Destiny Matrix

2007-11-27T13:55:00.000-08:00

On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:OK See the Sharon Weinberger articles sharonweinberger@gmail.com mentioning me noted on Wikipedia.On Nov 27, 2007, at 9:34 AM, David Kaiser wrote:Dear Jack,Thanks for your quick and helpful reply. I'm glad to continue via email rather than phone; that's easy enough. I am addressing this email just to you and not to the whole group because I

2007-11-27T13:52:00.000-08:00

Note - topological defects are nodes in the single-valued macro-quantum ODLRO parameter where the relative Goldstone phases are undefined like longitude at the North and South Poles. They are energetically stable when the corresponding homotopy group is larger than the identity, e.g. winding integers for first homotopy (1D vortices in 3D space), wrapping integers for second homotopy (0D monopoles

2007-11-26T15:31:00.000-08:00

Begin forwarded message:From: Jack Sarfatti Date: November 26, 2007 1:50:11 PM PSTTo: David KSubject: Re: Physics/Consciousness Research Group in the 1970sDear DavidPhone is not my preferred mode of communication because the channel capacity for scientific communication is too low. Also I only use a cell phone, quality not good noisy frequent drops on ATT and I do not like to stay on it -

2007-11-23T00:32:00.000-08:00

Subject: Re: Skinwalkers, Blue Book and All: TP Black LodgeIt has apparently already opened at the Skinwalker Ranch. See the book by Kelleher and Knapp http://www.huntfortheskinwalker.com/- creature coming out of the wormhole.I also discuss it in my book Super Cosmoshttp://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=23999You know it's like cockroaches. See one, you know there are many

2007-11-18T09:28:00.000-08:00

In mathematics, the special unitary group of degree n, denoted SU(n), is the group of n×n unitary matrices with unit determinant. The group operation is that of matrix multiplication. The special unitary group is a subgroup of the unitary group U(n), consisting of all n×n unitary matrices, which is itself a subgroup of the general linear group GL(n, C).The simplest case, SU(1), is a trivial group

2007-11-17T23:58:00.000-08:00

Note the EM vector potential A(em) is compared to the tetrad e^I, i.e. (2.101) & (2.105). Really A(em) should be compared with A^I(gravity) where the torsion field vanishes.e^I(gravity) = I^a(1905SR) + @A^I(gravity)where from P.W. Anderson's "More is different" emergent complexity I positA^I(gravity) = M^I^I = (dTheta)^I(Phi)^I - (Theta)^I(dPhi)^IConjecture:F^I(gravity) = DA^I ~ 2(dTheta)^I/\(

2007-11-17T18:02:00.000-08:00

It's not a cranky review nor is Lisi a crank. The only "crank" here is allegedly the one-and-only Lubos Motl http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/11/exceptionally-simple-theory-of.html http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~motl/ IMHO. Lisi paper has serious defects but it is still interesting and better than most papers on the theory archive. Peter Woit writes:Garrett Lisi has a new paper on the arXiv, with

2007-11-16T15:45:00.001-08:00

Lisi getting major media coverage despite Lubos Motl calling him a "crackpot". I have my doubts about the claims of E8 with regard to gravity, but I do not know having not yet studied the paper - only Lubos Motl's remarks on it. It's clear E8 is real physics, i.e. testable out on the limb even if it turns out to be partially wrong. String theory is not real physics. I mean most of the "string

2007-11-15T21:06:00.000-08:00

I suspect Lubos is essentially technically (formally) correct about that particular largely irrelevant point that assumes what it wants to prove. It's like theorems that prove it's impossible to generalize quantum theory, and like theorems that say quantum superposition of charge eigenstates are impossible. It does not apply to my background-independent macro-quantum gravity theory that the

2007-11-15T16:06:00.000-08:00

Bottom line is that even if Lubos Motl were correct that there is a fundamental flaw in the Lisi-Tony Smith approach, nevertheless, that does not make them "crackpots" it would only make them "wrong" which is better than any paper Lubos ever probably published which falls under the "not even wrong" category. At least Tony and Lisi make some contact with real data - it may be wrong like the

2007-11-15T15:54:00.000-08:00

On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:Didn't Tony Smith have something like this?Yes, you are right now that I recall. I still have not read the Lisa paper. I see Lubos Motl is compulsively attacking people personally with vague smears again rather than correcting what he thinks may be wrong or not even wrong with their ideas. His list of targets also includes Sir Roger Penrose,

2007-11-07T10:22:00.001-08:00

Dear CarlosWhat is new about my proposal is that curved spacetime is a macro-quantum "supersolid" effect in which the 4D world crystal lattice (or "simplex") distortion field, i.e. tetrad is precisely akin to the superflow field of He4 below Lambda. The nodes of the 4D world crystal lattice generally covariant "aether" are precisely the nodes of the post-inflation Higgs-Goldstone coherent vacuum

2007-11-01T16:57:00.000-07:00

Z: "How would you hide the additional spatial dimensions? By folding them up, like the string theorists?"J: Yes.Z: "Do you really want to go there?"J: Allah Akbar! Do we have a choice? ;-)"Mach" does make some sense only in a Wheeler-Feynman retro-causal theory without the total future absorber boundary condition.On Nov 1, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:Jack Sarfatti wrote:On 10/29/07,

