscow.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
... I am making progress in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
Ch 10: CAPS are mine not in the original
81. Gravity in Newtonian physics (Galilean relativity)
"all bodies move [in gravity fields] in the same manner independently of mass, provided the initial conditions are the same ... This property of the gravitational fields PROVIDES THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING AN ANALOGY between the motion of a body in a gravitational field and the motion of a body not located in any external field, but which is considered from the point of view of a non-inertial system of reference. ... in an inertial system, the FREE MOTION of all bodies is uniform and rectilinear ... Thus the properties of the motion in a noninertial system are the same as those in an inertial system of reference in the presence of a gravitational field. In other words a noninertial system is equivalent to a certain gravitational field. This is called the principle of equivalence."
L&L then give the example of a GLOBAL uniformly accelerating noninertial frame that is equivalent to a uniform gravitation field. Here "gravitational field" and "g-force" mean the same thing. Note that warp drive requires zero local g-force. A covariant tensor g-force is a physical absurdity. Also g-force is obviously a local observable that is only non-zero in a noninertial frame. Any physics theory that does not recognize that elementary fact is simply wrong.
"COORDINATE" vs "ACTUAL" Gravity Fields
What Zielinski has been trying to achieve, insofar as it is correct, and not unintelligible handwaving, is already well known. Zielinski's method has been to over-dramatize some informal remark that Einstein allegedly made in 1916 cited by Ruffini in his text book. No one has bothered to check the original German to see if the alleged (SEP) remark is not an error of translation? Thus as L&L continue:
"However, the fields to which the noninertial fields are equivalent ARE NOT COMPLETELY IDENTICAL with "ACTUAL" gravitational fields WHICH OCCUR ALSO IN INERTIAL FRAMES."
L&L are talking Newtonian mechanics here not Einstein's geometrodynamics.
The VERY Fundamental Importance of Asymptotic Flatness of Space-Time
"FOR THERE IS A VERY ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE with respect to their BEHAVIOR AT INFINITY. At infinite distances from
Whthe bodies producing the field, "ACTUAL" GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS ALWAYS GO TO ZERO."
That is the static gravity Green's function of the Poisson scalar field equation G(r - r') = |r - r'|^-1
r = field point for a point test particle, r = source point (source may be real on-mass-shell or virtual off-mass-shell exotic vacuum /\zpf "dark energy" field).
"Contrary to this, the [gravity] fields to which noninertial frames are equivalent INCREASE WITHOUT LIMIT AT INFINITY, or, in any event, REMAIN FINITE IN VALUE. Thus, for example, the centrifugal force which appears in a [global] ROTATING REFERENCE SYSTEM INCREASES WITHOUT LIMIT AS WE MOVE AWAY FROM THE AXIS OF ROTATION; [another example] THE [global gravity] FIELD TO WHICH A [noninertial] REFERENCE SYSTEM IN ACCELERATED LINEAR MOTION IS EQUIVALENT TO IS THE SAME OVER ALL SPACE AND ALSO AT INFINITY."
I forget the language Zielinski used to pooh pooh this essential physical constraint as "adhoc" or a "fudge" in his ill-posed pseudo-problem.
"The Question is: What is The Question?" John A. Wheeler
Why g-force cannot be a GCT covariant tensor quantity! Why any pure gravity stress-energy current density quantity cannot be a local GCT tensor!
"The fields to which [GLOBAL] noninertial systems are equivalent VANISH AS SOON AS WE TRANSFORM TO AN INERTIAL SYSTEM."
This continues to hold when we extend Newton's theory of gravity to Einstein's where global frames are replaced by local frames. In that case the "actual gravitational field" is not g-force, but is the tidal force given by the 4th rank curvature GCT tensor R^uvwl in the geodesic deviation equation.
d^2(xA - xB)^u/ds^2 = R^uvwl(xA - xB)^v(dxA^w/ds)(dxB^l/ds) in an LNIF
You have equation of same form in the coincident LIF where the curved indices u,v,w,l go over to the flat indices a,b,c,d
This equation works when Lp << xA - xB << local radii of curvature.
This geodesic deviation is detected, in principle, with Doppler radars on a pair of test particles A & B each of which is in zero g-force "free fall" timelike geodesic motion in curved space-time, but which nevertheless are in relative motion.
Example: Coordinate fake gravity field in a rotating global frame of reference in flat space-time. Since the tangential rods have Lorentz contraction and the radial rods do not, circumference/radius > pi. And the fake gravity force increases as f^2r, where f is the rotation frequency and r is cylinder distance from axis of roation. In contrast, for a "actual" gravity field in the Schwarzschild solution, in the rest LNIF the radial rods shrink and the tangential rods do not, therefore circumference/radius << pi. This is why lepto-quark quasi-particle Bohm hidden variables in the Higgs Ocean shrink from 10^-11 cm low magnification to 10^-16 cm high magnification from their zero point energy /\zpf cores (SLAC deep inelastic electron-hadron scattering).
"IN CONTRAST TO THIS, "ACTUAL" GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS (EXISTING ALSO IN AN INERTIAL REFERENCE SYSTEM) CANNOT BE ELIMINATED BY ANY CHOICE OF [GLOBAL] REFERENCE SYSTEM."
Here L&L only mean in Newtonian theory as their equations (81.1 - 2) show. That is, the Lagrangian IN A GLOBAL NEWTONIAN INERTIAL FRAME is
L = mv^2/2 - mV(gravity)
dv/dt = -gradV
LOCALITY of equivalence principle even in Newtonian physics
"All that can be done by a suitable choice of reference system is to ELIMINATE THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD IN A GIVEN REGION OF SPACE, SUFFICIENTLY SMALL SO THAT THE FIELD CAN BE CONSIDERED UNIFORM OVER IT. This can be done by choosing a [local] system in accelerated motion, the acceleration of which is equal to that which would be acquired by a particle placed in the region of the field which we are considering."
On Nov 2, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Orthodox 1916 GR is a local gauge force theory from only the 4-parameter translation subgroup of the 15 parameter conformal group. The compensating dynamical field is then guv(curved space-time)
If you also locally gauge the 6-parameter Lorentz group you get a new dynamical torsion field that is a 3rd rank tensor relative to the new expanded symmetry group that is larger than the 1916 Diff(4) group. This is basically what Gennady Shipov has proposed in Moscow.
Alex's "nonmetricity" may still be locally-gauging still a larger part of the conformal group. I am not sure at this point. I have not looked into it as yet.
However, Paul, your argument has nothing to do with this much deeper POV. You are still claiming to use only the 1916 theory and you are not doing it correctly.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Paul
Write this up in equation editor and send it out. It does not smell right to me, but I do not have the patience to wade through the e-mail notation. Your argument is basically unintelligible to me. There is no way you can split the inhomogeneous connection field transformation term XY (see below) into a tensor and a coordinate part in a frame independent way using only the orthodox 1916 GR theory. If you can get someone else to explain it maybe I will get it. So far, it seems "not even wrong." If you send it in standard notation I will look again. I do not want to be bush-wacked in this essentially trivial side issue when I am making breakthroughs in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
On Nov 2, 2004, at 6:36 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
I see no connection between Alex's precise mathematical extension of GR with torsion and nonmetricity and any of the vague unintelligible non-mathematical words you are using. I have not studied Alex's model in detail as yet, but I think what he is saying is that one needs to get beyond the 1916 GR, i.e. a bigger notion of the connection field to get a localized pure gravity energy-momentum tensor. This is a reasonable proposal. Indeed Einstein himself spent his later years doing precisely that. You have not said anything like that at all! You are working inside the GR 1916 framework and simply playing with words. Alex has NEW MATH that you do not have. In no sense is Alex agreeing with you, as there is nothing intelligible to agree with. This explains his silence. When have you said a larger connection field with non-metricity is required? Never!
Suppose we have
(Connection) = (Tensor Connection) + (Coordinate Connection)
Start from (Connection) = 0 in an LIF in accord with WEP. I will only use WEP not EEP from now on to avoid that Red Herring.
So that (Tensor Connection LIF) = -(Coordinate Connection LIF)
Diff(4) acting on 0 produces (Connection LNIF) =/= 0
Diff(4):(Connection)^uvw = (Connection)^u'v'w' = X^u'uX^vv'X^ww'(Connection)^uvw + X^u'kY^kv'w'
= X^u'uX^vv'X^ww'[(Tensor Connection LIF) + (Coordinate Connection LIF)]^uvw + X^u'kY^kv'w'
= X^u'kY^kv'w'
So the problem is how do you SPLIT
X^u'kY^kv'w' into (Tensor Connection LNIF)^u'v'w' + (Coordinate Connection LNIF)^u'v'w'
You could not even get this far in asking the question mathematically in 3 years. It's obvious this cannot be done. If it can just do it. Show us!
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Doc Savage wrote:
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
81. Gravity in Newtonian physics (Galilean relativity)
"all bodies move [in gravity fields] in the same manner independently of mass, provided the initial conditions are the same ... This property of the gravitational fields PROVIDES THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING AN ANALOGY between the motion of a body in a gravitational field and the motion of a body not located in any external field, but which is considered from the point of view of a non-inertial system of reference. ... in an inertial system, the FREE MOTION of all bodies is uniform and rectilinear ... Thus the properties of the motion in a noninertial system are the same as those in an inertial system of reference in the presence of a gravitational field. In other words a noninertial system is equivalent to a certain gravitational field. This is called the principle of equivalence."
