Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Pre-emptive strike on Iran?

On Jan 25, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Rich Doyle wrote:

"Dear jack:

Excuse me, but you assert that the North Koreans and the Islamo-fascists are not rational, but this same argument was made
about the Soviets and the Chinese."

No, that is simply false. When, where, who? Evidence? The whole MAD strategy of Herman Kahn et-al, the use of von Neumann's Theory of Games (see "A Beautiful Mind" on that BTW) was, is predicated on rational opponents who do not glorify Kamikazie Suicide Attacks with 72 Virgins waiting for them in Allah's Paradise. They did not strap explosives to children and women. I forgot to comment on your mention of Pakistan and Israel. First of all it is absurd to classify even the Likudniks with Al Qaeda, Hamas, Chechnyans et-al. Although, I generally deplore many of the heavy-handed oppressive tactics of the Likud on the oppressed Palistinian people most of whom are innocents, who need their own state, nevertheless, until the Palestinians control Hamas and their other terrorists using bombs on civilians, they will never be free. No Israeli government will launch a nuclear missile attack on US soil, that is absurd. Of course, there was that Israeli attack on a US Navy ship in Med off Lybia when in 1966 - an error. Pakistan is a different story. If there were a coup in Pakistan then most definitely Islamo-fasicists would launch Apocalypse Now strikes on us from there if they could. However, we have forces in Pakistan, now an ally, that are working to prevent that - hopefully with continued success. In any case, we will attack Iran soon if they do not comply. That is certain in my estimation and, what is relevant here, is that I reluctantly support such a move. Just my two cents worth in our democratic process where I carry a Big Stick (Staff of Moses ;-)).

"Soon, it will be made about the French."

No, that is silly. The Neo Cons have many faults, but that kind of insanity is not one of them. Most of the Neo Cons have that Utopian Idealist Red Trotskyite World Revolutionary fervor from their toilet training as Red Diaper Babies. Politics makes strange bedfellows and all that. The GWB Bush foreign policy is the fusion of Wilsonian and Trotskyite Utopianism with Christian Right Evangelical Apocalyptic Crusader "Onward Christian Soldiers" fervor. Did you know that Woodrow Wilson was a racist who showed "Birth of a Nation" at the White House and agreed with the way the Ku Klux Klan was portrayed? See the Ken Burns film on Jack Johnson (dramatized as "The Great White Hope") So much for Woodrow as the Great Democrat!

"Von Neuman, I believe, argued for pre-emptive bombing of Moscow. Our precedent shows us that even "madmen" act rationally when they have nukes, and given the strength of this precedent - it is the only way we know how to survive nuclear competition - I believe that the risk of sustaining an attack is worth taking and always unavoidable."

I would like to see the real evidence for that. Of course Johnny, Leo and Eddie were from the Transylvania part of Budapest, so what do you expect? :-) Seriously, I doubt the accuracy of your allegation above.

"Given the history of our own ( and Nazi) rocketry, there is also enough contingency even in the launch to argue against
pre-emption. In short, you are assuming (rather than demonstrating) that these states will act irrationally when the historical record suggests that they will act rationally, and you are assuming that NK and Iran will be capable of reliable delivery of the nukes, which history also suggests is unlikely on the first go. Hence if there are madmen in this scenario, it will be those who order pre-emption on the basis of these premises."

The Rev Mod Phys report assumes the liklihood of such reliable delivery yes. That's good enough for me. BTW my own black magick without magic sources suggest that the decision to pre-empt has already been made - The Die Is Cast. Essentially we are fiddling on the roof of the Victoria Emmanuel as Rome burns. ;-)

"Your singling out of the North Koreans and the Iranians also again raises the question: If we accept your premises, shouldn't we apply this logic to Israel, whose foreign and domestic policy has hardly been "rational"?"

I disagree obviously. While I strongly dislike the Likud policy of hysterical over-reaction in general to compare them as a direct military threat to USA on a par with the Islamo-fascists is preposterous. I support the policy of the Itzak Rabin who I met personally with Ed Teller for several hours at the home of Rabbi Pincus Lipner back in 1990. Now I know that the American Left on our University Campuses does not make these kinds of distinctions, but here in Bohemian North Beach, San Francisco, we are closer to the Mean Streets than you cloistered in The Ivy Groves of Academe. :-)

"How about Pakistan, that hive of proliferation?"

"Yes, dealt with above.

Respectfully,

Rich"

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:22:52 -0800, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

On Jan 24, 2005, at 6:23 PM, Rich Doyle wrote:

"Jack:

Yes, I understand that it is seconds and not minutes, but you still seem to beg the question of pre-emption: Your analysis suggests an argument against ABM's - they will cause a mistaken MAD scenario - not an argument for pre-emption."

Think of this as a chess game. You are not thinking ahead to the next moves in the game. We absolutely cannot, under no circumstances, allow Iran to hold that Sword of Damocles over our heads. I am sure the Israelis see it that way. All physicists in the American Defense Community will see it that way. It is a certainty that we shall attack Iran to prevent such an intolerable situation. The Islamo-Fascists want to destroy us and if we allow Iran to develop and position the weapons
described in the Rev Mod Phys report we shall be destroyed - I guarantee it. I have no qualms, no doubts about this whatsoever and I am urging all my connections in USG and Israel to attack Iran quickly if they do not capitulate unconditionally to our ultimatum by a specified date. I do not know how influential my position might be with the powers that be (see my auto-biography "Destiny Matrix") but at least I am on record. If the numbers were different, I would, of
course, oppose such pre-emptive strikes. It's too bad we goofed on the WMD issue in Iraq so it's "The Boy Who Cried Wolf", nevertheless on the issue of Iran and North Korea I side with the Neo Cons. I generally favor Pat Buchanan's, Maureen Dowd's and Senator Barbara Boxer's views on foreign policy, but not in this instance. If they understood the physics of WMD in its fullness they would agree with me on this issue. It's simply a matter of the numbers.

"With the time tested strategy of deterrence, the US could enjoy the same or greater security as it does today if N. Korea or Iran possessed nukes. What reason would they have for launching if they understand in advance that the US would respond
with overwhelming nuclear force should they succeed in launching a single nuke? Finally, why doesn't your logic of pre-emption apply to other nascent nuclear powers such as Pakistan? Israel?

Rich"

Very simple, the Islamo-fascists and that Madman in North Korea are not rational creatures like the Soviets were or the Russians today are, or the Chinese. The Islamo-fascists are essentially Kamikazi Suicide Bombers who want to destroy democracy. We must destroy them or they will destroy us. There is no middle ground here. George Walker Bush's simple view on this is, unfortunately, the correct view. Reluctantly, for whatever it may be worth, I swing my support to Wolfowitz's pre-emptive strategy on Iran and North Korea.

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:55:29 -0800, Jack Sarfatti
wrote:

On Jan 23, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote to Richard Doyle:

Richard read again what I wrote more slowly. I give adequate reasons.
Basically ONLY A MATTER OF TENS OF SECONDS and if we launch ABM
Russia
will launch MAD against USA!

On Jan 23, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Richard, would that it were ten minutes! It's TEN SECONDS! It would
take longer than that for President Bush to comprehend the decision
he had to make! I wrote "seconds" not "minutes". Your estimate is
off
by a factor of 60. Minutes is 1950's SAC Fail-Safe. Today it's
seconds - faster than we can think on deciding Apocalypse Now! To
be,
or not to be?

"Defense of the entire United States against solid-propellant ICBMs
launched from Iran appears impractical; even a system with 10-km/s
interceptors based both in the Caspian Sea and in Turkmenistan or
Afghanistan would provide less than ten seconds of decision time,
which is unlikely to be adequate for an operational system." p.xxvii
Rev Mod Phys, July 2004, 76, 3, Part II

*Note this correction to my earlier hastily-written bad phrasing
that
may have given the false idea that the Iranian missiles would be
launched from the Caspian Sea. It's our ABMS that would be launched
from there in a "best case scenario" that is not good enough - hence
the legitimate case for pre-emptive strikes on Iran NOW i.e. ASAP by
the Israeli Air Force and USAF.

On Jan 23, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Rich Doyle wrote:

Forgive a character for appearing out of nowhere. Such is to be
expected in this Sarfatti hypertextual post modern scientific
novel.
I have only two requests that I ask in the urgent context provoked
by a claim for the necessity of pre-emptive action against Iran.
Ok,
three:

(1) Where can one find this discussion of "boost-phase intercept
systems" in the Review of Modern Physics?

Go to the Physics Library at your University. Or contact
rmp@phys.washington.edu
http://www.phys.washington.edu/~rmp/
http://rmp.aps.org
Fax (206) 543-6782

The document is:

"Report of the American Physical Society Study Group on Boost-Phase
Intercept Systems for National Missile Defense: Scientific and
Technical Issues 12 authors from UCB, MIT, UI, Sandia, SLAC,
Argonne
National Lab, LDM Menlo Park, RAND, Los Alamos National Lab,
Cornell.

No American physicist can oppose immediate pre-emptive air strike on
Iran targets after looking at this report - subject to a definite
date of a US Ultimatum to the Iranian Mullahs for unfettered
inspection by IAEA. Even if their facilities are underground we can
track truck traffic in and out via satellite and Special Forces
infiltration teams and we can bury their spider holes under tons of
rock if need be.

An online query yielded no
response. Perhaps I have not searched sufficiently, and, like
certain
WMD, if will encounter continual claims for its existence.
Pointers
would be helpful - I literally have no time for a bricks and mortar
library search - this "ten minute window" could be now! - and no
trusty assistant to whom I can outsource it.

TEN SECOND WINDOW

(2) What exegesis of this discussion of "boost-phase intercept
systems" warrants the honorable Sarfatti's claim that pre-emptive
strikes are a necessity? This necessity is asserted rather than
argued, and such a rhetorical strategy is uncannily similar to the
strategy that enabled the unfounded and indefensible invasion of
Iraq. It was precisely the *absolute certainty* that weapons of
mass
destruction were to be found in Iraq that warranted Powell et al's
dismissal of the UN's efforts: If Hans Blick didn't find them, it
wasn't because there were none to be found, b/c the administration
knew with certainty that WMD's were there. We now approach
certainty
in knowing that no WMD's were there. Given that this new assertion
of
certainty comes in the wake of a fictional argument for the war in
Iraq, ought we not wonder about any claims for such knowledge about
the capacity of other nation states?

Read the report. :-) Also I am not suggesting land invasion only
surgical strikes. Our Army is exhausted in Iraq. We could not launch
a land invasion against Iran for quite awhile. It would require a US
Army of several million men under arms at least Vietnam level if not
WWII and that means a draft. Our only immediate option is air power.

(3) Pre-emption therefore relies on an essentially imaginary
techology
- it imagines that it can tell the future, and acts accordingly.
Deterrence also deployed such an imaginary techology, but it
actually
seemed to prevent wars: A state such as Iran imagined the
consequences of launching a strike against another nuclear power,
and
concluded that it was not worth the risk of its imagination being
correct. What happened to that other character in the post modern
national security novel - deterrence?

I suspect that the decision to pre-empt has already been made by
Sharon in Israel with tacit compliance by Bush. In any case I would
not oppose it anymore because of the facts in the Rev Mod Phys
report. Were it "ten minutes" and not "ten seconds" it might be
otherwise.

Responses read with gratitude. RD

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:10:29 -0800, Jack Sarfatti
wrote:

Begin forwarded message:

From: Jack Sarfatti
Date: January 22, 2005 8:48:19 PM PST
To: Doc Savage
Subject: Maureen Dowd & In Defense of Neocon "Wolfowitz"
Pre-emptive
Strike Policy on Iran and North Korea


On Jan 22, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Howard Fertman wrote:


Iranian nuke program is probably well bunkered and
decentralized.
Do
you think we could really take it out from the air?

Yes, that's why we are developing those bunker busters that go
down
deep. In any case we can literally bury them alive if need be. If
you
read the Rev Mod Phys report you will see that we have no choice.
If I
were President I would not hesitate and I was not at all for the
Iraqi
invasion. I basically agree with Maureen Dowd on the
miscalculations
of the Bush II people as does Bush I's confidant General Brent
Scowcroft. We invaded the wrong country. The real WMD threat is
Iran.
My position here is not at all ideological. As a physicist,
educated
at CAP Brooklyn, USAF ROTC Cornell by the Los Alamos weaponeers
of
WWII Manhattan Project and Project Jason people at UCSD, I see no
other choice. Either Iran and North Korea surrender or we wipe
out
their military capability with pre-emptive strikes. It's us or
them.
The facts are in Rev Mod Phys. We could not use ABM even if we
had
a
good one, which we do not, because Russia would be forced to
attack us
not knowing where our ABMs were really headed. The kicker is
there
is
not enough TIME ONLY TEN SECONDS window of opportunity for some
launch
positions in Iran even if our interceptors were near the Caspian
Sea. That's the problem. I was really
shocked when I saw the Rev Mod Phys report. Before then I would
have
been against it. Unlike Condi I can do arithmetic. :-)

Note Maureen's reference to "spooky action at a distance" below.
Also
Newton's third law etc. - and to Da Vinci Code! ;-)

OP-ED COLUMNIST

"Don't Know Much About Algebra
By MAUREEN DOWD

Published: January 20, 2005


Columnist Page: Maureen Dowd

Forum: Discuss This Column

E-mail: liberties@nytimes.com



Lawrence Summers, the president of Harvard, has been pilloried
for
suggesting that women may be biologically unsuited to succeed at
mathematics.

He may have a point.

Just look at Condoleezza Rice.

She's clearly a well-educated, intelligent woman, versed in
Brahms
and the Bolsheviks, who has just been rewarded for her loyalty
with
the most plum assignment in the second Bush cabinet.

Yet her math skills are woefully inadequate.

She can't do simple equations. She doesn't even know that X
times
zero equals zero. If you multiply 1,370 dead soldiers times zero
weapons of mass destruction, that equals zero achievement for
Ms.
Rice, who helped the president and vice president bamboozle the
country into war.

Was Condi out doing figure eights at the ice skating rink when
she
should have been home learning her figures? She couldn't have
spent
much time studying classic word problems: If two trains leave
Chicago
at noon, one going south at 20 miles an hour and one going north
at
30 miles an hour, how far will each have gotten by midnight?

Otherwise, she might have realized that if two cars leave the
Baghdad airport at noon on the main highway into the capital of
Iraq,
neither one is going to get there with any living passengers.
Our
22
months at war have not added up to that one major highway's
being
secured.