2007-10-30T12:02:00.000-07:00

On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Paul Zielinski wrote:I'm trying to understand tetrads. I'm particularly interested in Rovelli's and others' explanations of the relationship between the Einstein-Cartan tetrad model and the 1916 metric field model for GR.Good! Remember my basic idea here that seems to be completely original compared to Visser's, Chapline's, Volovik's et-al approaches. The key idea

2007-10-28T11:57:00.000-07:00

What is the general rule to couple all massless matter source fields to the emergent GeoMetroDynamic field in the unstable pre-inflation "false vacuum" whose percolating bubbles populates the cosmic landscape in eternal chaotic inflation? The moment of inflation to a bubble is a vacuum ODLRO phase transition from micro to MACRO in which the Higgs-Goldstone fields "jell" so to speak converting

2007-10-27T23:30:00.000-07:00

On Oct 27, 2007, at 10:28 PM, Kay zum Felde wrote:This a paper by G.E. Volovik. I think it is meant asan overview or summary of some basic aspects ofVolovik’s work. Its title is “Fermi point scenario foremergent gravity.” It is only 10 pages which makes itsuitable as a compact on hand collection of thecornerstones of his ideas concerning emergent gravity.I think this might be his intention.He

2007-10-27T13:52:00.001-07:00

Furthermore, even if you could do it, why bother? "Who ordered that?" It's a waste of time. It's not an interesting question. The ball is in your court to prove me wrong here, but I think you are wasting your time."It reduces the gravitational field of 1916 GR to an ordinary physical field that has a completely objective definition that can be described entirely in terms of generally covariant

2007-10-27T13:25:00.001-07:00

On Oct 27, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:"OK, fine. But then how does your BEC model explain the relationship between the material sources and the the Higgs-Goldstone fields? Are not material sources sources of your Higgs-Goldstone fields?"Jack replies:Very simple. I have written the equations a jillion times. BTW much simpler than George Chapline's vacuum ODLRO theory. I have a more

2007-10-27T13:25:00.000-07:00

2007-10-25T14:45:00.001-07:00

On Oct 25, 2007, at 2:04 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:http://www.physorg.com/news112541069.htmlTexture defects in 3D space are non-trivial mappings of the 3 sphere S3 with three independent Goldstone phases and four real Higgs scalar fields (Rocky Kolb's "WD40") of third homotopy group.http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0709/0709.3102v1.pdfMy theory in 3D space of GMD point defects is S2 of second

2007-10-23T14:16:00.001-07:00

"First we polish off some batches of political dispatches ..." Gondoliers G&S 12:45 PM and I am still in pajamas answering e-mails - looks like Nick Herbert has come up with a practical non-local signaling device? Is the "quantum compound" beyond orthodox QM?On Oct 23, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:Jack Sarfatti wrote:"equivalence principle" has several meanings.If you read Norton's

2007-10-22T21:04:00.001-07:00

"equivalence principle" has several meanings.Formally it is the tetrad idea as in the Rovelli quotes you sent to Kiehn.zero g-force LIF <-> non-zero g-forceLNIF at same P local coincidencea lot of confusion sets in about "gravity force" = "weight" in non-inertial frames that should not be confused with curvature. Basically in those discussions the static hovering frames are tacitly meant as when

2007-10-22T14:18:00.001-07:00

The dark matter (negative zero point energy density in a vortex filament) induced IR long-wave quark-quark force per unit mass isf(IR) = c^2/Lp* = constantLp* ~ 1 fermi ~ (Lp^2Hubble radius of future dark energy retro-causal de Sitter horizon)^1/3Lp ~ 10^-33 cmHubble "radius" ~ 10^28 cmThis means that the dark matter vortex filament core zero point energy density scales as1/Lp*r in IR limitbut

2007-10-22T00:00:00.000-07:00

What do they have in common?"the force between two quarks approaches a constant strength as we pull the quarks apart ..."p. 104 "The Trouble With Physics" Lee SmolinIn the simple weak curvature slow speed Galilean limit of Einstein's 1916 General Relativity (GR) with additional torsion, the quantum exotic vacuum zero point energy (ZPE) induced Sakharov (1967) gravity potential energy per unit

2007-10-20T13:29:00.000-07:00

Most of these issues are pseudo-problems based on the ambiguity of plain English and the unconscious shifts in meaning of the same nouns such as "gravitational field" that has at least two independent meanings. Also there is a paradigm shift between Newton and Einstein that causes a lot of confusion e.g. Puthoff's PV theory one example, string theory another. See L. Smolin "The Trouble with

2007-10-18T15:27:00.000-07:00

PS of course the local classical laws of physics (tensor and spinor equations) are still independent of the local coincident frames either unaccelerated LIFs or absolutely accelerated LNIFs. Note however, that the LNIF detectors see the Unruh-Hawking black body thermal photons not seen by the LIF detectors. This is a non-classical quantum effect.On Oct 18, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:In

2007-10-18T13:52:00.000-07:00

The theory seems to contradict Einstein's equivalence principle that all forms of stress-energy current densities, including locally random virtual zero point vacuum fluctuations bend spacetime equallly. Introducing a high frequency cutoff is a clear violation.On Oct 15, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:I am taking a second look at this paper and it deserves close study. http://www.arxiv.org