L&L then give the example of a GLOBAL uniformly accelerating noninertial frame that is equivalent to a uniform gravitation field. Here "gravitational field" and "g-force" mean the same thing. Note that warp drive requires zero local g-force. A covariant tensor g-force is a physical absurdity. Also g-force is obviously a local observable that is only non-zero in a noninertial frame. Any physics theory that does not recognize that elementary fact is simply wrong.
"COORDINATE" vs "ACTUAL" Gravity Fields
What Zielinski has been trying to achieve, insofar as it is correct, and not unintelligible handwaving, is already well known. Zielinski's method has been to over-dramatize some informal remark that Einstein allegedly made in 1916 cited by Ruffini in his text book. No one has bothered to check the original German to see if the alleged (SEP) remark is not an error of translation? Thus as L&L continue:
"However, the fields to which the noninertial fields are equivalent ARE NOT COMPLETELY IDENTICAL with "ACTUAL" gravitational fields WHICH OCCUR ALSO IN INERTIAL FRAMES."
L&L are talking Newtonian mechanics here not Einstein's geometrodynamics.
The VERY Fundamental Importance of Asymptotic Flatness of Space-Time
"FOR THERE IS A VERY ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE with respect to their BEHAVIOR AT INFINITY. At infinite distances from
Whthe bodies producing the field, "ACTUAL" GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS ALWAYS GO TO ZERO."
That is the static gravity Green's function of the Poisson scalar field equation G(r - r') = |r - r'|^-1
r = field point for a point test particle, r = source point (source may be real on-mass-shell or virtual off-mass-shell exotic vacuum /\zpf "dark energy" field).
"Contrary to this, the [gravity] fields to which noninertial frames are equivalent INCREASE WITHOUT LIMIT AT INFINITY, or, in any event, REMAIN FINITE IN VALUE. Thus, for example, the centrifugal force which appears in a [global] ROTATING REFERENCE SYSTEM INCREASES WITHOUT LIMIT AS WE MOVE AWAY FROM THE AXIS OF ROTATION; [another example] THE [global gravity] FIELD TO WHICH A [noninertial] REFERENCE SYSTEM IN ACCELERATED LINEAR MOTION IS EQUIVALENT TO IS THE SAME OVER ALL SPACE AND ALSO AT INFINITY."
I forget the language Zielinski used to pooh pooh this essential physical constraint as "adhoc" or a "fudge" in his ill-posed pseudo-problem.
"The Question is: What is The Question?" John A. Wheeler
Why g-force cannot be a GCT covariant tensor quantity! Why any pure gravity stress-energy current density quantity cannot be a local GCT tensor!
"The fields to which [GLOBAL] noninertial systems are equivalent VANISH AS SOON AS WE TRANSFORM TO AN INERTIAL SYSTEM."
This continues to hold when we extend Newton's theory of gravity to Einstein's where global frames are replaced by local frames. In that case the "actual gravitational field" is not g-force, but is the tidal force given by the 4th rank curvature GCT tensor R^uvwl in the geodesic deviation equation.
d^2(xA - xB)^u/ds^2 = R^uvwl(xA - xB)^v(dxA^w/ds)(dxB^l/ds) in an LNIF
You have equation of same form in the coincident LIF where the curved indices u,v,w,l go over to the flat indices a,b,c,d
This equation works when Lp << xA - xB << local radii of curvature.
This geodesic deviation is detected, in principle, with Doppler radars on a pair of test particles A & B each of which is in zero g-force "free fall" timelike geodesic motion in curved space-time, but which nevertheless are in relative motion.
Example: Coordinate fake gravity field in a rotating global frame of reference in flat space-time. Since the tangential rods have Lorentz contraction and the radial rods do not, circumference/radius > pi. And the fake gravity force increases as f^2r, where f is the rotation frequency and r is cylinder distance from axis of roation. In contrast, for a "actual" gravity field in the Schwarzschild solution, in the rest LNIF the radial rods shrink and the tangential rods do not, therefore circumference/radius << pi. This is why lepto-quark quasi-particle Bohm hidden variables in the Higgs Ocean shrink from 10^-11 cm low magnification to 10^-16 cm high magnification from their zero point energy /\zpf cores (SLAC deep inelastic electron-hadron scattering).
"IN CONTRAST TO THIS, "ACTUAL" GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS (EXISTING ALSO IN AN INERTIAL REFERENCE SYSTEM) CANNOT BE ELIMINATED BY ANY CHOICE OF [GLOBAL] REFERENCE SYSTEM."
Here L&L only mean in Newtonian theory as their equations (81.1 - 2) show. That is, the Lagrangian IN A GLOBAL NEWTONIAN INERTIAL FRAME is
L = mv^2/2 - mV(gravity)
dv/dt = -gradV
LOCALITY of equivalence principle even in Newtonian physics
"All that can be done by a suitable choice of reference system is to ELIMINATE THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD IN A GIVEN REGION OF SPACE, SUFFICIENTLY SMALL SO THAT THE FIELD CAN BE CONSIDERED UNIFORM OVER IT. This can be done by choosing a [local] system in accelerated motion, the acceleration of which is equal to that which would be acquired by a particle placed in the region of the field which we are considering."
On Nov 2, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Orthodox 1916 GR is a local gauge force theory from only the 4-parameter translation subgroup of the 15 parameter conformal group. The compensating dynamical field is then guv(curved space-time)
If you also locally gauge the 6-parameter Lorentz group you get a new dynamical torsion field that is a 3rd rank tensor relative to the new expanded symmetry group that is larger than the 1916 Diff(4) group. This is basically what Gennady Shipov has proposed in Moscow.
Alex's "nonmetricity" may still be locally-gauging still a larger part of the conformal group. I am not sure at this point. I have not looked into it as yet.
However, Paul, your argument has nothing to do with this much deeper POV. You are still claiming to use only the 1916 theory and you are not doing it correctly.
On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Paul
Write this up in equation editor and send it out. It does not smell right to me, but I do not have the patience to wade through the e-mail notation. Your argument is basically unintelligible to me. There is no way you can split the inhomogeneous connection field transformation term XY (see below) into a tensor and a coordinate part in a frame independent way using only the orthodox 1916 GR theory. If you can get someone else to explain it maybe I will get it. So far, it seems "not even wrong." If you send it in standard notation I will look again. I do not want to be bush-wacked in this essentially trivial side issue when I am making breakthroughs in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
On Nov 2, 2004, at 6:36 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
I see no connection between Alex's precise mathematical extension of GR with torsion and nonmetricity and any of the vague unintelligible non-mathematical words you are using. I have not studied Alex's model in detail as yet, but I think what he is saying is that one needs to get beyond the 1916 GR, i.e. a bigger notion of the connection field to get a localized pure gravity energy-momentum tensor. This is a reasonable proposal. Indeed Einstein himself spent his later years doing precisely that. You have not said anything like that at all! You are working inside the GR 1916 framework and simply playing with words. Alex has NEW MATH that you do not have. In no sense is Alex agreeing with you, as there is nothing intelligible to agree with. This explains his silence. When have you said a larger connection field with non-metricity is required? Never!
Suppose we have
(Connection) = (Tensor Connection) + (Coordinate Connection)
Start from (Connection) = 0 in an LIF in accord with WEP. I will only use WEP not EEP from now on to avoid that Red Herring.
So that (Tensor Connection LIF) = -(Coordinate Connection LIF)
Diff(4) acting on 0 produces (Connection LNIF) =/= 0
Diff(4):(Connection)^uvw = (Connection)^u'v'w' = X^u'uX^vv'X^ww'(Connection)^uvw + X^u'kY^kv'w'
= X^u'uX^vv'X^ww'[(Tensor Connection LIF) + (Coordinate Connection LIF)]^uvw + X^u'kY^kv'w'
= X^u'kY^kv'w'
So the problem is how do you SPLIT
X^u'kY^kv'w' into (Tensor Connection LNIF)^u'v'w' + (Coordinate Connection LNIF)^u'v'w'
You could not even get this far in asking the question mathematically in 3 years. It's obvious this cannot be done. If it can just do it. Show us!
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Doc Savage wrote:
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
Tuesday, November 02, 2004
On Nov 2, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
I am making breakthroughs in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Doc Savage wrote:
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
I am making breakthroughs in real stuff dealing with real observations (Pioneer 10/11 Solar Exotic Vacuum Hedgehog Defect, Galactic halo flat rotation curve, Entropy of Universe, Star Gate exotic vacuum field equations, Josephson effect metric engineering equation for induced /\zpf ...) and coming military related technology for warp, wormhole and weapon. I was informed that my debate on metric engineering with Puthoff was discussed very recently in a hush hush closed door session with high officials at DIA, CIA, NASA, NAS, Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks ...
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Doc Savage wrote:
fyi
On Nov 1, 2004, at 4:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
re: See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Hal Puthoff wrote (in quotes) on Nov 1, 2004
In a message dated 11/1/2004 3:12:19 PM Central Standard Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes:
Despite fact Hal Puthoff has published his PV model in peer-reviewed
journals many times over for maybe 20 years he is still unable to show
the gravimagnetism predicted and confirmed by GR. Also GR correctly
predicts 1913 + 16 pulsar data to a precision of 10^-14 where PV gives
a wrong answer way outside that error bar.