It's lucky for Ms. Rice that she's serving with men who are
just
as
lame at numbers as she is. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
Wolfowitz
couldn't be bothered to tally correctly the number of dead
soldiers
when he testified before Congress. And his boss, Donald
Rumsfeld,
didn't realize that using an autopen signature on more than
1,000
letters to the relatives of fallen troops added up to zero
solace.

Our new top diplomat has obviously not mastered fractions. When
she
asserted during her confirmation hearing that 120,000 Iraqi
troops
had been trained, Senator Joe Biden corrected her, saying she
was
off
by a bit. His calculation of trained Iraqi troops was actually
4,000
- hers was 30 times that. Maybe she's confusing hyperbole and
hypotenuse.

Her geometry is skewed if she thinks she'll now be more
powerful
than Rummy and Dick Cheney. Doesn't she know that the Pentagon
has
more sides than her Crawford triangle with George and Laura?

She could at least have read "The Da Vinci Code." Then she
would
have learned about Fibonacci numbers, a recurring mathematical
pattern in nature. When you invade a country, you should expect
an
insurgency. Or, as Fibonacci might have calculated it, if you
kill
one jihadist, two more arrive to take his place; if you kill
three,
five more pop up; if you get five, eight more appear, and so on.

The incoming secretary of state and her colleagues are, alas,
also
lousy at economics. After Bush officials promised that the
postwar
expenses would be covered by Iraqi oil revenues, we find
ourselves
spending $1 billion a week of our own money.

Ms. Rice and her fellow imperialists know so little about
physics
that they arrogantly jumped into "spooky action at a distance,"
turning the country they had hoped to make into a model
democracy
into a training ground for international terrorists, a nucleus
for a
new generation of radioactively dangerous fanatics.

How could they forget Newton's third law: for every action,
there's
an equal and opposite reaction?

The administration needs a lesson in subtraction. How do we
subtract
our troops and replace them with Iraqi troops while the
terrorists
keep subtracting Iraqi troops with car bombs and
rocket-propelled
grenades?

Condi may not know Einstein's theory of relativity, but she
has a
fine grasp of Cheney's theory of moral relativity. Because
they're
the good guys, they can do anything: dissembling to get into
war;
flattening Iraqi cities to save them; replacing the Geneva
Conventions with unconventional ways of making prisoners talk.
The
only equation the Bushies know is this one: Might = Right.

It is puzzling that if you add X (no exit strategy) to Y (Why
are we
there?) you get W²: George Bush's second inauguration.

At Condi's hearing, she justified the Bush administration's
misadventures by saying history would prove it right. "I know
enough
about history to stand back and to recognize that you judge
decisions
not at the moment, but in how it all adds up," she told a
skeptical
Senator Biden.

Problem is, she's calculating, but she can't add. For now, Sam
Cooke
is right about the Bushies. They don't know much about history."

E-mail: liberties@nytimes.com

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/20/opinion/20dowd.html?
oref=login&n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd
%2
fCol
umnists%2fMaureen%20Dowd


On Jan 22, 2005, at 1:05 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Memorandum For The Record

Advanced Intelligence Agency
The Invisible College of The Secret "Black Ops" Think Tank

Although I have had my doubts like everyone some new facts come
to
light. I received my copy of special issue of Reviews of Modern
Physics July 2004, Vol 76 No 3 Part II on Boost-Phase Intercept
Systems for National Defense: Scientific and Technical Issue. I
got
it only a few days ago - several months late.

One does not have to be a rocket scientist, though it helps, to
realize:

1. Either the Bush Administration creates regime change in both
North
Korea and Iran with native democratic forces from inside the
respective Axis of Evil Rogue Nations.

OR

2. IAF and USAF do pre-emptive surgical cruise missile/air
strikes on
all targets in Iran & North Korea ASAP, sooner rather than
later.

Why? We have no real alternative. No defense against missile
attack
from North Korea and Iran, especially Iran, is practical with
current
technology. I have no hesitation, no uncertainty whatever, in
advising President George Walker Bush to launch pre-emptive
strikes
with Israeli & RAF allies against all targets in Iran and North
Korea
ASAP if they fail to meet a US Ultimatum by a definite date. I
reluctantly come to this conclusion from the facts. We have no
effective defense barring black ops reverse engineering of "dark
energy" alien ET super-technology, that I assume, for this
purpose,
does not exist in any operational form we can rely on.

Major problem: our launch of interceptors against North Korea
and
Iran missile attacks would also look like our direct attacks on
Russia and China and would launch a Doomsday MAD response from
them.
In likely cases the decision on both sides would have to be done
in
less than 10 seconds!

For example, from Rev Mod Phys: note "maybe" below i.e. we do
not
have such and are not likely to in time

"1. Boost-phase defense against ... ICBMs hinges on the burn
time
of
the attacking missile and the speed of the defending interceptor
rocket. Defense of the entire United States against
liquid-propelleant ICBM ... launched from ... North Korea and
Iran
may be technically feasible ... However, the interceptor rockets
would have to be substantially faster (and therefore necessarily
larger) than those usually proposed ...

2. Boost-phase defense of the entire United States against
solid-propellant ICBMs, which have shorter burn times .. is
unlikely
to be practical when all factors are considered ... [even
against]
North Korea [even if we can make high speed interceptors, which
we
currently do not have and are not likely to have they] could not
defend against solid-propellant ICBMs launched from Iran ...

3. If interceptor rockets were based in space ... With the
technology
we judge could become available in the next fifteen years,
defending
against a single ICBM would require a thousand or more
interceptors
... Deploying such a system would require at least a five- to
tenfold
increase over current US space-launch rates ...

4. The Airborne Laser ... would be ineffective against
solid-propellant ICBMs ...

5. The existing US Navy Aegis ... should be capable of
defending
against short-or medium-range missiles launched from ships,
barges,
... off US coasrs. However, interceptor rockets would have to be
positioned within a few tens of kilometers of the launch
location
of
the attacking missile.

6. A key problem is ... munitions short fall ... a successful
intercept could cause live nuclear, chemical or biological
munitions
to fall on populated areas short of the target, in the United
States
or other countries"

*Other countries include Russia and Red China! Possibly Japan.
In
some cases we have only 10 seconds to decide! p.xxvii

"Timing intercepts accurately enough to avoid this problem would
be
difficult."


On Jan 22, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:


What accounts for the intelligence blunder on Iraqi WMD?

Here are, perhaps, some clues.

On Jan 21, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Green, Christopher, retired
keeper
of CIA Weird Desk, wrote:

Well, there are 72,100 hits on Google scholar for the
monopoles,
9,707
hits for Dyons, and 678 references in the NSF Physics
literature
link.
Lots of folks just don't know what Jack does.

To which I cite:

"Attempts to find monopoles

A number of attempts have been made to detect magnetic
monopoles,
ranging from simple experiments with large coils of wire
attempting
to catch passing monopoles to experiments involving the
analysis of
collisions in particle accelerators. Although there have been
tantalizing events recorded, none of these experiments have
produced reproducible evidence for the existence of magnetic
monopoles.

There are a number of possible explanations for these results:

▪ monopoles do not exist, or
▪ that they are very rare, or
▪ that they have some property that prevents them
from
being
detected by our current experimental designs, or
▪ that the experiments are flawed.

Theory

In particle theory, a magnetic monopole arises from a
topological
glitch in the vacuum configuration of gauge fields in a Grand
Unified Theory or other gauge unification scenario. The length
scale over which this special vacuum configuration exists is
called
the correlation length of the system. A correlation length
cannot
be larger than causality would allow, therefore the
correlation
length for making magnetic monopoles must be at least as big
as
the
horizon size determined by the metric of the expanding
Universe.

According to that logic, there should be at least one magnetic
monopole per horizon volume as it was when the symmetry
breaking
took place. This creates a problem, because it predicts that
the
monopole density today should be about 10^11 times the
critical
density of our Universe, according to the Big Bang model. But
so
far, physicists have been unable to find even one. Also, the
Universe appears to be close to its critical density - for all
matter combined.

Non-inflationary Big Bang cosmology suggests that monopoles
should
be plentiful, and the failure to find magnetic monopoles is
one
of
the main problems that led to the creation of cosmic inflation
theory. In inflation, the visible universe was much smaller in
the
period before inflation, and despite the very short time
before
inflation, it would have been small enough for the whole
visible
universe to have been within the horizon, and thus not
requiring
many monopoles. At the moment, versions of inflation seem to
be
the
most likely cosmological theories.

The idea of magnetic monopoles existing is an appealing one,
in
light of the very natural and elegant way they would fit into
a
number of theories that physicists find promising. For
example,
Paul Dirac's conclusion (related to the Aharonov-Bohm effect)
that
the existence of magnetic monopoles implies that both electric
and
magnetic charge are quantized is unquestioned."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Magnetic_monopole#Attempts_to_find_monopoles

http://www.bizspirit.com/science/
Sarfatti,%20Jack%20workshop.html

http://viva-books.com/duce.html

see also

http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/sudoplat.html

http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/hamer1.html

http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/stargate-con.html

http://www.namebase.org/sources/fL.html

http://www.holysmoke.org/wb/wb0174.htm

http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html

http://stardrive.org/cartoon/MagicBean.html

http://stardrive.org/cartoon/bovines.html

http://stardrive.org/cartoon/coffee.html

On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

This is the same kind of clueless argument I got into with
that
other USG intelligence genius Paul Murad over at DIA & STAIF
who
did not know that inflation cosmology predicts flat space. The
subject of magnetic monopoles is a legitimate subject. I never
said
otherwise! The mystery or anomaly is why we do not see any
free
isolated ones. The speculative claims cited below are not
corroborated. That was what I was talking about. Kit's point
below
is a red herring. Kit do not take these polemical cheap shots
they
only blow up in your face. You cannot outsmart me in my field
anymore than I can outsmart you in your field. Indeed, I would
never even try to. :-)

some references
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v26/i6/p1296_1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9505134
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v35/i8/p487_1

On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Kit
Of course there are many theory papers on the subject. There
are
no sustained credible claims that they actually exist in any
large
numbers in this universe! That was my point! You are being
too
simplistic here.

Indeed one of the triumphs of inflation cosmology is to
explain
why we don't see them cosmically!

On Jan 21, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Green, Christopher wrote:

Well, there are 72,100 hits on Google scholar for the
monopoles,
9,707
hits for Dyons, and 678 references in the NSF Physics
literature
link.
Lots of folks just don't know what Jack does.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Sarfatti [mailto:sarfatti@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:33 PM
To: Doc Savage
Subject: Cold fusion nano-tech, monopoles & "What about the
neutrino?"
P. Werbos

bcc
On Jan 20, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:

Jack wrote:

That utter nonsense! There are no magnetic monopole
devices.
That's
BOGUS pseudoscience!

[Gary]

BTW it was ... from NSF re: the de Broglie 'double
solution'
who
suggested:

"...if it turns out to be the critical clue that tells us
how to
manipulate magnetic monopoles or dyons... there is some
Russian
work
saying that could be used to catalyze baryon decay. Let me
translate.
Efficient, fast baryon decay would imply the ability to use
ANY
earth
matter as a nuclear fuel, with 1,000 times as much energy
produced per

gram of nuclear fuel as we now have with fission or
fusion. I
think I
understand why there was some Russian interest in that,
dating
back to

Sakharov."

Also Lochak was a student of de Broglie ...

Chaotic inflation theory says only maybe ONE magnetic
monopole per
Hubble universe.
No evidence for dyons, but when I have time I will check. I
have
a lot
of Schwinger's papers.

Paul Werbos did ask "What about the neutrino?" echo of I.
Rabi's
"Who
ordered that?"

The context is my Wheeler-Bohm micro-geon model of the
electron
where
the numbers 10^-18 cm, 10^-11 cm = h/mc & 10^-13 cm =
e^2/mc^2 all
connect together neatly in Schwarschild wormhole toy model:

C/R ~ (1 - (8pi/3)/\zpf(e^2/mc^2)^3p/h)^1/2

C = effective size of electron to virtual photon scattering
probe

R = fixed physical radius e^2/mc^2

When p/h scattering momentum transfer corresponds to 10^-18
cm
resolution of the Heisenberg microscope, you need the zero
point
energy
density core to be

/\zpf ~ (mc/h)^2

i.e. the virtual electron-positron plasma cloud dressing of
the
bare
electron extends out to h/mc exactly as it should! The
effective
size of
the electron at 10^-18 cm resolution is effectively a POINT
PARTICLE,
i.e. C/R -> 0, R FIXED physically. Ditto for quarks inside
hadrons. Now
what about the neutrino? It has weak charge of course.
Data seems to say rest mass ~ 0.1 ev i.e. 10^-6 mc^2, which
makes
h/mc
for neutrino very large ~ 10^-6 cm ~ 10 nanometers.

Imagine an electro-weak resonance in the electron-neutrino
electro-weak
reaction cross section

~ 1/{[(E^2 - (mc^2)^2] + (h/T)^2}

E = energy transfer, mc^2 ~ 0.1 ev T = life time of the
resonance.

Then use the Schwinger cold fusion idea with some kind of
nano-scale
molecular cage that traps the massive neutrino whose virtual
plasma
neutrino-antineutrino dressing cloud of 10 nanometers in
size
SNUGLY
FITS into the cage! An electro-weak cold fusion resonant
reaction
at
chemical energy scale then perhaps begins to make some
sense?
Maybe. I
am simply brain-storming here from Paul Werbos's question.