2007-10-18T13:49:00.001-07:00

What about General Relativity GR? Argument #1LIF is same result as below for SR. Use the EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE tetrad transformation e^au to go from 1905 SR LIF to LOCALLY COINCIDENT 1916 LNIF. A GCT scalar invariant remains an invariant. For example, given a first rank LIF tensor Ta (LIF) then Tu(LNIF) = eu^aTa, but a LIF scalar has no LIF "a-indices" therefore the scalar remains a scalar.But

2007-10-03T13:36:00.000-07:00

On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:Jack Sarfatti wrote:#3On Oct 2, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:In other words, linear coordinate substitutions?yesI^u is a homogeneous affine tensor under the above i.e.I^au to I^au' = C^uu'I^auWhich is analogous to a "Cartesian tensor" under orthogonal transformations in ordinary 3D space?yesThereforeI^audx^u is an affine invariant (scalar

2007-10-02T20:50:00.000-07:00

On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:10 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:Jack Sarfatti wrote:#1OK -- then does A^a to A^a - X^a under GCTs? Or under stretch-squeeze deformations of the manifold?Critical point.A real physical deformation always comes from either some dynamical change in the Tuv tensor. I am not talking about that at all. We are only talking about changes in POV or perspective of locally coincident

2007-09-29T18:24:00.002-07:00

PSConsiderF = T + R = (I/\ + A/\ + S/\)(I + A + S)OK so now it really looks like Yang-Mills F with A & S appearing symmetrically!Note that(I/\ + A/\ + S/\)I = 0therefore we have the 2-form field from the ten compensating gauge potentials of Poincare groupF = T + R = d(A + S) + (A + S)/\(A + S)F is peculiar with mixed Lorentz group indicesT^a + S^a^b = dA^a + dS^a^b + A^a/\A^b + S^ac/\A^c + S^ac/\

2007-09-29T18:24:00.001-07:00

Note also, the effect of the equivalence principle makes a difference in comparing gravity fields to Yang-Mills fields.Look at the exterior covariant derivative 1-formD = (d + S)/\note that d is usually written without the /\ that is tacitly understood sinced(p-form) = (p + 1)-formdual to boundary operator&(p + 1) dim manifold = p-dim manifold so that Stokes theorem generalizes toIntegral of d(

2007-09-29T17:38:00.000-07:00

The key equation is Rovelli's (2.89) for only the torsion-free curvature-only spin connection in terms of the tetrads. It has quadratic and quartic parts. The quartic part can be put into the desired form, but the quadratic part cannot. Also both parts depend on gradients in the tetrad component fields. It may be that only the torsion part of the spin connection can be put into the Yang-Mills

2007-09-27T16:44:00.000-07:00

I forgot that there is a missing dimensionless variable factor x -corrected below where x is the ratio of two lengths, the position of the test particle to the intrinsic scale r of the geometrodynamic field that is related to the source distortion M. What is r? Here I take it as the radius of curvature at the surface r* of the source as the closest analog to the cosmological parameter in the de

2007-09-24T16:07:00.001-07:00

The second rank tensor field guv(x) is compositeguv(x) = nabe^au(x)e^bv(x)therefore the quantum foam gravity zero point vacuum fluctuations in the fabric of warped 4D spacetime guv(x) are spin 0, 1 & 2.Therefore LISA/LIGO & Ray Chiao's "transducer" in addition to seeing the two massless spin 2 stretch-squeeze Weyl conformal vacuum gravity tensor wave linearly polarized modes at 45 deg relative to

2007-09-24T15:44:00.000-07:00

The principle of local gauge invariance for spin 1 compensating vector fields that are renormalizable with the Higgs-Goldstone hidden ODLRO symmetry (t'Hooft, 1973) is battle-tested experimentally (electroweak force & QCD) and is a direct consequence of Einstein locality for the Bohmian IT hidden variables when the effect of the BIT quantum (super) potential is small Q. The effect of the latter

2007-09-19T20:20:00.000-07:00

Curvature and torsion spin 1 vector fields in geometrodynamic sqrt substratumOn Sep 19, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:"In which case I suppose youre^a = I^a + B^ais an *arbitrary* basis in the tangent space?"Yes in sense of equivalence principle that the metric in the a,b,c Latin indices is Minkowski nab i.e.eb = nabe^aIn a coordinate basise^a = e^audx^uds^2 = guvdx^udx^v = e^aea = nabe^

2007-09-18T16:27:00.000-07:00

Z: Even if the spacetime remains flat? If so, then non-vanishing B^au doesn't necessarily mean non-vanishing intrinsic curvature.* S: That's precisely the point. I was too sloppy earlier. B^au =/= 0 both when there are accelerating detectors in flat spacetime and for all detectors in curved spacetime. What I should have said was that B^au =/= 0 in a curved spacetime. B^au = 0 in flat spacetime