"Straw man. PV, being a scalar theory, was never meant to apply to gravimagnetism or to cover the total degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation, and you know it."
Well Franklin Mead at USAF Edwards AFB Advanced Propulsion apparently doesn't know that. Eric Davis never says that in his USAF report on "Teleportation" you arranged for him. Chief Scientists at DIA, CIA, NAS, Lockheed Martin ... also editors at Aviation Week also Nick Cook at Jane's Defence Weekly don't know that. They all think I am a Blue Meanie to poor you! ;-)
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/USSKron.html
I agree your puny little 98 lb weakling PV scalar theory compared to Einstein's Charles Atlas tensor GR theory for the past 20 years is able to get the same 3 classic results that Einstein already had by 1916. That's not a victory by any standards. Mike Ibison did a nice PV paper showing that the you cannot explain 1913 + 16. Mike also says your PV is not consistent with Diff(4) GCT.
Since you cannot get gravimagnetism frame drag, how can you claim, with a straight face, that PV is any good for metric engineering of warp, wormhole and WMD to all those USAF, DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M Skunkworks, BAE et-al Chief Scientists, Project Managers, CEOs, Investors etc? Also we know that the real purpose of all this is the UFO flying saucers and you don't dare deny that! We have discussed that directly in the past with witnesses like Saul-Paul Sirag - for example at the Gorbachev State of the World Forum 2000 at the Fairmount Hotel in San Francisco. These people at DIA, CIA, NASA, L-M, BAE, Jane's Defence ... want something that has some hope of working. Something that can do it all. Something seamlessly integrated with the Battle-Tested Real McCoy Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Eric Davis and you & Co never even whisper "Dark Energy has anti-gravity" it's not in any of your papers and I have written it in copyrighted form in the relevant context for the first time in 2 books already in 2002 that are both on Amazon.com. These serious folks want The Right Stuff. How long do you think you can keep stringing them along with these promises, promises, promises, false hopes and wishing that never make it so? How long I ask you? Do you think the physicists in Moscow, Beograd, Kiev, Teheran, Beijing are waiting for you? They are forging ahead while you spin your wheels at the bottom of the Sand Dune for years and years and years. I have come Hal to wake you from your dogmatic slumbers. It's time to get out of the Tea Pot Hal. The Queen of Hearts is definitely not amused. Capisce? ;-)
"It is only meant to apply to those applications in its domain of applicability. And there it does very well."
Not good enough.
"Your other straw man, that your GR 17 colleagues don't take PV seriously as a replacement for GR is just a statement against your claim that that's what it's claimed to be. What they're saying is true. What you're saying is false."
Stop splitting legal hairs and quibbling. You know what I mean. We are talking defense policy planning dealing with the UFO coverup. Now that dark energy has been discovered this is Disclosure time.
The Right Stuff?
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer 10/11 anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
Monday, November 01, 2004
To be published in "Super Cosmos".
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:39 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Update:
The particular thin shell star gate (traversable wormhole) model in Eric's 2.1 Engineering the Space-Time Metric assumes a form of exotic on-mass-shell matter that anti-gravitates for which there is not the slightest shred of actual evidence. On the other hand ~ 73% of our universe is exotic vacuum w = -1 "dark energy" that does anti-gravitate! However, the form of the particular solution to Einstein's field equations that Eric gives cannot be implemented by any kind of zero point energy as a matter of basic principle. Therefore Eric's discussion on p. 10 is misleading and gives false hope. The Casimir force is not at all relevant to the problem for one thing.
The exotic vacuum field equation that must be solved is
Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
where /\zpf is a local scalar field.
Guv,^;v =/= 0 i.e. usual Bianchi identities break down for exotic vacua with non-vanishing zero point energy density.
Lorentz covariance + the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) that the motion of the centers of mass of extended bodies follow time-like geodesics in curved space-time, if there are no non-gravity forces (with zero weight in the geodesic rest frame of the freely floating object) imply
w = (pressure)/energy density) = -1
Proof is in John Peacock's "Cosmological Physics" p. 26.
Look at Eric's 2D wormhole mouth thin shell equation (2.9)
The LHS for ZPF virtual exotic vacuum stuff must be a 3x3 diagonal matrix with eigenvalues s, -s, -s i.e. trace = -s where s is the thin shell surface energy density. A positive surface energy density is needed to get the anti-gravity.
The model Eric gives cannot do this. We need a different model here.
Start with Eric's equations (2.1) & (2.2) and force it to fit
Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
where at this stage /\zpf is an arbitrary scalar field.
To be continued.
On Oct 30, 2004, at 3:19 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Eqs. (2.10)
About negative surface energy and negative surface tensions for a flat mouth stargate traversable wormhole toy model. It has a singularity so it is not a practical solution. But that is not the error. The error creeps in when Eric talks about the Casimir force i.e. ZPF. Like Hal Puthoff, who Eric says is his "mentor", Eric does not understand that w = (pressure/energy density) or in this thin shell case (surface tension/surface energy density) must = -1 for reasons of Lorentz covariance + equivalence principle (i.e. gravity-matter minimal local gauge coupling).
Kip Thorne's exotic matter source for the star gate (1986) was on-mass-shell real not off-mass-shell virtual.
In the case Eric treats rather than (1 + 3w) for 3D we have (1 + 2w) for 2D "thin shell".
That is we approximate Einstein's equation to the weak field Poisson equation
Grad^2V(exotic 2D shell throat) = (4piG/c^2)(energy density)(1 + 2w)
For Eric's solution (2.10)
This is w = +1 (on-mass-shell exotic matter)
But as soon as one talks about ZPF, then w = -1. Therefore, a negative zpf energy density has a positive pressure and this will gravitate not anti-gravitate as is needed. So what you want is a positive zero point energy density to get the anti-gravity. Eric explains this incorrectly. Also the QED Casimir force has nothing to do with this totally new kind of induced strong gravity from exotic vacuum zero point energy!
The discussion on p. 10 of this USAF report is seriously wrong. This is a common confusion in the literature BTW. Eric makes no mention of dark energy in precision cosmology so it is not surprising that he makes this conceptual error. Had he read Mike Turner's reviews on dark energy he would have realized this error, which has propagated in Nick Cook's book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and in Aviation Week's "To The Stars" earlier this year.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
On Oct 31, 2004, at 8:40 PM, Robert J. Brown wrote:
"Jack" == Jack Sarfatti writes:
What you call confusion is called deep insight by
professional physicists.
Actually Rovelli made exactly this distinction in the article
you sent me, and I agree with him on this.
Actual physical symmetry of a system is very different from
coordinate insensitivity of the physics.
Jack> No he is talking quantum gravity not classical general
Jack> relativity. The former is only a hope not a theory. If my
Jack> theory is right there is no quantum gravity in the canonical
Jack> sense and their criterion of "observable" which BTW is ONLY
Jack> NONLOCAL is silly.
On the quantum scale, how can something be truly local? Only if it
is the *SAME* thing, I think -- or at least within the radius of a
Planck-like distance Lp...
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
On Nov 1, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
On Oct 31, 2004, at 10:51 PM, Robert J. Brown wrote:
iksnileiz@earthlink.net said:
You mean you can't even understand this see-spot-run explanation?
I think it is more like "See? Spot has the runs!" Better clean up the
mess. ;-)
2nd draft:
Yes Robert I agree. Paul Zielinski is confused because he uses too much English and not enough math. Paul is strong at polemics and lawyer tricks but that is not good physics argumentation. Also he has not kept up with the relevant reviews. He is seeing problems that are not there. He is out of touch. I have been to 3 major GR meetings in past 2 years and am in touch with the top people in the field. These are exciting times in "precision cosmology" and Paul has no real conception of what the reality is. Paul would be instantly rejected as a nut crank if any of the top guns were to read some of his polemics and his not-even-wrong objections. WEP is good enough. Nonlocality of gravity energy is explained by Penrose. If you have a really closed system, i.e. no energy flow out of it, there is no way to measure the gravity energy anyway! You can only do it with gravity waves, i.e. open system, and that is the context of the real issue. Paul is in Laputa Land on these issues. Anyone today challenging the foundations of GR within its classical domain of validity is considered a crackpot by the top guns at GR 17. That includes Puthoff in both his PV and ZPF programs that he is trying to sell to USAF. 4 top physicists at GR 17 told me in no uncertain terms that they do not like what Puthoff is pitching in this regard. They also did not like the kaput NASA BPP program mostly because they saw it as a platform for Puthoff's ideas. I was rather surprised at that actually. I did not even mention NASA BPP. 3 of them brought it up on their own in the context of Puthoff's PV model. These are all facts that can be checked.
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Substantiates what I claim. It has good, bad and bogus ideas in it like Eric's paper at NIDS with Jacques Vallee that has been suppressed with the closure of NIDS (unfortunately). I am delaying release of my book Super Cosmos to include fair-balanced detailed critiqueS of both of Eric Davis's useful papers.
Nick Cook in his book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and Aviation Week in "To the Stars" have been put on a wild goose chase. Here is the True Story with The Right Virtual Stuff.