--
"What is
is always a totality of ensembles,
all present together, in an orderly series of stages of
enfoldment and unfoldment, which intermingle and
inter-penetrate each other in principle throughout the whole
of space. " David Bohm

Richard Doyle
Professor
Science, Medicine, Technology & Culture
Director of Composition
Department of English
Penn State University
http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/m/rmd12/


I do not know who this brilliant bizarro is - maybe Nick Herbert up to
his old TrickstoristicsOn Jan 24, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Koyaanisqatsi
Fahrvergnugen wrote:

THE SIRENS OF TITAN
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTKR71Y3E_index_0.html

---"Pontifex Maximus" wrote:

"If you really want to enslave people,
tell them that you're going to give
them total freedom."
--- L. Ron Hubbard

See also George Orwell, 1984, Animal Farm

http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/bsglyphs.htm

To: "Pontifex Maximus"
Subject: FROM RAY FOWLER AGAIN
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:42:36 -0330
HI,
CORRECTION TO MY WEBSITE ADDRESS NOTED ON LAST EMAIL.
IT IS NOW: : http://www.raymondfowler.com
BEST,
RAY FOWLER

Raymond E. Fowler: http://www.raymondfowler.com

"MARK CRISPIN MILLER"
http://www.markcrispinmiller.org

Miller is professor of media studies at New York
University and author of The Bush Dyslexicon.
On an IPA release dated March 18, 2003
[ www.accuracy.org/press_releases/PR031803.htm],
titled "White House Claims: A Pattern of Deceit,"
Miller stated: "The most successful lie is that
Iraq is tied to 9-11." He said today:

"The White House keeps hinting that Iraq was
implicated in the terrorist attacks. On Sunday,
Condoleezza Rice repeatedly implied that Islamic
terrorism had been aided by Saddam Hussein.
With him gone, she said, the Middle East no longer
has 'an atmosphere in which you have ideologies of
hatred spawning people who slam airplanes in the
World Trade Centers [sic].' That claim is groundless.
Before the war, there was no evidence of any such
connections -- and, in Iraq, no evidence has come to
light these last three months."

Bush and Freedom:
http://www.accuracy.org/press_releases/PR012105.htm

"Meria Heller"
http://www.meriaheller.com/

The Bush Dyslexicon
Observations on a National Disorder
by Mark Crispin Miller
An excerpt, Part 1 of 4
http://www.wwnorton.com/catalog/spring01/bushexcerpt.htm

[Re: Fw: CHEMTRAILS PROOF]
"Thomas R. Ascher" wrote to: "AB"

-----
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: CHEMTRAILS PROOF
Putin will spray rain clouds to guarantee sunshine for
celebrations
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_783584.html
--------
U.S Patent 3,899,144 - U.S.NAVY Chemtrail dispenser -1975
download here (R101r Files)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N2B342E4A
-----------
[Image]
---------
Hughs Chemtrail Patent:
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Hughes_Patent.html
---------
NOAA Form for Weather Modification
download here (R101r Files)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26412E4A
--------------------
Project Cloverleaf
http://www.carnicom.com/mgr1.htm
more:
http://www.geocities.com/lord_visionary/chemtrailsindex.htm
---------------
From a mechanic:
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Chemtrails/Witness_1.html
---------
Dyn-O-Mat
http://www.dynomat.com/
see also on same page:
Dyn-O-Drought & Dyn-O-Storm
---------
Dyn-O-Gel
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Chemtrails/Dyn-O-Gel.html
*****************************************
http://isecurehome.com/9102

EPA: Aircraft Regulations/Guidance Documents
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/aviation.htm

Proposed Rule -- Control of Air Pollution from
Aircraft and Aircraft Engines; Emission Standards
and Test Procedures (Published September 30, 2003)

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is
proposing to amend the existing emission standards
for oxides of nitrogen (NOx) for new commercial
aircraft engines. These new standards are
equivalent to the latest NOx emission standards
of the United Nations International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO), and thereby would bring the
United States aircraft standards into alignment
with the international standards. These standards
would go into effect in 2004 and would apply to
new aircraft engines utilized on commercial
aircraft that include small regional jets,
single-aisle aircraft, twin-aisle aircraft,
and 747s and larger aircraft.

Federal Register Notice
(Published September 30, 2003) 612K PDF
Fact Sheet:
"Proposed Aircraft Engine Emission Standards"
(EPA420-F-03-029, September 2003) 117K PDF

"Aircraft Contrails Factsheet"
(EPA430-F-00-005, September 2000) 1.56M PDF
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/aviation.htm
For further information or assistance about
this list, please contact Cheryl O'Neal;
phone: (734) 214-4269 or
email:
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/oms-cont.htm

_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/

Federal Aviation Administration
Office of Environment and Energy, AEE-300
800 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20591
Emissions Division (AEE-300)
http://www.aee.faa.gov/emissions/

--- Jack Sarfatti ha scritto:

Begin forwarded message:

From: Jack Sarfatti
Date: January 22, 2005 1:05:15 PM PST
To: Victor Martinez ,
Paul Werbos
Subject: In Defense of Neocon "Wolfowitz" Pre-emptive
Strike Policy on Iran and North Korea? A Modest Proposal
[...]
Memorandum For The Record
Advanced Intelligence Agency
The Invisible College of The Secret "Black Ops" Think Tank

re: Report of the American Physical Society Study Group on Boost-Phase
Intercept Systems for National Missile Defense: Scientific and
Technical Issues" published 13 October, 2004 Reviews of Modern
Physics,
July 2004, Volume 76, No 3 PART II, http://rmp.aps.org
rmp@phys.washington.edu
Fax (206) 543-6782
1. Either the Bush Administration creates regime change in
both North Korea and Iran with native democratic forces from
inside the respective Axis of Evil Rogue Nations.
OR
2. IAF and USAF do pre-emptive surgical cruise missile/air
strikes on all targets in Iran & North Korea ASAP,
sooner rather than later.
[...]
January 23
China Plans Next Manned Space Shot
http://www.space.com/astronotes/astronotes.html

Meanwhile....

[ ] [ ] [ ]

Women's situation much worse than before the fall of Hussein.
[...] http://tinyurl.com/3ktne

"...America has put Iraqi women in this position, and as long
as profits are insured for western investors, change for them
is unlikely. A government like the one that has been imposed
is less threatening to western profits, with little regard
for the women and other people it is ruining."
Source: Covert Action Quarterly Spring 04
"Assault on Iraqi Women"
By Gregory Elich
Synopsis by Amanda Pyle
http://www.plim.org/IraqWar.html
------------------------------------------------
Oil and troubled waters
An explosion of demand, plus international rivalry,
will inevitably lead to confrontation.

By Gerry Van Wyngen
BRW. 20 January 2005

The fight in recent times to secure future oil and
gas supplies is likely to lead to international
confrontation within a few years. It is a danger
that most Western countries, including Australia,
have not grasped fully. Oil prices have receded from
their $US50-a-barrel spike before Christmas but seem
unable to fall below $US40, which most analysts
believe is the top of the appropriate trading range
at the present inventory levels. This surprise is
believed to be shared by Organisation of Petroleum
Exporting Countries (Opec) producers. But there are
other dynamics in train.

Perhaps the first shot in this acquisition contest
was the invasion of Iraq by the US-led "coalition of
the willing". Despite the stated moral and security
imperatives, there was also a large slice of business
pragmatism. Russia and France were heavily involved
in Iraq's oil industry, and America wanted in.
More importantly, George W. Bush's strategists
envisaged a doubling of oil production that would
lower oil prices and pay for the cost of post-war
reconstruction. At the time, Rupert Murdoch, [owner
of FoxNews], an enthusiastic Bush supporter, was
predicting that the increase in oil production would
push prices down to $US20 a barrel.

The invasion was one of this decade's biggest strategy
blunders, and did not work out as planned. Iraq's oil
production is now less than before the war, and exports
from the rich northern oil fields have ceased since
the pipeline to Turkey was sabotaged on December 18.
...
http://news.google.com/news?q=Iraq+Oil+Pipeline

[ ] [ ] [ ]

Oil Rebounds, China's Crude Imports Surge
Fri Jan 21, 2005 05:17 AM ET
LONDON (Reuters) - Oil rebounded from sharp recent
losses on Friday as China reported a fresh record
in crude imports and a U.S. cold snap was expected
to keep up demand for heating fuels.
U.S. light crude climbed 44 cents to $47.75 a barrel,
and London Brent crude was up 40 cents at $44.72.

Prices have eased from 7-week highs close to $50 a
barrel after U.S. government data showed a rise in
fuel supplies in the world's biggest consumer at a
time when inventories usually decline at the coldest
point of winter.

But worries over sabotage attacks on Iraq's oil
industry ahead of Jan. 30 elections, uncertainty over
the outcome of OPEC's ministerial meeting on the same
day, and persistent hitches to world supply have
limited losses.

"Short-term fundamentals are not strong in the United
States as evidenced by this week's stocks data, but
the Iraq election and OPEC's meeting at the end of
the month is keeping the market from selling off,"
said Tony Nunan at Mitsubishi Corp. in Tokyo.

Sharply higher oil demand in China, now the world's
second biggest consumer, was partly behind the surge
in oil prices last year to a record peak above
$55 a barrel.

"We should expect record import volumes from China
every month. Demand growth is slowing but is still
growing faster than domestic production,"
said Gordon Kwan, director of oil and gas research
at CLSA in Hong Kong. ...
http://news.google.com/news?q=Iraq+Oil+Pipeline

[ ] [ ] [ ]

Military Solution to an Economic Crisis
http://www.plim.org/Aspects%20of%20India's%20Economy.htm

Military Solution to an Economic Crisis
Real Reasons for the US Invasion:

Indeed the US [...] plans to reverse ... various
trends ... by seizing the world's richest
oil-producing regions.

This it deems necessary for three related reasons.

1. Securing US supplies: First, the US itself is
increasingly dependent on oil imports--already a little
over half its daily consumption of 20 million barrels
is imported. It imports its oil from a variety of
sources--Canada, Venezuela, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia,
even Iraq. But its own production is falling, and will
continue to fall steadily, even as its consumption
continues to grow. In future, inevitably, it will
become increasingly dependent on oil from west
Asia-north Africa--a region where the masses of
ordinary people despise the US, where three of the
leading oil producers (Iraq, Iran and Libya) are
professedly anti-American, and the others
(Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates) are
in danger of being toppled by anti-American forces.
The US of course doing its best to tie up or seize
supplies from other regions--west Africa, northern
Latin America, the Caspian region. And yet the US
cannot escape the simple arithmetic.

2. Maintaining dollar hegemony: Secondly, if other
imperialist powers were able to displace US dominance
in the region, the dollar would be dealt a severe blow.
The pressure for switching to the euro would become
irresistible and would ring the death knell of dollar
supremacy. On the other hand, complete US control of
oil would preserve the rule of the dollar (not only
would oil producers continue to use the dollar for
their international trade, but the dollar's international
standing would rise) and hurt the credibility of the euro.

3. Oil as a weapon: Thirdly, direct American control
of oil would render potential challengers for world
or regional supremacy (Europe's imperialist powers,
Japan and China) dependent on the US. It is clear the
US is following this policy.

[ ] [ ] [ ]

Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government
(And You Know THEY Never Lie!) http://eia.doe.gov/

TOTAL ENERGY
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/totalenergy/totalenergynjava.html
Energy Information Administration, EI 30
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/totalenergy/totalenergynjava.html
The Early Release of the Annual Energy Outlook 2005
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html
Tables with reference case results for all years
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/aeoref_tab.html
Tables with current futures case results for all
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/currentfuture_tab.html
The Annual Energy Outlook 2004 Report has been archived
and is available at:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo04/index.html
Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (Early Release) - Overview
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/production.html
Energy Production and Imports
Figure data
Total energy consumption is expected to increase more
rapidly than domestic energy supply through 2025.
As a result, net imports of energy are projected to
meet a growing share of energy demand...
Net imports are expected to constitute 38 percent of
total U.S. energy consumption in 2025, up from
27 percent in 2003.

Projected U.S. crude oil production increases from
5.7 million barrels per day in 2003 to a peak of
6.2 million barrels per day in 2009 as a result of
increased production offshore, predominantly from
the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Beginning in
2010, U.S. crude oil production begins to decline,
falling to 4.7 million barrels per day in 2025.

Total domestic petroleum supply (crude oil, natural
gas plant liquids, refinery processing gains, and
other refinery inputs) follows the same pattern as
crude oil production in the AEO2005 forecast,
increasing from 9.1 million barrels per day in
2003 to a peak of 9.8 million barrels per day in
2009, then declining to 8.8 million barrels per day
in 2025...

In 2025, net petroleum imports, including both crude
oil and refined products, are expected to account for
68 percent of demand (on the basis of barrels per day),
up from 56 percent in 2003. Despite an expected
increase in distillation capacity at domestic
refineries, net imports of refined petroleum products
account for a growing portion of total net imports,
increasing from 14 percent in 2003 to 16 percent
in 2025 (as compared with 20 percent in AEO2004).

The most significant change in the AEO2005 energy
supply projections is in the outlook for natural
gas, particularly domestic lower 48 onshore
production and LNG imports. Domestic natural gas
production increases from 19.1 trillion cubic feet
in 2003 to 21.8 trillion cubic feet in 2025 in the
AEO2005 forecast; AEO2004 projected 24.0 trillion
cubic feet of domestic natural gas pr oduction
in 2025. ...Continued at:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/production.html
[...]
On Jan 22, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
What accounts for the intelligence blunder on Iraqi WMD?
Here are, perhaps, some clues.

On Jan 21, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Green, Christopher,
retired keeper of CIA Weird Desk, wrote:

Well, there are 72,100 hits on Google scholar
for the monopoles, 9,707 hits for Dyons, and 678
references in the NSF Physics literature link.
Lots of folks just don't know what Jack does.

[Christopher "Kit" Green, M.D., Ph.D.,
General Motors officer, former top UFO official at CIA,
former head of Robert T. Bigelow's NIDS Institute's
Scientific Advisory Board ]
BIGELOW AEROSPACE
1899 W. BROOKS AVENUE
NORTH LAS VEGAS, NV 89032
702-639-4440 - FAX 702-639-0881
http://www.bigelowaerospace.com/index.html

To which I cite:

Attempts to find monopoles: http://tinyurl.com/5wkt3
A number of attempts have been made to detect magnetic
monopoles, ranging from simple experiments with large
coils of wire attempting to catch passing monopoles to
experiments involving the analysis of collisions in
particle accelerators. Although there have been
tantalizing events recorded, none of these experiments
have produced reproducible evidence for the existence
of magnetic monopoles.

There are a number of possible explanations
for these results:

monopoles do not exist, or

that they are very rare, or

that they have some property
that prevents them from being
detected by our current
experimental designs, or

that the experiments are flawed.
http://tinyurl.com/5wkt3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Magnetic_monopole#Attempts_to_find_monopoles
http://www.bizspirit.com/science/Sarfatti,%20Jack%20workshop.html

see also

http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/stargate-con.html
http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/MagicBean.html
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/bovines.html
http://stardrive.org/cartoon/coffee.html
some references [OPENS INTO PDFs]:
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v26/i6/p1296_1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9505134
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v35/i8/p487_1

"Q u a z g a a" wrote:

SAVE THE COMET!
http://tinyurl.com/438wa

"The chains that hold the Fenris Wolf are rent asunder,
and the Wolf courses about. Brothers shall fight and slay
one another; sisters' sons shall break the bonds of
kinship. It shall fare hard with the world: great
whoredom, an axe-age, a sword-age, shields shall be
cloven, a wind-age, a wolf-age, ere the world sinks in
ruin. No man shall spare the other."
-- Voluspa
THE DOGS OF WAR
A Note from Val:
http://www.trufax.org/

"Fear comes when you identify with the body, its fear
of mortality and the genetic programming underlying
both. It means you are capable of being manipulated
by those whose task it is to re-stimulate body fears
for their own agenda in the battle of the polarities.
When you GROW OUT OF body ID AND REALIZE WHO YOU
ARE, you will fear Nothing. You are here at this time
to experience, and to observe the unfolding of
The Game, while the polarities DO WHAT THEY MUST.