2007-09-17T19:11:00.000-07:00

On Sep 16, 2007, at 4:56 PM, Paul Zielinski wrote:Jack Sarfatti wrote:yes - also it's intuitive and really not very different from Yang-Mills theory.----------------Internal Yang-Mills Field----- Curvature-Torsion FieldSymmetry Group G = U(1), SU(2), SU(3) ----------- P10 = T4xSO(1,3)Compensating gauge 1-form B^i ---------------- B^a where e^a = I^a + B^a, ds^2 = e^aea = guvdx^udx^vi,j,k = 1 U(1

2007-09-16T14:54:00.001-07:00

On Sep 16, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:yes - also it's intuitive and really not very different from Yang-Mills theory.----------------Internal Yang-Mills Field----- Curvature-Torsion FieldSymmetry Group G = U(1), SU(2), SU(3) ----------- P10 = T4xSO(1,3)Compensating gauge 1-form B^i ---------------- B^a where e^a = I^a + B^a, ds^2 = e^aea = guvdx^udx^vi,j,k = 1 U(1); i,j,k = 1,2,3 SU(2

2007-09-16T11:50:00.000-07:00

Physics TodayI agree with Rovelli Ch 2 "Quantum Gravity" that the tetrad 1-formse^a = e^audx^uare the most natural choice for the gravitational field with the most compact way of doing GRds^2 = guvdx^udx^v = (Minkowski)abe^ae^b = e^aeaCurvature 2-form is R^a^b = R^a^buvdx^u/\dx^v = DS^a^b = dS^a^b + S^ac/\S^cbS^a^b = S^a^budx^u is spin-connection 1-forme^a = I^a + B^aI^a is for Minkowski

2007-09-13T18:51:00.000-07:00

Einstein(1916)-Utiyama(1956)-Kibble(1961)Meaning of the spin connection coefficients & Lie algebra structure constantsI cannot push the analogy of the GR spin-connection coefficients w^a^bc with the structure constants c^i^jk of the internal symmetry Yang-Mills Lie algebras too far, although there is a physical relation it is not direct.In GR including torsion extension S^a^b = w^a^bce^c =

2007-09-13T17:34:00.000-07:00

On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:Our early universe has low entropy compared to present universe. Sir Roger Penrose says this is a big problem for inflation theory - it's the Arrow of Time problem - why irreversible aging is in same sense as expansion of 3D space with dark energy speeding up of that cosmic expansion.Our past universe post-inflation is not de Sitter. Our future

2007-09-11T20:02:00.001-07:00

On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Creon Levit wrote:Jack, this is very important, right? Very. It might help me (and a lot of us struggling to understand) if you could write very sort answers to the following questions: 1) If gravity = tetrads = spin-1 = renormalizable, then do you have renormalizable quantum gravity formulation? I believe so. But I am not expert in the details of t'Hooft's 1972 paper

2007-09-06T16:06:00.000-07:00

this is key point about remote viewing> Unfortunately, the Dopfer thesis does not discuss what was observed in > the lower detector with the coincidence requirement removed. For this > reason, a crucial test of quantum phenomena would be to re-create the > Dopfer Experiment and observe the role of the coincidence requirement > on what is observed in the lower arm detector. Several research groups

2007-08-22T17:09:00.000-07:00

Jack Sarfatti on Coast to Coast Talk Radio Aug 26, 2007 10PM Pacific TimeClear Channel Radio Networkhttp://qedcorp.com/APS/C2CJack1.mp3 listen herelisten here to me on Coast to Coast last nitehttp://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2007/08/26.htmlOn Aug 24, 2007, at 4:38 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:http://tinyurl.com/yrpxlcAlso Richard Dolan "UFOs and the National Security State" is on. I think I am

2007-08-18T11:57:00.000-07:00

Yes, but the real issue here is whether the effect can be used for practical superluminal communications AKA signal nonlocality. Note that virtual quanta do have a direct gravity effect. They do not have a direct electrodynamic effect in the case of photons, i.e. a virtual photon does not make a counter click, though it does shift sharp atomic spectra. A Valentini has shown how quantum theory

2007-08-18T11:53:00.001-07:00

This is evidence for my theory in http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602022 quite obviously - region of positive ZPF pressure w = -1 exotic vacuum without real matter in it - some dynamic change - recently forming not enough time to attract a lot of real matter to it. X rays from some real electrons, ions in it accelerated by negative pressure inhomogeneities, i.e. post-collision "train wreck" exotic

2007-08-18T11:34:00.000-07:00

Global conservation laws require global symmetries. Tuv^,v = 0,v = ordinary global T4 partial derivativeTuv = stress-energy current density local AFFINE tensor of non-gravity matter fields i.e. only for global Poincare group!globally conserved integrals for Pu exist no problem in accord with usual ideas of energy-momentum conservation.In 1915 GR above picture breaks down replaced byTuv^;v = 0;v =

2007-08-14T17:01:00.000-07:00

Assault on Freedom of Speech by San Francisco SupervisorsOn Aug 14, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:Well said Colin. :-)I agree to being self-righteous and outrageously moral. However, I do not think I have been irrational and prejudiced? I have also been humorous and satirical and have used ridicule. That aside your points are well taken.PS Martin Garvis who won for Don Imus and who