Casimir force? We don't need no damn Casimir force to reach for The Stars and Beyond! ;-)
Start from Matt Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes" 2.3.12 Generic static spherically symmetric spacetime: Without horizon i.e. Stargate metric toy model.
Visser's eq. (2.72) is essentially Davis's eq. (2.1). Visser's equations (2.73) - (2.84) p. 26 have what we need.
Notation: ' is ,r i.e. radial partial derivative. r is the Schwarzschild coordinate not the isotropic one Hal Puthoff misuses in his "PV without PV" "corrupted file will not display" parody of GR. :-) Matt Visser agreed with me on that at GR 17 in our double decker bus ride for drinks to The Vault on Dublin's river front. See Visser's eq. (2.40) p. 20 on Schwarzschild r vs isotropic r for GR SSS, see also Fig 2.2 Kruskal coordinate patches, p. 21 ignored in PV completely because of the "exponential" that does not work for now observed gravimagnetism (essential to metric engineering warp, wormhole & weapon).
b(r) is the wormhole mouth (stargate portal) shape function. Z(r) is the "time machine" through the stargate function. Z(r) = 0 means no time-travel shift through the star gate. Ignore Hawking's "chronology protection" infinite blue shift barrier against time travel to the past for now since it looks to me like we can time reverse it to a harmless infinite red shift. I cannot prove this yet but there is indirect empirical evidence from UFO "high strangeness" as in Eric Davis's NIDS paper with Jacques Vallee.
T00 is the energy density. Trr is the radial tension, p = transverse pressure = Ttheta,theta = Tphi,phi in spherical polar coordinates.
Trace Tuv (energy-momentum tensor of gravity source real and/or virtual exotic vacuum) = (energy density) + (radial tension) + 2(transverse pressure)
For isotropy (radial tension = transverse pressure) this reduces to (energy density)(1 + 3w)
For zpf w - -1 from Lorentz covariance in tangent space + WEP minimal coupling of source to geometry, i.e. local gauge invariance relative to 4-parameter translation group.
The Einstein field equations, reduce to
b' = (8piG/c^4)r^2T00 a dimensionless pure number
Z' = [b - (8piG/c^4)r^3Trr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
Trr' = (T00 - Trr)Z' - 2(p + Trr)/r
In the special case of the exotic vacuum dark zero point energy
Tuv(exotic vacuum) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv
Therefore, the stargate field equations with exotic vacuum dark zero point energy are:
b' = r^2/\zpfg00
Z' = [b - r^3/\zpfgrr]/2r^2(1 - b/r)
(/\zpfgrr)' = /\zpf(g00 - grr)Z' + [/\zpf(gtheta,theta + gphi,phi)]/r
Where we can use Eric Davis's eq. (2.2) i.e. in my notation
g00 = -e^2Z(r) (metric time travel distortion through the stargate)
grr = [1 - b(r)/r]^-1 (shape of star gate passage way AKA throat function)
gtheta,theta = 1
gphi,phi = sin^2(theta)
The guv must be dimensionless.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:39 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Update:
The particular thin shell star gate (traversable wormhole) model in Eric's 2.1 Engineering the Space-Time Metric assumes a form of exotic on-mass-shell matter that anti-gravitates for which there is not the slightest shred of actual evidence. On the other hand ~ 73% of our universe is exotic vacuum w = -1 "dark energy" that does anti-gravitate! However, the form of the particular solution to Einstein's field equations that Eric gives cannot be implemented by any kind of zero point energy as a matter of basic principle. Therefore Eric's discussion on p. 10 is misleading and gives false hope. The Casimir force is not at all relevant to the problem for one thing.
The exotic vacuum field equation that must be solved is
Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
where /\zpf is a local scalar field.
Guv,^;v =/= 0 i.e. usual Bianchi identities break down for exotic vacua with non-vanishing zero point energy density.
Lorentz covariance + the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) that the motion of the centers of mass of extended bodies follow time-like geodesics in curved space-time, if there are no non-gravity forces (with zero weight in the geodesic rest frame of the freely floating object) imply
w = (pressure)/energy density) = -1
Proof is in John Peacock's "Cosmological Physics" p. 26.
Look at Eric's 2D wormhole mouth thin shell equation (2.9)
The LHS for ZPF virtual exotic vacuum stuff must be a 3x3 diagonal matrix with eigenvalues s, -s, -s i.e. trace = -s where s is the thin shell surface energy density. A positive surface energy density is needed to get the anti-gravity.
The model Eric gives cannot do this. We need a different model here.
Start with Eric's equations (2.1) & (2.2) and force it to fit
Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
where at this stage /\zpf is an arbitrary scalar field.
To be continued.
On Oct 30, 2004, at 3:19 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Eqs. (2.10)
About negative surface energy and negative surface tensions for a flat mouth stargate traversable wormhole toy model. It has a singularity so it is not a practical solution. But that is not the error. The error creeps in when Eric talks about the Casimir force i.e. ZPF. Like Hal Puthoff, who Eric says is his "mentor", Eric does not understand that w = (pressure/energy density) or in this thin shell case (surface tension/surface energy density) must = -1 for reasons of Lorentz covariance + equivalence principle (i.e. gravity-matter minimal local gauge coupling).
Kip Thorne's exotic matter source for the star gate (1986) was on-mass-shell real not off-mass-shell virtual.
In the case Eric treats rather than (1 + 3w) for 3D we have (1 + 2w) for 2D "thin shell".
That is we approximate Einstein's equation to the weak field Poisson equation
Grad^2V(exotic 2D shell throat) = (4piG/c^2)(energy density)(1 + 2w)
For Eric's solution (2.10)
This is w = +1 (on-mass-shell exotic matter)
But as soon as one talks about ZPF, then w = -1. Therefore, a negative zpf energy density has a positive pressure and this will gravitate not anti-gravitate as is needed. So what you want is a positive zero point energy density to get the anti-gravity. Eric explains this incorrectly. Also the QED Casimir force has nothing to do with this totally new kind of induced strong gravity from exotic vacuum zero point energy!
The discussion on p. 10 of this USAF report is seriously wrong. This is a common confusion in the literature BTW. Eric makes no mention of dark energy in precision cosmology so it is not surprising that he makes this conceptual error. Had he read Mike Turner's reviews on dark energy he would have realized this error, which has propagated in Nick Cook's book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and in Aviation Week's "To The Stars" earlier this year.
On Oct 31, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
My point here is that in my macro-quantum theory gravity comes from the phase of a post-inflation giant quantum vacuum wave (Higgs Ocean) of small entropy that comes from an instability in the pre-inflation micro-quantum Dirac Sea of charged massless virtual fermions with large entropy. This is analogous to a superconductor. The origin of inertia of the lepto-quarks is a vacuum coherence effect, not the random ZPF EM drag of Haisch and Puthoff. This is like the energy-gap in the fermion quasi-particle spectrum of the BCS superconductor from the binding energy of electron pairs in the condensate. Nambu & Jona Lasino had this basic idea decades ago. But they did not have gravity and dark energy built in as I do.
There is no quantum gravity foam here. When the giant quantum wave vanishes in a dark energy macro-quantum topological defect like the one at the center of the Sun causing the anomaly in the motion of the NASA Pioneer space probes then we simply get back the globally flat unstable pre-inflation false vacuum inside the core of a topological defect in the coherent calm low entropy Higgs Ocean.
Note for NASA Space Probes Pioneer 10/11:
a_p = cH ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2 to ~ 10% precision = anomalous acceleration back towards Sun.
Here /\zpf(Pioneer anomaly) = H(t)/cr
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
R(t) = dimensionless FRW scale factor
t = cosmic time
Gravity potential energy per unit test mass of the exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defect between the 2 spheres, the first at 20 AU from Sun is
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = cv Pioneer anomaly
v = Hubble recession speed of the expanding space of the universe.
Or, like the flat stellar rotation curves around the dark matter Galactic Halo concentric to the giant black hole in the galactic center
V(zpf) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = v'^2 Galactic Halo
v' is constant stellar circulating speed in the flat part of the rotation curve of the Galaxy
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v'/cr)^2
On Oct 31, 2004, at 8:40 PM, Robert J. Brown wrote:
"Jack" == Jack Sarfatti
What you call confusion is called deep insight by
professional physicists.
Actually Rovelli made exactly this distinction in the article
you sent me, and I agree with him on this.
Actual physical symmetry of a system is very different from
coordinate insensitivity of the physics.
Jack> No he is talking quantum gravity not classical general
Jack> relativity. The former is only a hope not a theory. If my
Jack> theory is right there is no quantum gravity in the canonical
Jack> sense and their criterion of "observable" which BTW is ONLY
Jack> NONLOCAL is silly.
On the quantum scale, how can something be truly local? Only if it
is the *SAME* thing, I think -- or at least within the radius of a
Planck-like distance Lp...
The entropy of the universe if it is a hologram in sense of Hawking's formula
S/kB = A/4Lp^2
in my theory is exactly
S(Universe)/kB = R(t)^2/4 BITS
R(today t = 13.7 billion years from Big Bang) = 10^61
The entropy/kB of our universe today is ~ 10^122 BITS.
The universe starts from 1/4 BIT at the initial singularity, i.e. Dirac Sea to Higgs Ocean vacuum phase transition.