"Will you allow yourself to be manipulated by others,
or your own reactive emotions, or by body-induced
FEAR? What will you choose? Meanwhile the 'peace
movements' continue to unwittingly supply energy to
the dark side, which feeds off all the energy to
strengthen itself - to no avail in the end. Will you
choose to participate in the polarity drama, watch or
observe and learn? Your choice will influence the
result for you.

"You are here BECAUSE OF IT IS THE WAY IT IS, NOT
IN SPITE OF IT. You cannot stop any sequence of
events that are part of The Game, or the wild cards
that are introduced - nor would you want to (unless
you don't know who you are). It is what you chose
for experience. You will experience it and move on
to new experience, where you will make use of that
which you have learned here. So what's really the
big deal? There isn't one - it's just experience
for every incarnation concerned, uniquely flavored
for each, to be reflected upon afterward. Allow those
in mid and low-level incarnational perspectives to
do their thing, and observe. http://www.trufax.org/
See also What To Do During EndGame.
[...]

"...both sides are in error. Life is not supposed
to be a struggle, each against the other. It is an idea
that has its origin with Hobbes, and it has been
programmed into people's minds as defining the way life is.
It, too, is a lie. People have been lied to for so long
they believe it is all the truth. It isn't.
The whole planetary socio-cultural system is a lie.
If you are offered two choices, pick a third one yourself,
but make it reasonable, impeccable, and characteristic of
a non-polaric consciousness."
- Val Valerian http://www.trufax.org/

Future Based on the Studies of Robert Monroe
by Val Valerian

Robert Monroe is perhaps most famous for his books Journeys Out
of the Body, Far Journeys and Ultimate Journey. A true pioneer
in terms of the evolution of human consciousness. The notable
work in terms of investigations into the future of man appeared
in Far Journeys. In that book, Monroe details his discovery that
the Earth is surrounded by "bands" in which individuals congregate
after physical death, for varying lengths of time, based on their
individual resonant vibration and belief systems. This idea is
also quite evident in the work War in Heaven, which details the
manipulative control structures related to religious belief
systems in some of these interdimensional bands. Monroe's
discoveries about these rings/bands are important because of
what he discovers later about them around the time period of
3,000 AD.
[...]
Now, this is the interesting part. They told Monroe that
entities newly arriving on Earth at that time period first
had to experience one human life cycle in a period of time
before the changes were made, and then they were allowed to
spend time there. Monroe was told that these one-time experiences
were going on in the 20th century for some of those destined to
return to occupy the dimensional area around Earth in 3000 AD+.
Those who graduated from the Earth environment in 3,000 AD did
not return to Earth. They no longer needed to experience Earth
and could take on physical forms in lessening degrees of density
and radiation patterns until they no longer felt the need to do
so....on their journey to the infinite growth patterns of
consciousness that were developing all the time. Happy Trails!
http://www.trufax.org/

!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Meanwhile, way back in Persia:

I sent my Soul through the Invisible,
Some letter of that After-life to spell:
And by and by my soul return'd to me,
And answer'd "I Myself am Heav'n and Hell."
Omar Khayyam

!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!

...And, speaking of falling rocks...
***********************
... "In pre-Islamic days, called the Days of Ignorance,
the religious background of the Arabs was pagan, and
basically animistic." ...
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/Islam.html

"According to some (apparently different) sources such as

http://www.swordoftruth.com/swordoftruth/archives/byauthor/
aditichaturvedi/vpopia2.html

"... Muhammad's uncle was one of the resident priests of the
Shiv temple known as 'Kaaba'. ... this glorious Hindu temple
was made to symbolically represent a microcosm of the
universe. ... Right at the centre of the Kaaba
was the octogonal pedestal of Bramha the creator. ...
Muhammad destroyed all 360 idols,
but even he could not summon the courage to
completely obliterate the Shivling in the Kaaba. ...

"... Today it [the Shivling] lies broken at seven places
and held together by a silver band studded with silver
nails, bearing the name 'Sangey Aswad' which came from
the Sanskrit Ashwet meaning non-white or black stone.
[...] From the Hindu point of view, it is Shiva's lingham,
or phallic symbol. [...]
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/Islam.html#earlyarabia

"... oral recitation of Vedic scriptures was always done in
a lyrical fashion, utilizing music ... Muhammad decided to
forbid Music. ...".
***********************
"The status of women was that of pride and equal respect.
How could it be otherwise with a people whose chief deity
was the goddess Durga (Alla). Women married men of their
choice and were financially independent. They were
entrepeneurs, artisans, poets and even warriors! Later on
Muhammad would marry Khadija, who was not only a wealthy
merchant but also in the position to choose her own
husband. This clearly demonstrates the level of freedom
women enjoyed in Vedic Arabia. Hind, who was the wife of
Muhammad's chief enemy Abu Sufyan, herself participated
in the battlefield."
[...]
"Gone were the schools, teachers, libraries,
poets, artists, philosophers and scholars that
had littered the Vedic landscape of Arabia like
stars. Everyone had to become a raider if not
from choice then for the sake of surviving the
absolute intolerance of dissenters, that Islam
preached. Thus was the light of learning
extinguished in Arabia. All that remained was
the Koran, the Kalma and the murderous hatred
of anything Non-Muslim."
http://www.swordoftruth.com/swordoftruth/archives/byauthor/
aditichaturvedi/vpopia2.html
***********************
"Kali: the bloodthirsty wife of Shiva, with
blue-black body, four arms, using a human skull
as a cup. Her color symbolizes eternal night of
non-existence, free of illusion and distinction.
She wears a garland of the heads of impure
thoughts, which She has severed from the
personalities of Her devotees."
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/kali.htm
***********************
"The Shivling is the sacred meteorite. [...]
From the Hindu point of view, it is Shiva's lingham,
or phallic symbol. [...]

"More material and pictures about such things on webpage:
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/Islam.html#earlyarabia

"Although the above is not widely known in Eurocentric societies,
it is common knowledge in India, and indicates some of the history
and depth of feeling that is involved in the Muslim-Hindu conflicts
between Pakistan and India."
***********************
"... Muhammad received his first revelation in
610, on the mountain of Hira outside Mecca. The
revelation came in a time when Muhammad searched
for solitude. ..."
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/Islam.html
[...]
"According to a xenohistorian.faithweb web page:
http://xenohistorian.faithweb.com/neareast/ne09.html

"... Mohammed stayed [in Mecca in 615] because
his family connections protected him ... He came
into the courtyard of the Kaaba and suggested
that the gods and goddesses of Mecca might be
real after all, serving as saints or angels to
mediate between God and man. ... These are the
so-called "Satanic verses" that have caused much
controversy among scholars of Islam. ... They
[the Meccan establishment] enthusiastically
received his [Mohammed's] recantation, but when
he [Mohammed] saw the reaction he repented ...
He [Mohammed] said that the devil had momentarily
possessed his tongue, and denounced idolatry more
vigorously than before. ...".
***********************
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/Islam.html
***********************

See also Acharys S' "An Atheist Here to Destroy?"
http://www.truthbeknown.com/atheist.htm

And: "Kali meets Tank Girl"
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/kali.htm

AND: Don't forget to visit the Temple of Borobudur!
Links: http://www.borobudurpark.com/link.php
http://www.borobudurpark.com/

Pleasant Dreams ...
http://www.physics.helsinki.fi/~matpitka/mthorn.html

http://www.subgenius.com/pam1/pamphlet_p4.html
"... JEHOVAH 1 is a VENGEFUL GOD OF WRATH!
JEHOVAH 1 - a.k.a. YAHWEH - is a mad alien,
full of eyes round about, He cometh with the
clouds, radioactive, all-pervading, He has
forged His covenant with the SubGenius
in CHAINS of GENETIC PROGRAMMING and DEMANDS
OBEISANCE to His caveman sense of humor.
He has been denying us SLACK and what He is
making us do dates back to Homo Connectus,
First Whole Man; only by letting our bodies
obey the Code of financial lust survival
that is built into them can our brains
be freed from his INEVITABLE FIST."
http://www.subgenius.com/pam1/pamphlet_p4.html

"You are the knowing, not the condition that is known."
E c k h a r t T o l l e
http://www.eckharttolle.com/

"Think of timespace as a multidimensional
self-perfecting system in which everything
that has ever, or will ever occur, occurs
simultaneously. I believe timespace is a
kind of object, a geometrical supersolid.
I believe it may even be a type of hologram
in which energy and matter are byproducts
of the overlapping of two higher systems..."
--Takashi
http://mathnt.mat.jhu.edu/mathnew/Faculty/HomePages/tono.html

Robert Bruce: http://www.astraldynamics.com/
Dimi Chakalov: http://members.surfeu.at/dchakalov/intro.html
James Deardorff: http://www.tjresearch.info/contents.htm
Dick Farley:
http://www.alexconstantine.50megs.com/the_false_memory.html
Ray Fowler: http://www.raymondfowler.com
Stanton Friedman: http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/sfbio.html
Bernard Haisch: http://www.ufoskeptic.org/home.html
Nick Herbert: http://members.cruzio.com/~quanta/
Bruce Maccabee: http://brumac.8k.com/index.html
Pontifex Maximus:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/index.htm
Steven Mizrach: http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/stargate-con.html
Harold Puthoff: http://www.earthtech.org/index.html
Jack Sarfatti: http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/parsifal.html
Saul Paul Sirag: http://twm.co.nz/consc_phys.htm#Saul-Paul
Maxwell Smart 86: http://www.cia.gov/spy_fi/item15.html
Tony Smith:
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/worm4holes.html
Whitley Strieber: http://www.unknowncountry.com/
Jacques F Vallee: http://www.jacquesvallee.net/
Alfred L. Webre:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2005/01/et_visitorsspac.html
Arthur Young: http://www.arthuryoung.com/

Oil and Gas International: http://www.oilandgasinternational.com/

"Having profoundly modified space and time, and become,
in turn, modified by them, we are gradually evolving from
three-dimensional Euclidean beings into dwellers of the four
dimensional, non-Euclidean, space-time universe of
Dr. Einstein. We are parallel lines approaching infinity.
Those who make themselves at home in this new
universe will be the Homers, Dantes, Leonardos and
Michelangelos of tomorrow." -- William L. Laurence

Advanced Projects Research, Incorporated (APRI)
http://advancedprojects.com/
DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency]
http://www.darpa.mil/
ITPO [Information Processing Technology Office]
http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/
DARPA's IPTO will create a new generation of computational
and information systems that possess capabilities far beyond
those of current systems. These cognitive systems - systems
that know what they're doing:

[] will be able to reason, using substantial amounts of
appropriately represented knowledge;
[] will learn from their experiences and improve their
performance over time;
[] will be capable of explaining themselves and taking
naturally expressed direction from humans;
[] will be aware of themselves and able to reflect on
their own behavior;
[] will be able to respond robustly to surprises, in a
very general way.
http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/

'Who' perceives this?

Mumon's Twelve Zen Warnings.

1. To observe rules and regulations is to tie oneself
without a rope.
2. To act freely and without restraint is heresy
and deviltry.
3. To recognize mind and purify it is the false zen
of silent sitting.
4. To allow oneself freedom and to ignore
interrelating conditions is to fall into the pit.
5. To always be alert and clear is to wear chains
and an iron yoke.
6. To think of good and evil is to be in heaven
and hell.
7. To have a Buddha view and a Dharma view is to be
confined in two iron mountains.
8. To realize a thought as soon as it arises is to
exhaust one's energy.
9. To sit blankly in quietism is the zen of a corpse.
10. If you advance you will deviate from the principle.
11. If you retreat you will be against the truth.
12. If you neither advance nor retreat you are a
dead man breathing.

Now tell me, what will you do?
Make the utmost effort to attain completely realization
in this life. Do not let yourself circulate karma forever.
---Yamada Mumon Roshi
http://www.zmc.org/
http://www.bigmind.org/
http://www.shambhalasun.com/
http://onedropzendo.org/mumon.htm
http://www.zazen.or.jp/mumon-e.html

~ Interspecies Global Mind ~
"...It is said that we have enraged nature by tearing at
the pattern of her tracery, and for this transgression we
shall be punished mightily. But we are nature incarnate.
We are made up of her molecules and cells.
We are tools of her probings and if, indeed, we suffer and
we fail, from our lessons she will learn which way in the
future not to turn. For all that lives and all that ever has
is part of a collective brain, a neural net of the most
sprawling kind...an evolution-driven, worldwide,
multi-billion-year-old interspecies mind."
[] From: The History of the Global Brain XX
http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/6/6556/1.html

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=dc-SQUID
[...] "The UC Berkeley physicists demonstrated
quantum interference by building the first
superfluid equivalent of a superconducting
quantum interference device, called a
dc-SQUID, the most sensitive detector of
magnetic fields today.

"Just as superconducting dc-SQUIDs can measure
minuscule magnetic fields, such as magnetic
emanations from the brain, a superfluid SQUID
can detect changes in rotation, analogous to a
gyroscope. In addition to monitoring the Earth's
rotation, a superfluid gyroscope also could be
used to test predictions from Einstein's general
theory of relativity, such as how spinning
objects move in a gravitational field." [...]
http://www.physics.berkeley.edu/research/packard/history/history.html

Parenthetically, the so-called "Men-In-Black"
were tinkering with this technology way back
in the mid nineteen-sixties in West Virginia:
________________________________________________

"The Mothman Prophecies" from:
"Everything is Under Control" by Robert Anton Wilson

In 1968, West Virginia, especially in the area bordering
on Ohio, became the scene of an outbreak of weirdity that
crisscrosses several categories of controversy.
As documented in John Keel's The Mothman Prophecies, the
phenomena included:
[|] the first in the series of mysterious "cattle mutilations-
that have recurred regularly in many other states, usually
further west;
[|] over 100 sightings of strange lights (or UFOs) in the sky;
[|] three classic "close encounter" cases, in which people saw,
or thought they saw, extraterrestrials, or critters they
considered extraterrestrial;
[|] about 70 sightings of Mothman, a traditional "monster' of
the area who, like Bigfoot and Nessie, keeps coming back to
shock or terrorize a few witnesses, but never lingers long
enough to be scientifically confirmed; and
[|] a long parade of men in black, most of them driving black
Cadillacs and looking vaguely "Oriental." Mothman is, or
appears as, or is hallucinated as, a humanoid figure with
giant mothlike wings and glaring red eyes.