2007-08-10T17:30:00.000-07:00

Also I only took the linear term in the Einstein-Hilbert tetrad action expansion.Actually there are action denominator G terms ~ G(Newton)N^p/3 where p - 0, 1, 2, 3, 4in Lambda(zpf)e^a/\e^b/\e^c/\e^de^a = I^a + (1/N)^1/3A^aFor Salam f-gravityN = 1/Lp^2/\zpf(f) ~ 10^66/(1/10^-13)^2 ~ 10^6610^-26 ~ 10^40N^1/3 ~ 10^13N^4/3 ~ 10^62However there are other factors in the modified de Mateos-Beck

2007-07-30T17:54:00.000-07:00

Lubos Motl wrote:"George Chapline just gave the most provoking and most bizarre colloquium we have seen at Harvard for years. (I guess that the talk would not be bizarre enough for Quantoken and perhaps not even for Arun, and I apologize if they will be disappointed by the amount of strangeness.) Chapline used to be a T.A. for Feynman's lectures, he was awarded by various awards, but his goal

2007-07-29T16:00:00.000-07:00

R^a^b = Dw^a^bce^c = d(w^a^bce^c) + w^a^a'ce^a'/\w^c^bb'ce^b'd(w^a^bce^c) = d(w^a^bc)/\e^c + w^a^bcde^cR^a^b = d(w^a^bc)/\e^c + w^a^bcde^c + w^a^a'ce^a'/\w^c^bb'ce^b'T^a(P10) = w^abc(SO(1,3))e^b/\e^c = w^abc(SO(1,3))(I^b + (1/N)^1/3A^b)/\(I^c + (1/N)^1/3A^c)Note that the torsion field 2-form does not depend upon F^a = DA^a.G. Shipov's "teleparallel" theory I think meansR^a^b(P10) = 0WhereR^a^b(

2007-07-29T09:55:00.000-07:00

World Hologram: Space without spaceJohn A Wheeler coined"Mass without mass""Charge without charge""Spin without spin.""Law without law."in his mid-1950's classical geometrodynamics where he also introduced "quantum foam" elucidated below.World Hologram is "Space without space" (my term for the record)L(Einstein-Hilbert) = *(R^a^b/\e^c/\e^d + Lambda e^a/\e^b/\e^c/\e^d)e^a = I^a + (1/N)^1/3A^aR^a^b

2007-07-28T19:15:00.001-07:00

The Grand Illusion, The New Paradigm Quantum Gravity for Dummieshttp://www.kmelmidimusic.com/sinatra/u_gotomy.mid"You go to my head and you linger like a haunting refrain And I find you spinning 'round in my brain Like the bubbles in a glass of champagne You go to my head like a sip of sparkling Burgundy brew And I find the very mention of you Like the kicker in a julep or twoThe thrill of the

2007-07-28T16:36:00.000-07:00

Warp Drive and Torsion FieldsOn Jul 28, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Paul J. Werbos, Dr. wrote:Hi, Jack!I think I see the story now...First:----------------------I asked:2. What would Hehl's kinds of alternative models imply for the possibility of somethinglike warp drive in the SPIRIT of the Alcubierre solutions? (Not the same equations or solutions,but

2007-07-27T13:25:00.000-07:00

World HologramOn Jul 27, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Paul J. Werbos, Dr. wrote:At 10:37 PM 7/26/2007, Jack Sarfatti wrote:Jack: My theory is formally same as GR, but with a larger connection field including the antisymmetric 3rd rank GCT torsion tensor field in addition to the symmetric non-tensor curvature (disclination) only Levi-Civita connection for parallel transport of tensor fields along paths - at

2007-07-26T16:26:00.000-07:00

Retro-Causality, World Hologram, Quantum GravityOn Jul 26, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Paul J. Werbos, Dr. wrote:At 02:34 PM 7/26/2007, Srikanth R wrote:Hi,Shih has performed many beautiful experiments exploring various aspects of entangled photons: two-particle interference/diffraction, quantum lithography, quantum teleportation, an entangled version of the delayed choice experiment using the quantum

2007-07-16T21:44:00.000-07:00

Feynman to me in 1968 at Cal Tech in his office: "Jack, always try to prove yourself wrong."Hal missed his chance to cite The Son of God to me: "Let He who is without Sin cast the first stone." ;-)A possible problem with my theory dawned on me at the gym just now, undoubtedly from increased blood circulation to my brain?Note below 2nd draft in which I correct the 10^-22 error that should be 10^+

2007-07-16T18:00:00.000-07:00

Hal Puthoff's Electron ModelWhat's wrong is that Hal has not identified all of the relevant parameters of the problem of the structure of the electron. There is no gravity in his model. In fact gravity gets stronger as the scale decreases. This last statement comes from a Wignerian analysis of quantum gravity measurement as shown by Ng & Van Dam below.Let me make it as simple as possible, but

2007-07-15T21:44:00.000-07:00

http://arXiv:gr-qc/0403057 v1 13 Mar 2004“In essence, the holographic principle says that although the world around us appears to have three spatial dimensions, its contents can actually be encoded on a two-dimensional surface, like a hologram… According to the holographic principle, the number of degrees of freedom that this cubic region can contain is bounded by the surface area of the region