On Nov 1, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
On Oct 31, 2004, at 10:51 PM, Robert J. Brown wrote:
iksnileiz@earthlink.net said:
You mean you can't even understand this see-spot-run explanation?
I think it is more like "See? Spot has the runs!" Better clean up the
mess. ;-)
2nd draft:
Yes Robert I agree. Paul Zielinski is confused because he uses too much English and not enough math. Paul is strong at polemics and lawyer tricks but that is not good physics argumentation. Also he has not kept up with the relevant reviews. He is seeing problems that are not there. He is out of touch. I have been to 3 major GR meetings in past 2 years and am in touch with the top people in the field. These are exciting times in "precision cosmology" and Paul has no real conception of what the reality is. Paul would be instantly rejected as a nut crank if any of the top guns were to read some of his polemics and his not-even-wrong objections. WEP is good enough. Nonlocality of gravity energy is explained by Penrose. If you have a really closed system, i.e. no energy flow out of it, there is no way to measure the gravity energy anyway! You can only do it with gravity waves, i.e. open system, and that is the context of the real issue. Paul is in Laputa Land on these issues. Anyone today challenging the foundations of GR within its classical domain of validity is considered a crackpot by the top guns at GR 17. That includes Puthoff in both his PV and ZPF programs that he is trying to sell to USAF. 4 top physicists at GR 17 told me in no uncertain terms that they do not like what Puthoff is pitching in this regard. They also did not like the kaput NASA BPP program mostly because they saw it as a platform for Puthoff's ideas. I was rather surprised at that actually. I did not even mention NASA BPP. 3 of them brought it up on their own in the context of Puthoff's PV model. These are all facts that can be checked.
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Substantiates what I claim. It has good, bad and bogus ideas in it like Eric's paper at NIDS with Jacques Vallee that has been suppressed with the closure of NIDS (unfortunately). I am delaying release of my book Super Cosmos to include fair-balanced detailed critiqueS of both of Eric Davis's useful papers.
Saturday, October 30, 2004
See "Teleportation Physics Study" by Eric W. Davis, Air Force
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Eqs. (2.10)
About negative surface energy and negative surface tensions for a flat mouth stargate traversable wormhole toy model. It has a singularity so it is not a practical solution. But that is not the error. The error creeps in when Eric talks about the Casimir force i.e. ZPF. Like Hal Puthoff, who Eric says is his "mentor", Eric does not understand that w = (pressure/energy density) or in this thin shell case (surface tension/surface energy density) must = -1 for reasons of Lorentz covariance + equivalence principle (i.e. gravity-matter minimal local gauge coupling).
Kip Thorne's exotic matter source for the star gate (1986) was on-mass-shell real not off-mass-shell virtual.
In the case Eric treats rather than (1 + 3w) for 3D we have (1 + 2w) for 2D "thin shell".
That is we approximate Einstein's equation to the weak field Poisson equation
Grad^2V(exotic 2D shell throat) = (4piG/c^2)(energy density)(1 + 2w)
For Eric's solution (2.10)
This is w = +1 (on-mass-shell exotic matter)
But as soon as one talks about ZPF, then w = -1. Therefore, a negative zpf energy density has a positive pressure and this will gravitate not anti-gravitate as is needed. So what you want is a positive zero point energy density to get the anti-gravity. Eric explains this incorrectly. Also the QED Casimir force has nothing to do with this totally new kind of induced strong gravity from exotic vacuum zero point energy!
The discussion on p. 10 of this USAF report is seriously wrong. This is a common confusion in the literature BTW. Eric makes no mention of dark energy in precision cosmology so it is not surprising that he makes this conceptual error. Had he read Mike Turner's reviews on dark energy he would have realized this error, which has propagated in Nick Cook's book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and in Aviation Week's "To The Stars" earlier this year.
Research Lab Special Report, Edwards Air Force Base, August
2004, distribution unlimited (1.7 MB PDF file):
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Eqs. (2.10)
About negative surface energy and negative surface tensions for a flat mouth stargate traversable wormhole toy model. It has a singularity so it is not a practical solution. But that is not the error. The error creeps in when Eric talks about the Casimir force i.e. ZPF. Like Hal Puthoff, who Eric says is his "mentor", Eric does not understand that w = (pressure/energy density) or in this thin shell case (surface tension/surface energy density) must = -1 for reasons of Lorentz covariance + equivalence principle (i.e. gravity-matter minimal local gauge coupling).
Kip Thorne's exotic matter source for the star gate (1986) was on-mass-shell real not off-mass-shell virtual.
In the case Eric treats rather than (1 + 3w) for 3D we have (1 + 2w) for 2D "thin shell".
That is we approximate Einstein's equation to the weak field Poisson equation
Grad^2V(exotic 2D shell throat) = (4piG/c^2)(energy density)(1 + 2w)
For Eric's solution (2.10)
This is w = +1 (on-mass-shell exotic matter)
But as soon as one talks about ZPF, then w = -1. Therefore, a negative zpf energy density has a positive pressure and this will gravitate not anti-gravitate as is needed. So what you want is a positive zero point energy density to get the anti-gravity. Eric explains this incorrectly. Also the QED Casimir force has nothing to do with this totally new kind of induced strong gravity from exotic vacuum zero point energy!
The discussion on p. 10 of this USAF report is seriously wrong. This is a common confusion in the literature BTW. Eric makes no mention of dark energy in precision cosmology so it is not surprising that he makes this conceptual error. Had he read Mike Turner's reviews on dark energy he would have realized this error, which has propagated in Nick Cook's book "The Hunt for Zero Point" and in Aviation Week's "To The Stars" earlier this year.
Thursday, October 28, 2004
Note 3 If it ain't broke don't fix it. Why Hal's PV is a waste of time and certainly should not be put forth as a plausible route to practical metric engineering of Warp, Wormhole and Weapon W^3 (UFO high strangeness).
"We see that, despite some people's worries about energy conservation, general relativity has some very remarkable observational confirmations." Penrose p. 467
3.1.1 "the gravitational waves emitted by the remarkable double-neutron-star system known as PSR 1913 + 16 ... This system, has now been observed over a period of some 25 years, and its detailed motion has been tracked to great precision (which is possible because one of the stars is a pulsar which emits very precisely timed electromagnetic 'blips' some 17 times a second). The timing of these signals is so precise and the system itself so 'clean', that comparison between observation and theoretical expectation provides a confirmation of Einstein's general relativity to about one part in 10^12, an accuracy unprecedented in the scientific comparison between the observation of a particular system and theory. This figure refers to the overall timing precision over a period of more than 20 years." p. 466 Penrose "The Road to Reality"
3.1.2 Now it should be perfectly obvious that anyone who comes along today and claims that Einstein's theory of gravity has some fundamental conceptual flaws in its battle-tested domain of intended validity is immediately marked as a crank by the top people in the field - the keynote speakers at GR 17 for example. One must admit these top people have a strong case. On Hal's PV model, that Mike Ibison, who works with Hal, says is not compatible with general coordinate covariance and the tensor method and does not give the right answer for PSR 1913 + 16.
3.1.3 "But there is another reason, apart from just organizing complication, that the tensor calculus plays such a fundamental role in Einstein's theory. This goes back to the foundational principle of equivalence which started Einstein's whole line of thinking. Gravitation is not to be regarded as a force: for to an observer who is falling freely ... there is no gravitational force to be felt. Instead, gravitation manifests in the form of space-time curvature. Now it is important, if this idea is to work, that there be no 'preferred coordinates' in the theory."
3.1.4 "Theory" here means the local Euler-Lagrange dynamical field equations from a critical point in the action functional in the space of "paths" (Feynman approach). It is well known that particular vacuum solutions can spontaneous break a continuous symmetry and this is indeed the case in the FRW cosmology that does describe our large-scale universe to the amazing current precision of 2% and that can be expected to shrink with new space experiments. Our thermodynamically adiabatically expanding (Hubble redshift) accelerating (Type 1a supernovae) universe has a Hubble flow, i.e., a preferred operational state of rest in which the cosmic black body background radiation stretched out remnant, from the decoupling of photons to electrons 380,000 years after the Big Bang, now at a temperature of ~ 2.7 deg K, is isotropic to temperature fluctuations to 10^-5 (NASA WMAP Space Probe). Absolute time and absolute velocity measurements relative to this Hubble flow are now routine and provide the basis for the reliable navigation of our coming warp drive Space Navy as we fulfill our Manifest Destiny Matrix Out There in the Never-Ending High Frontier of the Infinity of Worlds in Super Cosmos.
3.1.5 NASA Pioneer 10/11 space probe blue shift acceleration pointing back to the Sun.
In my theory Einstein's gravity in the exotic vacuum is
3.1.5.1 Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
which in the Galilean-Newtonian limit is the static Poisson equation
Grad^2Vzpf = c^2/\zpf
emerges from a macro-quantum vacuum condensate "Higgs Ocean". We only need the S-wave term in the multipole expansion of the Green's function solution for the toy models below.