Another spook visiting the area called himself Indrid Cold and
said he came from a planet named Lanulos. He appeared twice to
a salesman named Woodrow Derenberger, with whom he seemed to
communicate by telepathy. Derenberger was thereafter vexed by
strange phone calls combining threats, electronic hums, and
code-like beeps. (See "Secret Cipher of the UFOnauts.")

While trying to investigate this combination of real weirdity
(the cattle mutilations, the UFO sightings confirmed on radar)
and growing mob hysteria, Keel himself became the target of
the weirdness. A maelstrom of electronic and mechanical
accidents haunted him, and strange people contacted him by
strange means to prophesy future events. The major repeated
prophecies were (1) the Pope would be stabbed while visiting
the Middle East, (2) Robert Kennedy was in danger, and the
threat waited for him in a hotel kitchen, (3) there would be
a nationwide power failure on December 24 at noon.

The Pope was not stabbed in the Middle East; he was stabbed
the next year in Manila. Robert Kennedy was shot dead in a
hotel kitchen by Sirhan Sirhan and/or persons unknown.
There was no power failure on December 24 at noon, but at
that exact hour a bridge collapsed in West Virginia, right
in the center of the UFO/ Mothman activities, killing over
100 people.

Keel claims that most major UFO flaps have this penumbra of
magick and surrealism about them, usually ignored by both
skeptics and the ardent believers in the ETH (extraterrestrial
theory.) He prefers to call the entities involved
ultra-terrestrials, existing on the borderland between
matter and energy, or reality and dream, and regards them as
mischievous, deceptive, often dangerous, and likely to produce
mental illness in those who insistently try to communicate
with them.

Reference:
The Mothman Prophecies, by John Keel, IlumiNet Press,
Avondale Estates, Ga., 1991
_______________________________________

Robert Anton Wilson may be found at
http://www.rawilson.com/main.shtml
_______________________________________

"As Thomas Huxley said, the universe acts a lot like a chess game
in which the player on the other side remains invisible to us.
By analyzing the moves, we try to form an image of the intellect
behind them. Images that have seemed almost believable to me at
various times have included the gods and goddesses of ancient
Greece (if you develop a Classic Poetry habit, that kind of
neurolinguistic programming can happen...) and also, of course,
those extra-terrestrials who have so much popularity these days.
I have also considered the player on the other side as more
impersonal, like the Tao, or more bizarre, like Shiva Dancing,
or more abstract, like Philip K. Dick's Vast Active Living
Information System (VALIS.) Mostly, though I think of the player
on the other side as a pookah -- a resident of Ireland, in rabbit
form, who may at any time dump a truckload of the Unknown and
Inexplicable right on your doorstep." --Robert Anton Wilson
http://www.rawilson.com/main.shtml

"What is necessary for man is to free himself from
the entire past of mankind, not only his individual
past. That is to say, you have to free yourself
from what every man before you has thought, felt
and experienced -- then only is it possible for you
to be yourself. The whole purpose of my talking to
people is to point out the uniqueness of every
individual. Culture or civilization or whatever you
might call it has always tried to fit us into a
framework. Man is not man at all; I call him a
'unique animal' -- and man will remain a unique
animal as long as he's burdened by the culture."

The "Anti-Krishnamurti":
-- Uppaluri Gopala Krishnamurti (Born 9 July 1918)
http://www.well.com/user/jct/mystiq1.htm

BRUMMBAER: http://www.brummbaer.net/
BRUMMBAER GALLERY: http://www.frodocpu.com/brummbaer.html
Jean "Moebius" Giraud: http://www.stardom.fr/

[ ] [ ] [ ]

Computer Chips in your Drivers License

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Oct. 6th
urged Virginia not to become the first state in
the nation to place radio frequency identification
chips in its driver's licenses. RFID tags are
computer chips attached to tiny antennae that are
capable of broadcasting their data wirelessly to
anyone with an RFID reader. They are currently
used for "contactless" applications such as
tollbooth speed passes. Almost everyone carries a
driver's license, and RFID chips allow people to
be tracked. This proposal would allow anyone to
set up a reader and capture the identities and
personal information of every person who comes
within range. FBI agents, for example, could
sweep up identities of everyone at a political
meeting, protest march, gun show or Islamic
prayer service.
Source: Asheville Global Report
"ACLU against Chips in VA Driver's: Licenses"
Credit ACLU October 14-20
Synopsis by Allison Lewis

[ ] [ ] [ ]

Mysteries of Siberia's "Valley of Death"
Eyewitness reports suggest that an ancient high-tech
"Installation" in remote Siberia was responsible for
sending guided plasma sphere weapons to destroy a
meteorite over Tunguska in 1908.
--------------------------------------------------
Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 12, Number 1
(December 2004-January 2005)
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia.
editor@nexusmagazine.com
Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280;
Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381
From our web page at:
www.nexusmagazine.com
--------------------------------------------------
by Dr Valery Uvarov © 2004
Department N13
National Security Academy
St Petersburg
Russia
Telephone: +7 (812) 237 1841
Email: nsa@homeuser.ru
Email: departament13@mail.ru

Part 1
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/installation1.html
Part 2
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/installation2.html

Beijing Aerospace Command and Control Centre (BACC)
[Project 921]
http://www.sinodefence.com/space/921/921.asp

China Great Wall Industry Corp.
http://www.cgwic.com

China's Space Launch Center
http://www.cgwic.com/launch/center1.html

Janes Aerospace
http://www.janes.com/aerospace/

Kai Tuozhe-1, Taiyuan launch site, China [Long March]
http://www.astronautix.com/lvfam/lonmarch.htm

North Korea Musudan-ri Test Range (Pekdosan)
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/facility/nodong.htm

Oberg's Pioneering Space
http://www.jamesoberg.com

Shenzhou
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/shenzhou.htm

Sino Defence Today
http://www.sinodefence.com/space/facility/ttc.asp

Traversing Singularity Barriers ^ Aeronautics
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/travel04.htm

Xichang Space Launch Center
http://www.cgwic.com/launch/center1.html

Entertaining, perhaps. Who the hell is Joe Matheny?
It's probably the "Joseph Matheny" who is more or less at
the origin of the "ong's hat" mythos and the author of
the "incunabula papers", a very interesting Borgesian prank.
http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id219/pg1/

A pseudonym of Hakim Bey, aka Peter Lamborn Wilson, et al ...

INCUNABULA
A Catalogue of Rare Books,
Manuscripts & Curiosa, Conspiracy Theory,
Frontier Science & Alternative Worlds
http://www.deoxy.org/inc.htm
http://www.deoxy.org/irc/index.htm

Hakim Bey and Ontological Anarchy:
The Writings of Hakim Bey
http://www.hermetic.com/bey/index.html

Sakhra-l'Assal Interviews
Peter Lamborn Wilson
http://www.hermetic.com/bey/pw-interview-2.html

"This is the Day we discovered the Door
that was open to all from the Start
this is the Day we traded in War
in exchange for a wide-open Heart
This is the birthday
of Love and of Light and the Child
the Day when we took off our diapers
and entangled our lives with the Wild."
--doctor jabir--
http://quantumtantra.com/

NICK HERBERT
http://members.cruzio.com/~quanta/

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
"The Black Lodge of Santa Cruz"
[Excerpt pg 24 of 69]:

"... Though still capable of composing myself and
dealing with the real world, I was nonetheless coming
apart. In the career of the magician, when they
reach that pinnacle of accomplishment and face the
outermost Abyss, it is assumed they will be able to
make a cautious and judicious approach before allowing
all that they have, and all they've become, to be
ripped away, as they are flung helpless into the Deep.
I was young, and rash, and simply could not see that
for all the care I took in avoiding disaster, the
things that I had set myself to study, and to attempt,
would lead me to face the destruction of my life as
I then understood it."

The Kaos-Babalon Press
London
Copyright (c) 2002 The Satyrikon
All Rights Reserved
Citation:
Satyr. "The Black Lodge of Santa Cruz"
http://www.biroco.com/kaos/
In: Biroco, Joel (ed), KAOS 14: Supplement
[PDF edition]. London: The Kaos-Babylon Press, 2002

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
INFLATION-THEORY IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTRATERRESTRIAL VISITATION
J. Deardorff, B. Haisch, B. Maccabee and H.E. Puthoff
Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, Vol 58, pp. 43-50,
2005.
http://www.bis-spaceflight.com/publicB2.htm
http://www.earthtech.org/publications/index.html
http://www.ufoskeptic.org/home.html

Curious situation
http://www.space.com/searchforlife/et_betterodds_050114.html
[...]
Pick up any good science magazine and you're sure to see
the latest in head-scratching ideas about superstring
theory, wormholes, or the stretching of spacetime itself.
Meanwhile, extrasolar planetary detection is on the verge
of becoming mundane.

"We are in the curious situation today that our best
modern physics and astrophysics theories predict that
we should be experiencing extraterrestrial visitation,
yet any possible evidence of such lurking in the UFO
phenomenon is scoffed at within our scientific
community," contends astrophysicist Bernard Haisch.

Haisch along with physicists James Deardorff,
Bruce Maccabee and Harold Puthoff make their
case in the JBIS article: "Inflation-Theory
Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitation".

The scientists point to two key discoveries made by
Australian astronomers and reported last year that
there is a "galactic habitable zone" in our Milky
Way Galaxy. And more importantly that Earth's own
star, the Sun, is relatively young in comparison to
the average star in this zone -- by as much as a
billion years.

Therefore, the researchers explain in their JBIS
article that an average alien civilization would
be far more advanced and have long since discovered
Earth. Additionally, other research work on the
supposition underlying the Big Bang -- known as the
theory of inflation -- shores up the prospect,
they advise, that our world is immersed in a much
larger extraterrestrial civilization. [...]
http://www.space.com/searchforlife/et_betterodds_050114.html
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2005/01/et_visitorsspac.html

[][][]
t i t a n : http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTKR71Y3E_index_0.html
[][][]

e s c h a t o l o g y

"... What was said was that culture is the shockwave of
eschatology. Nothing is unannounced. This is like a weird
quality of experience, you can't learn this from physics
or economics. (Maybe you can learn it from economics.)
Nothing is unannounced. Everything is preceded by the
shockwave of its coming. So somehow the spreading zaniness
of reality is part of the boundary-dissolving qualities
that are going to make up this new cultural mix of
disembodied human beings, nanotechnologically-maintained
environments, dissolved self-definitions, people living
at many levels at the same time; intelligence as a kind of
free-flowing nonlocal resource that comes and goes as
needed; prosthesis, implant, boundary dissolution -- these
things are usually presented as fairly terrifying. But in
fact I think behind it all lurks, you know, the demons who
do calisthenics in the angles of every room on this planet
to keep it all from collapsing into a flat line."

Terence McKenna
http://www.abrupt.org/LOGOS/tm980728.html
Live at Wetlands Preserve, NYC
July 28, 1998
http://www.levity.com/eschaton/archive.html

Q u e t z a l c o a t l
http://www.deoxy.org/omega.htm

Raymond E. Fowler: http://www.raymondfowler.com
http://www.nicap.org/ray.htm
http://boudillion.com/interviews/fowler.htm
http://www.terrestrialworld.com/Maine-MUFON/Fowler.htm

Does Recurrent Isolated Sleep Paralysis
Involve More than Cognitive Neurosciences?
by Jean-Christophe Terrillon, Ph.D., and
Sirley Marques-Bonham, Ph.D.
http://www.theconsciousdreamer.org/SSE.HTM

* * * * * * * * *
The Long Walk - 1989 Annotated Fable
featuring the Star Sponge and the 50 Gates
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/quad4c.htm
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/quad4c.htm

SCALAR
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/quetzal5.htm
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/quetzal5.htm

Ancient Script: Fractal: The Hollow Knots
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/fractal.htm
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/fractal.htm

* * * * * * * * *
Golden Children in
The ET - Human Link
by Dana Redfield
http://ufophysics.com/golden.htm

Dana Redfield, c/o:
Hampton Roads Publishing
1125 Stoney Ridge Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902

_/-_/-_/-_/-_/

The Rewinning of the Poetic Mead * Gebo * Isa * Othala
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/fourunes.htm

Lost Rune Tarot: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/runes_mt.htm

--- Winifred Barton wrote:
I think most of you have met Blanche McLanahan "The
Watcher." This Brilliant British ally speaks crop circle
language and how it relates to the Unified Field and
salvation for all.
Blanche says "It is my belief that the "*/language of the crop
circles"/* could be the one language that will bind us all.
(1.12/12.1)
Blanche McLanahan
She Who Watches - She Who Listens - She Who Waits - She Who Speaks
http://www.omtron.com/she/articles/shewhowatches.htm
cube crop circle formed 8/8/04
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2004/woodingdean2/
woodingdean2004b.html
[...]

Trust ^ Thinking Outside of the Box:
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/mt_box.htm

[...]
An understanding will bring us to meet our goal.
Our fate is no equation, but the bend in our destiny caused by
refraction will be corrected and we shall see through the
darkness and around the curvature in space.
[...]
To quote Marie Curie, "Nothing is to be feared, only understood."
[...]
The message offers the understanding if we could all be on
the same wavelength and ask the right question. That question
may be as simple as, "Why?"

The embryonic nuclei lies await our discovery. It is resting
in our blood. It is the essence of life, of all creation.......
it is the Holy Grail. The greatest story ever told has been
written on Earth's canvas for all to see. Now that it is written
we must gain this understanding by asking why. Never should fear
prevent our next step.

"ASK WHY , THEN CLOSE YOUR EYES.
YOU WILL SEE THE ANSWER THAT
ORIGINATES FROM YOUR HEART TO YOUR MIND.
IT IS INSIDE US. IT DOES COME FROM
WITHIN AND HAS BEEN THERE ALL ALONG."