2007-07-15T15:16:00.000-07:00

http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/physik_astronomie/bericht-52458.htmlThe close-packed little (figuratively speaking of course) "green balls" of "Volume-without-volume" are of size&l ~ N^1/6 LpThere is a point gravity monopole inside each "green ball" where the vacuum ODLRO order parameter drops to zero leaving the two effective 3D + 1 Goldstone phases undefined corresponding to

2007-07-14T20:41:00.001-07:00

All The King's Horses and All The King's Men couldn't put Humpty Dumpty together again.But along came Jack The Giant Killerhttp://stardrive.org/cartoon/MagicBean.htmlElectro-weak unification Higgs boson scale ~ 10^-16 cmN(EM-Weak) ~ 10^-3210^66 ~ 10^34N^1/2 ~ 10^17N^1/3 ~ 10^11coupling of spin 1 graviphoton A^a to flat Minkowski spacetime is ~ 10^-11 compared to Planck scale where it is 1 it's

2007-07-14T20:12:00.000-07:00

On Jul 14, 2007, at 7:43 PM, ROBERT BECKER wrote:Jack, Version 13 of your Paper was the last version that contained the References to my work. That was the last major version of your Paper prior to the long break in time before you rewrote the Paper in June 2007.I lost all the originals in the laptop crash. I may have some of them on on Mac dot storage. In any case they are up on the archive -

2007-07-14T19:07:00.000-07:00

Yes, I did not mean it was a bad paper and at least they are being motivated by experiments and observations and are not dazzled by pure math - Circe for theorists.On Jul 14, 2007, at 3:53 PM, ROBERT BECKER wrote:"Jack, I tend to agree with your conclusion. I read the referenced Paper and the two experimental Papers it references. On the positive side, the math appears to be correct, and they do

2007-07-11T10:58:00.000-07:00

Resolution-dependent gravity self-coupling strength IT FROM BITe^a = I^a(flat Minkowski) + (1/N)^1/3A^a(intrinsic warp field) = emergent tetrad field 1-forms~ M^a^a "Destiny Omega Point Matrix" of Goldstone World Hologram Screen Coherent Vacuum PhasesThe holographic dimensionless self-coupling of gravity to itself at the renormalizable Yang-Mills spin 1 tetrad-spinor level is@G = (1/N)^1/3 ~ (Lp^

2007-07-10T08:49:00.000-07:00

/\zpf ~ 1/r^2 = 1/NLp^2required by world hologramThis explains exactly why the dark energy is small on large scale need to allow the universe to exist.The amount of dark energy in a quantum cell of space is(hc/Lp^2)(1/NLp^2)(Lp^2/3N^1/3Lp^1/3)^3 = hc/Lpis a scale-invariant!On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:This will go into next major revision of my archive paperhttp://gr-qc/

2007-07-01T16:43:00.000-07:00

Indeed, exactly as observed in our skies the UFO will appear to teleport disappearing here reappearing there after a time corresponding to a faster-than-light speed as it enters and leaves weightless warp drive befuddling the AFO Victorian Station Master. On Jul 1, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: > Hawking and Ellis discuss this nicely in "The Large Scale Structure of > Space-Time" > >

2007-06-23T15:12:00.000-07:00

Memorandum for the RecordOn Jun 23, 2007, at 1:48 PM, michael ibison wrote:JackI have not looked at Hal's latest model, but it is painful seeing this exchange. I note that you have a habit of quoting things that people never said.- MichaelOn Jun 23, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:No Michael what I have said about Hal's model is completely accurate. You are fooling yourself on this. People

2007-06-22T15:40:00.000-07:00

Memorandum for the RecordMichaelYour point eludes me. You keep retreating to Asymptopia in the land of the ineffable. I at first understood you to mean that you found a proof that warp drive is impossible. Now you seem to have changed your stance. There is no conventional propellant in warp drive period. HFGW are a conventional propellant in this sense easy to prove and I did. What is your

2007-06-22T14:55:00.000-07:00

On Jun 21, 2007, at 4:32 AM, Paul J. Werbos, Dr. wrote:At 11:18 PM 6/20/2007, RAY HUDSON wrote:I was going to respond to this as well, but how could I do better than Creon has done? He has captured all of the thoughts I was going to offer from an engineering perspective… and then some! The most interesting to me (not surprising given my flight controls bias) is the gyroscopic effect of a

2007-06-22T12:30:00.001-07:00

On Jun 21, 2007, at 10:19 AM, RKiehn2352@aol.com wrote:*************************************************************************** "You might remember this old note that I called to the attention of JS:Thermodynamics as a Finsler Space with TorsionOne of the most striking features of thermodynamics is the division into two sets of those variables that appear in thermodynamic constraints: there

2007-06-21T14:58:00.000-07:00

On Jun 21, 2007, at 1:53 AM, Juris Tambergs wrote:bccThank you Dr. TambergsYou make excellent points I agree with all of them. :-)bcc"Dear Prof.Jack Sarfatti,Many thanks for your first kind reply message of 13.06.2007 on my first letter to you.After it, I received ~10 other messages, related with your discussions on conceptual problems of theoretical physics with other people.Since I am quite

2007-06-20T21:02:00.001-07:00

On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Creon Levit wrote:A deep topic. Please don't take it personally, but I cannot say I agree, or even that I understand, your thoughts l-4 your message.Here are my own thoughts why rotation is so fundamental, to mainstream physics and to "fringe" physics:1. Every object in the universe is spinning. From elementary particles to galaxy clusters and beyond. Perhaps even