3.1.5.2 The data shows a zero point energy exotic vacuum hedgehog point defect in the single-valued Higgs Ocean local order parameter pinned at the center of the Sun. The hedgehog is two concentric spheres, in this case with center at the Sun. The first one starts at ~ 20 AU at Uranus orbit. We do not yet know the radius of the outer sphere. There is no exotic /\zpg zero point dark energy density inside our solar system out to 20 AU. The hedgehog has a constant gradient flow between the two spheres. This is well known to soft-condensed matter physicists. Indeed, the dark energy density distribution between the two spheres is simply
/\zpf(Solar Hedgehog) = H(t)/cr
Where H(t) is the FRW Hubble parameter
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
t = FRW cosmic time (conveniently defined) and R(t) is the dimensionless FRW scale factor of expanding accelerating 3D space.
The exotic vacuum gravity potential energy per unit test particle mass in this weak field limit of GR is
Vzpf(Solar Hedgehog) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = c(Hubble recession speed)
The observed anomalous Pioneer acceleration back to the Sun is then
a_P ~ cH(t) ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2
3.1.5.3 Note the galactic halo with a flat stellar rotational curve has
a = v^2/r
where tangential v is constant.
Vzpf(Galactic Halo) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = ar = v^2
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v/c)^2(1/r)^2
3.1.5.4 If the universe is a hologram in the sense of t-Hooft and Susskind then the entropy of the universe is simply
S(Universe) = (kB/4)R(t)^2
kB is Boltzman's constant and 1/4 comes from Hawking's formula for black hole entropy.
R(t) is the dimensionless FRW scale factor.
Note that the entropy of the post-inflationary Universe is zero at the Big Bang.
This explains WHY the Arrow of Time for the irreversibility of the Second Law of Thermodynamics points the same way as the expansion of space of the Universe.
My Father's House has Many Universes.
3.1.6 Active Diff(4) symmetry implies an infinity of parallel universes next door!
Remembering that Penrose is talking about the structure of the local partial differential equations of the c-number field theory (that's all we need for Feynman's path integral quantum field theory as well) and not certain special solutions with certain kinds of Killing vector fields: "if a limited class of coordinate systems were taken to be Nature's preferred choices, then these would define 'natural observer systems' with respect to which the notion of 'gravitational force' could be re-introduced, and the central role of the principle of equivalence would be lost. The point is, in fact, a rather delicate one ... it is essential for the spirit of Einstein's theory that this notion of coordinate independence be maintained. This is what is referred to as the principle of general covariance. It tells us not only that there are to be no preferred coordinates, but also that, if we have two different space-times, representing two physically distinct gravitational fields, then there is to be no naturally preferred pointwise identification between the two - so we cannot say which particular spacetime point of one is to be regarded as the same point as some particular spacetime point of the other!" p. 459
Here Penrose gives an excellent definition of parallel interpenetrating universes of the IT kind not the BIT worlds of Everett and Deutsch BTW. This is quite "classical" actually "macro-quantum" and has nothing to do with the Hawking-Hartle "Wave Function of The Universe".
3.1.7 I was told by someone of great stature in the field (close to Penrose) at GR 17 that Hal knows well who has read Hal's work "It's not right, don't waste your time on it." Kit Green says he got an opposite opinion from a Nobel Prize physicist. I would like to know who. This is more than abstract theory because the UFO data is of immense long-term national security importance. The recent shut down of NIDS is also most curious. The UFO "high-strangeness" discussed by Jacques Vallee and Eric Davis on the NIDS website cannot be ignored although Eric Davis, with USAF connections, trying to explain it using Hal's PV ideas is a serious blunder in my opinion and gets a certain part of the US Intelligence Community looking in the wrong direction sort of like what happened in Iraq on WMD.
Problems: 3.1.A How does Puthoff's PV theory get the two transverse oscillating stretch-squeeze tidal polarization modes for gravity waves?
3.1.B How does Puthoff's PV theory describe the gravimagnetism (Lense-Thirring frame drag) of a gyroscope - now seen experimentally?
3.2 Also a quick comment on Fontana's idea presented at Paul Murad's STAIF Pow Wow in Roswell Country:
On Oct 24, 2004, at 7:06 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:
Design of a Quantum Source of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves (HFGW) and Test Methodology
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0410022
Authors: Giorgio Fontana
Comments: CP699, Space Technology and Applications International Forum-STAIF 2004, proceedings published by AIP and edited by M.S. El-Genk
Subj-class: General Physics
The generation of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves (HFGW) has been identified as the required breakthrough that will lead to new forms of space propulsion. Many techniques have been devised to generate HFGW, but most of them exhibit marginal efficiency, therefore the power emitted in form of gravitational waves (GW) is orders of magnitude lower than the input power. The gravitational wave counterpart of the LASER, termed Gravitational-wave LASER or "GASER" is the quantum approach to the efficient generation of gravitational waves. Electrons, protons, muons, etc, all have charge and mass, if accelerated they usually lose energy through the very fast electric and magnetic channels, this causes a negligible emission through the gravitational channel. Quantum systems can be engineered to forbid electric and magnetic transitions, therefore the gravitational spin-2 transitions can take place. A class of active materials, suitable for making a GASER based on electronic transitions in the solid state, is identified along with their relevant physical properties. Means for creating coherence and population inversion and means to increase the emission probability are described. The expected performances of the device are derived from quantum gravitational theories. Additional properties of the active materials are considered to enforce the theoretical foundation of the device. A proof-of-concept device, operating at about 1 THz, is described. Experiments are proposed as a natural starting point of the research.
This appears to be highly implausible because for "bodies ... in motion, in orbit about one another ... gravitational waves - ripples in the fabric of spacetime - will emanate and carry positive energy away ... In normal circumstances, this energy loss will be very small. For example, the largest such effect in our own solar system arises from the Jupiter-Sun system, and the rate of energy loss is only about that emitted by a 40-watt bulb." Penrose p. 465
OK, but what about Ray Chiao's superconducting gravi-magnetic/electromagnetic transducer effect. Even with that it's hard to see how HFGW could lift a 30 foot flying saucer before we even get to Super Carrier Class Star Ships.
Podkletnov and Ning Li making claims with the support of Modanese. Wait and see. Millis from NASA BPP not optimistic.
Hard to see how even a GASER could have a large enough propulsive effect. Even if it did, this would be a tidal stretch-squeeze and it is hard to see how this can translate into a zero-g force "near metric field" Alcubierre warp drive with zero time dilation and effective global faster than light capability (locally the ship is on a timelike geodesic with no causality violation). One loophole is the idea that space-time gets soft at small scales beginning in the nanometer 10^-7 cm needed for practical metric engineering. That is the "string tension" (c^4/G) must get weaker. IF Hal Puthoff's PV could be salvaged by getting rid of that exponential isotropic stumbling block, then c getting smaller would help. This does happen in a BEC of course. Hal, of course, wants c to get bigger, which is going the wrong way down a one-way street. Of course my exotic vacuum /\zpf idea is an entirely different approach to any of those above.
That said, let's continue.
3.3
Fig. 19.8 p. 465 is a nice example of the inherent nonlocality of the negative gravity potential energy that persists in Einstein's GR and is not only a property of its Newtonian limit as is sometimes falsely claimed.
"We see that, despite some people's worries about energy conservation, general relativity has some very remarkable observational confirmations. ... Gravitational energy is a genuinely non-local quantity. This does not imply that there is no mathematical description of gravitational energy, however ... we do not yet have a complete understanding of gravitational mass/energy, there is an important class of situations in which a very complete answer can be given. These situations are ... asymptotically flat, and they refer to gravitating systems that may be regarded as being isolated from the rest of the universe, essentially because of their very large distance from everything else." p. 467
*Paul, note as I said this is what Pauli means by a "closed system", i.e. asymptotically flat!
"The work of Hermann Bondi ... generalized by Rayner Sachs provided a clear-cut mathematical accounting for the mass-energy carried away from such a system in the form of gravitational waves, and a conservation law was achieved ... This conservation law does not have the local character of that for non-gravitational fields, as manifested in ..."
Tab(Matter)^;b = 0 REAL LOCALLY CURVED SPACE-TIME REPRESENTATION ;b = GCT covariant derivative
or
Tab(Matter)^,b + tab(Matter<->Geometry)^,b = 0 VIRTUAL GLOBALLY FLAT SPACE-TIME REPRESENTATION ,b is Minkowski space-time ordinary partial derivative.
Note that tab(Matter-Geometry) is a good tensor in the VIRTUAL POINCARE GROUP of GIF -> GIF' frame transformations of this fictitious space-time that Yilmaz and Hal Puthoff misinterpret as physically real.
tab(Matter<->Geometry) is NOT a Diff(4) GCT tensor of course.
tab(Matter<->Geometry) = 0 in the Diff(4) geodesic LIF.
tab(Matter<->Geometry) =/= 0 in the Diff(4) non-geodesic LNIF.
Do not at all confuse this with the completely separate equation from the Bianchi identities
Gab(Vacuum Geometry)^;b = 0
t*ab(Vacuum Geometry) = (c^4/8piG)Guv(Vacuum Geometry)
This splits into a matter-free really vacuum conformal part and a matter-induced Ricci part.
More on that later.