"Is it for the one to reach out speaking
only for himself? Or shall the many rise
and speak for the one? And should this
one suffer indifference of the whole and
find banishment, then it is not the one
to lose but the many. Unification brings
enlightenment and truth, so that this one
might gain for all."
shewhowatches

Blanche McLanahan
http://www.omtron.com/she/index.htm

[-[+]-]

The Book of Watchers
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/intraphz.htm
. . . . . . . . .
The Vatican on UFO
Monsignor Corrado Balducci, a Vatican expert on exorcism,
has made several public pronouncements on the UFO phenomenon.
He advises that the Vatican is receiving much information on
UFO and alien contact, from its nuncios in various countries.
Monsignor Balducci is on a Vatican commission looking into
such encounters, and how to cope with them.
The Catholic Church has historically demonized many new
phenomena that were poorly understood, but Monsignor Balducci
states: "These encounters are not demonic, they are not due
to psychological impairment, and they are not a case of
entity attachment; we are closely following and studying this
phenomenon." He continues:

"We find no direct reference to extraterrestrial life in the
Bible, but neither does it exclude the existence of such:

"The distance between the angels -- pure spiritual
beings -- and us -- beings of spirit and matter,
body and soul -- is too large

"Between us and the angels, another life form
probably exists -- beings with a physical body
but one more perfect than ours and which
influences the soul less in its intelligent
acts and intentions

"The relationship between mind and matter in such
beings might be different than in our case

"If they are indeed superior to us, they can help,
support, and protect us in spiritual development;
they may have done so in the past"

See notes on an interview with Michael Hesemann in
MUFON UFO Journal, June 2004, 434, pg.19, http://www.mufon.com/
http://www.figu.org/us/figu/supporter/hesemann.htm
http://www.magazin2000plus.de/
See also http://www.vatican.va.

"Programmable matter is probably not the next
technological revolution, nor even perhaps the
one after that. But it's coming, and when it
does it will change our lives as much as any
invention ever has. Imagine being able to
program matter itself -- to change it, with
the click of a cursor, from hard to soft, from
paper to stone, from fluorescent to
super-reflective to invisible. Supported by
companies ranging from Levi Strauss to IBM and
the Defense Department, solid-state physicists
in laboratories at MIT, Harvard,
Sun Microsystems, and elsewhere are currently
creating arrays of microscopic devices called
'quantum dots' that are capable of acting like
programmable atoms. They can be configured
electronically to replicate the properties of
any known atom and then can be changed, as fast
as an electrical signal can travel, to have the
properties of a different atom. Soon it will be
possible not only to engineer into solid matter
such unnatural properties as variable magnetism,
programmable flavors, or exotic chemical bonds,
but also to change these properties at will."
--Hacking Matter: Levitating Chairs,
Quantum Mirages, and the Infinite
Weirdness of Programmable Atoms
by Wil McCarthy
(Basic Books, March 2003,
ISBN 0-465-04428-X)

"If you were offered physical immortality
as a 'Wallerstein brain' (a human brain
maintained in a jar interfacing to a
virtual reality through its sensory and
motor neurons), would you accept it?"
-- Ray Kurzweil
http://www.kurzweilai.net/

This new series of booklets compiled by Betty (Andreasson) Luca
contains many more illustrations of the ufo crafts encountered
by her, but more especially they contain teachings about our
universe from the ET perspective - most importantly these
booklets contain the WARNINGS from the ET Beings about the dire
condition of our Sun - these messages, transmitted in a mixture
of Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, English, Hebrew, Arabic and
Irish-Gaelic words (as well as in glyphic script) relate to a
disaster event that could befall the Earth in the not too
distant future. Be Warned ! They are available from:

Betty Luca ....
http://ufophysics.com/guests.htm
http://ufophysics.com/guests/grayfs.jpg
http://ufophysics.com/guests/grayface.jpg

* * * * * * * * *
Wheels Within Wheels ^ Psyops Manifesto:
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/diskelf2.htm
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/diskelf2.htm

* * * * * * * * *
Mystery Glyphs from
the ET Beings...
(from "Extraterrestrial Communications -
A Step Beyond Tomorrow" Booklets I and II
by Betty Ann Luca)
http://ufophysics.com/paglist.htm#betty
Mystery ET glyphs from "A Step Beyond Tomorrow"
by Betty (Andreasson) Luca.
What do they say, what language are they ?
They closely resemble Japanese Hiragana phonetic symbols.
http://ufophysics.com/guests/hirags.gif
Are these expressions of East Asian languages ?

* * * * * * * * *
[P]eculiar glyph-like manifestation[s] from the
Great Geometer: http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/bsglyphs.htm

* * * * * * * * *
The first two booklets
"Extraterrestrial Communications - A Step Beyond Tomorrow" Part I
"Extraterrestrial Communications - A Step Beyond Tomorrow" Part II
by Betty Luca
http://ufophysics.com/sunsnova.htm

* * * * * * * * *
Quazgaa:
http://www.xdream.freeserve.co.uk/Chosen/Ch5.htm
http://www.xdream.freeserve.co.uk/Chosen/quazsuecw.jpg

* * * * * * * * *
"Brane Worlds, the Subanthropic Principle and the
Undetectability Conjecture" by
Beatriz Gato Rivera
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0308078

* * * * * * * * *
1970's Ship with Inhabitants
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/70s_ship.htm
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/70s_ship.htm

_/-_/-_/-_/-_/

"Those who do battle with monsters
must take care that they do not
thereby become a monster.
Always remember that when you
gaze into the abyss, the abyss
gazes back on you."
-- Freidrich Nietzsche *
http://www.counterpunch.org/

* Quoted by Judge Wallach at the outset of his draft paper,
"The Logical Nexus Between the Decision to Deny Application
of the Third Geneva Convention to the Taliban and al Qaeda,
and the Mistreatment of Prisoners in Abu Ghraib."

Jennifer Van Bergen, J.D., is the author of
The Twilight of Democracy: The Bush Plan for America
(Common Courage Press, 2004).
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1567512925/counterpunchmaga
She has written and spoken extensively on civil liberties,
human rights, and international law. She is currently organizing a
major Forum on Dissent Since 9/11 in Miami from March 11-13.
See http://www.partnersinprotest.org .

_/-_/-_/-_/-_/

Saint Monica's Quantum Electrodynamic Lift
http://pw1.netcom.com/~mthorn/st_moni2.htm

* * * * * * * * *
Incunabula & Obscuranta
http://www.levity.com/eschaton/archive.html

Quad-Four:
"21st Century Four-Mouthed Wormhole Hieroglyphic"
http://pweb.netcom.com/~mthorn/quad4.htm

Re: ... the pipeline to Turkey was sabotaged ...
http://news.google.com/news?q=Iraq+Oil+Pipeline

THE SIRENS OF TITAN
Seeing, touching and smelling the extraordinarily
Earth-like world of Titan
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTKR71Y3E_index_0.html

24 January 2005
On 14 January ESA's Huygens probe made an historic
first ever descent to the surface of Titan,
1.2 billion kilometres from Earth and the largest
of Saturn's moons. [...]
Descent Imager-Spectral Radiometer (DISR):
"Geological evidence for precipitation, erosion,
mechanical abrasion and other fluvial activity
says that the physical processes shaping Titan are
much the same as those shaping Earth."

Spectacular images captured by the DISR reveal
that Titan has extraordinarily Earth-like
meteorology and geology. Images have shown a
complex network of narrow drainage channels
running from brighter highlands to lower,
flatter, dark regions. These channels merge
into river systems running into lakebeds
featuring offshore 'islands' and 'shoals'
remarkably similar to those on Earth.

Data provided in part by the Gas Chromatograph
and Mass Spectrometer (GCMS) and Surface
Science Package (SSP) support Dr Tomasko's
conclusions. Huygens' data provide strong
evidence for liquids flowing on Titan.
However, the fluid involved is methane,
a simple organic compound that can exist as a
liquid or gas at Titan's sub-170°C temperatures,
rather than water as on Earth.
[...]
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTKR71Y3E_index_0.html



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com






--
"What is
is always a totality of ensembles,
all present together, in an orderly series of stages of
enfoldment and unfoldment, which intermingle and
inter-penetrate each other in principle throughout the whole
of space. " David Bohm

Richard Doyle
Professor
Science, Medicine, Technology & Culture
Director of Composition
Department of English
Penn State University
http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/m/rmd12/





--
"What is
is always a totality of ensembles,
all present together, in an orderly series of stages of
enfoldment and unfoldment, which intermingle and
inter-penetrate each other in principle throughout the whole
of space. " David Bohm

Richard Doyle
Professor
Science, Medicine, Technology & Culture
Director of Composition
Department of English
Penn State University
http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/m/rmd12/


Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Structure of the Electron

On Jan 19, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:

"Hi Paul,

I am cc to Jack ...

Hotmail apparently lost the mail you sent cc to me yesterday. I did however see in Andrei's reply:

[Paul?]

I do not believe it is possible to deduce that gravity is important to a realistic description of what holds the electron together. Also, I do not believe that linear methods -- eigenfunctions and eigenvalues -- are good enough here."

I don't know who is writing this however to cite Niels Bohr, you may not believe it, but it is true anyway - whoever you are.

"In fact, if you speak of stable configurations -- EITHER static or dynamic -- for a real set of fields over 3+1-D space-time, then this is a subject very well known in Russia! The classic book on The Skyrme Model by Makhankov, Rybakov and Sanyuk is properly a Bible in this area. It shows how a truly nonlinear field model is essential, to explain the existence of stable vortices of force, like the electron. Rybakov and Sanyuk are still at Moscow State University -- or were, last I heard.

In fact, I actually believe I have found this day the first truly viable realistic model for the electron."

Let's see it. Remember, I deduce a critical momentum transfer of ~ 10^-18 cm for the electron to SHRINK to a point of zero radius, by having the electron micro-geon have a fixed physical radius of e^2/mc^2 with a zero point virtual cloud of scale h/mc ~ 10^-11 cm i.e. /\zpf ~ (mc/h)^2

i.e. the experimental numbers 10^-18 cm, 10^-13 cm and 10^-11 cm are all linked together in the simple Schwarzschild geon "Mass without mass" idea of Wheeler's geometrodynamics via

Apparent size of lepto-quark micro-geon at scattering momentum transfer p

(Circumference/FIXED Radius) ~ [1 - (8pi/3)/\zpf(e^2/mc^2)^3(p/h)]

Where the virtual zero point plasma dressing cloud scale surrounding the micro-geon hard core is /\zpf^-1/2.

0 = [1 - (8pi/3)/\zpf(e^2/mc^2)^3(p/h)]

i.e. when e^2/mc^2 ~ 10^-13 cm, p/h ~ 10^18 cm^-1

Then /\zpf ~ (mc/h)^2 ~ 10^22 cm^-2

i.e. 10 /\zpf10^-39 10^18 ~ 10-22/\zpf = 1

This is NOT a random coincidence, but an important physical idea that demands Bohm's interpretation of quantum theory.

A more realistic model will be to use the one of A. Burinski in Moscow based on the Kerr-Newman geon rather than the Schwarschild one I use above.

Sunday, January 16, 2005

CIA Remote Viewing Experiments 1970's

BTW Victor, as far as I know I am the only one who has linked RV to signal nonlocality with possible exception of Brian Josephson and Fotini Pallikari though I am not aware if they explicitly say it definitively in writing? This is the main focus of my talk in Santa Fe, New Mexico on April 24, 2005 http://www.bizspirit.com 7th International Conference on Science and Consciousness. This is the physics for the CIA/DIA/SRI RV work of Puthoff & Targ.

On Jan 16, 2005, at 8:05 PM, Victor Martinez wrote:

DOC:

Here's a paper I found which purports to explain Drs Puthoff/Targ's RV
work; I like his explanation much better than Antony Valentini's at:

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112151

I have a degree/teaching credential in journalism/English, NOT in
physics! –

http://mist.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/qm_nl.html

Yes, this is exactly what I have been talking about. The macro-quantum theory is nonlinear in the sense below. The giant vacuum coherent Tsunami local "world hologram" wave Psi obeys an equation in ordinary space something like

D^uDuPsi + m^2Psi + b|Psi|^2Psi ~ 0

Where Du is the Einstein general relativity covariant partial derivative

m^2 < 0, b > 0

The all important nonlinearity is the term b|Psi|^2Psi

We also have a formally similar local hologram giant quantum wave that pilots our brain function. That is our conscious mind field. We are conscious because there is direct feedback from the material brain to the mind field from the nonlinearity presponse term absent in micro-quantum theory. PW Anderson in "More is different" showed that the giant quantum wave has a "phase rigidity" that makes it immune to the environmental decoherence of Zurek that Tegmark attacked Penrose and Hameroff with.

Stapp had a detailed model of a nonlinear QM of mind with application to retro-PK paranormal data. Physics Today virtually roasted Stapp alive for his heresy even though his paper is not wrong.


This is the important part:

"3. NONLINEAR QUANTUM MECHANICS AND SUPERLUMINAL LOOPHOLES  

This prohibition against superluminal communication, as stated above, is a part of standard quantum mechanics. However, this prohibition is broken if quantum mechanics is allowed to be slightly "non-linear", a technical term meaning that when quantum waves are superimposed they may generate a small cross-term not present in the standard formalism. Steven Weinberg, Nobel laureate for his theoretical work in unifying the electromagnetic and weak interactions, investigated a theory which introduces small non-linear corrections to standard quantum mechanics [13]. The onset of non-linear behavior is seen in other areas of physics, e.g., laser light in certain media, and, he suggested, might also be present but unnoticed in quantum mechanics. Weinberg's non-linear QM subtly alters certain properties of the standard theory, producing new physical effects that can be detected through precise measurements.

Two years after Weinberg's non-linear QM theory was published, Joseph Polchinski published a paper demonstrating that Weinberg's non-linear corrections upset the balance in quantum mechanics that prevents superluminal communication using EPR experiments [14]. Through the new non-linear effects, separated measurements on the same quantum system begin to "talk" to each other and faster-than-light and/or backward-in-time signaling becomes possible. Polchinski describes such an arrangement as an "EPR telephone".

The Weinberg/Polchinski work had implications that are devastating for the Copenhagen representation of the wave function as "observer knowledge". Polchinski has shown that a tiny non-linear modification transforms the "hidden" nonlocality of the standard QM formalism into a manifest property that can be used for nonlocal observer-to-observer communication. This is completely inconsistent with the Copenhagen "knowledge" interpretation.