2007-06-20T17:33:00.000-07:00

"Where shall wisdom be found?" (Job?)"The greatest ideas are the greatest events." Nietzsche (via Yale's Harold Bloom)OK I cannot recall off-hand the German who AIAA gave an award to for exotic propulsion. It created a minor scandal as it seemed to be "crackpot." But perhaps it deserved a second look? As I recall he also had a ++++-- signature group theory and he claimed to compute elementary

2007-06-20T06:08:00.000-07:00

Memorandum for the Historical Record in the History of Theoretical PhysicsI awoke with a start. So I want to record this before I forget the "dream."OK consider Ibison's "point" approximation of the "Alcubierre" geodesic warp drive bubble history in an otherwise 1905 Special Relativity (SR) globally flat Minkowski space-time. In the usual way choose a Global Inertial Frame (GIF) allowing a

2007-06-12T17:39:00.000-07:00

OK we have binary pulsars http://www.astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro201/psr1913.htmGravity waves are emitted and you can use Minkowski background - energy momentum is conserved here in the usual way. The issue however is whether an observer on the in-spiraling rotating neutron star feels a g-force recoil from the gravity.waves? http://www.astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro201/

2007-06-12T17:36:00.001-07:00

4) For reference, including five eyewitness reports beyond those who have submitted images, please see Earthfiles below:• 06/08/2007 —More Drone Photos and Other Eyewitnesses• 05/30/2007 —Birmingham-Type "Drone" Seen At Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, in Mid-1980s• 05/28/2007 —Letters About Unidentified "Drone" Aerial Objects• 05/25/2007 —Two More Eyewitnesses of Aerial "Drones" in 2005 and 2006• 05/

2007-06-11T18:44:00.000-07:00

OK here is what is wrong with Michael's clever argument in a nutshell.Think in the "S-Matrix" way, but be careful, the analogy is imperfect.In the past 4D flat spacetime region with warp drive switched off the center of mass momentum of the enemy alien saucer is conserved. There is no propulsion without an ejected propellant there as Michael says becauseTuv(enemy ship)^,v = 0,v is ordinary

2007-06-09T16:54:00.001-07:00

Note that gauge-relativity theories are intrinsically quantum renormalizable spin 1 vector field theories with two signs of charges hence both attractive and repulsive classical forces. Gravity is bilinear in the spin 1 substratum tetrad "charges" hence is classically only "spin 2" attractive, with repulsion in the zero point quantum corrections, i.e. "dark energy."Utiyama continued:"Some systems

2007-06-09T15:56:00.001-07:00

Utiyama's 1956 paper was work he actually finished in 1954 so he never got full credit. Details are in L O'Raifeartagh's Princeton book "The Dawning of Gauge Theory".Utiyama in 1956 wrote a clear statement of the gauge-relativity organizing idea: "Some systems of fields have been considered which are invariant on a certain group of transformations depending on n-parameters."Stop there for a few

2007-06-09T14:50:00.003-07:00

At this point in time I see no problem in theoretical physics in 2007, including both dark energy and dark matter, that cannot be solved satisfactorily in terms of the two great already battle-tested organizing ideas:1. The gauge principle, i.e. Einstein's relativity principle expressed in its deepest form.2. "More is different" (PW Anderson) emergence of new orders i.e. effective low/high energy

2007-06-09T14:50:00.001-07:00

2007-06-04T17:55:00.001-07:00

http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect20/A10.html (background info)Yang-Mills gauge forces are spin 1 renormalizable as quantum fields, which is good. Gravity as a spin 2 field is not quantum renormalizable, which is bad. However, we have seen that gravity's tetrad substratum is also spin 1 and that spin 2 is a composite along with spin 1 and spin 0 quantum corrections not seen in the classical theory.

2007-06-03T17:00:00.001-07:00

To be more precise: Let Psi be the matter source fields forming a basis for an irreducible representation R of the rigid global Lie group G where the action field density L invariant under G. We need a new larger action density L' invariant under the larger locally gauged G(x) where the parameters of G are no longer constants but are arbitrary functions of the overlapping local coordinate charts.

2007-06-03T12:37:00.000-07:00

Utiyama's Phys Rev paper 1956 based on work he did in 1954 asks the "now familiar question what happens when a Lagrangian invariant with respect to a rigid Lie group G is required to be invariant with respect to the corresponding spacetime dependent group G(x)." p. 210Examples:1. Electromagnetism G = 1-parameter internal symmetry rigid U1, Noether's theorem in globally flat Minkowski spacetime

2007-05-30T17:25:00.001-07:00

IT FROM QBITPart 1 (1929) Weyl starts with 4 projective coordinates x0, x1, x2, x3 on a 3D spacelike surface with coordinates x,y,zx = x1/x0y = x2/x0z = x3/x0The equation for the Einstein light cone unit sphere S2 isx^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1equal tox1^2 + x2^2 + x3^2 - x0^2 = 0for null geodesic light rays in globally flat Minkowski spacetime of Einstein's 1905 special relativity.The 2-component Weyl