"We see that, despite some people's worries about energy conservation, general relativity has some very remarkable observational confirmations." Penrose p. 467
3.1.1 "the gravitational waves emitted by the remarkable double-neutron-star system known as PSR 1913 + 16 ... This system, has now been observed over a period of some 25 years, and its detailed motion has been tracked to great precision (which is possible because one of the stars is a pulsar which emits very precisely timed electromagnetic 'blips' some 17 times a second). The timing of these signals is so precise and the system itself so 'clean', that comparison between observation and theoretical expectation provides a confirmation of Einstein's general relativity to about one part in 10^12, an accuracy unprecedented in the scientific comparison between the observation of a particular system and theory. This figure refers to the overall timing precision over a period of more than 20 years." p. 466 Penrose "The Road to Reality"
3.1.2 Now it should be perfectly obvious that anyone who comes along today and claims that Einstein's theory of gravity has some fundamental conceptual flaws in its battle-tested domain of intended validity is immediately marked as a crank by the top people in the field - the keynote speakers at GR 17 for example. One must admit these top people have a strong case. On Hal's PV model, that Mike Ibison, who works with Hal, says is not compatible with general coordinate covariance and the tensor method and does not give the right answer for PSR 1913 + 16.
3.1.3 "But there is another reason, apart from just organizing complication, that the tensor calculus plays such a fundamental role in Einstein's theory. This goes back to the foundational principle of equivalence which started Einstein's whole line of thinking. Gravitation is not to be regarded as a force: for to an observer who is falling freely ... there is no gravitational force to be felt. Instead, gravitation manifests in the form of space-time curvature. Now it is important, if this idea is to work, that there be no 'preferred coordinates' in the theory."
3.1.4 "Theory" here means the local Euler-Lagrange dynamical field equations from a critical point in the action functional in the space of "paths" (Feynman approach). It is well known that particular vacuum solutions can spontaneous break a continuous symmetry and this is indeed the case in the FRW cosmology that does describe our large-scale universe to the amazing current precision of 2% and that can be expected to shrink with new space experiments. Our thermodynamically adiabatically expanding (Hubble redshift) accelerating (Type 1a supernovae) universe has a Hubble flow, i.e., a preferred operational state of rest in which the cosmic black body background radiation stretched out remnant, from the decoupling of photons to electrons 380,000 years after the Big Bang, now at a temperature of ~ 2.7 deg K, is isotropic to temperature fluctuations to 10^-5 (NASA WMAP Space Probe). Absolute time and absolute velocity measurements relative to this Hubble flow are now routine and provide the basis for the reliable navigation of our coming warp drive Space Navy as we fulfill our Manifest Destiny Matrix Out There in the Never-Ending High Frontier of the Infinity of Worlds in Super Cosmos.
3.1.5 NASA Pioneer 10/11 space probe blue shift acceleration pointing back to the Sun.
In my theory Einstein's gravity in the exotic vacuum is
3.1.5.1 Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
which in the Galilean-Newtonian limit is the static Poisson equation
Grad^2Vzpf = c^2/\zpf
emerges from a macro-quantum vacuum condensate "Higgs Ocean". We only need the S-wave term in the multipole expansion of the Green's function solution for the toy models below.
3.1.5.2 The data shows a zero point energy exotic vacuum hedgehog point defect in the single-valued Higgs Ocean local order parameter pinned at the center of the Sun. The hedgehog is two concentric spheres, in this case with center at the Sun. The first one starts at ~ 20 AU at Uranus orbit. We do not yet know the radius of the outer sphere. There is no exotic /\zpg zero point dark energy density inside our solar system out to 20 AU. The hedgehog has a constant gradient flow between the two spheres. This is well known to soft-condensed matter physicists. Indeed, the dark energy density distribution between the two spheres is simply
/\zpf(Solar Hedgehog) = H(t)/cr
Where H(t) is the FRW Hubble parameter
H(t) = R(t)^-1dR(t)/dt
t = FRW cosmic time (conveniently defined) and R(t) is the dimensionless FRW scale factor of expanding accelerating 3D space.
The exotic vacuum gravity potential energy per unit test particle mass in this weak field limit of GR is
Vzpf(Solar Hedgehog) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = cHr = c(Hubble recession speed)
The observed anomalous Pioneer acceleration back to the Sun is then
a_P ~ cH(t) ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2
3.1.5.3 Note the galactic halo with a flat stellar rotational curve has
a = v^2/r
where tangential v is constant.
Vzpf(Galactic Halo) = c^2/\zpfr^2 = ar = v^2
/\zpf(Galactic Halo) = (v/c)^2(1/r)^2
3.1.5.4 If the universe is a hologram in the sense of t-Hooft and Susskind then the entropy of the universe is simply
S(Universe) = (kB/4)R(t)^2
kB is Boltzman's constant and 1/4 comes from Hawking's formula for black hole entropy.
R(t) is the dimensionless FRW scale factor.
Note that the entropy of the post-inflationary Universe is zero at the Big Bang.
This explains WHY the Arrow of Time for the irreversibility of the Second Law of Thermodynamics points the same way as the expansion of space of the Universe.
My Father's House has Many Universes.
3.1.6 Active Diff(4) symmetry implies an infinity of parallel universes next door!
Remembering that Penrose is talking about the structure of the local partial differential equations of the c-number field theory (that's all we need for Feynman's path integral quantum field theory as well) and not certain special solutions with certain kinds of Killing vector fields: "if a limited class of coordinate systems were taken to be Nature's preferred choices, then these would define 'natural observer systems' with respect to which the notion of 'gravitational force' could be re-introduced, and the central role of the principle of equivalence would be lost. The point is, in fact, a rather delicate one ... it is essential for the spirit of Einstein's theory that this notion of coordinate independence be maintained. This is what is referred to as the principle of general covariance. It tells us not only that there are to be no preferred coordinates, but also that, if we have two different space-times, representing two physically distinct gravitational fields, then there is to be no naturally preferred pointwise identification between the two - so we cannot say which particular spacetime point of one is to be regarded as the same point as some particular spacetime point of the other!" p. 459
Here Penrose gives an excellent definition of parallel interpenetrating universes of the IT kind not the BIT worlds of Everett and Deutsch BTW. This is quite "classical" actually "macro-quantum" and has nothing to do with the Hawking-Hartle "Wave Function of The Universe".
3.1.7 I was told by someone of great stature in the field (close to Penrose) at GR 17 that Hal knows well who has read Hal's work "It's not right, don't waste your time on it." Kit Green says he got an opposite opinion from a Nobel Prize physicist. I would like to know who. This is more than abstract theory because the UFO data is of immense long-term national security importance. The recent shut down of NIDS is also most curious. The UFO "high-strangeness" discussed by Jacques Vallee and Eric Davis on the NIDS website cannot be ignored although Eric Davis, with USAF connections, trying to explain it using Hal's PV ideas is a serious blunder in my opinion and gets a certain part of the US Intelligence Community looking in the wrong direction sort of like what happened in Iraq on WMD.
Problems: 3.1.A How does Puthoff's PV theory get the two transverse oscillating stretch-squeeze tidal polarization modes for gravity waves?
3.1.B How does Puthoff's PV theory describe the gravimagnetism (Lense-Thirring frame drag) of a gyroscope - now seen experimentally?
3.2 Also a quick comment on Fontana's idea presented at Paul Murad's STAIF Pow Wow in Roswell Country:
On Oct 24, 2004, at 7:06 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:
Design of a Quantum Source of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves (HFGW) and Test Methodology
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0410022
Authors: Giorgio Fontana
Comments: CP699, Space Technology and Applications International Forum-STAIF 2004, proceedings published by AIP and edited by M.S. El-Genk
Subj-class: General Physics
The generation of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves (HFGW) has been identified as the required breakthrough that will lead to new forms of space propulsion. Many techniques have been devised to generate HFGW, but most of them exhibit marginal efficiency, therefore the power emitted in form of gravitational waves (GW) is orders of magnitude lower than the input power. The gravitational wave counterpart of the LASER, termed Gravitational-wave LASER or "GASER" is the quantum approach to the efficient generation of gravitational waves. Electrons, protons, muons, etc, all have charge and mass, if accelerated they usually lose energy through the very fast electric and magnetic channels, this causes a negligible emission through the gravitational channel. Quantum systems can be engineered to forbid electric and magnetic transitions, therefore the gravitational spin-2 transitions can take place. A class of active materials, suitable for making a GASER based on electronic transitions in the solid state, is identified along with their relevant physical properties. Means for creating coherence and population inversion and means to increase the emission probability are described. The expected performances of the device are derived from quantum gravitational theories. Additional properties of the active materials are considered to enforce the theoretical foundation of the device. A proof-of-concept device, operating at about 1 THz, is described. Experiments are proposed as a natural starting point of the research.
This appears to be highly implausible because for "bodies ... in motion, in orbit about one another ... gravitational waves - ripples in the fabric of spacetime - will emanate and carry positive energy away ... In normal circumstances, this energy loss will be very small. For example, the largest such effect in our own solar system arises from the Jupiter-Sun system, and the rate of energy loss is only about that emitted by a 40-watt bulb." Penrose p. 465
OK, but what about Ray Chiao's superconducting gravi-magnetic/electromagnetic transducer effect. Even with that it's hard to see how HFGW could lift a 30 foot flying saucer before we even get to Super Carrier Class Star Ships.
Podkletnov and Ning Li making claims with the support of Modanese. Wait and see. Millis from NASA BPP not optimistic.