Thus, the Copenhagen interpretation is not "robust" because it is inconsistent with a tiny modification of the standard formalism. The transactional interpretation, on the other hand, can easily accommodate this modification of the formalism and is robust enough to be tested and verified (or falsified) by the same effect. If quantum mechanics has any detectable nonlinearity, we get a faster-than-light and backwards-in-time telephone.

But is quantum mechanics non-linear? Atomic physics experiments have been used by several experimental groups to test Weinberg's non-linear theory. So far, these tests have all been negative, indicating that any non-linearities in the quantum formalism are extremely small, if they exist at all. These negative results are not surprising, however, because the atomic transitions used involve only a few electron-volts of energy. If quantum mechanics does have non-linear properties, they would expected to depend on energy and to appear only at a very high energy scale and particularly at the highest energy densities. Weinberg-Polchinski tests should be made, if possible, with the highest energy particle accelerators. Perhaps then we can find out what connections might be made with Polchinski's EPR telephone."
World Hologram, Dark Energy & Vacuum Coherence
On Jan 15, 2005, at 10:17 PM, Carlos Castro wrote:


3- The geometric-mean expression of the observed
vacuum energy density in terms of an upper ( IR )
scale and lower ( UV ) scale was derived from first
principles ( without the Holographic hypothesis ) in
:

" Anti de Sitter Gravity from BF-CS-Higgs Theory "
Modern Physics. Letts A 17
( 2002 ) 2095-2103

I hope these papers may be useful to you.

Best wishes

Carlos Castro

Carlos, I am confused about your 3.

Basically the vacuum dark energy density is 0.73 of the critical density for a flat universe from inflation.
That is

Omega(dark energy) ~ 0.73

Omega(dark matter) ~ 0.23

Omega(ordinary stuff) ~ 0.04

This mean that Einstein's cosmological constant is

/\ ~ (10^28 cm)^-2

The dark vacuum energy density is then

too(vacuum) ~ (c^4/8piG)/\ ~ 10^-7 ergs/cc (from memory)

so where does UV scale come in?

In my theory, if UV scale ~ Lp ~ 10^-33 cm

/\ = Lp^-2(1 - Lp^2|Vacuum Coherence|^2)

i.e.

/\ = (UV scale)(1 - (UV scale)|Vacuum Coherence|^2) = (IR scale)

here I use Susskind hologram model as well, i.e. I normalize the vacuum coherence on a 2D "screen" (de Sitter horizon?)

Entropy of universe/kB =(10^28 cm)^2/4Lp^2 = 10^122 BITS

Why electrons look like points


On Jan 16, 2005, at 6:57 AM, Paul J. Werbos, Dr. wrote:

At 10:37 PM 1/15/2005, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Strong short scale warping of space is essential to explain the deep inelastic electron scattering data. You miss the boat completely ignoring warp effects in my opinion. Indeed dark energy strongly warps spacetime on a small scale (distinct from its large scale coarse grained properties.

-----------


"Hi, Jack!

I need to understand more precisely what you are referring to here.

'Way back in the early 1970s, they told me that all particle-on-electron scattering experiments were consistent with the QED model of a zero-radius electron without a need to account for other effects."

I am explaining WHY. Remember h/mc is size of the virtual electron-positron virtual photon "dressed" cloud. As soon as momentum transfer is ~ 2h/mc you get real pair creation so that you cannot tell what is what. The deep inelastic data I think has momentum transfers >> 2h/mc when the point-like structure shows up. At low energy < 1Mev/c scattering transfers the electron is a fuzzy ball of effective size 10^-11 cm - only at much higher magnification do you see it explicitly as a "point" from the effect I am describing.

"I assume this story may have been modified very slightly to say we need to account for the whole electroweak model. (By "radius" I do NOT mean where the Coulomb field exists... only the radius of the charge source. This is not the same thing as the so-called "classical radius.")."

The "classical radius" is (1/137) Compton wavelength. At low energy scattering you cannot resolve less than this Compton fog because you create real electron-positron pairs. It's only at much more powerful deep inelastic scattering transfers that you punch through and even the three quarks look like points (unified lepto-quarks).
In my model the electron is a G* ~ 10^40G from /\zpf core micro-geon of radius e^2/mc^2 ~ 1 fermi = 10^-13 cm surrounded by virtual electron-positron screening plasma out to ~ h/mc ~ 10^-11 cm. In deep inelastic probes by electrons of electron or hadrons via virtual spacelike photon exchange the effective size is the CIRCUMFERENCE of the micro geon at fixed physical radius e^2/mc^2 for scattering momentum transfer p

Roughly, the effective size is (1 - (8pi/3)/\zpf(e^2/mc^2)^3p/h)^1/2(e^2/mc^2)

Where the zero point exotic vacuum dark energy core of the electro-quark micro-geon of Wheeler's "Mass without mass" pure vacuum Bohm hidden variable solution is

The electron geon shrinks to a point from extreme space warping by its zero point energy core when

(1 - (8pi/3)/\zpf(e^2/mc^2)^3p/h) = 0

at p ~ h/(10^-17 cm)

This requires the exotic vacuum core parameter to be

(8pi/3)/\zpf(10^-13)^3(10^-17)^-1 = 1

/\zpf ~ (3/8pi)10^(39 - 17) cm^-2 ~ 10^23 cm^-2

i.e. roughly speaking this is the BEAUTIFUL RESULT!

/\zpf = (h/mc)^-2

which makes a lot of sense since it is the exotic vacuum virtual plasma e+e- cloud at 10^-11 cm that is CAUSING the extreme space warp! That is I DERIVE 10^-17 ~ 10^-18 cm or so from Einstein's

Guv + /\zpfguv = 0

where low energy micro-geon Wheeler "Mass without mass" size is e^2/mc^2 = 1 fermi, with exotic vacuum virtual electron-positron plasma cloud out to h/mc = 10^-11 cm gives the critical scattering probe impact parameter as 10^-17 cm where the incredibly shrinking electron geon ZPF wormhole stealth cloaks itself to look like a vanishing point!


"Are you saying that more recent experiments are inconsistent with that?"

No.

"I have heard some noises about people developing "preon" models of the electron as a bound particle. I can think of good theoretical reasons to want to do that... but is there actual empirical data contradicting the zero radius model, and suggesting an actual "radius"? If so, I would very much appreciate a URL or arXiv.org reference to a really coherent review (as readable as possible) of those new experiments."

I don't read silly preon theory papers. I am only using the old SLAC data from the 70's or so.

"I have to admit I am a bit surprised. 10**13 cm would be large enough ... isn't that about what nucleons are? And weren't the scattering experiments of the 1960s plenty good enough to measure (or "see") that kind of radius?

http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/on-line/electron/section1/properties.asp

One curious aspect: if the upper bound on electron radius today is 10**-18, and if it all seems to follow simple linear QED rules beyond that inner core radius, then the energy in the Coulomb field outside that inner core exceeds the total mass-energy of the electron. Either the inner core has negative mass-energy, or there are additional negative terms outside the core."

The zero point energy of virtual electron-positron plasma is negative as shown by Peter Milonni in "The Quantum Vacuum". This follows from Fermi statistics - the anti-commutation rules of the Dirac theory. So it is consistently a pretty picture showing that Bohm was right and Bohr was wrong on the possibility of spacetime visualization of quantum processes. All the Peres stuff is wrong. Copenhagen is wrong.

Wheeler's old attempt to use Einstein's Vision works once the direct gravity of the dark energy is used. That was what Wheeler missed in the 1950's for obvious reasons. It took 50 years to discover dark energy - important for all scales. As Above, So Below.

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Brazilian UFO Metric Engineering Torsion Field Research

BTW The Brazilians are very active in UFO research. I know this from being there, and I mean at the highest levels of the Brazilian military as well as key academics at UNICAMP and other key universities. This was true back in 1984 and there is no reason to assume that the interest has abated. Also Uri Geller is a Super Star with the Brazilian Power Elite - again from direct experience.

On Jan 15, 2005, at 8:51 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

The Brazilians seem to solve Zielinski's problem.

Take a really flat Minkowski spacetime. All the inertial force effects from using non-inertial frames are described by Jim Corum's Anholonomic Object. The spin connection is zero and it is the spin connection that defines the intrinsic geometry that distinguishes Minkowski spacetime with apparent gravity fields for non-inertial observers from real gravity fields. The key is the spin connection from locally gauging the Lorentz group. More on this anon. The Brazilian paper is important even if their main thesis is not correct.

The Brazilians also discuss the gravity energy density nonlocality problem and also the relation of general covariance to the different strengths of the equivalence principle.

However, the true power of the local equivalence principle is that locally we cannot distinguish noninertial coordinate frame inertial force effects from true gravity fields. This is seen in the Brazilian equation (255) on p. 32

That the "con" form of Jim Corum's inertial force anholonomic object equals the spin connection minus the contortion.

However, the Brazilians have a more general covering meta-theory which allows one to see what happens if the equivalence principle in eq (255) is violated maybe at the micro-quantum level?

Indeed their teleparallel formulation is closer to my macro-quantum vacuum coherence gauge field approach, i.e. their eq (253) on p.31 where the GR tetrad is split into the trivial and non-trivial parts

h^au = x^a,u + B^au

where B^au is the teleparallel "translational gauge potential" like in non-Abelian Yang-Mills theory of the electro-weak sub-nuclear forces.

In my theory, the dimensionless gauge potential is

B^auPa = Bu = Lp(Macro Quantum Vacuum Coherent World Hologram Goldstone Phase),u

Note that

Lp = (hG/c^3)^1/2

Therefore, when the quantum h -> 0 we have Bu -> 0, similarly when G -> 0 and or c -> infinity separately Bu -> 0.
Therefore, my theory demands:

There is no gravity field possible when separately

1. The speed of light c is truely infinite with Galilean relativity

2. Planck's quantum of action h is truly zero, i.e. a "classical world"

3. Newton's constant G is truly zero.

4. There is no ODLRO vacuum coherence, i.e. the SED theory of Puthoff, Haisch, Marshall, Cole, Rueda et-al of completely random stochastic zero point vacuum fluctuations is true. Gravity is not possible then.

Do the Russians outgun us in space weapons?

see http://qedcorp.com/SDI/RussianTorsion2.pdf

This note is based on the recent torsion-gauge theory paper of the Brazilians Arcos and Pereira “Torsion Gravity: A Reappraisal” of Jan 7, 2005 on the Cornell Archive. It clears up some loose ends still hanging from the torsion propulsion workshop at ISSO in 2000 prior to Vigier IV at UCB where we looked the work of Kleinert in Berlin, Hammond in Fargo North Dakota, Shipov in Moscow and Bangkok and Tesla expert Jim Corum (who left SARA defense contractors in Huntington Beach, CA and went to work for Senator Robert Byrd's ISR think tank in West Virginia before disappearing into a black hole :-)), but came to no clear conclusion on the Russian claims (e.g. Akimov) of advanced torsion field propellantless propulsion and exotic space weapons systems. The considerations below are independent of the Brazilian’s claim that torsion and curvature describe the same dynamics from alternative force and geometrodynamic complementary views. I do not like that idea at all, but time will tell.

There is more interesting stuff on global GR with Wilson loops and the equivalence principle in the Brazilian paper that I will get to - independent of their I think wrong idea that torsion and curvature describe the same dynamics. One good thing about their paper is that I cleared up formally what comes from locally gauging the translation group Lie algebra {Pa} and what comes from locally gauging the Lorentz group {Sab}. Einstein's 1916 GR only partially gauges the Lorentz group - leaving out the antisymmetric contortion GCT tensor piece of the connection field. I suspect, but have not proved, that this 1916 GR approximation corresponds to locally gauging the 3 space rotations {S12, S13,S23} without locally gauging the 3 Lorentz boosts {S01,S02,SO3}? There are also the 5 remaining conformal generators to locally gauge. Unlike the Brazilians, I expect that as we locally gauge everything in sight to larger and larger Lie algebras of observables we add more and more dynamical degrees of freedom to the nonrigid mutable fabric of spacetime whose tailoring is the job of metric engineers for the manufacture of warps, wormholes and if need be weapons that make all conventional weaponry impotent and obsolete as we see in those magnificent flying machines from we don't know where or when.
Remote Viewing and ET Contact


On Jan 15, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Memorandum for the Record

The scenario in the film Independence Day is closer to reality than in the film ET.

On Jan 14, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:


On Jan 14, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:

FYI, would be interesting to add your meeting with Targ and Puthoff, etc. I have added comments in [brackets]

reprinted from APERTURE, Vol. 1, No.2, 2002

This chronology was compiled by IRVA vice-president Paul H. Smith

partly based on research for his book, Reading the Enemy's Mind:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/0312875150/ref=dp_proddesc_0/002-0512790-0267250?%5Fencoding=UTF8&n=283155


This is only a brief chronology of events in remote viewing history. Many more details could be added, and many more names included. But this will serve as a starting place to record the major events and some of the important personalities in relation to one another. Certainly, important events and personalities remain to be added. This chronology will become more complete over time. If you wish to nominate an event to be considered for addition to the timeline please forward it to Timeline.

Readers should be aware that there are two parallel remote viewing timelines: the operational, military-run program at Ft. Meade, Maryland, and the civilian-led, military-funded research program in California. External civilian research and applications were also taking place. In the chronology below, the operational and military lines are intermingled with a few references to the RV-related activities in the civilian sector.

[Jack can you 'lock-down' your CONTACT timeframe re: future physics, etc.?]

Sept 1971 Ingo Swann begins PK research with Cleve Backster

I met Backster in 1974. He will be at Santa Fe Conference April 2005 where I am also speaking.
http://www.bizspirit.com

CIA Chief of Station the late Harold Chipman also conducted REAL successful RV operations on Soviet Union targets - or so he told me in mid-80's.

Nov 1971 Swann participates in PK experiments in Gertrude Schmeidler's lab; also participates in OBE experiments.

8 Dec 1971
First remote viewing experiment (describing weather in Tucson, AZ from ASPR offices in NYC). Term "Remote Viewing" is adopted.

Was Stewart Hammeroff involved in that one?


22 Feb 1972
First beacon experiments (also conducted at ASPR)

March 1972
Cleve Backster shows Swann a letter from Dr. Hal Puthoff at Stanford Research Institute. Swann and Puthoff communicate.

6 June 1972
Swann/Puthoff magnetometer / quark-detector equipment experiment in physics building at Stanford University.

27 June 1972
Puthoff communicates with Kit Green, Central Intelligence Agency, concerning the magnetometer experiment results.