2007-05-23T19:07:00.001-07:00

http://sharonweinberger.com/?p=60http://www.stayaerusa.org/the_trailer.html opens with Col. John Alexander, don't know who the others are besides me and Uri.Right - that's why I suspect those photos are faked with Photoshop. It's probably a very clever spoof, but I can't say for sure. I am sitting on the fence leaning toward a really good spoof. Watch out there I go - uh oh! ;-)On May 23, 2007,

2007-05-18T19:00:00.000-07:00

Author: Jack SarfattiSubject: My truly original discoveryis my M-Matrix of non-closed 1 forms from the coherent vacuum Goldstone phases of the post-inflation field from which the warped Einstein-Cartan tetrad 1-forms and the spin-connection 1-forms simply emerge in much the same way as does the superfluid velocity field v = (h/m)Grad(Phase).A^a = M^a^a tetrad 1-formsS^a^b = M^[a,b] = - S^b^a

2007-05-16T16:46:00.000-07:00

Notes for STAIF 2008 talk in Albuquerque Space Force Defense MeetingsWorking these practical applications of my general theory of emergent curvature-torsion Einstein-Cartan (old-fashioned "unified field theory") actually ties into modern string theory and points the way to asking the correct questions to metric engineer warp and wormhole on the road to Michio Kaku's "Type IV Super Civilization."

2007-05-15T14:22:00.000-07:00

High Strangeness and US Intelligence Community"there may be language difficultiesbut it seems more and more are overcoming them every dayi would even say there are not two languages separated here but at least 12 and likely many more"There are at least 3 conflicting opinions when 2 Greeks meet. :-)"bundle field theory is not excruciatingly unreachable"many can attain fluency by their late

2007-05-14T23:15:00.000-07:00

Discussion with a mathematicianMarkwho wrote:"You might be heading in the same direction, but from an entirely different starting point -- but one that's got problems. For one, with the I's in the definition of the tetrad, you're still trying to have it both ways and inject a semblance of translation invariance in curved spacetimes. There is none."No I don't think so. No global translational

2007-05-13T15:35:00.000-07:00

First a short review of potential theory.I. If the force f decreases with distance and the potential energy U is (positive) negative, then the force is (repulsive) attractive. Example I.1U = +e^2/r > 0f = -dU/dr = +e^2/r^2 points toward r -> infinity, i.e. repulsionnote that (d/dr)(1/r) = - 1/r^2the two - signs cancelII. If the force increases with distance and the potential energy U is (

2007-05-12T22:55:00.000-07:00

From the final chapters of A. Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" p.453 I picked up an interesting fact expressed in a clear pedagogical way without all the rigor mortis of the finicky mathematicians posing as physicists loading us up with excess baggage."Poincare invariance in our original D-dimensional spacetime now appears as an internal symmetry."BINGO! That's another justification for

2007-05-09T11:54:00.000-07:00

SynopsisThe following input ideas1. Lenny Susskind’s “world hologram”2. Hagen Kleinert’s “world crystal Planck lattice”3. Bekenstein’s c-BIT per Planck area for “horizon” thermodynamics in black holes and deSitter cosmologies4. Observed number for dark energy density of our accelerating universe from Type Ia SuperNovae observations5. Local gauge invariance of the global space-time symmetry of the

2007-05-07T21:08:00.000-07:00

At times one must be anchored in consensus reality analogous to low energy effective field theories in physics at critical points in renormalization group flows - perhaps(e.g. Volovick in Russia, but probably not as his theory violates IR-UV "duality"). Note I said "at times" not "all the time." That we have been to the Moon is a non-negotiable fact and anyone who seriously suggests otherwise is

2007-05-07T20:20:00.000-07:00

Note Brownian motion analogyThe basic "length" operator is L ~ N^1/2LpLp separates the point defects where the 3 real Higgs scalar fields O(3) symmetry have simultaneous "nodes" and they are 3D spacelike separated from each other. The 2 Goldstone phases Theta & Phi are undefined at the nodes that are Goldstone phase singularities. The vacuum manifold has same topology S2 as does the surrounding

2007-05-06T12:59:00.000-07:00

t'Hooft claims that all elementary particles must be point particles that they cannot be extended deformable objects.The identity of all particles of the same type is in the quantum statistics of the permutation group. For example the Pauli exclusion principle for electrons that N-electron wave functions are totally antisymmetric in all quantum numbers - a column in the Young diagram notation for

2007-04-28T21:29:00.000-07:00

“Gravity is that field which corresponds to a gauge invariance with respect to displacement transformations.” Richard Feynman[i][i] http:/arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9602013 F. Hehl, p. 21There is a part of F. Hehl's paper 1996 that to me suggests a connection of the torsion gap, i.e. dislocation density in Kleinert's world crystal lattice as a kind of poor-man's noncommutative geometry i.e. 4.3 eqs

2007-04-27T11:02:00.000-07:00

Ed Witten & Lenny Susskind lament on absence of an "organizing idea" for M Theory (equivalence principle was the organizing idea for Einstein's 1915 GR). They need lament no more - it's the same organizing idea!There has been a recent flurry in letters in Physics Today - a bit odd in that Weinberg seems unfamiliar with Hehl's work, yet Hehl gave famous lectures on torsion theory at Institute of