Hard to see how even a GASER could have a large enough propulsive effect. Even if it did, this would be a tidal stretch-squeeze and it is hard to see how this can translate into a zero-g force "near metric field" Alcubierre warp drive with zero time dilation and effective global faster than light capability (locally the ship is on a timelike geodesic with no causality violation). One loophole is the idea that space-time gets soft at small scales beginning in the nanometer 10^-7 cm needed for practical metric engineering. That is the "string tension" (c^4/G) must get weaker. IF Hal Puthoff's PV could be salvaged by getting rid of that exponential isotropic stumbling block, then c getting smaller would help. This does happen in a BEC of course. Hal, of course, wants c to get bigger, which is going the wrong way down a one-way street. Of course my exotic vacuum /\zpf idea is an entirely different approach to any of those above.
That said, let's continue.
3.3
Fig. 19.8 p. 465 is a nice example of the inherent nonlocality of the negative gravity potential energy that persists in Einstein's GR and is not only a property of its Newtonian limit as is sometimes falsely claimed.
"We see that, despite some people's worries about energy conservation, general relativity has some very remarkable observational confirmations. ... Gravitational energy is a genuinely non-local quantity. This does not imply that there is no mathematical description of gravitational energy, however ... we do not yet have a complete understanding of gravitational mass/energy, there is an important class of situations in which a very complete answer can be given. These situations are ... asymptotically flat, and they refer to gravitating systems that may be regarded as being isolated from the rest of the universe, essentially because of their very large distance from everything else." p. 467
*Paul, note as I said this is what Pauli means by a "closed system", i.e. asymptotically flat!
"The work of Hermann Bondi ... generalized by Rayner Sachs provided a clear-cut mathematical accounting for the mass-energy carried away from such a system in the form of gravitational waves, and a conservation law was achieved ... This conservation law does not have the local character of that for non-gravitational fields, as manifested in ..."
Tab(Matter)^;b = 0 REAL LOCALLY CURVED SPACE-TIME REPRESENTATION ;b = GCT covariant derivative
or
Tab(Matter)^,b + tab(Matter<->Geometry)^,b = 0 VIRTUAL GLOBALLY FLAT SPACE-TIME REPRESENTATION ,b is Minkowski space-time ordinary partial derivative.
Note that tab(Matter-Geometry) is a good tensor in the VIRTUAL POINCARE GROUP of GIF -> GIF' frame transformations of this fictitious space-time that Yilmaz and Hal Puthoff misinterpret as physically real.
tab(Matter<->Geometry) is NOT a Diff(4) GCT tensor of course.
tab(Matter<->Geometry) = 0 in the Diff(4) geodesic LIF.
tab(Matter<->Geometry) =/= 0 in the Diff(4) non-geodesic LNIF.
Do not at all confuse this with the completely separate equation from the Bianchi identities
Gab(Vacuum Geometry)^;b = 0
t*ab(Vacuum Geometry) = (c^4/8piG)Guv(Vacuum Geometry)
This splits into a matter-free really vacuum conformal part and a matter-induced Ricci part.
More on that later.
On Oct 28, 2004, at 9:32 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
PS
Note that Tab is a 4x4 matrix.
There is a principal axis transformation that diagonalizes it. The
diagonal elements in that case are the eigenvalues.
Trace{Tab} is the sum of the eigenvalues. It is a frame invariant under
these kinds of transformations, which are not obviously GCT, but
something else? A different kind of group. What is the physical meaning
of this new group? In classical mechanics of coupled particles they are
"normal modes" of independent motions in a linear theory. What do they
mean here in classical local field theory?
Det{Tab} is the invariant product of the eigenvalues.
All of this is local in space-time.
There are also other sums of products of the eigenvalues forming the
coefficients of the secular polynomial of the matrix.
Question: can we generalize this formally to tensors and spinors of
rank > 2?
For example a third rank tensor is a lattice in a 3-space. Can we
diagonalize it?
There is a set of diagonals in these higher dimensional cases.
Similarly, a 4th rank tensor is a lattice in a 4-space and so on.
On Oct 28, 2004, at 8:29 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
1.2 Roger Penrose "The Road to Reality" (2004) 19.5 The
Energy-Momentum Tensor
1.2.1 "[What is] the energy density of a field?, this density being
the source of gravity ... such as Maxwell's ... it does so via a
tensor quantity ... This is a symmetric [02]-valence tensor which
satisfies a [local] conservation equation [COVARIANT 4-divergence of
energy-momentum tensor vanishes] ... The quantity T^ab collects
together all the different densities and fluxes of the energy and
momentum in the fields and particles ... in a standard [flat]
Minkowski coordinate system, the covector T^0b defines the density of
4-momentum, and the three co-vectors T^1b, T^2b, T^3b, provide the
flux of 4-momentum in the three independent spatial directions ...
T00 measures the energy density, and T11, T22, T33 measure the
pressure, in the three directions of the spatial coordinate axes."
[Note by Jack on micro-quantum random zero point exotic vacuum
energy-momentum tensor (AKA stress-energy density tensor true for all
quantum fields of any spin;
Trace{Tab(zpf)} = T00 + T11 + T22 + T33
For real photons with w = +1/3 this is 2T00
At the boundary w = -1/3 between ordinary and exotic matter, the trace vanishes.
P(zpf) = T11 + T22 + T33
Energy Density (zpf) = T00
w(zpf) = P(zpf)/[Energy Density (zpf)] = -1 ]
For an isotropic case, no Casimir type plates for example, I should
have written
3P(zpf) = T11 + T22 + T33
T11 = T22 = T33 = P(zpf) = -T00 from Lorentz + General Coordinate
Covariance + Equivalence Principle
Therefore
Trace{Tab} = T00 + T11 + T22 + T33 = Too + 3P = Too(1 + 3w)
This is generally true for isotropic case for both real and virtual
stuff.
For virtual off-mass-shell vacuum zpf stuff
Too(zpf) + P(zpf) = 0
i.e. w = -1
Therefore,
Trace{Tab(zpf) = -2Too
For virtual photon ZPF, Too > 0 i.e. negative pressure.
Kip Thorne's criterion for "exotic matter" (1986) for the metric
engineering of warp, wormhole and weapon is
Trace{Tab(exotic matter)} < 0
PS
Note that Tab is a 4x4 matrix.
There is a principal axis transformation that diagonalizes it. The
diagonal elements in that case are the eigenvalues.
Trace{Tab} is the sum of the eigenvalues. It is a frame invariant under
these kinds of transformations, which are not obviously GCT, but
something else? A different kind of group. What is the physical meaning
of this new group? In classical mechanics of coupled particles they are
"normal modes" of independent motions in a linear theory. What do they
mean here in classical local field theory?
Det{Tab} is the invariant product of the eigenvalues.
All of this is local in space-time.
There are also other sums of products of the eigenvalues forming the
coefficients of the secular polynomial of the matrix.
Question: can we generalize this formally to tensors and spinors of
rank > 2?
For example a third rank tensor is a lattice in a 3-space. Can we
diagonalize it?
There is a set of diagonals in these higher dimensional cases.
Similarly, a 4th rank tensor is a lattice in a 4-space and so on.
On Oct 28, 2004, at 8:29 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
1.2 Roger Penrose "The Road to Reality" (2004) 19.5 The
Energy-Momentum Tensor
1.2.1 "[What is] the energy density of a field?, this density being
the source of gravity ... such as Maxwell's ... it does so via a
tensor quantity ... This is a symmetric [02]-valence tensor which
satisfies a [local] conservation equation [COVARIANT 4-divergence of
energy-momentum tensor vanishes] ... The quantity T^ab collects
together all the different densities and fluxes of the energy and
momentum in the fields and particles ... in a standard [flat]
Minkowski coordinate system, the covector T^0b defines the density of
4-momentum, and the three co-vectors T^1b, T^2b, T^3b, provide the
flux of 4-momentum in the three independent spatial directions ...
T00 measures the energy density, and T11, T22, T33 measure the
pressure, in the three directions of the spatial coordinate axes."
[Note by Jack on micro-quantum random zero point exotic vacuum
energy-momentum tensor (AKA stress-energy density tensor true for all
quantum fields of any spin;
Trace{Tab(zpf)} = T00 + T11 + T22 + T33
For real photons with w = +1/3 this is 2T00
At the boundary w = -1/3 between ordinary and exotic matter, the trace vanishes.
P(zpf) = T11 + T22 + T33
Energy Density (zpf) = T00
w(zpf) = P(zpf)/[Energy Density (zpf)] = -1 ]
For an isotropic case, no Casimir type plates for example, I should
have written
3P(zpf) = T11 + T22 + T33
T11 = T22 = T33 = P(zpf) = -T00 from Lorentz + General Coordinate
Covariance + Equivalence Principle
Therefore
Trace{Tab} = T00 + T11 + T22 + T33 = Too + 3P = Too(1 + 3w)
This is generally true for isotropic case for both real and virtual
stuff.
For virtual off-mass-shell vacuum zpf stuff
Too(zpf) + P(zpf) = 0
i.e. w = -1
Therefore,
Trace{Tab(zpf) = -2Too
For virtual photon ZPF, Too > 0 i.e. negative pressure.
Kip Thorne's criterion for "exotic matter" (1986) for the metric
engineering of warp, wormhole and weapon is
Trace{Tab(exotic matter)} < 0
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