Kit Green and I in active contact up until very recently.

Aug 1972
Under Puthoff's supervision, CIA representatives conduct first evaluation trials with Swann. Russell Targ visits Puthoff at SRI.

1 Oct 1972
CIA awards SRI $50K exploratory contract.

Sept 1972
Russell Targ joins the RV program at SRI.

Summer 1973
Pat Price and Ingo Swann remote view NSA's Sugar Grove facility in West Virginia.

Pat Price very close friend of Hal Chipman's. Indeed they had some private security business. Chip also allegedly part of early MK ULTRA in San Francisco. Some episodes TV Series The Enforcer written by Chip. I also have his film treatment "The Union" on anti-Soviet CIA RV Cold War Ops (fictionalized). Hal Puthoff still refuses to acknowledge Chip's role in all this. Chip told me Hal was out of the loop on that for security reasons. Chip and Neocon Pundit Stephen Schwartz had a great falling out. Reason is classified for this forum.


July 1974
Pat Price's operational remote viewing of a facility near Semipalatinsk in USSR conducted.

This was really controlled by Harold Chipman at a layer Hal Puthoff was not privy to. Chip met Russell Targ at Henry Dakin's 3220 Sacramento St ~ 1985 don't know if Russ recalls but there were witnesses (Creon Levit, me, Bob Jones, Kim Burrafato).

[Contact? re: future physics, etc., backwards time flow, eschatological matters]

The key physics issue here is "signal nonlocality" that is strictly forbidden in micro-quantum theory. Indeed this is why "Quantum Mind" is not a good term. David Deutsch says no consciousness in micro-quantum theory. I agree. Antony Valentini showed what changes to micro-quantum theory are needed to get "signal nonlocality". Macro-quantum theory is to micro-quantum theory as general relativity is to special relativity. You need signal nonlocality to have RV as well as ordinary interior consciousness, i.e. naturally conscious nano-tech AI androids for example. Wait till MAC's Steve Jobs announces "conscious computers"! :-) Our minds are large things not micro-things. Large "hologram" quantum coherent phase modulated systems are immune to environmental decoherence because of "phase rigidity" (PW Anderson's "More is different" indeed "more" allows PRESPONSE ((Dick Bierman et-al)) "signal nonlocality"). Therefore, Max Tegmark's objection against Penrose-Hammeroff does not apply. Signal nonlocality compromises quantum computer cryptography-teleportation-density coding et-al schemes - a backdoor loophole)


18 Oct 1974
Russell Targ and Hall Puthoff publish article on remote viewing research in Nature.

July 1975
CIA terminates involvement in and funding of remote viewing.

[Contact ? terminated shortly after this]

i.e, OVERT involvement


Later in 1975
Air Force Foreign Technology Division becomes the primary funder of SRI research program, with Dale Graff supervising.

Same group allegedly involved in flying saucer Black Ops.

March 1976
Puthoff & Targ publish a major article about remote viewing in Proceedings of IEEE.

1976
Dr. Edwin May joins RV program at SRI International.

1977
The book Mind Reach (Targ & Puthoff) is published.

June 1977
Founding of Mobius Group; Project Deepquest - a submarine RV experiment is jointly conducted by SRI International / Stephan Schwartz.

Not same Stephen Schwartz who wrote "The Two Faces of Islam" same name two different people.

Sept 1977
US Army's remote viewing program GONDOLA WISH is extablished by Lt. F. Holmes "Skip" Atwater at the direction of the Army Assistant Chief of Staff Intelligence, Maj. Gen. Edmund Thompson.

13 July 1978
GONDOLA WISH name is changed to GRILL FLAME.

Oct 1978
US Army's INSCOM is tasked by the ACSI with developing a parapsychology program.

Dec 78 - Jan 79
Selection of remote viewers for GRILL FLAME. Mel Riley, Joe McMoneagle, Ken Bell, and three others are included.

4 Sept 1979
First Army-conducted operational remote viewing session performed.

March 1979
Remote viewers working with Dale Graff at Wright-Patterson AFB and at SRI correctly locate downed Soviet TU-22 recce aircraft.

1979-81
Stephan Schwartz conducts Alexandria Project, a remote viewing archaeology project in Egypt. His book Alexandria Project is subsequently published.

I suspect that real Egyptologists consider this and also similar stuff by Jim Hurtak to be bogus. See "The Star Gate Conspiracy".

ca. 1980
Air Force Chief of Staff cancels AF RV program; Dale Graff joins Defense Intelligence Agency as principal staff officer for remote viewing effort.

1981-82
Puthoff and Swann develop coordinate remote viewing (CRV) architecture.
1982
Russell Targ leaves SRI International's RV program. Mel Riley departs Ft. Meade's operational RV unit.
1982
With Swann as instructor, two individuals (Tom McNear and Rob Cowart) begin first CRV training.
Dec 1982
US Army's RV project's name is changed to CENTER LANE.
1983
Charlene Cavanaugh joins military RV unit in August; Paul H. Smith joins in September.
Jan 1984
Bill Ray joins military RV unit; second group of CRV candidates begins training (group includes Smith, Ray, Charlene Chavanaugh; Ed Dames is last minute addition to training contract while remaining assigned to his sponsoring unit).
1984
The book Mind Race (Targ & Keith Harary) is published.
Apr 1984
Lyn Buchanan joins the Ft. Meade RV unit.
Sept 1984
Joe McMoneagle retires from the Ft. Meade RV unit.
July 1984
Brig. Gen Harry Soyster replaces Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine as Commander, INSCOM. Orders close of Army's CENTER LANE RV program. Soyster eventually persuaded to allow transfer of program & personnel to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).
1985
Dr. Hal Puthoff leaves SRI International to take directorship of Institute of Advanced Studies in Austin, TX.

This is little more than a smallish office lab in a cheap industrial park in Austin suburb - not at all like IAS in Princeton, New Jersey. See Nick Cook's description in "The Hunt for Zero Point".

Dr. Edwin May becomes director of SRI's program.
1985-86
Caravel Project, an underwater archaeology project conducted by Stephan Schwartz.
31 Jan 1986
After a year of holding operational control, DIA takes formal control of the military operational RV program, and renames it SUN STREAK. Ed Dames joins RV unit.
1986
Mel Riley is once more assigned to the Ft. Meade RV unit.
1987
Brig Leander Project, an underwater archaeology project conducted by Stephan Schwartz.
Dec 1987
F. Holmes "Skip" Atwater departs the Ft. Meade RV unit on retirement leave.
June 1988
David Morehouse is assigned to the Ft. Meade RV unit.
Dec 1988
Ed Dames departs the Ft. Meade RV unit.
June 1990
David Morehouse departs, and Mel Riley retires from the Ft. Meade RV unit.
Aug 1990
Paul Smith is reassigned from the Ft. Meade RV unit to the 101st Airborne Division for Desert Shield / Desert Storm.
Late 1990
Dale Graff becomes chief of the Ft. Meade RV unit, and changes project name to STAR GATE.
1991
Edwin May moves RV research program from SRI International to Science Applications International Corporation.
Jan 1992
Lyn Buchanan retires from the Ft. Meade RV unit.
1993
The book Mind Trek (McMoneagle) is published.
June 1993
Dale Graff retires.
1994
Wording added to Federal Y95 budget transferring control of STAR GATE from DIA to CIA.
1995
CIA begins Congressionally directed evaluation of RV as an intelligence tool. American Institutes of Research is hired to do a "scientific" study; in the report officially published in September the AIR concludes that RV has no value as an intelligence tool. Significant questions are raised about the completeness and accuracy of the AIR study.
30 June 1995
CIA cancels STAR GATE program. The five remaining personnel are reassigned to other jobs in the government.
28 Nov 1995
Ted Koppel's Nightline reveals existence of government remote viewing effort. Interviewed are former CIA director Robert Gates, Dale Graff, Edwin May, Joe McMoneagle, etc.

[Contact re-established?]

1996
Remote Viewing is featured in many media articles and broadcasts, and becomes a featured item on Art Bell's and other talk shows.
Nov 1996
The book Psychic Warrior (Morehouse) is published.
Feb 1997
The book Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies (Schnabel) is published.

This is an important book, note Chapter "You can't go home again" story of one-armed man and also story of cold metallic voices on tapes about Uri Geller.

18 March 1999
The International Remote Viewing Association is formed.
19-20 March 1999
First remote viewing conference: CRV Conference hosted by Lyn Buchanan's training company, P>S>I.
Featured speakers: Russell Targ, John Alexander..
19-20 May 2000
Year 2000 Remote Viewing Conference in Mesquite, NV.
Featured speakers: Charles T. Tart, Jessica Utts, Larry Dossey, Marcello Truzzi..
June 2001
First IRVA sponsored remote viewing conference. Held at Texas, Station Las Vegas, NV.
Featured speakers: Edgar Mitchell, Dean Radin, Jeffrey Mishlove.

See my article about this in FIRST EDITION of Mishlove's "The Roots of Consciousness" removed in second edition for some strange reason I think having to do with Black Ops in-fighting. Very Orwellian since the content of my removed article is very relevant today.

June 2002
IRVA remote viewing conference in Austin, TX, celebrating 30 years of remote viewing.
Featured speakers: Ingo Swann, Hal Puthoff, Dale Graff, Cleve Backster.
October 2003
Joint sponsorship of remote viewing conference with the A.R.E. Held at Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Featured speakers: Charles Cayce, James Spottiswoode, Hal Puthoff, and Dale Graff.
June 2004
IRVA remote viewing conference in Las Vegas, NV.
Featured speakers: Ingo Swann, Melvin Morse, and Daryl Bem

Copyright © 2002 by Paul H. Smith.
Permission granted to quote in full or part with proper attribution.




On Jan 15, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

PS if you want to know what is really happening listen to
http://qedcorp.com/book/psi/hitweapon.html
I wrote that in 1978!
You need Real Player, which is a free download - most browsers have it built in.

On Jan 15, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Hal is simply repeating what I already have said in my two books from 2002 on Amazon
Destiny Matrix and Space-Time and Beyond. Also I have had DIRECT CONTACT, which, Hal
apparently has not, although maybe he has. The difference is that Hal's physics theory is not
correct. The Jury is still out on mine. But remember the ETs are helping me in my physics
theorizing. Uri Geller and I were directly contacted at about the same time and I was told
in 1953 that I would be meeting people like Uri Geller (also Hal) in "twenty years", which
happened! http://stardrive.org/cartoon/spectra.html
Now these ARE THE FACTS. Capische?
Wake up and smell the coffee.

BTW according to FRONTLINE GWB won the presidency just with the Evangelical vote. He did not need the Catholics, the Jews , the Blacks or the Hispanics. There are as many UFO believers in USA as there are Evangelicals. Count them. Furthermore, there is a significant overlap. Most Evangelicals think ET is "demonic" and they are probably correct about SOME of the ETs, the ones who abduct. That is why I focus on the military weapons aspect of all this from C^3 -> W^3. See the TV series Battle Star Galactica and Star Gate SG 1 on Sci Fi Channel. Both of those shows are closer to reality than one might think. The systematic murders of Eugene Mallove, John Mack, the bio-weapons scientists are happening most likely because we are under attack not only from Al Qaeda. Someone Out There wants to exterminate the human race on this planet. Killing the bioweapons scientists weakens our ability to defend ourselves against bioweapons attack. That is obvious.

Hal & Co did not make the best case for their thesis, which I agree with. The discovery of dark energy shows the natural basis for the metric engineering of warp, wormhole, WMD (AKA W^3) supertechnology. Hal & Co do not mention that properly because they would have to give me the credit as it is clearly stated in my two books from 2002.

On Jan 15, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Victor Martinez wrote:

Dr PUTHOFF:

Thanx for the heads-up on this one, but I think I had already streamed
the story all of you wrote BEFORE I got your notice; look for an e-mail
entitled: "Fermi's Paradox: ET Visitors: Scientists see High Likelihood
of Contact."

It's not "high likelihood" it HAS ALREADY HAPPENED. Hal always takes the wimpy position trying to be respectable. It's a cop out. He satisfies neither side. Also he makes it easy for Robert Park and other CSICOPS to shoot him down with shoddy PV physics.

Also, I wanted to inform you that your piece hit the big time yesterday
and today: It was one of the stories headlined in the immensely popular

www.drudgereport.com/

and as of 8:32 a.m. this morning, it was still posted there with the
tag,"JOURNAL: Scientists See High Likelihood of ET Visitors."

Check it out,... perhaps it'll still be there! MILLIONS will now see it!
In the meantime, GREAT JOB to you and your comrades in arms! –


From: Puthoff@aol.com
Date: January 14, 2005 9:23:39 PM PST
To: victorgm@webtv.net
Cc: haisch@calphysics.org, brumac@compuserve.com, deardorj@proaxis.com
Subject: ET Visitors: Scientists see high liklihood



http://www.space.com/searchforlife/et_betterodds_050114.html
One World Or Many
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0501189

Consensus of chaotic inflation e.g. see Max Tegmark's website of an infinity of parallel universes is being challenged by a wide angle anomaly in the WMAP data. New data that was supposed to be published has apparently been held back? The above paper makes the case that there is only one relatively small universe - smaller than the observable universe! It's close to a virtual reality cosmic pong game. There are "walls" of a cosmic dodecahedron you pass through a wall and instantly come out on an antipodal wall billions of light years away. There are multiple images of the same objects in the celestial sphere in this model. What is really true? We will not know for awhile.

arXiv:astro-ph/0501189 v1 11 Jan 2005

"The Shape of Space after WMAP data
Jean-Pierre Luminet
Laboratoire Univers et Th´eories, CNRS-UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris,
F–92195 Meudon c´edex, France.

Abstract
What is the shape of space is a long-standing question in cosmology. In this talk I review recent advances in cosmic topology since it has entered a new era of experimental tests. High redshift surveys of astronomical sources and accurate maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB) are beginning to hint at the shape of the universe, or at least to limit the wide range of possibilities. Among those possibilites are surprising “wrap around” universe models in which space, whatever its curvature, may be smaller than the observable universe and generate topological lensing effects on a detectable cosmic scale. In particular, the recent analysis of CMB data provided by the WMAP satellite suggest a finite universe with the topology of the Poincar´e dodecahedral spherical space. Such a model of a “small universe”, the volume of which would represent only about 80 % the volume of the observable universe, offers an observational signature in the form of a predictable topological lens effect on one hand, and raises new issues on the early universe physics on the other hand."